gatomontes99 Posted Saturday at 09:36 PM Report Posted Saturday at 09:36 PM Stuff is getting real now folks. The left thought they were cute with their banana republic b.s. Now that table is turned and they are in the cross hairs. Good luck. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted Saturday at 09:47 PM Report Posted Saturday at 09:47 PM It's ABOUT BULLSHIT and ^you've been duped into starting a worthless thread based on nothing but TWEET. LMAO Quote
Barquentine Posted Saturday at 10:04 PM Report Posted Saturday at 10:04 PM Some bullsh*t from 2020. Pathetically stupid! Quote
West Posted Saturday at 10:04 PM Report Posted Saturday at 10:04 PM 27 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Stuff is getting real now folks. The left thought they were cute with their banana republic b.s. Now that table is turned and they are in the cross hairs. Good luck. Hmmm. Here I was told the Biden administration weren't targeting Christians Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Saturday at 10:22 PM Author Report Posted Saturday at 10:22 PM 33 minutes ago, robosmith said: It's ABOUT BULLSHIT and ^you've been duped into starting a worthless thread based on nothing but TWEET. LMAO You know that Adam Shitforbrains colluded with Russians to get naked pictures of Trump? And don't forget that the DOJ has stated that Schiff lied about the Russian hoax. They have evidence of that: Quote “Both Schiff and Swalwell were notorious for going on left-wing media outlets such as CNN and MSNBC to push the Russia conspiracy theory,” Hemingway continued. “Schiff, now California’s junior senator, lied publicly for years about the matter, falsely claiming to have secret evidence substantiating the hoax.” https://amac.us/newsline/society/doj-report-exposes-adam-schiffs-lies-and-leaks/ 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Radiorum Posted Saturday at 10:32 PM Report Posted Saturday at 10:32 PM Here is her entire quote, and it is from 2021. "The mob who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6 to try to stop Congress from carrying out its constitutional responsibilities were behaving like domestic enemies of our country," Gabbard said. "But let's be clear, the John Brennans, Adam Schiffs and the oligarchs in Big Tech who are trying to undermine our constitutionally protected rights and turn our country into a police state with KGB-style surveillance are also domestic enemies — and much more powerful, and therefore dangerous, than the mob that stormed the Capitol." https://www.theblaze.com/news/tulsi-gabbard-adam-schiff-john-brennan-domestic-enemies Quote
robosmith Posted Sunday at 01:19 AM Report Posted Sunday at 01:19 AM 2 hours ago, Radiorum said: Here is her entire quote, and it is from 2021. "The mob who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6 to try to stop Congress from carrying out its constitutional responsibilities were behaving like domestic enemies of our country," Gabbard said. "But let's be clear, the John Brennans, Adam Schiffs and the oligarchs in Big Tech who are trying to undermine our constitutionally protected rights and turn our country into a police state with KGB-style surveillance are also domestic enemies — and much more powerful, and therefore dangerous, than the mob that stormed the Capitol." https://www.theblaze.com/news/tulsi-gabbard-adam-schiff-john-brennan-domestic-enemies Brennan and Schiff were not part of the intel community and had nothing to do with running surveillance in 2021. AKA ^just BULLSHIT. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Sunday at 01:57 AM Author Report Posted Sunday at 01:57 AM 37 minutes ago, robosmith said: Brennan and Schiff were not part of the intel community and had nothing to do with running surveillance in 2021. AKA ^just BULLSHIT. Good gawd man. Read for comprehension. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted Sunday at 03:12 AM Report Posted Sunday at 03:12 AM 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: Good gawd man. Read for comprehension. I read ^this and found NO ILLUMINATION. Try again. Meanwhile, Gabbard's claim about Brennan and Schiff: Quote the John Brennans, Adam Schiffs and the oligarchs in Big Tech who are trying to undermine our constitutionally protected rights and turn our country into a police state with KGB-style surveillance IS NONSENSE when they had NO ROLE in surveillance of ANY KIND, let alone "KGB-style." LMAO 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Sunday at 10:54 AM Author Report Posted Sunday at 10:54 AM 7 hours ago, robosmith said: I read ^this and found NO ILLUMINATION. Try again. Meanwhile, Gabbard's claim about Brennan and Schiff: IS NONSENSE when they had NO ROLE in surveillance of ANY KIND, let alone "KGB-style." LMAO You are so far off base that you aren't even in the stadium. Why do you have this false belief that you have the be in surveillance to violate someone's rights? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Michael Hardner Posted Sunday at 12:47 PM Report Posted Sunday at 12:47 PM The Democratic Party May soon be banned. Anybody here think that's a bad idea? Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
User Posted Sunday at 06:11 PM Report Posted Sunday at 06:11 PM 5 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: The Democratic Party May soon be banned. Anybody here think that's a bad idea? How is the Democratic Party going to be banned, let alone soon? Quote
robosmith Posted Sunday at 06:55 PM Report Posted Sunday at 06:55 PM 7 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: You are so far off base that you aren't even in the stadium. Why do you have this false belief that you have the be in surveillance to violate someone's rights? Gabbard's entire premise is JUST BULLSHIT, including what she SPEICIFICALLY SAID about surveillance. There was NO "trying to undermine our constitutionally protected rights" OTOH, it was Trump who was trying to overturn the will of the American VOTERS. "I just need to find" just enough more votes to win GA, ON TAPE. 🤮 Quote
User Posted Sunday at 06:56 PM Report Posted Sunday at 06:56 PM Just now, robosmith said: "I just need to find" just enough more votes to win GA, ON TAPE. OK... and? Are you now opposed to finding all the lawfully cast votes in an election? Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Sunday at 08:20 PM Author Report Posted Sunday at 08:20 PM (edited) 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Gabbard's entire premise is JUST BULLSHIT, including what she SPEICIFICALLY SAID about surveillance. There was NO "trying to undermine our constitutionally protected rights" OTOH, it was Trump who was trying to overturn the will of the American VOTERS. "I just need to find" just enough more votes to win GA, ON TAPE. 🤮 Can you find something that doesn't exist? And you didn't answer my question. WTF did you get that someone had to be in intelligence to violate someone else's rights? Edited Sunday at 08:21 PM by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Nationalist Posted Sunday at 08:31 PM Report Posted Sunday at 08:31 PM 19 hours ago, robosmith said: Brennan and Schiff were not part of the intel community and had nothing to do with running surveillance in 2021. AKA ^just BULLSHIT. It starts...giggle... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted Sunday at 09:33 PM Report Posted Sunday at 09:33 PM 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: It starts...giggle... Nope. Trump corruption continues.... Your defense of it never stops. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.