eyeball Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 10 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: You. Well, it didn't work. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
gatomontes99 Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 2 minutes ago, eyeball said: Well, it didn't work. Yes it did. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
eyeball Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 6 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Yes it did. You're saying you do believe me? My apologies for doubting you. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 30 minutes ago, eyeball said: This is just your usual hee haw donkey talk. I'm contributing less to it. I burn a lot of wood from my property that would otherwise just rot and release CO2. No I didn't. This what I said... Correct. Hey we have conservatives who need to call themselves Liberals out here to get any respect so go figure. I said it wasn't as good as a carbon tax. You do realize the tax is based on the price of carbon right? Meh they just want to get elected and will say whatever they need to do so. You should practice what you preach but I doubt you could keep up the effort any more than Conservatives and Liberals can stick with the program. No I meant the Titanic that couldn't steer out of the way of disaster. It couldn't adapt in time otherwise it would have magically materialized a bow thruster to tighten up it's turning radius. It's a boat thing but that's okay I don't except you to understand. It didn't look to me like you saw the connection but if you say you did it's proof you simply don't give a shit. No you don't. Who are you trying to kid? LMAO! Oh look, and a giant word wall of you going back on what you previously said and try and desperately to rewrite it Gosh who would have thunk it And let's get real, I said you supported a carbon tax and you said yes I supported alberta's carbon tax under Ralph Klein and it wasn't a carbon tax. And when I pointed out he never did that you tried to claim he did and unfortunately it turned out you were lying yet again I told you this a million times but if you have to lie to try and make your point then you don't have a very good point. You're on the wrong side of that argument. If you can't address stuff honestly then what does that tell you? Why is it the entire left seems to be compelled to lie and lie badly in order to try and make sense of their point of view? Anyway without any science here titanic comments are inaccurate and meaningless although my green comments about the titanic are spot on You had 10 years. You did nothing. You heat your home with a carbon heat source in a province that has electricity. You can't provide a single drop of science to support your position. You are a joke and climate change is a joke, and anybody reading this or people like you around the web are going to be turned off of climate change they're not going to be motivated to do anything about it. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 6 minutes ago, eyeball said: You're saying you do believe me? My apologies for doubting you. Wow. That was lame. Want to try again? You shouldn't. But it would be fun for me if you did. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Legato Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 1 hour ago, eyeball said: I heat my house with wood in a modern low emission stove. Is that what you call a woody? Quote
eyeball Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 4 minutes ago, CdnFox said: And let's get real, I said you supported a carbon tax and you said yes I supported alberta's carbon tax under Ralph Klein No I didn't. 5 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Hee haw... 6 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Ditto 7 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Anyway without any science here titanic comments are inaccurate and meaningless although my green comments about the titanic are spot on Your green comments? I guess I missed those. Sorry. 8 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You had 10 years. You did nothing You had 12 but I'll give Harper credit for demonstrating you need to tank the economy to do so. He deserves a statue for showing us the way. 13 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You heat your home with a carbon heat source in a province that has electricity. You can't provide a single drop of science to support your position. I've been told I shouldn't allow wood debris to accumulate because of the threat it could pose to public safety by becoming fuel for a wildfire. This is supported by what many right wingers suggest we do. 15 minutes ago, CdnFox said: ...climate change is a joke. At least you're being honest. I doubt you'll ever hear PP say that however and you'll happily pay for his virtue signalling anyway. 10 minutes ago, Legato said: Is that what you call a woody? It's a Timber Wolf. Best damn woodstove I ever owned. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
eyeball Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 21 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Wow. That was lame. Want to try again? You shouldn't. But it would be fun for me if you did. Ok, I'll take you at your word, thanks. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
robosmith Posted March 19 Author Report Posted March 19 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: Lol... "Who me?" Twenties... ^Forgot how to spell Tweenkies, grandpa. LMAO Quote
CdnFox Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 2 hours ago, eyeball said: No I didn't. Are you now claiming that you don't support a carbon tax and haven't? Quote Your green comments? I guess I missed those. Sorry. You literally replied to it so unfortunately that's your short-term memory issue kicking in again Quote You had 12 but I'll give Harper credit for demonstrating you need to tank the economy to do so. Harper won his first government in 2006 and lost to Justin Trudeau in 2015 Now I know math is hard, but I think if you consult an actual mathematician you'll see that that is less than 12 Quote He deserves a statue for showing us the way. He deserves to have a statue made for showing us how a good government should be and then have it dropped on Justin Trudeau Quote I've been told I shouldn't allow wood debris to accumulate because of the threat it could pose to public safety by becoming fuel for a wildfire. This is supported by what many right wingers suggest we do. How are you letting wood debris accumulate? Are you cutting down trees? Wow you just get more environmentally friendly everyday don't you Quote At least you're being honest. I doubt you'll ever hear PP say that however and you'll happily pay for his virtue signalling anyway. And what plan was he virtue signaling? Or are you just making crap up out of your ass same as always. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Nationalist Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 8 hours ago, robosmith said: ^Forgot how to spell Tweenkies, grandpa. LMAO Friggin" spell checker Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted March 19 Author Report Posted March 19 5 hours ago, Nationalist said: Friggin" spell checker That's what happens when YOU USE IMAGINARY WORDS. LMAO It means you have NO RESPECT for clear communication. Quote
CdnFox Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 9 minutes ago, robosmith said: That's what happens when YOU USE IMAGINARY WORDS. LMAO It means you have NO RESPECT for clear communication. This from the guy who misused 'cognitive dissonance' for about 6 months straight Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted March 19 Author Report Posted March 19 2 minutes ago, CdnFox said: This from the guy who misused 'cognitive dissonance' for about 6 months straight ^This from the guy who's so stupid he doesn't understand the clear definition I POSTED. Quote
CdnFox Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 4 minutes ago, robosmith said: ^This from the guy who's so stupid he doesn't understand the clear definition I POSTED. Everybody except you understood the clear definition, that's what made it so damn funny You constantly use words without having any clue what they actually mean and it is one of the more hilarious parts of reading your posts hey, bring back 'dunning kruger' again, that was beyond hilarious When you started referring to people as being "a dunning kruger" i would laugh every time Honestly you have the vocabulary of a grade 4 student so it's pretty funny to watch you try and call out other people about communication skills Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.