West Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/dojs-closes-investigation-of-sbc/ Investigation closes with no indictments. Just shows how vile the Biden DOJ was. Quote
robosmith Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 2 minutes ago, West said: https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/dojs-closes-investigation-of-sbc/ Investigation closes with no indictments. Just shows how vile the Biden DOJ was. Or it shows just how CORRUPT the Trump DoJ IS. We all know that Bondi will do whatever 34 Felony Convictions Trump orders. Too bad he can't pardon himself for STATE FELONY CONVICTIONS. LMAO 1 Quote
West Posted March 12 Author Report Posted March 12 (edited) 6 minutes ago, robosmith said: Or it shows just how CORRUPT the Trump DoJ IS. We all know that Bondi will do whatever 34 Felony Convictions Trump orders. Too bad he can't pardon himself for STATE FELONY CONVICTIONS. LMAO Meh.. try it and I'm sure the lefties will be put up on federal charges related to civil rights violations. Biden and his entourage ought to be in prison Edited March 12 by West 1 Quote
SpankyMcFarland Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 It would be surprising to me if there wasn’t a cover-up of sex crimes in an organization like the SBC. Sex crimes happen everywhere and religious bodies conceal them everywhere. Anyway, dear reader, you be the judge: https://religionnews.com/2022/05/22/sbc-abuse-report-for-decades-southern-baptist-leaders-denied-abuse-misled-trustees-mistreated-survivors-guidepost-johnny-hunt/ Here’s the report. The executive summary is more than enough to get the flavour of the problem. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22031737-final-guidepost-solutions-independent-investigation-report/ 1 Quote
West Posted March 12 Author Report Posted March 12 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Or it shows just how CORRUPT the Trump DoJ IS. We all know that Bondi will do whatever 34 Felony Convictions Trump orders. Too bad he can't pardon himself for STATE FELONY CONVICTIONS. LMAO Most of the investigation was done under Biden. It's been going on for a few years now. The left used it as a cover to infiltrate and gain control over the denominations funds, the decision making branches etc. And the more conservative leaning people were forced out of leadership as a result of false narratives. 16 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said: It would be surprising to me if there wasn’t a cover-up of sex crimes in an organization like the SBC. Sex crimes happen everywhere and religious bodies conceal them everywhere. Anyway, dear reader, you be the judge: https://religionnews.com/2022/05/22/sbc-abuse-report-for-decades-southern-baptist-leaders-denied-abuse-misled-trustees-mistreated-survivors-guidepost-johnny-hunt/ Here’s the report. The executive summary is more than enough to get the flavour of the problem. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22031737-final-guidepost-solutions-independent-investigation-report/ Jonny Hunt is probably going to win millions in a defamation suit. Quote
WestCanMan Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 2 hours ago, West said: https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/dojs-closes-investigation-of-sbc/ Investigation closes with no indictments. Just shows how vile the Biden DOJ was. Leftists must be FURIOUS! Who would just go and investigate something like that? Were the people leading the investigation elected at least? Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
West Posted March 12 Author Report Posted March 12 (edited) 44 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Leftists must be FURIOUS! Who would just go and investigate something like that? Were the people leading the investigation elected at least? Megan Basham has a good book on the topic. When you realize it's the Democrat power players who are funding this, and are using it to sway public beliefs about institutions to sway political power, it makes sense. They served purpose of draining the bank account of the denomination and burying them in legal fees. That's largely the point of the exercise. Not to mention it's swung woke a bit too Edited March 12 by West Quote
robosmith Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: Leftists must be FURIOUS! Who would just go and investigate something like that? Were the people leading the investigation elected at least? REAL conservatives would be furious about SBC protecting the institution from accountability by abuse survivors. But it turns out that ^you're just a FAKE conservative. Southern Baptist leaders mistreated abuse survivors for decades, report says Quote A blockbuster report found that SBC lawyers worked for years to protect the institution and demonized abuse survivors and accused a prominent pastor of abusing a colleague's wife. 1 Quote
West Posted March 12 Author Report Posted March 12 1 hour ago, robosmith said: REAL conservatives would be furious about SBC protecting the institution from accountability by abuse survivors. But it turns out that ^you're just a FAKE conservative. Southern Baptist leaders mistreated abuse survivors for decades, report says The Guidepost report has already been thoroughly debunked and is now the cause of a multi million dollar lawsuit against the SBC. Do keep up and don't post a story from 3 years ago when much has already unfolded Quote
robosmith Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 2 minutes ago, West said: The Guidepost report has already been thoroughly debunked and is now the cause of a multi million dollar lawsuit against the SBC. Do keep up and don't post a story from 3 years ago when much has already unfolded I don't see you posting or pointing to ANY debunking. Maybe cause it just exists in your imagination. Of course, you never critically analyze anything that disputes your agenda. Quote
West Posted March 13 Author Report Posted March 13 (edited) 4 minutes ago, robosmith said: I don't see you posting or pointing to ANY debunking. Maybe cause it just exists in your imagination. Of course, you never critically analyze anything that disputes your agenda. Follow the story. https://baptistnews.com/article/new-date-set-for-johnny-hunt-trial/ Edited March 13 by West Quote
robosmith Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 14 minutes ago, West said: Follow the story. https://baptistnews.com/article/new-date-set-for-johnny-hunt-trial/ I read your cite. Got any legitimate independent reporting? Only MAGA CULT like you would trust a source that is obviously in bed with the Southern Baptist Convention. Quote
West Posted March 13 Author Report Posted March 13 (edited) 44 minutes ago, robosmith said: I read your cite. Got any legitimate independent reporting? Only MAGA CULT like you would trust a source that is obviously in bed with the Southern Baptist Convention. Are you saying that Johnny Hunt is not suing the SBC for $100 million because of the Guidepost report? The SBC already tried to settle out with him. This is basic Democrat playbook. Kick up a perverted sexual fantasy about child molestation. Ham up a media story. Put it to grand jury who basically put anything through. Grab a headliner. Have it fall flat after a couple of years. Meanwhile they destroy reputations. Many of trump's supporters met a similar fate It's vile what they do actually Edited March 13 by West Quote
gatomontes99 Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 47 minutes ago, West said: Are you saying that Johnny Hunt is not suing the SBC for $100 million because of the Guidepost report? The SBC already tried to settle out with him. This is basic Democrat playbook. Kick up a perverted sexual fantasy about child molestation. Ham up a media story. Put it to grand jury who basically put anything through. Grab a headliner. Have it fall flat after a couple of years. Meanwhile they destroy reputations. Many of trump's supporters met a similar fate It's vile what they do actually He is saying he doesn't want to talk about the reality of the situation so he will attack the source even of the source is perfectly accurate. In his mind, if he can dismiss the source as invalid then he doesn't have to accept the reality of the situation. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 48 minutes ago, West said: Are you saying that Johnny Hunt is not suing the SBC for $100 million because of the Guidepost report? The SBC already tried to settle out with him. This is basic Democrat playbook. Kick up a perverted sexual fantasy about child molestation. Ham up a media story. Put it to grand jury who basically put anything through. Grab a headliner. Have it fall flat after a couple of years. Meanwhile they destroy reputations. Many of trump's supporters met a similar fate It's vile what they do actually Seems like Hunt destroyed his own reputation by having an affair with a subordinate. And his complaint seems ludicrously LAME: Quote Hunt claims he should not have been included in the Guideposts report because his situation falls outside the scope of what Guideposts was enlisted to investigate. Nothing about facts of his own behavior. LMAO Quote
West Posted March 13 Author Report Posted March 13 47 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: He is saying he doesn't want to talk about the reality of the situation so he will attack the source even of the source is perfectly accurate. In his mind, if he can dismiss the source as invalid then he doesn't have to accept the reality of the situation. Yup. Its pretty disturbing. Quote
West Posted March 13 Author Report Posted March 13 48 minutes ago, robosmith said: Seems like Hunt destroyed his own reputation by having an affair with a subordinate. And his complaint seems ludicrously LAME: Nothing about facts of his own behavior. LMAO The way i see it you had a bunch of left wing perverts obsessed with old mens sex lives. Pretty disturbing Quote
robosmith Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 1 hour ago, West said: The way i see it you had a bunch of left wing perverts obsessed with old mens sex lives. Pretty disturbing Hunt's victim claimed sexual assault and all he could do is say the investigator wasn't authorized to consider that. Very lame and transparently guilty. Quote
West Posted March 13 Author Report Posted March 13 (edited) 31 minutes ago, robosmith said: Hunt's victim claimed sexual assault and all he could do is say the investigator wasn't authorized to consider that. Very lame and transparently guilty. Claimed... but he was never charged. The wokesters also claimed that there was a bunch of men running around raping kids and the executive leadership was covering it up at the higher levels. Turns out that there's no criminal charges. All they did was drain millions in legal fees and paid for shotty "reports" that opened them up to a $100 million defamation suit. But of course that was the plan from the whacko pushing this from the beginning most likely... to take out a historically conservative institution in Marxist fashion Edited March 13 by West Quote
robosmith Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 1 hour ago, West said: Claimed... but he was never charged. So what? He said she said, is often not charged. But he was fired and made a lot of money, so he's suing for a lot of money. 1 hour ago, West said: The wokesters also claimed that there was a bunch of men running around raping kids and the executive leadership was covering it up at the higher levels. Turns out that there's no criminal charges. Who are the "wokesters"? No wokesters mentioned in your cite. 1 hour ago, West said: All they did was drain millions in legal fees and paid for shotty "reports" that opened them up to a $100 million defamation suit. But of course that was the plan from the whacko pushing this from the beginning most likely... Nope. Hunt lost his very high salary and that's the basis for the $100M 1 hour ago, West said: to take out a historically conservative institution in Marxist fashion You always have a vivid imagination. That's why you're DELUSIONAL. Quote
West Posted March 13 Author Report Posted March 13 6 hours ago, robosmith said: So what? He said she said, is often not charged. But he was fired and made a lot of money, so he's suing for a lot of money. Who are the "wokesters"? No wokesters mentioned in your cite. Nope. Hunt lost his very high salary and that's the basis for the $100M You always have a vivid imagination. That's why you're DELUSIONAL. https://www.amazon.ca/Shepherds-Sale-Evangelical-Leaders-Leftist-ebook/dp/B0CRQGNLMY You'll have to give this a read. Basham outlines how this was a coordinated effort to turn the SBC into a weaponized woke institution. You can apply what they did here to how they've attempted to dismantle other organizations such as the NRA, colleges, and the entertainment. Same patterns because it's the same playbook to move public policy leftward. Those funding it have even said as such. Quote
robosmith Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 4 hours ago, West said: https://www.amazon.ca/Shepherds-Sale-Evangelical-Leaders-Leftist-ebook/dp/B0CRQGNLMY You'll have to give this a read. Basham outlines how this was a coordinated effort to turn the SBC into a weaponized woke institution. You can apply what they did here to how they've attempted to dismantle other organizations such as the NRA, colleges, and the entertainment. Same patterns because it's the same playbook to move public policy leftward. Those funding it have even said as such. Your source is trash. Quote The book was criticized for its inaccuracies. A number of people mentioned in the book have publicly contested its assertions. J. D. Greear, for example, wrote that the book's reporting "is neither careful nor charitable, and in many places, demonstrably untrue, as even the simplest of internet searches reveals."[4] Warren Cole Smith, writing for The Dispatch, suggested that the book was not journalism but propaganda,[1] while Rick Pidcock of Baptist News Global said that Basham "resorts to lies and conspiracy theories to make her case."[5] According to Smith, the "fundamental flaw" of Basham's book is that "corrupting money is not on the evangelical left, as she claims, but on the populist right."[1] Pidcock went further and wrote, "the bigger story is how Basham and the evangelicals who support her book are actually the wolves in bed with billionaires."[5] Smith went on to suggest that the book "has many villains, but it has only one true hero: Donald J. Trump. He is mentioned more than 30 times in the book, all positively or defensively." Smith argued that Shepherds for Sale "purports to fight for the Gospel against heretics, but Basham is waging a proxy war, defending Trump against his evangelical critics."[1] Quote
impartialobserver Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 What is rather amusing is that folks think that the boots on the ground personnel are directly connected to the President. Quote
West Posted March 13 Author Report Posted March 13 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Your source is trash. Haha.. Using leftist opinions to discard the source. How predictable 1 Quote
West Posted March 13 Author Report Posted March 13 (edited) 1 hour ago, impartialobserver said: What is rather amusing is that folks think that the boots on the ground personnel are directly connected to the President. Biden said he was going after Christians in his SOTU address. Turns out he had an open investigation into one of the most prominent conservative denominations in the country. I guess it's okay though because they don't share your politics am I right? Edited March 13 by West Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.