gatomontes99 Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 11 minutes ago, Hodad said: Jesus, man. Get a grip. Read those quotes. Fauci, as in your quotes, NEVER said it was definitive or impossible. Rather, he said simply that it was highly improbable. And, with apologies to the conspiracy theorists, the scientific perspective is STILL, years later, that the origin was most likely natural. No. He said totally. Totally as in total as in totality. There is no wiggle room there. Totally eliminates the possibility for other options. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: If anyone's a vaxtard, it's the guy who said "The only reason that deaths are up 36% is because hospitalizations are up by way more than that. This is actually proof that the vaccine is working." We vaxed 85% of Canadians in 2021, and look at how many hospitalizations we had in 2022... Is that your idea of "working"? Theoretically we had so many covid hospitalizations in 2020 that hospitals were overwhelmed, so we had to "lock down for two weeks to flatten the curve". (FYI that's Sciencese for "just the tip") If hospitalizations were overwhelming in 2020, what were they in 2022? Octuple overwhelming? And when hospitalizations were "octuple overwhelming", why was the news doing 1/80th the amount of covid coverage? "Common sense dictates that the amount of pandemic coverage on TV is inversely proportional to the number of hospitalizations and deaths." - vaxtards Not hospitalizations, dummy. Infections were waaaay up. It was a pandemic, after all. And no, news coverage is entirely dictated by what the audience wants to see. What gets eyeballs and clicks. These are businesses. Quote
WestCanMan Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Hodad said: Not hospitalizations, dummy. Infections were waaaay up. It was a pandemic, after all. Look at the hospitalizations and ICU visits there dummy. Also way up. Do you remember why everyone was forced to vax? What was the reason, Hodad? To keep deaths down, but especially to keep covid from getting passed along to granny. Infections were like wildfire after the jabs came out. Clearly the mass-vaxing campaign did nothing to slow the spread. Clearly it didn't slow down the number of people dying. Only a cultist could look at such huge rises in deaths, infections, hospitalizations and ICU visits and call it "a success". Edited March 13 by WestCanMan Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
Hodad Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: No. He said totally. Totally as in total as in totality. There is no wiggle room there. Totally eliminates the possibility for other options. Bullshit. "Totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human" does not mean that a lab leak is impossible. It simply means that the evolutionary steps are plausible if not probable. On other words, there's no reason to jump to another explanation. Which is where the science still is today. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 10 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: Says you. Don't judge me for how I spend my time, and I will leave you be as well. But he's right and people do judge you. The fact that you can't cope with that is why you put people on ignore Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
CdnFox Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 12 hours ago, WestCanMan said: TBH, ignore can even be a way of engaging with people from the across the aisle if you go about it the right way. There are some people you disagree with who are worth listening to, and some who aren't. Filtering out the turds makes engaging across the aisle less bitter, increasing the chances of positive exchanges. I personally think of Beave as a cultist, due to his inability to consider inconvenient truths, but he also puts out 5x as many cites as eyeball, robo, myata and ex-flyer (some of them do 0), so it's at least worth seeing where leftists get their drivel from, and addressing the drivel right from the source. I get where you're coming from and I understand the logic, but I have to disagree I consider myata to be a complete waste of space for example. Anyone who can't even be bothered to speak English is obviously a useless tard who brings nothing to the debate. But I still don't block him, I believe the moment you start to filter any content aggressively to the point where you don't even allow yourself to be exposed to it is the moment where you stop really expanding your thoughts beyond your own conclusions. He may never say anything of interest or particularly intelligent, but then again you never know. I'm not calling you out for how you're thinking about it but personally I think the best thing you can do is not use the ignore feature and just simply skim over the people you don't like or their posts and not give them a lot of time but not ignore them either. Otherwise you become as close-minded and simple and you're thinking as for example Mike hardener 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Hodad Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 16 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Look at the hospitalizations and ICU visits there dummy. Also way up. Do you remember why everyone was forced to vax? What was the reason, Hodad? To keep deaths down, but especially to keep covid from getting passed along to granny. Infections were like wildfire after the jabs came out. Clearly the mass-vaxing campaign did nothing to slow the spread. Clearly it didn't slow down the number of people dying. Only a cultist could look at such huge rises in deaths, infections, hospitalizations and ICU visits and call it "a success". The vaccines didn't prevent transmission as much as hoped, but they did help. And in any case, a 5-7x reduction in hospitalization and death is a massive farking win. That IS slowing down the number of people dying. 1 million+ lives saved, and all you armchair epidemiologists can do is shit on that huge success. Give me a break. I know you're obsessed with terrible math, but as always, the asinine argument you are making applies perfectly to seat belts in cars. Regardless of the "death count" in raw numbers, seat belts are dramatically effective at saving lives on a per-incident basis. Exactly like the vaccines. Quote
robosmith Posted March 13 Author Report Posted March 13 On 3/11/2025 at 7:26 PM, WestCanMan said: Did you honestly have to read a Helen Mirren post to realize that you're incapable of believing anything that you didn't see on CNN? Did you have to constantly rollout your OBSESSION with CNN? Time to get new material for your schtick. Quote
CouchPotato Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Did you have to constantly rollout your OBSESSION with CNN? Time to get new material for your schtick. Maybe something fresh and witty like FOS Lies or New Smacks. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Did you have to constantly rollout your OBSESSION with CNN? Time to get new material for your schtick. This from the guy who's every single post includes something about FOS NEWS Just now, CouchPotato said: Maybe something fresh and witty like FOS Lies or New Smacks. Ha! posted at the same time as mine, great minds think alike. Or at least great minds think alike about a specific stupid mind 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted March 13 Author Report Posted March 13 3 minutes ago, CouchPotato said: Maybe something fresh and witty like FOS Lies or New Smacks. Sorry but those oldies but goodies are SO DAMNING they will never go out of style until you right wingers get the message that THEY LIE ALL THE TIME. Quote
CdnFox Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Sorry but those oldies but goodies are SO DAMNING they will never go out of style until you right wingers get the message that THEY LIE ALL THE TIME. LOL the dictionary definition of 'oblivious' just shows a picture of Robosmith Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
CouchPotato Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 (edited) 5 minutes ago, robosmith said: Sorry but those oldies but goodies are SO DAMNING they will never go out of style until you right wingers get the message that THEY LIE ALL THE TIME. robo, if Helen Mirren offered me money to put you on ignore, I wouldn't do it. We may not agree on everything, but I get a lot of enjoyment out of your posts. Edited March 13 by CouchPotato 1 Quote
robosmith Posted March 13 Author Report Posted March 13 Just now, CouchPotato said: robo, if Helen Mirren offered me money to put you on ignore, I wouldn't do it. So what, don't care. Quote
CdnFox Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 3 minutes ago, robosmith said: So what, don't care. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 9 hours ago, Hodad said: Bullshit. "Totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human" does not mean that a lab leak is impossible. It simply means that the evolutionary steps are plausible if not probable. On other words, there's no reason to jump to another explanation. Which is where the science still is today. Lmao....bullshit. You are such a dem simp. Come on man. Have some dignity. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 38 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Lmao....bullshit. You are such a dem simp. Come on man. Have some dignity. Lash out when you get caught lying again. Way to go. Hope that's what you're teaching your kids! 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 1 minute ago, Hodad said: Lash out when you get caught lying again. Way to go. Hope that's what you're teaching your kids! I have no other recourse. Your retort was complete bullshit. You know it was. No one is that stùpid. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 (edited) 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: I have no other recourse. Your retort was complete bullshit. You know it was. No one is that stùpid. Apparently you are. If you can't understand a basic statement and have to invent new (more convenient) meanings for it. If he had meant to say it was impossible, he would have said that. It doesn't even farking contradict the lab leak theory, in which the virus made the jump IN the lab. It simply means that it does not appear to be engineered. Which, again, the science still supports today. Stop making shit up. Edited March 13 by Hodad 1 Quote
User Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 32 minutes ago, Hodad said: Apparently you are. If you can't understand a basic statement and have to invent new (more convenient) meanings for it. If he had meant to say it was impossible, he would have said that. It doesn't even farking contradict the lab leak theory, in which the virus made the jump IN the lab. It simply means that it does not appear to be engineered. Which, again, the science still supports today. Stop making shit up. This is rich coming from the guy who defends the butchering of the word woman and pushes an absurd understanding for what tolerance means. Oh, and to the point of the thread, you got tired of me calling you out on this so you hide from me now! Quote
gatomontes99 Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 24 minutes ago, Hodad said: Apparently you are. If you can't understand a basic statement and have to invent new (more convenient) meanings for it. If he had meant to say it was impossible, he would have said that. It doesn't even farking contradict the lab leak theory, in which the virus made the jump IN the lab. It simply means that it does not appear to be engineered. Which, again, the science still supports today. Stop making shit up. He said it was totally natural. There is no ambiguity in that statement. None. Cambridge Dictionary totally adverb completely Cambridge Dictionary completely adverb in every way or as much as possible There is no ambiguity when Fauci said totally natural, he meant it did not come from a lab. The lab leak theory is moot if it is natural because it would have jumped outside the lab any way. The reality is that there are no cases of Sars-COV-2 jumping from animal to human other than the supposed jump at the wet market in Wuhan. None. His assertion that it was totally natural was a lie. It was later exposed that the NIH did, in fact, fund the research that led to COVID. Fauci was likely in panic mode and trying to cover up the fact that he had paid for the virus that caused the pandemic. He was part of the reason so many people died. He thought that China could cover it up. So he lied. For you to make such semantic excuses is just absurd. It is possible it was natural and a lab leak? Do you even hear yourself? No. It is not possible to be natural and only come from a lab leak. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
WestCanMan Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 11 hours ago, Hodad said: The vaccines didn't prevent transmission as much as hoped, but they did help. You're beyond pretzeled right now. You say "The vax is working because even after the massive spike in infections and hospitalizations that followed the vax campaign, deaths only went up by 36%. But the vaxes did help limit the spread as well." Huh? Did infections spike? Did infections "increase on an unprecedented scale"? Did infections increase exponentially? Did deaths go way up or didn't they? Are those the kinds of results that justify vax-fascism? And on top of the vaccines' blatant failure to protect, they also injure people who don't even need vaccines to begin with. Listen to yourself: you're clinging to the results of clinical trials conducted - in secrecy - by Pfizer and Moderna that said "our expensive vaccines work" to explain away what looks like an apocalyptic real-world failure on a national level. Fauci's statement in Dec 2022 would be "The results from a country of 40 million people just came in, and it's now 100% certain that the vaccines can injure or kill you but they definitely won't slow the spread of covid or prevent you from dying from it." General: "Our soldiers went into battle and none of their bullets worked. They were all duds. All of our soldiers died and the region was overrun by cannibals." Hodad: "But the bullets worked in the labs, so the battle was actually somewhat of a success." Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
Hodad Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 27 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: He said it was totally natural. There is no ambiguity in that statement. None. Care to quote that? Or you just making shit up again? 1 Quote
WestCanMan Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 57 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: It was later exposed that the NIH did, in fact, fund the research that led to COVID. Fauci was likely in panic mode and trying to cover up the fact that he had paid for the virus that caused the pandemic. Fauci, head of the NiH, an American gov't institution, helped create the virus and now they want to sue China for the damage it caused... 🤔 Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
gatomontes99 Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 30 minutes ago, Hodad said: Care to quote that? Or you just making shit up again? I did quote it. You quoted me quoting it. Just now, WestCanMan said: Fauci, head of the NiH, an American gov't institution, helped create the virus and now they want to sue China for the damage it caused... 🤔 Well, duh. Lol 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.