Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, BeaverFever said:

It doesn’t sound like there’s any basis to revoke his citizenship under existing laws. But even if there was, we’re not there yet IMO. If Trump were to make a clear attempt to annex Canada then I think anyone in his regime would be an enemy of the state and then I would support a special act of parliament to strip citizenship from such people under certain circumstances. 

At the end of the day, citizenship should only ever be revoked if they've committed some sort of crime, not just because of who they are associated with. Musk is unelected and has no actual power, if trump decides to do something or not musk has no control.

This is just an extension of cancel culture and it's a bad thing. If musk seriously violates Canadian law or even international law in a major way then at least you could say you were doing it for cause but doing it just because you don't like him or who he associates with would be grossly inappropriate.

As a nation we really have to step back from that kind of thinking. The whole cancel culture thing is not healthy

Posted
2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

At the end of the day, citizenship should only ever be revoked if they've committed some sort of crime, not just because of who they are associated with.

Hmmm, and here you were all set to cheer and defend kids who were born in America being sent away to wherever their parents came from.

What changed?

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
11 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Hmmm, and here you were all set to cheer and defend kids who were born in America being sent away to wherever their parents came from.

What changed?

Stay in the ballpark.

Posted

Canadians don't like Musk.   Every Canadian citizen could sign a petition and it would have no force in law.  Once you’re a citizen, unless you committed fraud to get that citizenship, the government cannot take it away.  

Posted
4 hours ago, eyeball said:

Hmmm, and here you were all set to cheer and defend kids who were born in America being sent away to wherever their parents came from.

 

I don't think you really thought that sentence through. I think you meant to say I defended sending away the kids who were born in America :) 

When you get mad your English skills start to slip

 in any case  what I said is the law could be changed to allow for it without a constitutional amendment. Their parents aren't American, and their parents were illegally on American soil, therefore it's arguable that birth place citizenship should not apply. It would be quite different if their parents were american

In this case again it is the parent  who is canadian, not where they were born. 

so this is consistent. Granting someone citizenship because of their parents being citizens is one thing. Even granting birthplace citizenship to those who are born in the country to parents who are in the country legally is one thing. Granting it to a child of illegals is essentially allowing the child to benefit from crime as well as the parents. As I said previously  taking citizenship away for crime is at least defensible.

You make it so easy to pick on you and you don't pay attention :) 

Posted
1 hour ago, TreeBeard said:

Canadians don't like Musk.   Every Canadian citizen could sign a petition and it would have no force in law.  Once you’re a citizen, unless you committed fraud to get that citizenship, the government cannot take it away.  

True. This is just a demonstration of how much they dislike him. Over 312,000 now.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, CdnFox said:

in any case  what I said is the law could be changed to allow for it without a constitutional amendment.

You said that because you don't know what you're talking about. But it's good to see you're on the kids side today.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
Just now, eyeball said:

You said that because you don't know what you're talking about.

 I said that because I do know what I'm talking about and proved it. Sorry to see you're still crying about it :) Have a cookie and a nap, you'll feel better

Posted
9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I said that because I do know what I'm talking about and proved it.

The why hasn't it happened?

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
4 hours ago, eyeball said:

The why hasn't it happened?

Because he hasn't done it yet.  If it's important to him he'll get around to it.  You can hardly say he hasn't been busy with other things :)  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave L went up a rank
      Contributor
    • dekker99 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dave L went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Dave L went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...