Jump to content

Border Czar, Tom Homan floats investigation into Alexandria Occasio Cortez, after webinar for illegal immigrants was conducted by her office.


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
Quote

Border czar Tom Homan suggested an investigation into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) could be forthcoming after critics said her latest effort to oppose deportation for illegal immigrants may have broken federal law. 

...

“So, maybe AOC is going to be in trouble now, but I need the AOG to opine on that. Impediment is impediment, in my opinion,” Homan said. “I'm not a prosecutor, but we need some further guidance on that. But again, if we have to take every federal dollar out of the city, we’ll do it. I mean, we're done."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/homan-floats-investigation-into-aoc-after-webinar-for-illegal-immigrants/ar-AA1z3Qoc

Real. Material. Losses.

That is how you get these people to follow the law. No more playing around. Those days are gone. The parents are in charge and making the kids clean up their room.

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 2
  • Downvote 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
  • gatomontes99 changed the title to Border Czar, Tom Homan floats investigation into Alexandria Occasio Cortez, after webinar for illegal immigrants was conducted by her office.
Posted
7 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Real. Material. Losses.

That is how you get these people to follow the law. No more playing around. Those days are gone. The parents are in charge and making the kids clean up their room.

So you think it should be illegal to inform other people of their legal rights? Pretty fashy, but unsurprising.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

So you think it should be illegal to inform other people of their legal rights? Pretty fashy, but unsurprising.

If that was what she was doing, Homan wouldn't be after her. The seminar, reportedly, advised illegal immigrants how to avoid ICE.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
6 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

If that was what she was doing, Homan wouldn't be after her.

LMAO, don't be retarded. The point is to create fear and intimidate political opponents regardless of whether they have cause. That's what fascists do.

Quote

The seminar, reportedly, advised illegal immigrants how to avoid ICE.

Oh yeah? How? Deploy smoke bombs? Dress up in disguises? Hide out on Turkish soil perhaps?

Or maybe it was as it was reported in your own link:

Quote

 

During Ocasio-Cortez's office’s Facebook webinar, which she did not attend, livestream hosts said the Fourth Amendment applies to everyone, including illegal immigrants. The constitutional protection affords a defense from “unreasonable” searches and seizures by the government. 

"So, there's a general rule here, which is in private spaces, ICE is going to need a warrant signed by a judge or your consent to enter that space or to do a search. When we're talking about public spaces, ICE will need reasonable suspicion in order to make an arrest," said one speaker, who identified herself as Laura. 

...

Following the webinar, Ocasio-Cortez posted a series of “Know Your Rights” pamphlets on her social media accounts educating illegal immigrants on how to respond to ICE agents. The documents, written in English and Spanish, advised people not to open doors to agents unless they have a warrant, warned them not to share any personal information with authorities, and told them to hire a lawyer in anticipation of ICE operations. 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Real. Material. Losses.

That is how you get these people to follow the law. No more playing around. Those days are gone. The parents are in charge and making the kids clean up their room.

Good. I hope he nails that psychopath to a tree. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

So you think it should be illegal to inform other people of their legal rights? Pretty fashy, but unsurprising.

We all have the same rights. 

Now don't be a b*tch. 

Just now, Black Dog said:

He's got nothing, just like you.

He's got something. It's why the stupid b*tch is under investigation. 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Yes that was the point of AOC's webinar, glad you are on board with her sharing that information.

No, that's not the point of AOC's webinar. 

The point of AOC's webinar is to advance illegal aliens.

And also to put non-heterosexuals and non-whites ahead of whites, especially conservative, straight white males. 

Now don't be a dumbass and pay attention. 

 

Edited by Deluge
Posted
10 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

LMAO, don't be retarded. The point is to create fear and intimidate political opponents regardless of whether they have cause. That's what fascists do.

Oh yeah? How? Deploy smoke bombs? Dress up in disguises? Hide out on Turkish soil perhaps?

Or maybe it was as it was reported in your own link:

 

So you like your cherry picked quotes? I have those too, you know.

Quote

Blaser informed viewers recent ICE raids in the Empire State have taken place “early in the morning” and in “public places,” and have often involved unmarked ICE vehicles stopping cars as people drive to and from work. 

...

She also noted that ICE arrests have taken place during required check-ins with federal immigration authorities and – outside of New York City – during probation or parole appointments and when migrants are being transferred from police custody.

https://nypost.com/2025/02/13/us-news/aoc-shares-tips-on-how-illegal-immigrants-can-evade-ice-do-not-open-your-door/

They were telling illegal immigrants how to avoid being caught. They did talk about rights, and that is fine. But when they tell criminals how to avoid being caught, that is material aid. That is a crime.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
7 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

So you like your cherry picked quotes? I have those too, you know.

They were telling illegal immigrants how to avoid being caught. They did talk about rights, and that is fine. But when they tell criminals how to avoid being caught, that is material aid. That is a crime.

Woke Dog is part of the resistance. He really can't be expected to understand logic, reason, science and common sense. 

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

They were telling illegal immigrants how to avoid being caught. They did talk about rights, and that is fine. But when they tell criminals how to avoid being caught, that is material aid. That is a crime.

Advice is not material aid, dummy. 

6 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Woke Dog is part of the resistance. He really can't be expected to understand logic, reason, science and common sense. 

And yet i still know telling someone not to open the door to law enforcement unless they have a warrant isn't illegal, unlike you bootlickers.

Edited by Black Dog
Posted
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

And yet i still know telling someone not to open the door to law enforcement unless hey have a warrant isn't illegal, unlike you bootlickers.

Unless it's ICE and they have reason to believe you've been harboring violent criminal aliens. 

You'd best open the door, dumbass. ;) 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Advice is not material aid, dummy.

And yet i still know telling someone not to open the door to law enforcement unless hey have a warrant isn't illegal, unlike you bootlickers.

Ahem...

Quote


material support or resources
(4) the term “material support or resources” has the same meaning given that term in section 2339A (including the definitions of “training” and “expert advice or assistance” in that section);
Source

18 USC § 2339B(g)(4)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=18-USC-1016054322-611479343&term_occur=999&term_src=title:18:part:I:chapter:113B:section:2339B

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
52 minutes ago, Deluge said:

The point of AOC's webinar is to advance illegal aliens.

And also to put non-heterosexuals and non-whites ahead of whites, especially conservative, straight white males. 

Now don't be a dumbass and pay attention. 

Paranoid much?

Posted
1 hour ago, Deluge said:

And also to put non-heterosexuals and non-whites ahead of whites, especially conservative, straight white males. 

A mindset clearly inferior to that of any illegal alien's.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Ahem...

Can you tell me how the "18 U.S. Code § 2339B - Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations" applies here (hint: it does not).

 

Edited by Black Dog
Posted
2 hours ago, Deluge said:

Unless it's ICE and they have reason to believe you've been harboring violent criminal aliens. 

You'd best open the door, dumbass. ;) 

Lol no, see this is why people need to be told their rights because of dumb shitheads like you.

Posted
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

Can you tell me how the "18 U.S. Code § 2339B - Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations" applies here (hint: it does not).

 

Read closer. The definition is applied from the source. "Material Support" is universally defined. It doesn't matter if it is terrorist or not.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said:

Read closer. The definition is applied from the source. "Material Support" is universally defined. It doesn't matter if it is terrorist or not.

No dummy, it's not "universally defined" it is a term specific to that statute, which only applies to designated terrorist organizations.

So can you tell me what specific law prohibits giving "material support" in the form of advising people of their constitutional rights?

Posted
17 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

No dummy, it's not "universally defined" it is a term specific to that statute, which only applies to designated terrorist organizations.

So can you tell me what specific law prohibits giving "material support" in the form of advising people of their constitutional rights?

Fine. I had to dig around for it, but here you go:

Quote

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title8-section1324&num=0&edition=prelim

1324. Bringing in and harboring certain aliens

...

(iii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;

By telling illegal aliens how to avoid ICE raids, they are in violation of 8 USC 1324(a)(iii) as is bolded above for you to review. This is providing material support to illegal aliens.

As I said, as Tom Homan said and as the law says, what her office did was illegal. If she directed, assisted or provided the means to violate the law, she is also guilty.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
Just now, gatomontes99 said:

Fine. I had to dig around for it, but here you go:

Quote

(iii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;

By telling illegal aliens how to avoid ICE raids, they are in violation of 8 USC 1324(a)(iii) as is bolded above for you to review. This is providing material support to illegal aliens.

That law is about actually literally physically hiding people. Holding a webinar is not that.

Quote

As I said, as Tom Homan said and as the law says, what her office did was illegal. If she directed, assisted or provided the means to violate the law, she is also guilty.

As I said: they got nothing on her, just watch.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

That law is about actually literally physically hiding people. Holding a webinar is not that.

As I said: they got nothing on her, just watch.

They are literally telling them how to hide.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
Just now, gatomontes99 said:

They are literally telling them how to hide.

Telling people to ask law enforcement to produce a warrant is not telling them how to hide. 

I honestly didn't expect this wave of fascists to be so goddamned dumb.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...