godzilla Posted February 4 Author Report Posted February 4 11 minutes ago, CdnFox said: All of them apperently, biden gave pardons for ALL AND ANY crimes. Only he knows how many that truly is, must have been a lot tho if he couldn't even be specific so, to be clear, you're unaware of any crimes.. specifically? Quote
CdnFox Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 28 minutes ago, godzilla said: so, to be clear, you're unaware of any crimes.. specifically? So to be clear regardless of the specific ones I may or may not be aware of it sounds like there's a lot that nobody was aware of that they need protection from. So will now never know the full scope of it. So having answered your question you can answer one of mine. If they committed no crimes, why did they need to have a blanket pardon that encompassed everything? Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 42 minutes ago, CdnFox said: All of them apperently, biden gave pardons for ALL AND ANY crimes. Only he knows how many that truly is, must have been a lot tho if he couldn't even be specific "must have been" means you have no idea. Those pardons were prophylactic to ward off Trump's PROMISED RETRIBUTION/PERSECUTIONS. Since you KNOW NOTHING about US law, the POTUS is NOT SUPPOSED to direct prosecutions by the DoJ. But Trump is a maniac with NO RESPECT for ETHICS nor JUSTICE. Now you know (but are probably STILL in DENIAL) Quote
CdnFox Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 (edited) 6 minutes ago, robosmith said: "must have been" means you have no idea. No it means I don't have an exact count of how many. Could be 30 could be 50 could be 100, thanks to Biden will never know. But I know it was more than one, or there have been no reason to pardon Them and they wouldn't have needed a blanket pardon, would they Edited February 4 by CdnFox Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
WestCanMan Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 1 hour ago, godzilla said: so, to be clear, you're unaware of any crimes.. specifically? Biden's crimes and his family's crimes are well-known, if that's what you're talking about. Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
Legato Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 3 hours ago, Radiorum said: What do you know about it? Really, tell us. What do you know about it besides what you have been told? Jack Smith has less integrity than a soap bubble. Any report coming from his office should be immediately recycled into toilet paper. Quote
Moonlight Graham Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 8 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Were Biden, Hillary and Kamala better choices? Obviously not. Term 1 Trump was better than all those losers combined. Depends how much you like authoritarian dictators with a cult of personality. 1 Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
WestCanMan Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 46 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said: Depends how much you like authoritarian dictators with a cult of personality. What makes you think Biden wasn't that? Biden was the main culprit in 2 major wars: 1 that he instigated, and one that was caused by his weakness. What makes you think Hillary would have been any better? She was a vicious little snake. Kamala was just a plain old loser. I would be learning Chinese right now if she was elected, not that it would matter. I think they'd just be killing everyone when they got here. Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
Moonlight Graham Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 35 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: What makes you think Biden wasn't that? Biden was the main culprit in 2 major wars: 1 that he instigated, and one that was caused by his weakness. What makes you think Hillary would have been any better? She was a vicious little snake. Kamala was just a plain old loser. I would be learning Chinese right now if she was elected, not that it would matter. I think they'd just be killing everyone when they got here. Well I don't like the post-Obama Democrats either. Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
robosmith Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 5 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Biden's crimes and his family's crimes are well-known, if that's what you're talking about. You mean the ALLEGATIONS heard on FOS LIES. You ever wonder why the House RepubliCONS never made their case for impeachment? A: it's cause they had NO EVIDENCE. 3 hours ago, Legato said: Jack Smith has less integrity than a soap bubble. Any report coming from his office should be immediately recycled into toilet paper. Who is telling you ^this TROLLSHIT? LMAO Quote
robosmith Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: What makes you think Biden wasn't that? Biden was the main culprit in 2 major wars: 1 that he instigated, and one that was caused by his weakness. Your fantasies don't make ^this true. LMAO 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: What makes you think Hillary would have been any better? She was a vicious little snake. Because YOU KNOW HER? LMAO 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Kamala was just a plain old loser. I would be learning Chinese right now if she was elected, not that it would matter. I think they'd just be killing everyone when they got here. Why do you believe China would invade Canada? Of course we know that Canada would LOSE if you didn't have NATO for defense. Quote
Legato Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 8 hours ago, robosmith said: You mean the ALLEGATIONS heard on FOS LIES. You ever wonder why the House RepubliCONS never made their case for impeachment? A: it's cause they had NO EVIDENCE. Who is telling you ^this TROLLSHIT? LMAO You are. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.