WestCanMan Posted January 16, 2025 Report Posted January 16, 2025 Do cultists ever get tired of seeing the Dems just levelling vicious and completely unsubstantiated slander at political opponents? Is even one of you guys getting a bit tired of it? "OMG, a woman claims to have been nearly raped by the appointee at some point in the late '90s at a house somewhere in NY or NJ but the poor thing has no evidence or witnesses. *nom nom nom nom* WE HAVE TO BELIEVE! *nom nom nom nom*" That's a great characterization of the Dem thought process in action if I do say so myself. 2 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
robosmith Posted January 16, 2025 Report Posted January 16, 2025 (edited) Do you know why "Borking" became a derogatory accusation? RepubliCONS use it to imply illegitimate slander, but when everyone above him in the DoJ quit instead of firing Nixon's special prosecutor, Bork stood up and asked "how high do you want me to jump?" LMAO IOW RepubliCONS pretend there was NOTHING WRONG with Bork obstructing JUSTICE. AKA the prosecution of Nixon's LIES about HIS CRIMES. When Bork later failed to be confirmed for his SCOTUS nomination, the RepubliCONS invented the term Borked, continuing to deny that Bork did nothing wrong in firing Nixon's special prosecutor in an attempt to cover up Nixon's crimes. Edited January 17, 2025 by robosmith Quote
WestCanMan Posted January 17, 2025 Author Report Posted January 17, 2025 (edited) 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Do you know why "Borking" became a derogatory accusation? RepubliCONS use it to imply illegitimate slander, but when everyone above him in the DoJ quit instead of firing Nixon's special prosecutor, Bork stood up and asked "how high do you want me to jump?" LMAO IOW RepubliCONS pretend there was NOTHING WRONG with Bork obstructing JUSTICE. AKA the prosecution of Nixon's LIES about HIS CRIMES. When Bork later failed to be confirmed for his SCOTUS nomination, the RepubliCONS invented the term Borked, continuing to deny that Bork did nothing wrong in firing Nixon's special prosecutor in an attempt to cover up Nixon's crimes. Nice try. Bork was unanimously confirmed in the senate to be a federal judge in 1982, almost ten years after Watergate. It wasn't until '87 that the Dems went berserk: Just hours after the nomination, Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) declared in a greatly publicized speech that if Bork were confirmed, women “would be forced into back-alley abortions”, blacks would be forced to accept segregation in “lunch counters”, law enforcement agents would “break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids”, children would never learn about evolution in school, and artists “could be censored” by over-reaching federal authorities. Other prominent Democrats joined the fierce criticism of Bork’s nomination and candidacy. Some of them focused on the nominee’s previous legal rulings as a judge. Others turned to the leaked list of the nominee’s rented movies, apparently looking for something incriminating in his individual entertainment preferences. Yet others pointed to Bork’s second marriage – to a Catholic woman – as proof of his presumed staunch opposition to abortion. bork verb (1)ˈbȯrk variants or less commonly Bork US politics, informal : to attack or defeat (a nominee or candidate for public office) unfairly through an organized campaign of harsh public criticism or vilification Regardless of how you feel about judge Bork, the Dems are still Borking constantly, and their constant stream of lies and hypocrisy is even more tiresome than it is outrageous now. Edited January 17, 2025 by WestCanMan 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
robosmith Posted January 17, 2025 Report Posted January 17, 2025 (edited) 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: Nice try. Bork was unanimously confirmed in the senate to be a federal judge in 1982, almost ten years after Watergate. It wasn't until '87 that the Dems went berserk: Just hours after the nomination, Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) declared in a greatly publicized speech that if Bork were confirmed, women “would be forced into back-alley abortions”, blacks would be forced to accept segregation in “lunch counters”, law enforcement agents would “break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids”, children would never learn about evolution in school, and artists “could be censored” by over-reaching federal authorities. Other prominent Democrats joined the fierce criticism of Bork’s nomination and candidacy. Some of them focused on the nominee’s previous legal rulings as a judge. Others turned to the leaked list of the nominee’s rented movies, apparently looking for something incriminating in his individual entertainment preferences. Yet others pointed to Bork’s second marriage – to a Catholic woman – as proof of his presumed staunch opposition to abortion. bork verb (1)ˈbȯrk variants or less commonly Bork US politics, informal : to attack or defeat (a nominee or candidate for public office) unfairly through an organized campaign of harsh public criticism or vilification Regardless of how you feel about judge Bork, the Dems are still Borking constantly, and their constant stream of lies and hypocrisy is even more tiresome than it is outrageous now. NOTHING you say ^here refutes the FACTS that I cited. Bork was denied a spot on the SCOTUS due to his obsequiousness to Nixon and that is the origin of "Borked." None of the Democrats thought he was honest nor principled. IOW, your definition of "Bork" is superfluous because the reality is the campaign against Bork was entirely fair because it was a consequence of his UNETHICAL behavior. Edited January 17, 2025 by robosmith Quote
Legato Posted January 17, 2025 Report Posted January 17, 2025 6 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Do cultists ever get tired of seeing the Dems just levelling vicious and completely unsubstantiated slander at political opponents? Is even one of you guys getting a bit tired of it? "OMG, a woman claims to have been nearly raped by the appointee at some point in the late '90s at a house somewhere in NY or NJ but the poor thing has no evidence or witnesses. *nom nom nom nom* WE HAVE TO BELIEVE! *nom nom nom nom*" That's a great characterization of the Dem thought process in action if I do say so myself. That explains the Dems fixation with Russia. Borking is eating Russian sausage seared with Vodka and served with a generous helping of tablespin sauce. 1 1 Quote
WestCanMan Posted January 17, 2025 Author Report Posted January 17, 2025 11 hours ago, Legato said: That explains the Dems fixation with Russia. Borking is eating Russian sausage seared with Vodka and served with a generous helping of tablespin sauce. When the Dems/CNN say "Russian disinformation", what they mean is "'Murica is nummer wun! NO ONE'S DISNIFURMASHUN IS GOODER THAN ARZ!" Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
Nationalist Posted January 17, 2025 Report Posted January 17, 2025 13 hours ago, robosmith said: NOTHING you say ^here refutes the FACTS that I cited. Bork was denied a spot on the SCOTUS due to his obsequiousness to Nixon and that is the origin of "Borked." None of the Democrats thought he was honest nor principled. IOW, your definition of "Bork" is superfluous because the reality is the campaign against Bork was entirely fair because it was a consequence of his UNETHICAL behavior. A Libbie proclaiming ethics...ROFLMAO! You slime have no ethics. You have accusations and loud, shrill banshee screams. But ethics? No. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted January 17, 2025 Report Posted January 17, 2025 2 hours ago, Nationalist said: A Libbie proclaiming ethics...ROFLMAO! You slime have no ethics. You have accusations and loud, shrill banshee screams. But ethics? No. No one ever resigned from the WH Office of Government Ethics under a Democrat POTUS. You're BANKRUPT, AGAIN. Government Ethics Chief Resigns, Casting Uncertainty ... The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics Jul 6, 2017 — Walter M. Shaub Jr., the United States' top ethics watchdog, has clashed repeatedly with the Trump administration, but said he had not been ... Exiting Ethics Chief Walter Shaub Calls Trump White ... NPR https://www.npr.org › 2017/07/07 › exiting-ethics-chief... Jul 7, 2017 — Walter Shaub Jr., outgoing director of the Office of Government Ethics, says there's a new normal for ethics in the Trump administration. US government ethics chief resigns, with parting shot at ... The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com › us-news › jul › walter-s... Jul 6, 2017 — Walter Shaub, head of the independent Office of Government Ethics, pens resignation letter with reminder: 'Public service is a public trust' Quote
WestCanMan Posted January 17, 2025 Author Report Posted January 17, 2025 17 hours ago, robosmith said: NOTHING you say ^here refutes the FACTS that I cited. Bork was denied a spot on the SCOTUS due to his obsequiousness to Nixon and that is the origin of "Borked." If the Dems thought all that about Watergate then they never would have unanimously appointed him to be a federal judge 5 years earlier, roboliar. Quote None of the Democrats thought he was honest nor principled. Jesus Christ. Here you go just taking Dems at their w🤡rd now 🤣. Dems taking honesty and principles into account... 🤣😂 That was pure comedy gold. Quote IOW, your definition of "Bork" is superfluous It's Merriam Webster's definition, dummy. Stop living in denial. The Dems just are who they are and apparently they will never change. Why would they when their little cultists never catch on? Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
Nationalist Posted January 17, 2025 Report Posted January 17, 2025 4 hours ago, robosmith said: No one ever resigned from the WH Office of Government Ethics under a Democrat POTUS. You're BANKRUPT, AGAIN. Government Ethics Chief Resigns, Casting Uncertainty ... The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics Jul 6, 2017 — Walter M. Shaub Jr., the United States' top ethics watchdog, has clashed repeatedly with the Trump administration, but said he had not been ... Exiting Ethics Chief Walter Shaub Calls Trump White ... NPR https://www.npr.org › 2017/07/07 › exiting-ethics-chief... Jul 7, 2017 — Walter Shaub Jr., outgoing director of the Office of Government Ethics, says there's a new normal for ethics in the Trump administration. US government ethics chief resigns, with parting shot at ... The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com › us-news › jul › walter-s... Jul 6, 2017 — Walter Shaub, head of the independent Office of Government Ethics, pens resignation letter with reminder: 'Public service is a public trust' That's because along with a lack of ethics, you Libbies have no morality either. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted January 17, 2025 Report Posted January 17, 2025 5 minutes ago, Nationalist said: That's because along with a lack of ethics, you Libbies have no morality either. Ethics and morality are two peas in a pod, doofus. Too bad you have NO CASE for either of your unsubstantiated CLAIMS. IF only you could find Biden's Walter Shaub you MIGHT have one. Quote
Nationalist Posted January 18, 2025 Report Posted January 18, 2025 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Ethics and morality are two peas in a pod, doofus. Too bad you have NO CASE for either of your unsubstantiated CLAIMS. IF only you could find Biden's Walter Shaub you MIGHT have one. Yes dear... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
West Posted January 18, 2025 Report Posted January 18, 2025 Tara Reade on her treatment by the Biden machine https://x.com/ReadeAlexandra/status/1880334539081589013/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1880334539081589013¤tTweetUser=ReadeAlexandra Quote
robosmith Posted January 18, 2025 Report Posted January 18, 2025 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: Yes dear... What a ^kiss ass. LMAO Must be why your wife puts up with your IGNORANCE and fraudulence. 1 hour ago, West said: Tara Reade on her treatment by the Biden machine https://x.com/ReadeAlexandra/status/1880334539081589013/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1880334539081589013¤tTweetUser=ReadeAlexandra Ooops. Quote
Nationalist Posted January 18, 2025 Report Posted January 18, 2025 34 minutes ago, robosmith said: What a ^kiss ass. LMAO Must be why your wife puts up with your IGNORANCE and fraudulence. Ya see...this is why you fail so often. Your aim is bad. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
West Posted January 18, 2025 Report Posted January 18, 2025 Given CNNs settlement and guilty verdict of defaming a war veteran as well as other cases such as settling with the Covington kids, any of these stories that appear on left wing media should be treated with suspicion 1 Quote
robosmith Posted January 18, 2025 Report Posted January 18, 2025 17 hours ago, Nationalist said: Ya see...this is why you fail so often. Your aim is bad. ONLY in YOUR FANTASIES. LMAO I've had you nailed since the first week. Your FRAUDULENCE is WHY you defend FRAUDULENCE. And YOUR TROLLING was admitted BY YOU. "just messin with ya" 🤮 1 Quote
WestCanMan Posted January 18, 2025 Author Report Posted January 18, 2025 14 hours ago, West said: Given CNNs settlement and guilty verdict of defaming a war veteran as well as other cases such as settling with the Covington kids, any of these stories that appear on left wing media should be treated with suspicion There's no further low that CNN can stoop to. Their ultra-low standard for morality and decency was laid bare in when they went after Nick Sandman for whatever bizarre reason, and it's astonishing to see so many robo's still suckling at the slander teat. 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.