straight up, Hegseth refuses to say that he would not deploy US military inside the USA

[godzilla]

Hegseth Won't Answer If He Would REFUSE Trump ILLEGAL Order

its a simple question... he refused to answer.

[User]

So... you opposed the Democrats deploying the military to protect the Inauguration of Biden? You opposed Eisenhower using the 101st Airborne to escort black kids into school?

 

[gatomontes99]

7 minutes ago, godzilla said:

Hegseth Won't Answer If He Would REFUSE Trump ILLEGAL Order

its a simple question... he refused to answer.

So Hegseth refused to answer when he stopped beating his wife because he never started it must mean he won't stop beating his wife?

Remember when Democrats were all pissed off because Trump didn't order the NG to intervene on J6? Then we found out he did and Miller didn't do it. Now they are acting like Trump will turn the military on civilians just because. They are such trash.

https://www.cf.org/news/transcripts-trump-urged-use-of-troops-to-protect-capitol-on-jan-6-but-was-rebuffed/

 

[Dougie93]

34 minutes ago, godzilla said:

Hegseth Won't Answer If He Would REFUSE Trump ILLEGAL Order

its a simple question... he refused to answer.

it's not unlawful for the President to deploy troops inside the USA

by the Insurrection Act of 1807 ;

Under this law, in response to a state government’s request, the president may deploy the military to suppress an insurrection in that state. In addition, the Insurrection Act allows the president — with or without the state government’s consent — to use the military to enforce federal law or suppress a rebellion against federal authority in a state, or to protect a group of people’s civil rights when the state government is unable or unwilling to do so.

it would be so amusing to see you Democrat traitors to the republic shot dead by federal troops

under the Insurrection Act, after you've been screeching about "Insurrection" for the last four years

die in a fire of your own making, you filthy disgusting Communist traitors, burn in Hell after

 

[gatomontes99]

10 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

it's not unlawful for the President to deploy troops inside the USA

by the Insurrection Act of 1807 ;

Under this law, in response to a state government’s request, the president may deploy the military to suppress an insurrection in that state. In addition, the Insurrection Act allows the president — with or without the state government’s consent — to use the military to enforce federal law or suppress a rebellion against federal authority in a state, or to protect a group of people’s civil rights when the state government is unable or unwilling to do so.

it would be so amusing to see you Democrat traitors to the republic shot dead by federal troops

under the Insurrection Act, after you've been screeching about "Insurrection" for the last four years

die in a fire of your own making, you filthy disgusting Communist traitors, burn in Hell after

 

If it was, Lincoln would have been the bad guy.

 

[Dougie93]

2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

If it was, Lincoln would have been the bad guy.

Patron Saint of the Republic

Emancipation Proclamation in the face of Antietam Creek

extra constitutional war measures to crush the Democrat party plantation aristocracy traitors

by whatever means necessary

glory, glory, hallelujah

 

[robosmith]

23 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

it's not unlawful for the President to deploy troops inside the USA

by the Insurrection Act of 1807 ;

Under this law, in response to a state government’s request, the president may deploy the military to suppress an insurrection in that state. In addition, the Insurrection Act allows the president — with or without the state government’s consent — to use the military to enforce federal law or suppress a rebellion against federal authority in a state, or to protect a group of people’s civil rights when the state government is unable or unwilling to do so.

it would be so amusing to see you Democrat traitors to the republic shot dead by federal troops

under the Insurrection Act, after you've been screeching about "Insurrection" for the last four years

die in a fire of your own making, you filthy disgusting Communist traitors, burn in Hell after

 

I'll bet you're the life of the party at your KKK chapter's conclave. 🤮

[Nationalist]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I'll bet you're the life of the party at your KKK chapter's conclave. 🤮

As much fun as you at the whiners' diner.

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

As much fun as you at the whiners' diner.

You'll have to give me directions to your diner since I've never been there.

[Nationalist]

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You'll have to give me directions to your diner since I've never been there.

Oh don't worry. You'll be going there in due time.

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

So Hegseth refused to answer when he stopped beating his wife because he never started it must mean he won't stop beating his wife?

Remember when Democrats were all pissed off because Trump didn't order the NG to intervene on J6? Then we found out he did and Miller didn't do it. Now they are acting like Trump will turn the military on civilians just because. They are such trash.

https://www.cf.org/news/transcripts-trump-urged-use-of-troops-to-protect-capitol-on-jan-6-but-was-rebuffed/

 

He's already:

• Threatened to invade two of our NATO allies in a land
• Advocated for violence against protestors 
• Tried to deploy the army against civilians on J6
• Egged on a murderous mob that was hunting his own VP
• Tried to overthrow democracy altogether 

But nah, he'd neeeeeeeeeever betray the sacred trust of the military if it served his ends. 🙄

Edited January 14, 2025 by Hodad

[User]

1 minute ago, Hodad said:

He's already:

• Threatened to invade two of our NATO allies in a land
• Advocated for violence against protestors 
• Egged on a murderous mob that was hunting his own VP
• Tried to overthrow democracy altogether 

But nah, he'd neeeeeeeeeever betray the sacred trust of the military if it served his ends. 🙄

Well, when you sum it up so dishonestly like that... 

 

[gatomontes99]

Just now, Hodad said:

He's already:

• Threatened to invade two of our NATO allies in a land
• Advocated for violence against protestors 
• Egged on a murderous mob that was hunting his own VP
• Tried to overthrow democracy altogether 

But nah, he'd neeeeeeeeeever betray the sacred trust of the military if it served his ends. 🙄

Lmao.  Ok. Sure.

 

[Dougie93]

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I'll bet you're the life of the party at your KKK chapter's conclave. 🤮

the Klu Klux Klan were Democrat Party Confederates founded by Lt. General Nathan Bedford Forrest

whereas I am a Republican ; Glorious Union marching to the sea with Billy Sherman

to crush you Democrat party plantation aristocracy traitors to the republic

Posse Comitatus only precludes federal troops from enforcing criminal law therein

but in this case we'd be hanging you from the nearest tree, as an Unlawful Combatants

by the laws of armed conflict ; Eagle with thunderbolts in talons grasped

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

So Hegseth refused to answer when he stopped beating his wife because he never started it must mean he won't stop beating his wife?

Remember when Democrats were all pissed off because Trump didn't order the NG to intervene on J6? Then we found out he did and Miller didn't do it. Now they are acting like Trump will turn the military on civilians just because. They are such trash.

https://www.cf.org/news/transcripts-trump-urged-use-of-troops-to-protect-capitol-on-jan-6-but-was-rebuffed/

 

And no, I just watched and he was asked a VERY fair question: Is there any order that a Commander in Chief--any president of any party--could give that would violate the constitution. 

And the suck-ass couldn't even muster up the spine to acknowledge that such an order could exist. The proper answer is "I take an oath to defend the constitution and if an illegal order is given it is my duty to refuse it."

What a weak-ass biotch.

 

--His refusal speaks volumes. He may as well have whipped out a megaphone and yelled "Fark the constitution. I'll do whatever Trump says whenever he says it, whether it's constitutional or not."

Edited January 14, 2025 by Hodad

[NAME REMOVED]

1 hour ago, godzilla said:

Hegseth Won't Answer If He Would REFUSE Trump ILLEGAL Order

its a simple question... he refused to answer.

This would certainly start a Civil War, especially if he deployed troops in California, or New England.

[Nationalist]

These Libbies will absolutely lose their sh1t when Hegseth is confirmed. 

[gatomontes99]

6 minutes ago, Hodad said:

And no, I just watched and he was asked a VERY fair question: Is there any order that a Commander in Chief--any president of any party--could give that would violate the constitution. 

And the suck-ass couldn't even muster up the spine to acknowledge that such an order could exist. The proper answer is "I take an oath to defend the constitution and if an illegal order is given it is my duty to refuse it."

What a weak-ass biotch.

 

--His refusal speaks volumes. He may as well have whipped out a megaphone and yelled "Fark the constitution. I'll do whatever Trump says whenever he says it, whether it's constitutional or not."

Nah. It is a bullshìt question. It is a bullshìt question because it presumes that Trump will make some illegal command. These democrats didn't ask those questions of Joe even though Joe was clearly mentally diminished and could potentially issue orders in confusion. The question was a partisan hack question.

[Hodad]

3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

These Libbies will absolutely lose their sh1t when Hegseth is confirmed. 

Everyone with even a shred of decency or patriotism will. Only traitorous schemers will think this patently unqualified and wholly corrupt goon assuming control of the military is a good idea. 

He's not qualified to hold the job, nor a man of any character to deserve the job if he were qualified.

[Hodad]

5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Nah. It is a bullshìt question. It is a bullshìt question because it presumes that Trump will make some illegal command. These democrats didn't ask those questions of Joe even though Joe was clearly mentally diminished and could potentially issue orders in confusion. The question was a partisan hack question.

You're lying. Watch the video of his testimony. The question explicitly did not presume that. They drilled down to the basic question: Is it possible for any president of any party to give an order that would be unconstitutional or illegal? He refused to even acknowledge that such a thing was possible.

 

And don't forget that Trump made MANY illegal orders or inquiries his last time in office.

Edited January 14, 2025 by Hodad

[Nationalist]

12 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Everyone with even a shred of decency or patriotism will. Only traitorous schemers will think this patently unqualified and wholly corrupt goon assuming control of the military is a good idea. 

He's not qualified to hold the job, nor a man of any character to deserve the job if he were qualified.

Poor baby.

Elections do have consequences. 

Enjoy the consequences Puddin'.

[godzilla]

its all ok. Christians are allowed to sin because they are always subsequently redeemed by Jesus.

specifically, he says so at 2:55 into the following video

'You were still married, correct?': Kaine grills Hegseth on past affair

[gatomontes99]

44 minutes ago, Hodad said:

You're lying. Watch the video of his testimony. The question explicitly did not presume that. They drilled down to the basic question: Is it possible for any president of any party to give an order that would be unconstitutional or illegal? He refused to even acknowledge that such a thing was possible.

 

And don't forget that Trump made MANY illegal orders or inquiries his last time in office.

Lol. Sure.

"We all know Trumonos a Russian asset and will move to destroy America. But, if any President ordered you to attack American citizens, would you do it?"

Yeah, they weren't talking about Trump.

[NAME REMOVED]

25 minutes ago, godzilla said:

its all ok. Christians are allowed to sin because they are always subsequently redeemed by Jesus.

specifically, he says so at 2:55 into the following video

'You were still married, correct?': Kaine grills Hegseth on past affair

Welcome to 2025. 

When the United States was formed in 1776, they went to great lengths to separate the church from the state, for obvious reasons. For the past 2 decades, Republicans have been trying to blur that line, and appealing to the Evangelical Christian community. It is a proven failed system, as the Europeans did this for centuries. It was only when the church and state become separate did the working and middle class prosper. 

[User]

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

And the suck-ass couldn't even muster up the spine to acknowledge that such an order could exist. The proper answer is "I take an oath to defend the constitution and if an illegal order is given it is my duty to refuse it."

What a weak-ass biotch.

You are such a pathic cowardly liar. That is why you hide from me. 

He literally says:

"I am interested in upholding the laws and constitution in any particular scenario"

May have missed a word in there, transcribing this from the video and they are talking over each other. 

So, keep hiding you pathetic coward.