Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Links are all in there, dummy.

This is your "source", which I'll grant you is probably a bit more respectable than CNN:

ScreenShot2025-01-08at11_33_04AM.png.041450ff327e0acae58bf5d0b8825e52.png

Not all of the events on that chart have a hotlink.

Quote

1) Nope. It's all right wingers, including the neo Nazis targeting Jews.

2) There's only 7 on that list in that timeframe, none of which involving more than 3 people since that matters to you.

1) Neo-Nazis, Dems, and Demi cultists are the 3 main groups that hate Jews in the US.

2) There are attacks that aren't on there then, including the Danforth shooter and the van attack. 

Our gov't does whatever it can to pretend that attacks by muslims aren't terrorist attacks. 

Quote

More Muslims have died in Islamophobic attacks in Canada in the last 10 years than non-Muslims killed by Islamists.

You're high on glue, Dummy. islamists killed over 20, and there were less than ten of them killed. 

If we get to use the gov't's standard for categorizing attacks against muslims, we can throw all of those into random, ridiculous categories as well, to bring the number of muslims killed by Canadians down to zero. It's 20-0, Black Dummy.

Quote

you can't be racist against crackers.

There ya go again.

Quote

LOl are you claiming every murder of a white person by a black person is racially motivated? LMAO.

If the FBI doesn't have to make sense, why are you holding me to that standard?

The standard on your list is: made racist comments online at some point in their life, so they were extremists

Of the 6,400 blacks that killed people, do you think that none of them killed people of other races, and had previously used racial epithets? How many black people have never said "cracker"? Uh-ohhhhh. Seems like there are hundreds, if not thousands of extremist murders every year by black Americans. 

There are even more "murders of police officers by BLMers" than there are "extremist attacks by whites against blacks" on your list. But guess what: when BLM supporters kill cops the FBI doesn't put them on an "extremist attackers" list. 

Quote

1) The Vegas shooter was a conservative but 2) it's unlikely the attack was politically motivated.

1) Wrong

2) God you're dumb 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
12 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

I would never advocate for any illegal act...but I do think it is necessary to point touthow absurd it is for you to imply axiomatically that something is necessarily wrong with political violence.

If you think about it, you'll realize that this thread is about the FBI's ridiculous obsession, and not whether or not political violence is always inherently wrong. 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

If you think about it, you'll realize that this thread is about the FBI's ridiculous obsession, and not whether or not political violence is always inherently wrong. 

Well clearly, especially if what you are claiming is true, there is nothing ridiculous about the fbi being obsessed with white people.

 

White people have the greatest justification from abstract principles, such as the right to self determination, to engage in political violence.

 

Any responsible law enforcement agency should recognize that and do whatever it can to inb4 it.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

This is your "source", which I'll grant you is probably a bit more respectable than CNN:

Not all of the events on that chart have a hotlink.

Then Google it, you already have a nurse to wipe your ass for you.

Quote

1) Neo-Nazis, Dems, and Demi cultists are the 3 main groups that hate Jews in the US.

Neo Nazis are right wingers dipshit.

Quote

2) There are attacks that aren't on there then, including the Danforth shooter and the van attack. 

Danforth shooter is on there, which only killed two people and is not known to be politically motivated. Not sure which van attack you're talking about; the incel guy?

Quote

You're high on glue, Dummy. islamists killed over 20, and there were less than ten of them killed. 

Your source lists 6 deaths by Islamists compared to 11 killed in two anti-Muslim incidents. you're huffing lead paint again.

Quote

If we get to use the gov't's standard for categorizing attacks against muslims, we can throw all of those into random, ridiculous categories as well, to bring the number of muslims killed by Canadians down to zero. It's 20-0, Black Dummy.

Gibberish.

Quote

If the FBI doesn't have to make sense, why are you holding me to that standard?

The standard on your list is: made racist comments online at some point in their life, so they were extremists

That's not my standard or the FBI's you dumb cracker.

Quote

Of the 6,400 blacks that killed people, do you think that none of them killed people of other races, and had previously used racial epithets? How many black people have never said "cracker"? Uh-ohhhhh. Seems like there are hundreds, if not thousands of extremist murders every year by black Americans. 

More gibberish.

Quote

There are even more "murders of police officers by BLMers" than there are "extremist attacks by whites against blacks" on your list. But guess what: when BLM supporters kill cops the FBI doesn't put them on an "extremist attackers" list. 

Insane ramblings now.

Quote

 

1) Wrong

2) God you're dumb 

 

https://www.newsweek.com/las-vegas-gunman-was-trump-supporter-happy-stock-market-701597

wah wah

Edited by Black Dog
Posted
10 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Then Google it, you already have a nurse to wipe your ass for you.

It's your link. Where did you get your bogus chart from?

Quote

Neo Nazis are right wingers dipshit.

That's old reasoning. Leftists are far more inclined to behave as fascists now that right-winger are. 

Quote

Your source lists 6 deaths by Islamists compared to 11 killed in two anti-Muslim incidents. you're huffing lead paint again.

Mass-killings by islamists like Minassian and Hussein are quickly shuffled off to other categories, but anyone who's white who ever killed anyone of a different race or religion is automatically an extremist. 

I think it was Hussein where the whole immediate family is muslim but he was theoretically not. 

It gets tiring seeing all the excuses. Whenever there's a mass-attack in Canada, it's more than a 50% that it came from that 1.5% of our population. 

And the biggest attack against muslims in Canada was just retaliatory... it happened within a few months of 3 separate attacks by muslims. 

  • Like 1

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Because it was an attack against (95%) conservatives, which would qualify it as an attack by leftists. 

Remember when I said that whenever leftists attack the FBI never finds a manifesto? This was part of that. Somehow, after all this time, the FBI never managed to figure out a motive for that, and they never classified it as a terrorist attack.

Did you take a poll of the attendees? LMAO

The shooter was obviously a gun nut with his bump stocks, so that makes him a right winger.

 

Quote

 

While investigators concluded that the motive of Stephen Paddock was unclear, newly released records include an account that he was angry about the casinos’ treatment of wealthy clients.

 

The man who fatally shot 60 people at an outdoor music festival in Las Vegas in 2017 had been angry over what he saw as casinos scaling back on perks for V.I.P. gamblers like himself, according to an account provided to the F.B.I.

 

 

Edited by robosmith
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It's your link. Where did you get your bogus chart from?

Same place you got yours.

Quote

That's old reasoning. Leftists are far more inclined to behave as fascists now that right-winger are. 

Except the guys who did those shootings were right wingers.

Quote

Mass-killings by islamists like Minassian and Hussein are quickly shuffled off to other categories

Minassian was not only not an Islamist, it's not even clear that he was Muslim and he provided a clear motive for his actions that had nothing to do with religion.

Quote

, but anyone who's white who ever killed anyone of a different race or religion is automatically an extremist. 

Literally the same thing you're doing by saying everyone with a foreign-sounding name is an Islamist but you're to dumb to grasp that.

Quote

It gets tiring seeing all the excuses. Whenever there's a mass-attack in Canada, it's more than a 50% that it came from that 1.5% of our population. 

Incels? Incels have killed more people than Islamists in the last decade in this country.

Quote

And the biggest attack against muslims in Canada was just retaliatory... it happened within a few months of 3 separate attacks by muslims. 

I did not have "Alexandre Bissonnette was right" on my bingo card for today but i shouldn't be surprised at your depravity.

Edited by Black Dog
Posted
13 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

it's not even clear that he was Muslim and he provided a clear motive for his actions that had nothing to do with religion.

These shootings/van attacks always start off as "probably not a muslim". All of them. It is only slowly and begrudgingly that our gov't finally acknowledges that terrorists here have ties to islam.

The guy who shot our reservist at the war memorial and then attacked the HoC wasn't classified as an islamist for a long time. 

I think it was Faisal Hussein whose family already had a lawyer's statement to the media the first thing in the morning, the day after the attack, saying that "We're all muslims, but he is not. His attack was done because of his own mental health issues and not our religion."

Contrast our government's haste to deem attacks against muslims as 100% bigoted, like for example how quickly Trudeau piled on "racist white Canadians"  in defence of the hijab hoax girl, and then how he just doubled-down after he found out it was a hoax. "Canadian racism is real!!!!" Violent islamist extremism in never real here, even when it hits people with a truck or a bullet. 

It's the same in the states, with the instant condemnation of MAGA racists for the "attack" on Jussie Smollett, and then the painstakingly slow and only partial withdrawal of his accusation after mounds and mounds of evidence came out. 

The FBI/MSM in the US are a COMPLETE farce. Whites are always instantly assumed to be fully guilty of bigotry, but everyone else has to be carrying a flag, and yelling something political, and have a tattoo on their forehead, and have a thousand FB posts to be considered a possible candidate for an extremist classification, and even then there's a waiting period of at least a week before the connection is finally made, and under no circumstances will a manifesto be released. 

When the BLM riots were peaking, 4 black teens took a retarded white kid and tortured him, partly scalped him, live-streamed it on FB, but it wasn't "political", or "extremism", and it definitely had nothing!!!!! to do with the BLM riots... Weird, hey? 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
Just now, WestCanMan said:

These shootings/van attacks always start off as "probably not a muslim". All of them. It is only slowly and begrudgingly that our gov't finally acknowledges that terrorists here have ties to islam.

You claimed Minassian was an Islamist: where's your evidence?

Quote

The guy who shot our reservist at the war memorial and then attacked the HoC wasn't classified as an islamist for a long time. 

lol bullshit, people were speculating about it right away (he was wearing a keffiyeh) and it was confirmed that he was weirdo Mulsim convert within days. 

Quote

I think it was Faisal Hussein whose family already had a lawyer's statement to the media the first thing in the morning, the day after the attack, saying that "We're all muslims, but he is not. His attack was done because of his own mental health issues and not our religion."

And you have no evidence to the contrary other than his last name.

Quote

Contrast our government's haste to deem attacks against muslims as 100% bigoted, like for example how quickly Trudeau piled on "racist white Canadians"  in defence of the hijab hoax girl, and then how he just doubled-down after he found out it was a hoax. "Canadian racism is real!!!!" Violent islamist extremism in never real here, even when it hits people with a truck or a bullet. 

LOL violent Islamic extremism can't be that big a problem here if you have to try and shoehorn unrelated incidents into that category.

Quote

The FBI/MSM in the US are a COMPLETE farce. Whites are always instantly assumed to be fully guilty of bigotry, but everyone else has to be carrying a flag, and yelling something political, and have a tattoo on their forehead, and have a thousand FB posts to be considered a possible candidate for an extremist classification, and even then there's a waiting period of at least a week before the connection is finally made, and under no circumstances will a manifesto be released. 

Here's a novel idea: give us an actual example of this phenomenon. Name an incident in which the perpetrator was ideologically motivated with a manifesto and everything but didn't get reported as such.

Quote

When the BLM riots were peaking, 4 black teens took a retarded white kid and tortured him, partly scalped him, live-streamed it on FB, but it wasn't "political", or "extremism", and it definitely had nothing!!!!! to do with the BLM riots... Weird, hey? 

You're full of crap. That incident took place in January 2017, a full three years before the BLM protests took off. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

lol bullshit, people were speculating about it right away (he was wearing a keffiyeh) and it was confirmed that he was weirdo Mulsim convert within days. 

Right. Normal people were suspecting that, because we're not stupid like you, but our media was determined to have everyone believe that islam had nothing to do with it. 

Quote

And you have no evidence to the contrary other than his last name.

I have a lifetime of knowledge and wisdom, two things which you lack, and I also have the specific knowledge that in this instance, that person was raised in a muslim family. 

FYI in a lot of countries in 2025 they still have the death penalty on the books for apostasy. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youcef_Nadarkhani

So if you're born into an islamic family, becoming agnostic or atheist is forbidden, and they don't take it lightly. Converting to another religion is asking for death.

You really have no clue how islam works, and your leftard confirmation bias forbids you to learn. 

Quote

LOL violent Islamic extremism can't be that big a problem here if you have to try and shoehorn unrelated incidents into that category.

It's such a big problem that we have to go through metal detectors before we get on a plane. 

Almost every intrusive security measure that we're subjected to here is on account of the fact that we have muslims here. 

There's not 1 bollard put up anywhere on earth to prevent non-muslims from barreling into Christmas markets. 

There are no non-muslim countries that ever normalized relations with a country while they were behaving like 1942 Nazi Germans, but Iran and Iraq did that with Pakistan in 1947 while they were still busy burning and hacking Sikhs and Hindus to death by the hundreds of thousands.  Pakistan's second genocide in the millions, in 1971, didn't harm their relations with the other muslim countries at all. 

You just have no idea who you're defending here. The difference between the level of bigotry in Pakistan and Nazi Germany is negligible.

Quote

Here's a novel idea: give us an actual example of this phenomenon. Name an incident in which the perpetrator was ideologically motivated with a manifesto and everything but didn't get reported as such.

Here's a novel idea: become the first leftard to ever pull their head out of their ass. 

I can't help you to remember how stupid people were back in 2014 when Michael Brown was shot by cops. If you didn't notice the stupidity when it was happening, then you can never fully understand it. 

I lived through months and months of watching people describe M Brown as a gentle giant after I saw video of him conducting a violent robbery just moments before he was shot. The MSM in Canada and the USA supported widespread violent riots that were entirely based on the gentle giant myth, which was 100% known to be false almost as soon as CNN said it. 

Then they used the gentle giant moniker again on G Floyd, while Keith Ellison hid video from the world about how Floyd actually died. 

I can't explain to you how stupid all of that was. Yet it went over your head like moon behind a thick layer of clouds. You thought the riots were justified and cool when they actually an abomination, right from the very start. You justified widespread arson, assaults and murder based on an obvious lie. 

So... I bolded this part "with a manifesto" but have yet to explain why, do you have a guess yet? 

How the F am I supposed to know which incidents had manifestos, dummy? Only the FBI gets their hands on those, and they destroy, omit, fabricate evidence whenever it suits their fancy. If the FBI don't want you to see a manifesto, you never will. If there's a manifesto they don't like, they'll just make a new one, or edit the sh1t out of it.

Buddy, when the FBI makes a declarative statement, all you know for sure is that someone's lips moved, that's it. There's no more that can possibly be gleaned from them watching them yap. 

FBI: "This guy had a manifesto and he emailed it to one guy." 🤣 Really? FYI the CIA sent an email to the FBI and guess what that email said when it got passed along to Rosemary Collyer at the FISA court...? The exact opposite of what it said when the FBI got it. So when the FBI says "He emailed his manifesto to one guy", what they actually mean is that they just gave themselves a blank cheque to lie and slanderIt means that they're going to create a narrative. It means that people like you are going to be led astray, 100%, and there's nothing anyone can do to stop it.

Quote

 That incident took place in January 2017, a full three years before the BLM protests took off. 

🤣 You just gave away your age, dummy. You were too young to be watching TV in the last half of 2014, and all of 2015 and 2016, when BLM was inciting/orchestrating/leading violent riots all over the country. Did you turn 15 in 2020? 16? 

You're a 20-yr old sitting on your mom's couch getting high on weed right now, aren't you... F'ing guaranteed. Stupid child.

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
6 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Ws 9/11 within the last ten years? 

The issue is older than a decade.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
19 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Right. Normal people were suspecting that, because we're not stupid like you, but our media was determined to have everyone believe that islam had nothing to do with it. 

LOL so that's no, you don't have any evidence beyond him having a foreign-sounding last name, then.

 

Quote

I have a lifetime of knowledge and wisdom, two things which you lack, and I also have the specific knowledge that in this instance, that person was raised in a muslim family. 

Prove it.

Quote

 

FYI in a lot of countries in 2025 they still have the death penalty on the books for apostasy. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youcef_Nadarkhani

So if you're born into an islamic family, becoming agnostic or atheist is forbidden, and they don't take it lightly. Converting to another religion is asking for death.

You really have no clue how islam works, and your leftard confirmation bias forbids you to learn. 

 

lol the difference between normal people and crazy people like you is the former shape their world based on information they take in while you do the exact opposite.

Quote

It's such a big problem that we have to go through metal detectors before we get on a plane. 

Do you not remember having to do that before 9/11 or are you senile?

Quote

 

Almost every intrusive security measure that we're subjected to here is on account of the fact that we have muslims here. 

There's not 1 bollard put up anywhere on earth to prevent non-muslims from barreling into Christmas markets. 

There are no non-muslim countries that ever normalized relations with a country while they were behaving like 1942 Nazi Germans, but Iran and Iraq did that with Pakistan in 1947 while they were still busy burning and hacking Sikhs and Hindus to death by the hundreds of thousands.  Pakistan's second genocide in the millions, in 1971, didn't harm their relations with the other muslim countries at all. 

You just have no idea who you're defending here. The difference between the level of bigotry in Pakistan and Nazi Germany is negligible.

 

You are simply incapable of keeping your plaque-clogged brain focussed, are you? None of this is relevant to the discussion which you started.

Quote

 

Here's a novel idea: become the first leftard to ever pull their head out of their ass. 

I can't help you to remember how stupid people were back in 2014 when Michael Brown was shot by cops. If you didn't notice the stupidity when it was happening, then you can never fully understand it. 

I lived through months and months of watching people describe M Brown as a gentle giant after I saw video of him conducting a violent robbery just moments before he was shot. The MSM in Canada and the USA supported widespread violent riots that were entirely based on the gentle giant myth, which was 100% known to be false almost as soon as CNN said it. 

Then they used the gentle giant moniker again on G Floyd, while Keith Ellison hid video from the world about how Floyd actually died. 

I can't explain to you how stupid all of that was. Yet it went over your head like moon behind a thick layer of clouds. You thought the riots were justified and cool when they actually an abomination, right from the very start. You justified widespread arson, assaults and murder based on an obvious lie. 

So... I bolded this part "with a manifesto" but have yet to explain why, do you have a guess yet? 

How the F am I supposed to know which incidents had manifestos, dummy? Only the FBI gets their hands on those, and they destroy, omit, fabricate evidence whenever it suits their fancy. If the FBI don't want you to see a manifesto, you never will. If there's a manifesto they don't like, they'll just make a new one, or edit the sh1t out of it.

Buddy, when the FBI makes a declarative statement, all you know for sure is that someone's lips moved, that's it. There's no more that can possibly be gleaned from them watching them yap. 

FBI: "This guy had a manifesto and he emailed it to one guy." 🤣 Really? FYI the CIA sent an email to the FBI and guess what that email said when it got passed along to Rosemary Collyer at the FISA court...? The exact opposite of what it said when the FBI got it. So when the FBI says "He emailed his manifesto to one guy", what they actually mean is that they just gave themselves a blank cheque to lie and slanderIt means that they're going to create a narrative. It means that people like you are going to be led astray, 100%, and there's nothing anyone can do to stop it.

 

I ain't reading all that delusional paranoid garbage.

Quote

 

🤣 You just gave away your age, dummy. You were too young to be watching TV in the last half of 2014, and all of 2015 and 2016, when BLM was inciting/orchestrating/leading violent riots all over the country. Did you turn 15 in 2020? 16? 

 

LOL do you actually believe there were three years of constant rioting? Is that what the prions in your brain are making you think?

Quote

You're a 20-yr old sitting on your mom's couch getting high on weed right now, aren't you... F'ing guaranteed. Stupid child

Yeah dude, I've been posting here since 2003 when I was a zygote.

Your brain is just cooked.

Posted
22 hours ago, Black Dog said:

LOL so that's no, you don't have any evidence beyond him having a foreign-sounding last name, then

And the fact that he was a muslim. That part's important, because we're talking about muslims, right?

Quote

lol the difference between normal people and crazy people like you is the former shape their world based on information they take in while you do the exact opposite.

The difference between me and you is that I use current and historical facts about cultures to understand them, and you judge people by 1) the colour of their skin and 2) what you want to believe, based on nothing more than present woke ideology and zero facts.

Mohammed was a violent bigot, a misogynist, and a pedophile, period, and there's no denying any of that. When people follow him, that says something important about them that you just don't want to acknowledge. If people followed hitler you'd come to an instant judgement about them, but not mohammed... and they're the same people. 

Islamic cultures through the ages and even today are extremely bigoted and misogynistic, and they don't share our views on pedophilia. Look at what went on in Afghanistan when our troops were there... it's disgusting. The Ottoman Empire was extremely bigoted for 1,000 years, and committed genocides to the very end of their days. The Turks still deny the Armenian genocide, they don't care. They're not even slightly repentant. It's just who they are. Islamic state was able to ATTRACT hundreds of thousands followers by putting out videos of beheading women and burning people to death. Are you attracted to that? Is it something that you'd like to do? If so, then there's a group of people that you will get along famously with. Pakistan has committed 2 genocides in the millions in the years since WWII. They just blend in over there. They're a face in the crowd.

Quote

Do you not remember having to do that before 9/11 or are you senile?

Did you think that 911 was the first even islamic terrorist attack using planes or are you senile? 

Quote

You are simply incapable of keeping your plaque-clogged brain focussed, are you? None of this is relevant to the discussion which you started.

It's irrelevant to you because you're too stupid/ignorant to connect the dots. 

There's one group of people that we 100% know are different from everyone else. They're nothing like Buddhists, Hindus, Atheists, Christians, Jews, or anyone else. Right? Who else blows up children all over the world?

Quote

I ain't reading all that delusional paranoid garbage.

It's all 100% true, and if there was anything inaccurate in there you'd love to call it out, but you can't say sh1t about anything because, like I said, it is all true. 

What's really happening is that your confirmation bias just hijackd your brain and you lack the intestinal fortitude to dive in and face it. You're a useful id10t, not a social justice warrior, and you can't face it

Quote

Yeah dude, I've been posting here since 2003 when I was a zygote.

Your brain is just cooked.

Yeah dude, someone's been posting here with that account since 2003, when you were a zygote.

Or, your brain is just not developing properly.

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
15 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

And the fact that he was a muslim. That part's important, because we're talking about muslims, right?

For which you have no evidence. Put up or stfu.

Quote

The difference between me and you is that I use current and historical facts about cultures to understand them, and you judge people by 1) the colour of their skin and 2) what you want to believe, based on nothing more than present woke ideology and zero facts.

Mohammed was a violent bigot, a misogynist, and a pedophile, period, and there's no denying any of that. When people follow him, that says something important about them that you just don't want to acknowledge. If people followed hitler you'd come to an instant judgement about them, but not mohammed... and they're the same people. 

Islamic cultures through the ages and even today are extremely bigoted and misogynistic, and they don't share our views on pedophilia. Look at what went on in Afghanistan when our troops were there... it's disgusting. The Ottoman Empire was extremely bigoted for 1,000 years, and committed genocides to the very end of their days. The Turks still deny the Armenian genocide, they don't care. They're not even slightly repentant. It's just who they are. Islamic state was able to ATTRACT hundreds of thousands followers by putting out videos of beheading women and burning people to death. Are you attracted to that? Is it something that you'd like to do? If so, then there's a group of people that you will get along famously with. Pakistan has committed 2 genocides in the millions in the years since WWII. They just blend in over there. They're a face in the crowd.

Again: can you at least try to stay on topic lol.

Quote

Did you think that 911 was the first even islamic terrorist attack using planes or are you senile? 

There were lots of hijackings in the '70s and '80s, some of which were connected to the middle East, many of which were not.

Quote

 

It's irrelevant to you because you're too stupid/ignorant to connect the dots. 

There's one group of people that we 100% know are different from everyone else. They're nothing like Buddhists, Hindus, Atheists, Christians, Jews, or anyone else. Right? Who else blows up children all over the world?

 

Americans.

Quote

 

It's all 100% true, and if there was anything inaccurate in there you'd love to call it out, but you can't say sh1t about anything because, like I said, it is all true. 

What's really happening is that your confirmation bias just hijackd your brain and you lack the intestinal fortitude to dive in and face it. You're a useful id10t, not a social justice warrior, and you can't face it

 

No most of your shit is off-topic paranoid conspiratorial delusions that don't even connect to your own OP. Take your meds.

Quote

 

Yeah dude, someone's been posting here with that account since 2003, when you were a zygote.

Or, your brain is just not developing properly.

 

This is my new favourite insane conspiracy of yours. LMAO.

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

This is my new favourite insane conspiracy of yours. LMAO.

You can't answer any meaningful questions, and then you carry on with your drivel lol.

But you were close once in that post: when you said "Americans", you would have been right if you said "Biden". He's been known to drone-strike kids.

 

It's good to see you finally admit that you HATE America. That's why you're a leftists, and a kamala voter. 

Edited by WestCanMan

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You can't answer any meaningful questions, and then you carry on with your drivel lol.

How many times have I asked you for proof that the van incel was actually an Islamist now and every time you've ducked it so maybe stop projecting.

Quote

But you were close once in that post: when you said "Americans", you would have been right if you said "Biden". He's been known to drone-strike kids.

But not as many as Trump, who even beat Obama's numbers.

Quote

It's good to see you finally admit that you HATE America. That's why you're a leftists, and a kamala voter. 

Oh I've been saying I hate America for a long time but hat's hardly germane to the subject at hand: honky terrorism.

Posted
23 hours ago, Black Dog said:

But that's not what the parameters of this discussion are, keep up pops.

LOL...when you're wrong...why don't you man-up and admit you're wrong Pup?

  • Thanks 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
39 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

LOL...when you're wrong...why don't you man-up and admit you're wrong Pup?

what am I wrong about specifically here? Can you articulate it or are you just butting in because you need attention?

Posted
2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

How many times have I asked you for proof that the van incel was actually an Islamist now and every time you've ducked it so maybe stop projecting.

I'm talking in general. About all of them. Faisal Hussein, the guy who attacked the HoC, Minassian, the muslim who killed the soldiers in Que... All of them. 

With Faisal Hussein they went on to pretend that "his brothers, sisters and parents are muslim, but he's not" lol. The MSM will literally p!ss in your face and tell you it's raining. 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

what am I wrong about specifically here? Can you articulate it or are you just butting in because you need attention?

The issue at hand is WAY older than the last 10 years.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

The issue at hand is WAY older than the last 10 years.

I didn't say it wasn't but the OP was talking about that timeframe.

Edited by Black Dog
Posted
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I'm talking in general. About all of them. Faisal Hussein, the guy who attacked the HoC, Minassian, the muslim who killed the soldiers in Que... All of them. 

And I'm asking you to prove your claim that Minassian, specifically, was not only a Muslim but an "Islamist". Because he left a pretty clear digital trail of his motivations which had nothing to do with Islam.

Quote

With Faisal Hussein they went on to pretend that "his brothers, sisters and parents are muslim, but he's not" lol. The MSM will literally p!ss in your face and tell you it's raining. 

No one said he wasn't Muslim, dummy. He was but apparently not particularly devout.

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

No one said he wasn't Muslim, dummy. He was but apparently not particularly devout.

Of course they downplayed his ties to islam. It's formulaic:

  • If the shooter is from a majority leftist group, they weren't politically active members, weren't devout, they left no manifesto, and they were just suffering from mental health issues. 
  • If the shooter was a white male and the victims were not 100% conservative adults then they were never just "suffering from mental health issues", they are classified as avowed white supremacists if they ever said anything on social media that was deemed racist by blue-haired factcheckers, and they all had manifestos which perfectly fit the FBI/Dems' new narrative of the day. 
  • If the shooter was a white male and the victims were 100% conservative adults then they were "suffering from mental health issues", they were apolitical, and none of them had manifestos. 

This comes as a surprise to you every single time, but I wasn't born yesterday. 

 

So listen to yourself, Black Dummy. Why are you so intent on believing that their islamist beliefs never have anyhing to do with their psychotic attacks? 

There are more Sikhs, Hindus and Buddhists (combined, not each) than muslims, and how many mass-killings have they accounted for? Are they at ten (or whatever) as well? Are they at two? Surely they are just as likely to be incels or suffer mental health issues. 

Edited by WestCanMan

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...