Traitors

[Chrissy1979]

6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You have many times mentioned things about gender, and frankly you're so painfully shallow that it's literally impossible for someone to feel out of their depth with you   LOLOL. 

 

Cite one time or skulk away like the loser you are.

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Cite one time or skulk away like the loser you are.

One time that you've been so painfully shallow? Sure, here you go

Now, You have to be a special kind of b*tch to ask people to run around and cut and paste crap you already knew you said.  So there's your one freebie.  Nobody likes a sealion. 

Low effort post and no actual facts or rational argument are your specialty.  You're easily one of the least intelligent posters on the board and that includes Robosmith, you're THAT dense. 

Step up your game and people won't look down on you so much. 

[Chrissy1979]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

One time that you've been so painfully shallow? Sure, here you go

Now, You have to be a special kind of b*tch to ask people to run around and cut and paste crap you already knew you said.  So there's your one freebie.  Nobody likes a sealion. 

Low effort post and no actual facts or rational argument are your specialty.  You're easily one of the least intelligent posters on the board and that includes Robosmith, you're THAT dense. 

Step up your game and people won't look down on you so much. 

See. I never talked about gender at all.

That was a lot of words to admit you failed 

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

See. I never talked about gender at all.

 

of course you have. But given how stupid you looked at the time I guess I can understand why you would try and avoid admitting it  

Quote

That was a lot of words to admit you failed 

It was a reasonable number to prove that you did   

And again, given your reading and comprehension skills anything over three words may seem Longwood to you but it isn't to anyone else

[Chrissy1979]

9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

of course you have. But given how stupid you looked at the time I guess I can understand why you would try and avoid admitting it  

It was a reasonable number to prove that you did   

And again, given your reading and comprehension skills anything over three words may seem Longwood to you but it isn't to anyone else

You have up trying to cite an instance where I referred to gender? How embarrassing for you. I accept your admission you just rely on such things as crutches in debates because you're just not very good at this.

[CdnFox]

57 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You have up trying to cite an instance where I referred to gender? How embarrassing for you. I accept your admission you just rely on such things as crutches in debates because you're just not very good at this.

Ohh look. She asks for a cite, i provide one. Now she asks for ANOTHER one.  Then it's another and another and another. 

Yes, we all know how sealioning works.  Like  i said you have to be a real biatch to pull that kind of crap just because you can't defend yourself but... well there you go. 

This is why everyone calls you "Pissy Chrissy"     

[Chrissy1979]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Ohh look. She asks for a cite, i provide one. Now she asks for ANOTHER one.  Then it's another and another and another. 

Yes, we all know how sealioning works.  Like  i said you have to be a real biatch to pull that kind of crap just because you can't defend yourself but... well there you go. 

This is why everyone calls you "Pissy Chrissy"     

You didn't provide one. I didn't realize you were that stupid that you don't even know what citation is. 

I expect another very long-winded response that says nothing. 😆 

[CdnFox]

38 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You didn't provide one. I didn't realize you were that stupid that you don't even know what citation is. 

 

How is it not a cite? I said you were too shallow to be "in too deep" with,  you demanded i prove it, i posted an excellent example and surprise suprise, you're butthurt and it's supposedly all my fault  

Typical leftard.  You say something stupid, someone points out it's stupid, you demand they prove you said it and they do, and now you want to blame them for your stupid. 

And you still haven't denounced that rapist clinton or hillary or the dems for supporting him. Yeash. No wonder no one will marry you.  (the cat doesn't count btw. I know, you had the ceremony and all but still). 

[Chrissy1979]

The basis of your argument was an imaginary position you ascribed to me about gender. I said I never stayed any position on this topic and challenged you to cite me doing so. You tried to move the goalposts and blabbered incoherently about shallowness and Bill Clinton for a while, trying desperately to put us all to sleep so we would forget you failed.

[NAME REMOVED]

 

LOL. It's funny since it is true.

[Army Guy]

You and others on here that are sticking with the liberal plan to stop tariffs are betting on the lame horse...I mean just look at the liberals track record since they have been in office, what have they really done to unite the country, are they leaving the country better than when they got it...Do you really think justin has our best interest in mind, i mean the fact he could have retired long ago giving his party time to have a decent leadership campaign, but instead he stuck them in the back and gave them almost no time at all...

And this is the guy you're throwing your support behind the same guy voted as the worst PM ever in our history... and now because one premiere decides this is not the best course of action she is a traitor...

I can tell you this once the tariffs are in place and the liberal government puts everything on the table....if we decide to put tariffs on energy, including power and oil and gas...Canada will soon find out why this liberal policies are the wrong ones...

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

The basis of your argument was an imaginary position you ascribed to me about gender.

I Didn't make an argument. I made an observation. And it's based on my opinion of you which is a product of all the things i've seen you do and say. 

So my statement was perfectly accurate.  Sorry for your bad luck. 

there's no goal posts to move. that's the kind of person you are.  The only one attempting to change the channel here is you.  Sealioning being a specialty of yours.

And i see you coudn't explain how it wasn't a cite.   

So you don't know what an argument is, you don't know what a cite is, and you don't have a point.  

You must be a leftie