J6: An insurrection or a fedsurrection?

[User]

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

"Sure, there were a bunch of our guys involved in breaching the capitol's paper-thin defences, but they weren't under our control. Not even Epps was. It was just a coincidence that we had dozens of guys there."

If you have some other evidence to offer, let's hear it. 

[WestCanMan]

53 minutes ago, User said:

If you have some other evidence to offer, let's hear it. 

Among the dozens of FBI assets reported to be at the capitol, Ray Epps was caught on video urging people to break into the capitol both the day before and the day of the riot. 

Epps even texted to his nephew that he orchestrated the riot.

There are photos and video of Epps being at the very forefront of the rioters at the very first barricade, and even whispering instructions to one of the very first people to attack guards at the first barricade.

Then suddenly Epps, the guy who was plainly seen telling people that "they have to breach the capitol's defences" for two days, inexplicably took off. 

The guy who was seen committing sedition, and who bragged in texts on his phone that he committed sedition, wasn't charged with sedition. He wasn't charged with anything for 32 months after the mostly peaceful protest, and even then it was just a misdemeanour which he only received probabation for. 

What does that remind you of?

 

Kevin Clinesmith: FBI lawyer, fabricated evidence and then presented his false evidence to a judge to completely mislead her. He was convicted of "making a false statement" and got 1 year probation. 

Ray Epps: Operated exactly like the agent provocateurs that the FBI paid to convince people to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer. He overtly committed sedition, he freely admitted to committing sedition via a text message to his nephew, but he was never charged for sedition. The FBI never charged him with anything until after nearly 3 years of people pointing out that he blatantly committed sedition. At that point the FBI charged him with a far lesser crime, and he got 12 months probation, just like Clinesmith. 

277 people were convicted of crimes on Jan 6th and got sentenced to prison terms. Epps was guiltier than most of them. 

2 guys, 2 serious crimes committed for the FBI, both got 12 months probation. 

Epps was an FBI asset, 100%. 

Edited December 15, 2024 by WestCanMan

[User]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Among the dozens of FBI assets reported to be at the capitol, Ray Epps was caught on video urging people to break into the capitol both the day before and the day of the riot. 

What evidence do you have that Epps was an FBI asset?

 

[BeaverFever]

On 12/12/2024 at 6:11 PM, West said:

Multiple FBI agents breached the Capitol without authorization and were not even authorized to be at the J6 event

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-ig-reveals-number-fbi-confidential-sources-ground-during-jan-6

Crazy

 

Dumbass. 
 

1) its says informants not agents. Of the thousands of MAGA losers who swarmed the Capitol, 26 were informants snitching on their fellow MAGA losers 

2) It doesn’t say they breached the Capitol it say they were outside the Capitol

 

Seriously this is how you MAGAtards work distorting the truth at every turn whether through stupidity and dishonesty 

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

Dumbass. 
 

1) its says informants not agents. Of the thousands of MAGA losers who swarmed the Capitol, 26 were informants snitching on their fellow MAGA losers 

2) It doesn’t say they breached the Capitol it say they were outside the Capitol

 

Seriously this is how you MAGAtards work distorting the truth at every turn whether through stupidity and dishonesty 

Dumbass.

11 of them breached capitol defences to enter the restricted area.

3 others went into the capitol itself.

3 of the 26 FBI assets in attendance were "assigned by the FBI" to be there (at the rally), and one of those 3 entered the capitol building itself. (remember when it was "a conspiracy theory" that any FBI assets were even known to be there???? Of course not)

So West is correct to say that dozens "weren't authorized to be there", based on that article. 

West is also correct to say that multiple FBI assets breached the capitol because more than one is "multiple". 

 

But let's be honest, that's just what the FBI is admitting to.

If the FBI had 75 people there, or even 200 people there, it would take a long time to figure out that there were "more than the 26 that they admitted to being there".

How long does it take to even prove that even 1 person there was an FBI asset? Then another, then another....  

Until people independently prove that there was a 27th FBI asset there, there's no proof that the FBI was even lying. You gotta admit: by saying that there were 26 there it makes it super hard to ever prove them wrong. 

And the FBI was obviously lying, because they lie about everything. Name 1 thing that they haven't lied about lately....

You'd have to be born yesterday to just believe anyone in the FBI when they're talking, especially the guy - Horowitz - who's mostly to blame for all of the FBI's lies, crimes and election influencing of the past 12 years.