Kamala's Billions

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

Better than Kamala? I would say that most candidates could have done better. Same thing with Hilary. I mean when Pew Research pools reveal that Hilary was the most unpopular first lady in the history of the White House, it should have been a hint not to run with her. In 2016, Trump did not win, as much Hilary lost. The election was hers to lose, and she did.

With Kamala, it would have been a miracle if she won. The election was pretty much the American people either choosing or rejecting Trump. Biden should ahve rode with a better vice president. Even now, her inner circle advisers are proving that not only Kamala was the wrong candidate to go with, but how clueless the Democrats are, when it comes to competing in elections. 

 

Joe beat Trump. Who are you suggesting can do that NOW?

[gatomontes99]

2 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

They aren't going to run with AOC.

If they do, that just proves that the Democratic party needs to be eradicated.

We really need to save this post.

[NAME REMOVED]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Joe beat Trump. Who are you suggesting can do that NOW?

I can probably think of 6 or 7 people 

[CdnFox]

43 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

I can probably think of 6 or 7 people 

Well it'll have to remain hypothetical because trump won't be running again.

Which presents new problems. The next guy might turn out to be very smart and be able to appeal to all of the things trump did but put a lot more polish on the package and appeal to an even wider base.

The problem with the left whether it's in Canada or the united states is that they tend to look for a white knight. They want the shining armor and the white horse and this person will just ride in and through sheer personality will win the election for them.

But especially right now with the people of America and even Canada are really wanting is policy. Competency. A solid plan. A path forward that leads to real prosperity.

The left should not be asking who can beat the next trump. The left should be asking what can they offer and put on the table that Americans will want more than anything else and then they can start talking about who can sell that

[ironstone]

9 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

I can probably think of 6 or 7 people 

Who?

The Democrats have to decide if they'll keep moving even farther to the left or perhaps a bit back towards the centre( but still far from it).

I think Gavin Newsom might be considered a favorite even though he is also far-left and hasn't been good for California. When they picked wacky Tim Walz over Josh Shapiro, it meant they wanted to go farther left.

Hillary may even run again.

Edited November 30, 2024 by ironstone

[robosmith]

12 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

I can probably think of 6 or 7 people 

Who is the TOP prospect. After that, no one else matters.

3 hours ago, ironstone said:

Who?

The Democrats have to decide if they'll keep moving even farther to the left or perhaps a bit back towards the centre( but still far from it).

I think Gavin Newsom might be considered a favorite even though he is also far-left and hasn't been good for California. When they picked wacky Tim Walz over Josh Shapiro, it meant they wanted to go farther left.

Hillary may even run again.

Hillary has done virtually nothing to raise her prospects.

[NAME REMOVED]

Just now, robosmith said:

Who is the TOP prospect. After that, no one else matters.

Personally I would have went with Pete Buttigieg.

I am aware that he is gay, and one can say if American would accept a gay President.  However, he never came across as weak, and could school anyone in a debate. I think America would have forgot about it after he  schooled Trump in a debate. Kamala's problem was that she had alcohol issues, and looked soft and weak to the Americans public, and that to the American public, was more important than being a con man.

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, ironstone said:

 

Hillary may even run again.

LOL  god help us all  

I think we would see Michelle Obama run before we saw Hillary. I think even the democrats are realizing that excessively old candidates aren't a great idea.

Honestly I don't think they have anybody that's going to get the job done. The party has become infested with those on the left who would run exactly the same campaign but Kamala did and would not appeal to Americans for exactly the same reasons. They need to become about honesty and truth and facts and most importantly a clear vision for the future economically and socially without the woke nonsense that they can clearly articulate. 

They're still believing they should be woke and it's all about personalities and giggling.  They're never going to succeed with that. 

[ironstone]

This is where I heard about Hillary possibly running again. 

Could be Chunk Yogurt too😉

[WestCanMan]

On 11/26/2024 at 2:08 PM, Fluffypants said:

How the hell do you spend that much money in 3 months and end up in debt?

You spend like a liberal. I.e., liberally. It's what they do. 

9 minutes ago, ironstone said:

This is where I heard about Hillary possibly running again. 

Could be Chunk Yogurt too😉

Somehow Obama seems about as authentic saying the word "brothas" as Biden would lol. 

[WestCanMan]

🤣

[Fluffypants]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

🤣

Kamala was talking like she was sitting at bar with her friend that just got cheated on and after a few drinks tells her how he isn't worth it and don't let him take your power.