gatomontes99 Posted January 15 Author Report Posted January 15 1 minute ago, Black Dog said: So to be clear you also don't think the military should be looking for any people with extremist beliefs in their ranks? Now is that because you don't thinks such people exist or is it because you are sympathetic to the cause of right wing extremism? No. What i said was you think that anyone in the military is an extremist. We aren't going to stop beating our wives because we never started and we arent going to kick out extremists because your definition of extremist is bullshìt. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
User Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 1 minute ago, Black Dog said: So to be clear you also don't think the military should be looking for any people with extremist beliefs in their ranks? Now is that because you don't thinks such people exist or is it because you are sympathetic to the cause of right wing extremism? Did you even watch the hearing? Hegseth addressed the stupidity of this witch hunt, they found something like 200 people most of whom were extremists because of their gang affiliations. Quote
Black Dog Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: No. What i said was you think that anyone in the military is an extremist. That's not true. Now answer the question. Quote We aren't going to stop beating our wives because we never started and we arent going to kick out extremists because your definition of extremist is bullshìt. So you don't believe there are extremists in the military then? Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 15 Author Report Posted January 15 3 hours ago, User said: Yeah, and you should have to use a breathalyzer that we can all monitor before you post here... What evidence do you have that Hegseth is a drunkard? I'm kind of shocked that he would admit his posts are of a sober mind. At least if he was drunk or high he'd have an excuse. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
User Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 5 minutes ago, Black Dog said: So you don't believe there are extremists in the military then? The question is, how big of a problem is this that we must go on a witch hunt to find them? The evidence I have seen so far shows there is less extremism in the military than in the general public. So... what is your point? 5 minutes ago, Black Dog said: That's not true. Now answer the question. Demands the coward hiding from me. Quote
WestCanMan Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 (edited) 6 hours ago, Black Dog said: what the f*ck are you blubbering about, you crack brained shitbird? How do you know? Are you looking at his shirtless twink thirst traps hoping to feel the slightest stirring in your shrivelled little pecker? You and godzilla sure like changing the topic to cokk, when you're not talking about how it's ok for Biden to shower with his daughter and kiss little children on the mouth, or how cool it is for drag queens to dance for little children... I'd say that you two should get a room, but I'm afraid to think who you guys would drag in there with you. Edited January 15 by WestCanMan Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
CdnFox Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 18 minutes ago, Black Dog said: I'm enjoying your mommy's basement actually. LOL so you figure i'm this old guy.... then make a joke about sleeping with my obviosly older mom. Well that says a lot more about you than me kiddo 1 hour ago, Black Dog said: I don't know why you do this to yourself, you know I always bring receipts. On 1/6/2025 at 10:51 AM, CdnFox said: Non whites were absolutely allowed, there were no restrictions they could come in in whatever numbers they wanted and frequently did. And the populations prove it. Ummm.... sorry guy but lots of non whites did indeed come in for most of our history as i noted. And the populations do prove it. I get it, you're hoping that quoting out of context will change the truth YOUR claim was that non whites were not allowed for "most of our history". I said that they WERE allowed. And the were. Tens of thousands of chinese alone never mind blacks or japanese etc. And a tax is not a restriction. So i was absolutely correct. For most of our history they were allowed in without restriction. But i love that you're now posting your own losses and trying to pass them off as something else 1 hour ago, DUI_Offender said: There is no point in arguing with @CdnFox. For starters, he is not even Canadian. His loyalty is with Russia. Furthermore, when he loses arguments, which is the norm, he will resort to childish antics, like calling his adversaries "liars." He is predictable as a clock. Awww kid, Only when you lie Usually i call you drunk But only when you've been drinking And i see you're still going around BEGGING people to not talk to me. ROFLMAO! Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
CdnFox Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 1 hour ago, Black Dog said: Quote Your comment was that only white people were allowed into Canada for most of our history. I said that was wrong. Turned out I was correct and you were mistaken. Now your butters. That's not what I said, Forgot this one Yes it was. What you said very specifically was that For most of our history, only white people were allowed I said that was not true, you had a hissy fit and pointed out that for 20 years or so there was a tax on chinese and for about 20 years there was a ban on certain races And you were wrong. As i pointed out with cites and facts. Hey why not provide a link to the original conversation and people can see for themselves? You looked like a complete tard Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Black Dog Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 (edited) 15 hours ago, CdnFox said: LOL so you figure i'm this old guy.... then make a joke about sleeping with my obviosly older mom. Well that says a lot more about you than me kiddo lol I bet people still give you wedgies in the hallway you f*cking dork. Quote Ummm.... sorry guy but lots of non whites did indeed come in for most of our history as i noted. And the populations do prove it. LOL i like how your fixated on this when the real point is your false claim that there were no restrictions. Absolutely cringe. Quote I get it, you're hoping that quoting out of context will change the truth YOUR claim was that non whites were not allowed for "most of our history". I said that they WERE allowed. And the were. Tens of thousands of chinese alone never mind blacks or japanese etc. "wITh nO rEsTRicTionS" Quote And a tax is not a restriction. So i was absolutely correct. For most of our history they were allowed in without restriction. The head tax was a restriction, one specifically designed to restrict the number of Chinese immigrants. The Chinese Exclusion act was a restriction. The Immigration Act of 1910 also expanded the list of prohibited immigrants. These restrictions were in place from 1885 to 1968, 83 of the first 100 years of the country's existence. Quote But i love that you're now posting your own losses and trying to pass them off as something else I can't believe you're still digging this hole for yourself, you are truly one of the saddest human beings I've ever encountered. 15 hours ago, CdnFox said: Forgot this one Yes it was. What you said very specifically was that For most of our history, only white people were allowed I said that was not true, you had a hissy fit and pointed out that for 20 years or so there was a tax on chinese and for about 20 years there was a ban on certain races And you were wrong. As i pointed out with cites and facts. Hey why not provide a link to the original conversation and people can see for themselves? You looked like a complete tard LOl you're still going on about something that was clearly and obviously hyperbole because you're a sad little loser? You also didn't provide any cites and facts, as usual. Finally I already linked to the original convo you stupid muppet. Edited January 16 by Black Dog Quote
User Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 50 minutes ago, Black Dog said: can't believe you're still digging this hole for yourself, you are truly one of the saddest human beings I've ever encountered. Again, you are the coward hiding from me who thinks a fake vagina makes someone a real woman. Quote
CdnFox Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 (edited) 2 hours ago, Black Dog said: lol I bet people still give you wedgies in the hallway you f*cking dork. Sounds like the voice of experience talking Get a lot of wedgies at school so it was on your mind i take it? Quote LOL i like how your fixated on this when the real point is your false claim that there were no restrictions. Absolutely cringe. Sorry kid but i was right. You claimed only whites were allowed for most of our history. i pointed out that for most of our history anyone was allowed with no restrictions. Turned out to be true Quote The head tax was a restriction, one specifically designed to restrict the number of Chinese immigrants. Nonsense. If you read the hansard records it was not a restriction at all. The concern was that people who were coming here from china to work would have no vested interest in the country and would simply turn around and leave after making a certain amount of money even if they were naturalized. The tax was to make sure that people took it seriously when they were coming, but they could still come. It didn't restrict anyone. Literally anyone who was willing to pay the tax was welcome to come. No restriction. It's like claiming that the boat ticket to get over here was a restriction. These are just costs associated with the move, they're not restrictions by any reasonable sense of the word. Today we have actual restrictions in that we don't let everybody in. And we have a point system to help make sure the people we do let in are the best choice. But we didn't have anything like that then. So what's happened here is you lost and you lost badly and now you are so buthurt that you are trying to recreate the argument you've already lost in a way that you hope will allow you to win Your claim was that for most of Canada's history only white people were allowed. That was your claim. As to it being hyperbole, you've attempted to claim it's true all the way along. So clearly not hyperbole or you would just have said "You're right i was exaggerating. " That was absolutely not true. As i pointed out. For most of our history there was no restrictions and non whites have been welcome. You've spent pages now trying to deny that simple fact. Sorry kid, you lose. Edited January 16 by CdnFox Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Black Dog Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 30 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Sounds like the voice of experience talking Get a lot of wedgies at school so it was on your mind i take it? Nope but I stuffed a lot of losers into garbage cans and lockers, which is how I can smell the loser on you. Quote Sorry kid but i was right. You claimed only whites were allowed for most of our history. i pointed out that for most of our history anyone was allowed with no restrictions. Turned out to be true Which is a false claim. Quote Nonsense. If you read the hansard records it was not a restriction at all. The concern was that people who were coming here from china to work would have no vested interest in the country and would simply turn around and leave after making a certain amount of money even if they were naturalized. The tax was to make sure that people took it seriously when they were coming, but they could still come. link or stfu. This is transparently bullshit since the head tax wasn't applied to any other race or ethnic group to whom such concerns would also apply. "Beginning with the Chinese Immigration Act of 1885, a head tax of $50 was imposed on Chinese newcomers in an attempt to deter immigration. Not content with the tax's effect, the government subsequently raised the amount to $100 in 1900, and then to $500 - the equivalent of two years' wages - in 1903. This tax remained in place until 1923, when the government amended the Chinese Immigration Act and effectively banned most Chinese immigrants until 1947."-Stephen Harper Quote It didn't restrict anyone. Literally anyone who was willing to pay the tax was welcome to come. No restriction. It restricted anyone who couldn't afford the tax, which was the whole point. Quote It's like claiming that the boat ticket to get over here was a restriction. These are just costs associated with the move, they're not restrictions by any reasonable sense of the word. The literal definition of restriction is "a limiting condition or measure, especially a legal one" which would apply here. Quote Today we have actual restrictions in that we don't let everybody in. And we have a point system to help make sure the people we do let in are the best choice. But we didn't have anything like that then. So what's happened here is you lost and you lost badly and now you are so buthurt that you are trying to recreate the argument you've already lost in a way that you hope will allow you to win It's very funny when you do this when everyone can see you're wrong, a liar and, most of all, a sad little b!tch who cant man up. Quote Your claim was that for most of Canada's history only white people were allowed. That was your claim. As to it being hyperbole, you've attempted to claim it's true all the way along. So clearly not hyperbole or you would just have said "You're right i was exaggerating. " I said it was hyperbole from the moment you started crying about it you dumb b!tch. What is true is Canada restricted non white immigration heavily over the first 100 years of its existence, which every kid in social studies knows but i guess they didn't teach that in your dipshit school. Quote That was absolutely not true. As i pointed out. For most of our history there was no restrictions and non whites have been welcome. You've spent pages now trying to deny that simple fact. Sorry kid, you lose. Sorry you old loser, you're lying again and restating your false claims over and over again doesn't make them true. Quote
User Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 1 hour ago, Black Dog said: Nope but I stuffed a lot of losers into garbage cans and lockers, which is how I can smell the loser on you. Says the coward hiding from me. Quote
CdnFox Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 1 hour ago, Black Dog said: Nope but I stuffed a lot of losers into garbage cans and lockers, which is how I can smell the loser on you. Which is a false claim. link or stfu. This is transparently bullshit since the head tax wasn't applied to any other race or ethnic group to whom such concerns would also apply. "Beginning with the Chinese Immigration Act of 1885, a head tax of $50 was imposed on Chinese newcomers in an attempt to deter immigration. Not content with the tax's effect, the government subsequently raised the amount to $100 in 1900, and then to $500 - the equivalent of two years' wages - in 1903. This tax remained in place until 1923, when the government amended the Chinese Immigration Act and effectively banned most Chinese immigrants until 1947."-Stephen Harper It restricted anyone who couldn't afford the tax, which was the whole point. The literal definition of restriction is "a limiting condition or measure, especially a legal one" which would apply here. It's very funny when you do this when everyone can see you're wrong, a liar and, most of all, a sad little b!tch who cant man up. I said it was hyperbole from the moment you started crying about it you dumb b!tch. What is true is Canada restricted non white immigration heavily over the first 100 years of its existence, which every kid in social studies knows but i guess they didn't teach that in your dipshit school. Sorry you old loser, you're lying again and restating your false claims over and over again doesn't make them true. LOL - sounds like you were the one one who got bullied and now you're trying to cope with it by pretending you're the bully for a change That's probably not the healthiest way to deal with it. In any case, you're welcome to provide a link to the whole thread (i noticed you dodged that last time i mentioned it) and people can read for themselves. You said that for most of Canada's history only europeans were allowed. I said you were wrong. Turned out you were wrong. Now you're butthurt about it. This is how you behave every single time - you say something stupid, you get proven wrong and despite being clearly wrong you try to continue to argue lying your ass of and trying to reframe the issue. You were wrong. FOr most of canada's history non whites were allowed in just fine. You lose. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted January 17 Author Report Posted January 17 13 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said: Dude that drinks over dude that wears lipstick? Definite upgrade. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
User Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 @DUI_Offender can no longer (if he ever really could) logical fact-based arguments. Quote
Black Dog Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Dude that drinks over dude that wears lipstick? Definite upgrade. lol Quote
User Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 28 minutes ago, Black Dog said: lol You are not smart enough or honest enough to even know what this is a picture of. You are stupid enough to laugh at it though. Quote
Black Dog Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 21 minutes ago, User said: You are not smart enough or honest enough to even know what this is a picture of. You are stupid enough to laugh at it though. It's some twink rubbing his pecker on the 9/11 memorial. Quote
User Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 2 minutes ago, Black Dog said: It's some twink rubbing his pecker on the 9/11 memorial. Of course that is what you would think... because you an ignorant person. Quote
Black Dog Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 14 minutes ago, User said: Of course that is what you would think... because you an ignorant person. Picture doesn't lie even if you do. Quote
User Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 Just now, Black Dog said: Picture doesn't lie even if you do. Like I said, you are ignorant and dishonest. Most of the time a coward too. Quote
Black Dog Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 (edited) 18 minutes ago, User said: Like I said, you are ignorant and dishonest. Most of the time a coward too. Aw sweetie I thought you'd be happy you're finally getting some attention after you've been crying all over the board about how nobody wuvs you. Dipshit. Edited January 17 by Black Dog Quote
CdnFox Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 40 minutes ago, Black Dog said: It's some twink rubbing his pecker on the 9/11 memorial. Once again, you're losing an argument with @User and you go to the homosexual reference (this time with pics you think of as sexual). Every time. "i'm losing! What can save me now? I know - Homosexuality!!!" Yeash. Learn how to debate. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.