Why Would Our So Called Gov't Impose Tariffs On Ourselves MP Pierre Poilievre?

[Political Smash]

 Because they work for the WEF divide and conquer you will own nothing and be happy agenda always conspiring against the the well being of the majority of Canadian citizens (with exception of especially liberal insiders) and so they continue to screw Canadian citizens while robbing us blind.

 

 When Justin Trudeau and his party of Liberal liars claim to believe something why would the majority of Canadian citizens even entertain the idea that they are not lying when they claim to believe the rubbish they feed everyone when they prove to lie and deceive so very often?

 

 Every time they claim to be doing something for the citizens of Canada, they simply leave out something "bad" for the citizens of Canada "for the WEF sick agenda."

 

 Why would anyone trust liars who value a climate hoax used to rob Canadians of a decent future more than they value the well being and safety of Canadian citizens? The majority of Canadians never voted for anyone to rob Canadians of a decent future and value a climate hoax more than they value the lives of the majority of Canadian citizens. To even imply that the majority of Canadian citizens ever did is an oxy m0ron. Again, of the entire Earth's surface area, not even 30 percent of the surface area is land. Humans only occupy 10 percent of that land which means that humans only occupy 3% of the entire Earth's surface area and not one person globally has ever proven with even so much as a  shred of validity that 3% of the entire Earth's surface area occupied by humans raises the Earth's atmospheric temperature even so much as 0.000001 degree yet they keep lying compulsively and obsessively of a climate crisis caused by humans and use such lies to rob us blind while detouring businesses from being successful as their asinine motives drive businesses out of Canada I find quite obvious to deliberately further rob Canadians of a decent future. Let alone caused by humans, I have never even seen any proof of a climate crisis over the years but instead I saw Catherine McKenna when Minister of the Environment remove over a hundred years of Canadian climate recorded history citing it as unreliable and again I state all these years later they cited it as unreliable because it exposes that their climate crisis is a hoax used to suit their sick WEF divide and conquer with lies and deceptions agenda.

 

 Sure Trudeau's carbon tax reduces carbon emissions because it kills Canadian citizens who otherwise live a breathe Just ask the current Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault who swears up and down it works and now you know why quite factually. They value a climate hoax more than they value the lives of Canadian citizens and for this, yet another reason, have no business holding office betraying the well being and safety of Canadian citizens.

 

 The Liberal and NDP coalition have worked so hard to rob Canadians of a future how is it not the duty of Canadian citizens to make sure Canadian citizens rob Liberals and NDP of everything that they and their families have in the near future when they so very eagerly without hesitation are robbing the general population of Canadian citizens including our children of everything especially of a future for years now while distracting with their lies and deceptions fabricated as what they claim to believe? Why shouldn't Canadian citizens feel obligated to thrown them in prison while labelling them haters for speaking against Canadian citizens robbing them blind when they have so eagerly been doing such to Canadian citizens for years now?!

 

 I am against the Liberal NDP coalition and their rubbish that they push upon Canadian citizens and our families but perhaps the way to end their madness is by placing the threat that they put on the majority of Canadian citizens upon them and their families! How would they like for themselves and their families to have no future while they starve and go homeless as they are doing to us Canadian citizens and our children under many pathetic lies and deceptions they use as guises to screw us all in every way they appear to be able to think of now?

 

 It's my pleasure to give you all something to think about as I continue to stand strong for the well being and safety of the citizens of Canada as I have for 24 and ½ years now!

 

 Again, I love and care about everyone but that doesn't mean your actions do not disgust me and nor does it mean that your ignorance doesn't infuriate me and nor does it mean you shouldn't pay the price for destroying the well being, sanity and decent future of Canadian citizens like the Liberals and NDP deliberately have for years now in multiple ways as I have pointed out multiple examples time and time again for almost a decade now!

 

This title and release was inspired by Pierre Poilievre's YouTube channel's video titled "Why would Trudeau raise tariffs on ourselves?" which Pierre Poilievre released Nov. 6th 2024.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQ_qxFj1TW4

 

love

 

Primary Factual Fundamentalist

World Class Activist

David Jeffrey Spetch

Owen Sound Ontario Canada

Ps. Be good, be strong!

[Nationalist]

I couldn't agree more.

Good post.

[SkyHigh]

8 hours ago, Political Smash said:

Because they work for the WEF

And because you start your post with Alex Jones talking points, the rest can just be ignored.

But aren't you worried that Soros will read this and come after you?

[Nationalist]

25 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

And because you start your post with Alex Jones talking points, the rest can just be ignored.

But aren't you worried that Soros will read this and come after you?

Ok...prove we have a climate crisis. 

I'll wait...

[SkyHigh]

3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Ok...prove we have a climate crisis. 

I'll wait...

Did I say anything about a climate crisis?

I said that using Alex Jones level conspiracy theories makes one look like a raving mad man.

Are you afraid of Klaus Schwab?

 

[Nationalist]

2 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

Did I say anything about a climate crisis?

I said that using Alex Jones level conspiracy theories makes one look like a raving mad man.

Are you afraid of Klaus Schwab?

 

No. Are you afraid of Alex Jones?

[SkyHigh]

49 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

No. Are you afraid of Alex Jones?

As much as I am with of the homeless crazy dude yelling "The End is Nigh" on the street corner, so not at all 

You on the other hand said you "couldn't agree more" with a post that began with WEF, globalist nonsense, effectively encouraging the aforementioned crazy dude on the corner.

Do you think Alex Jones (who claims to get downloads directly from god, explaining the globalists plots) is in any way, shape or form credible?

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, SkyHigh said:

As much as I am with of the homeless crazy dude yelling "The End is Nigh" on the street corner, so not at all 

You on the other hand said you "couldn't agree more" with a post that began with WEF, globalist nonsense, effectively encouraging the aforementioned crazy dude on the corner.

Do you think Alex Jones (who claims to get downloads directly from god, explaining the globalists plots) is in any way, shape or form credible?

Mr. or Mrs. High. Whichever the case may or may not be...

1. The OP by @Political Smash doen not mention Alex Jones. You have tried to derail the thread with his invocation. 

2. The OP is about the climate laws and regulations imposed by the Canadian Liberals. So let's try real hard to stay on topic...Mkaaayyy?

Further to that, I ask you again..."prove we have a climate crisis"? You can't. Nobody can. And that...young Padewan...is the problem.

In REALITY...not a single peer reviewed scientific document will proclaim a "climate crisis". Why? It's simply not a crisis. It's a "potential" issue and perhaps...and that's a very big "perhaps"...even a crisis. But TODAY it's noted that the average global temperature has risen over the last century...that would be 4 generations...or more...at about .2 degrees PER DECADE. That...my disingenuous young Padewan...a crisis does not make.!

The "green" movement is nothing more than just another scare tactic to keep mindless slumps in a constant state of panic, in order to make them willing dupes. Frankly, Pixie-Dust and his whole Gawd-forsaken cabinet should be jailed for the undue suffering they've imposed on Canadians...

WITH A BLATANT LIE!

Now...young Padewan...the question remains...

Prove there's a climate crisis.

Edited November 7, 2024 by Nationalist

[Legato]

3 hours ago, SkyHigh said:

And because you start your post with Alex Jones talking points, the rest can just be ignored.

But aren't you worried that Soros will read this and come after you?

So because you start your post with WEF talking points, the rest can be ignored.

Soros already has you bought and paid for.

[Nationalist]

17 minutes ago, Legato said:

So because you start your post with WEF talking points, the rest can be ignored.

Soros already has you bought and paid for.

And I doubt he even understands that.

[herbie]

The striking chorus of cheers from the dimwits so stupid they believe tariffs are something you impose on domestic goods.
The only thing remotely similar was the tax on manufacturers that was removed over 30 years ago.

18 hours ago, Political Smash said:

Why would anyone trust liars who value a climate hoax

Your post instantly became shit unworthy of reading the moment you included those ignorant words.

[Political Smash]

On 11/7/2024 at 7:31 AM, SkyHigh said:

And because you start your post with Alex Jones talking points, the rest can just be ignored.

But aren't you worried that Soros will read this and come after you?

You ignore it because you can't contest it with even so much as a shred of validity as you yourself so eagerly demonstrates like all climate crisis hoaxers.

On 11/7/2024 at 8:05 AM, SkyHigh said:

Did I say anything about a climate crisis?

I said that using Alex Jones level conspiracy theories makes one look like a raving mad man.

Are you afraid of Klaus Schwab?

 

The fact that not one person globally has shared evidence that 3% of the Earth's surface area occupied by humans raises the Earth's atmospheric temperature even so much as 0.000001 degree yet we have a bunch of radical climate hoaxers lying to people claiming that humans are the cause of a climate crisis used to rob us of a future is not a theory thus reveals Sky High a delusional liar certainly doesn't reflect me as a conspiracy theorist in any way shape or form. Of which I have never seen factual evidence of any climate crisis (even aside from their claim that humans are he cause) to begin with.

On 11/7/2024 at 10:49 AM, Legato said:

So because you start your post with WEF talking points, the rest can be ignored.

Soros already has you bought and paid for.

Good and appearingly legitimate point being I am not all that familiar with Sky highs rhetoric but it looks like it is likely on the mark.

23 hours ago, herbie said:

The striking chorus of cheers from the dimwits so stupid they believe tariffs are something you impose on domestic goods.
The only thing remotely similar was the tax on manufacturers that was removed over 30 years ago.

Your post instantly became shit unworthy of reading the moment you included those ignorant words.

Tariffs raise the cost and so does the climate crisis hoax tax so which part of that do you not understand which is why Pierre brought it up in the first place and what relevance does your rhetoric on tax on manufacturers removed over 30 years ago have when manufacturers are paying carbon taxes too?

 

Both ways we are under threat of losing business in Canada.

 

Some people are so desperate to try and make irrelevant jibber the issue it's very laughable to see them make imbeciles of themselves to try and detour others of becoming aware of what they so eagerly try to hide from the general public because they do not want the general public to become aware because then the general public are not so easily shat upon when aware of what these radicals try to hide..

Edited November 8, 2024 by Political Smash

[Political Smash]

Ok, I have taken the time to respond to several posts on several threads as being homeless, life has become somewhat difficult when it comes to keeping up with certain things such as responding here of which I do miss and will try and make time to more frequently as I am soon to complete my shelter.

 

Getting cold out there, not inviting for me to sit outside at a public building and do work in such a way so basically for the most part I have to wait for a public office to be open and must be available (no survival priorities etc. to take care of) 

 

Ah boo hoo, yeah I know lmao. 🙃 I'll be back before long to see what else there is. Take care.

Edited November 8, 2024 by Political Smash

[herbie]

Your climate denial does not make you a Conservative, it makes you a stupid person that votes conservative. As does your opposition to a carbon tax without any alternative your statements show you actually desire to increase emissions in spite of all evidence in front of your own face.

Suggesting and acting on things that are contrary to your own interest is a definition of mental instability

[SkyHigh]

On 11/7/2024 at 7:49 AM, Legato said:

So because you start your post with WEF talking points, the rest can be ignored.

Soros already has you bought and paid for.

Exactly, that's how logic works.

Even if the conclusion is correct (I'm not saying it is or is not in this case) if it doesn't follow from the premise then the entire argument is fallacious and does not merit reflection. 

Here's an example. Probably the most known syllogism goes as follows:

P1: All men are mortal 

P2: Socrates is a man

Conclusion : Socrates is mortal 

You can see this is both a sound and valid argument because, if the premises are true the conclusion must be true 

Now if I say 

P1: All men are mortal 

P2: Socrates is a man

Conclusion : when it rains puddles form on the street 

You can now see that the conclusion does not follow from the premises , so although it is true puddles form after rain, the argument itself has no merit 

😄Be scared little man, I do work for Soros and I've sent the WEF to your house. You'll be in a black site by tomorrow for daring to question the new world order.

 

 

[Legato]

12 hours ago, SkyHigh said:

Exactly, that's how logic works.

Even if the conclusion is correct (I'm not saying it is or is not in this case) if it doesn't follow from the premise then the entire argument is fallacious and does not merit reflection. 

Here's an example. Probably the most known syllogism goes as follows:

P1: All men are mortal 

P2: Socrates is a man

Conclusion : Socrates is mortal 

You can see this is both a sound and valid argument because, if the premises are true the conclusion must be true 

Now if I say 

P1: All men are mortal 

P2: Socrates is a man

Conclusion : when it rains puddles form on the street 

You can now see that the conclusion does not follow from the premises , so although it is true puddles form after rain, the argument itself has no merit 

😄Be scared little man, I do work for Soros and I've sent the WEF to your house. You'll be in a black site by tomorrow for daring to question the new world order.

 

 

well the examples given are ex ample. Not providing ample substance but only silly gisms is a definite trait of WEF inspired talking points.

Then you have the temerity to use Socrates name in vain, shame on you.  

[SkyHigh]

8 hours ago, Legato said:

well the examples given are ex ample. Not providing ample substance but only silly gisms is a definite trait of WEF inspired talking points.

Then you have the temerity to use Socrates name in vain, shame on you.  

Read a book nimrod 

[SkyHigh]

9 hours ago, Legato said:

well the examples given are ex ample. Not providing ample substance but only silly gisms is a definite trait of WEF inspired talking points.

Then you have the temerity to use Socrates name in vain, shame on you.  

I do sympathize with you  logic is difficult for people like you with diminished mental capacities.

 

Edited December 16, 2024 by SkyHigh

[Legato]

1 hour ago, SkyHigh said:

Read a book nimrod 

This is a Nimrod

[Legato]

14 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

I do sympathize with you  logic is difficult for people like you with diminished mental capacities.

 

Thank you for the sympathy. It is a long time since I needed Boolean, although I don't remember any silly gisms in the truth tables. You must have read the Brian Aldiss version.

[Political Smash]

On 11/8/2024 at 5:45 PM, herbie said:

Your climate denial does not make you a Conservative, it makes you a stupid person that votes conservative. As does your opposition to a carbon tax without any alternative your statements show you actually desire to increase emissions in spite of all evidence in front of your own face.

Suggesting and acting on things that are contrary to your own interest is a definition of mental instability

Yet you like all other climate crisis hoaxers fail to prove the 3% of the Earth's surface area occupied by humans raises the Earth's atmospheric temperature even such a small margin as 0.000001 degree yet you continue to try and propagate lies you can't even prove in the first place. 

 

I do not deny climate or that the climate changes, we have winter, spring, summer and autumn with snow, rain, sun with a various range of temperatures long before the climate crisis hoax even came along go figure.

Edited December 18, 2024 by Political Smash

[taxme]

On 11/7/2024 at 7:38 AM, Nationalist said:

Mr. or Mrs. High. Whichever the case may or may not be...

1. The OP by @Political Smash doen not mention Alex Jones. You have tried to derail the thread with his invocation. 

2. The OP is about the climate laws and regulations imposed by the Canadian Liberals. So let's try real hard to stay on topic...Mkaaayyy?

Further to that, I ask you again..."prove we have a climate crisis"? You can't. Nobody can. And that...young Padewan...is the problem.

In REALITY...not a single peer reviewed scientific document will proclaim a "climate crisis". Why? It's simply not a crisis. It's a "potential" issue and perhaps...and that's a very big "perhaps"...even a crisis. But TODAY it's noted that the average global temperature has risen over the last century...that would be 4 generations...or more...at about .2 degrees PER DECADE. That...my disingenuous young Padewan...a crisis does not make.!

The "green" movement is nothing more than just another scare tactic to keep mindless slumps in a constant state of panic, in order to make them willing dupes. Frankly, Pixie-Dust and his whole Gawd-forsaken cabinet should be jailed for the undue suffering they've imposed on Canadians...

WITH A BLATANT LIE!

Now...young Padewan...the question remains...

Prove there's a climate crisis.

He cannot prove that there is any climate change going on as serious as they like to make it out to be. Half of Miami was supposed to be under water by 2020, according to liar Al Gore. As if the big lie about covid was not enough for them, they now have something else to panic over. Climate change. These stupid imbeciles never learn anything. 

[taxme]

4 hours ago, Political Smash said:

Yet you like all other climate crisis hoaxers fail to prove the 3% of the Earth's surface area occupied by humans raises the Earth's atmospheric temperature even such a small margin as 0.000001 degree yet you continue to try and propagate lies you can't even prove in the first place. 

 

I do not deny climate or that the climate changes, we have winter, spring, summer and autumn with snow, rain, sun with a various range of temperatures long before the climate crisis hoax even came along go figure.

From my window and the casual trips that i take around town, i have not noted any real big climate changes going on. All appears to be normal to me. 

[herbie]

One instance of the phrase "climate hoaxers" brands the poster as a totally ignorant tool incapable of reason.
As you do not realize that, it marks you a dullard among that crowd.

[Nationalist]

11 hours ago, herbie said:

One instance of the phrase "climate hoaxers" brands the poster as a totally ignorant tool incapable of reason.
As you do not realize that, it marks you a dullard among that crowd.

Or you a monumental dupe.

One or the other...