The Only Patriotic Choice for President

[WestCanMan]

On 10/4/2024 at 11:53 PM, WestCanMan said:

From CdnFox's article:

• "Democratic President Joe Biden and Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris have left up tweets expressing support for actor Jussie Smollett after he was allegedly a victim in a racist and anti-gay hate attack that occurred on January 29, 2019. However, on Thursday, a jury found that Smollett lied about the attack."

FYI that jury decision wasn't a day or two after Jussie's faked hate crime attack. The world had come to know that he was a fraud long before that. 

Why was "patriot Kamala" still supporting Jussie's obvious attempt to divide the country you stupid a-hole?

What a couple of stupid dipshits. Only a total skid like you could vote for them. 

Where'd you go, robo? Here, I'll add this to the "Kamala the Patriot" thread 🤣

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, SkyHigh said:

Defining words is an essential part of any fruitful conversations.

 

It certainly can be, but it's also a much abused tool of the left to distract conversations and attempt to avoid situations where you already know the answer but you're going to lose the argument so you try and change the focus into arguing about the definition.

I'm sure those kind of tactics absolutely Slay them at grade school debate clubs. Here it's just an obvious tactic and a neon  sign held to the world saying " blink blink I don't have an answer for the actual issues"

Quote

 

Now go peddle your nonsense to others, at least numbskulls like west can have an ideological belief, you're just a contrarian. 

In other words, you're boring 

 

Awwww look at you begging for me not to be mean to you. 

In other words  i scare you. 

Put your big boy pants on and actually try debating and dealing with the issues you low brow low effort lowlife loser. 

[Deluge]

On 10/5/2024 at 8:31 PM, SkyHigh said:

Upset? Son, you make me laugh

I just asked you to define Marxism (you of course couldn't) then you went off.

You lack the mental capacity to get mad at. I expect more from my ten year old nephew, but I won't let you you confirm that because I would never introduce him to a pedo like you .

Nobody makes you laugh, pronouns. It's ALL tears ALL of the time for you diaper dopers. 

You asked me to define Marxism, and that's probably because you're a Marxist yourself and you hate conservatives talking about it. "Keep Karl out of your mouth, racist." lol

I already gave a sufficient definition of Marxism in an earlier post. I told you to go find that post and read it, but being the lazy communist slut that you are, you stamped your feet and started calling me names. There is no quicker way to Prager U videos than the childish behavior you exhibited. 

Now, you can go back through all the posts and find where I spoke about Marxism (and it would've been easier to find if you weren't such a crybaby b*tch) or we can go back to Prager U and other educational videos. 

It's your choice.  

 

Edited October 7, 2024 by Deluge

[Deluge]

On 10/6/2024 at 8:12 AM, SkyHigh said:

Defining words is an essential part of any fruitful conversations. Often people can be arguing the same point using different vocabulary. I of course wouldn't expect you to understand that, because I doubt you've ever had a fruitful conversation.

Now go peddle your nonsense to others, at least numbskulls like west can have an ideological belief, you're just a contrarian. 

In other words, you're boring 

No, CDN is right. 

You're a communist b*tch who thinks Marx is the cat's pajamas.

Your problem is that you can't handle it when non-Marxists don't talk about your hero the way you want them to, so you stamp your feet and throw a hissy fit. 

Defining words IS an essential part of fruitful conversation, but you don't own the definitions. For example: if someone doesn't give a shit about Marxism or Socialism, or Communism, or any of that shit, and just maintains a nutshell definition of it for reference, then it's still OK even though you disagree with that stance - just don't be a b*tch about it; be a man.  

Edited October 7, 2024 by Deluge

[SkyHigh]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

Nobody makes you laugh, pronouns. It's ALL tears ALL of the time for you diaper dopers. 

You asked me to define Marxism, and that's probably because you're a Marxist yourself and you hate conservatives talking about it. "Keep Karl out of your mouth, racist." lol

I already gave a sufficient definition of Marxism in an earlier post. I told you to go find that post and read it, but being the lazy communist slut that you are, you stamped your feet and started calling me names. There is no quicker way to Prager U videos than the childish behavior you exhibited. 

Now, you can go back through all the posts and find where I spoke about Marxism (and it would've been easier to find if you weren't such a crybaby b*tch) or we can go back to Prager U and other educational videos. 

It's your choice.  

 

Oh someone's got their panties in a bunch.

You're definition was lacking at best but even under your failed attempt to clarify, I don't see how that applies to any policies that either of the two main parties have put forth 

I'm an ardent capitalist, that has built and sold two companies. I'm more a proponent of a PPP model of capitalism and I believe in regulations but I'm strongly opposed to any form of communism.

Ok , now you can ignore everything I just said, go on ranting like a petulant child, whilst saying I'm the one getting mad

Sad little pervert.

[impartialobserver]

10 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

Oh someone's got their panties in a bunch.

You're definition was lacking at best but even under your failed attempt to clarify, I don't see how that applies to any policies that either of the two main parties have put forth 

I'm an ardent capitalist, that has built and sold two companies. I'm more a proponent of a PPP model of capitalism and I believe in regulations but I'm strongly opposed to any form of communism.

Ok , now you can ignore everything I just said, go on ranting like a petulant child, whilst saying I'm the one getting mad

Sad little pervert.

Interesting is it not that the most outspoken on here (and other forums) are always telling other posters how mad, upset, bothered, etc. they are. Most likely a form of projection. They are the ones who are bitter, angry, pi$$ed off, etc. but to admit that would implicitly show weakness. They try to say that they are stoic, unphased and oblivious to your commentary when in fact.. it really bothers them. 

Edited October 7, 2024 by impartialobserver

[Deluge]

2 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

You're definition was lacking at best..

I don't give a shit, Mrs. Marx. I have a general understanding of it, and that's all a freedom loving patriot needs to understand.

In other words, I know enough about it to tell to stop crying like a communist b*tch and f*ck off.  

If you can't handle freedom in America then I don't know what else i can tell you other than tough shit. 

 

 

[SkyHigh]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

No, CDN is right. 

You're a communist b*tch who thinks Marx is the cat's pajamas.

Your problem is that you can't handle it when non-Marxists don't talk about your hero the way you want them to, so you stamp your feet and throw a hissy fit. 

Defining words IS an essential part of fruitful conversation, but you don't own the definitions. For example: if someone doesn't give a shit about Marxism or Socialism, or Communism, or any of that shit, and just maintains a nutshell definition of it for reference, then it's still OK even though you disagree with that stance - just don't be a b*tch about it; be a man.  

What's funny is I actually read the communist manifesto before coming to the conclusion that I thought Marxism was a ridiculous economic system. I'd bet money that you've never actually read anything on Marxism and simply regurgitate things you've heard from the likes of Tucker Carlson. 

So all you can do is rant like an unhinged lunatic , making assertions you not only can't support but go against everything I've ever posted here. Because you got nothing else 

Sad little pervert 

[SkyHigh]

17 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Interesting is it not that the most outspoken on here (and other forums) are always telling other posters how mad, upset, bothered, etc. they are. Most likely a form of projection. They are the ones who are bitter, angry, pi$$ed off, etc. but to admit that would implicitly show weakness. They try to say that they are stoic, unphased and oblivious to your commentary when in fact.. it really bothers them. 

Projection being the operative word, in my opinion it's also a reflection of people that never had any real responsibilities or decision making opertunities in their professional lives, so don't understand what it takes to be able to effectively influence someone their choices. There is also definitely some Dunning Kruger effect going on as well.

[impartialobserver]

1 minute ago, SkyHigh said:

Projection being the operative word, in my opinion it's also a reflection of people that never had any real responsibilities or decision making opertunities in their professional lives, so don't understand what it takes to be able to effectively influence someone their choices. There is also definitely some Dunning Kruger effect going on as well.

Its easy for someone on an anonymous internet forum to claim to be brilliant, successful, wealthy, or bada$$. I met one of these types in real life. Online.. he was John Wayne. Real life.. he was a frail, meek old man on an oxygen tank.  

[SkyHigh]

20 minutes ago, Deluge said:

I don't give a shit, Mrs. Marx. I have a general understanding of it, and that's all a freedom loving patriot needs to understand.

In other words, I know enough about it to tell to stop crying like a communist b*tch and f*ck off.  

If you can't handle freedom in America then I don't know what else i can tell you other than tough shit. 

 

 

Still not American pedo 

And in the aggregate we have more freedom (particularly financial) in Canada 

The rest of your post is just the unfounded nonsense you usually spout

[SkyHigh]

3 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Its easy for someone on an anonymous internet forum to claim to be brilliant, successful, wealthy, or bada$$. I met one of these types in real life. Online.. he was John Wayne. Real life.. he was a frail, meek old man on an oxygen tank.  

Yup keyboard warriors, tough as all get out behind their computers but in real life wouldn't have the balls to say a tenth of what they spew here.

[Deluge]

5 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

Still not American pedo 

Point out where I said you were, f*ckface. 

[SkyHigh]

31 minutes ago, Deluge said:

you can't handle freedom in America

Why would a Canadian care about "freedom" in America 

[Deluge]

34 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Interesting is it not that the most outspoken on here (and other forums) are always telling other posters how mad, upset, bothered, etc. they are. Most likely a form of projection. They are the ones who are bitter, angry, pi$$ed off, etc. but to admit that would implicitly show weakness. They try to say that they are stoic, unphased and oblivious to your commentary when in fact.. it really bothers them. 

Spoken like a true doormat. Well done, cuckpartialobserver! 

[impartialobserver]

1 minute ago, SkyHigh said:

Yup keyboard warriors, tough as all get out behind their computers but in real life wouldn't have the balls to say a tenth of what they spew here.

the cop out is that they will get "cancelled" if they do. The only place that they can speak the truth is on obscure, meaningless internet chat forums. If they were as brave, courageous, righteous, and bada$$ as they claim to be online.. that would not deter them. In fact, it would embolden them, 

[Deluge]

Just now, SkyHigh said:

Why would a Canadian care about "freedom" in America 

Because you're a Canadian Marxist b*tch on an American thread. You can't help yourself.  

[impartialobserver]

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

Spoken like a true doormat. Well done, cuckpartialobserver! 

you prove my point.. it bothers you. 

[Deluge]

Just now, impartialobserver said:

the cop out is that they will get "cancelled" if they do. 

And cancel culture is the left's favorite - right after abortion.  

[SkyHigh]

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

Because you're a Canadian Marxist b*tch on an American thread. You can't help yourself.  

So angry 

And so full of crap

[Deluge]

9 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

you prove my point.. it bothers you. 

No it doesn't. 

When a leftoid spews its filth, I step in and throw it back in your faces.

It's a logical response.  

7 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

So angry 

And so full of crap

Said SkyHigh to the mirror. 

Well, at least you show self awareness in front of your reflection.  

Edited October 7, 2024 by Deluge

[impartialobserver]

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

No it doesn't. 

When a leftoid spews its filth, I step in and throw it back in your faces.

It's a logical response.  

If it did not bother you.. you would not respond. You would brush it off as insignificant and move on. 

[Deluge]

3 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

If it did not bother you.. you would not respond. You would brush it off as insignificant and move on. 

Silence is an admission of defeat, and no one should ever leave you with the last word. lol

Edited October 7, 2024 by Deluge

[impartialobserver]

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

Silence is also an admission of defeat, and no one should ever leave you with the last word. lol

you would be the worst poker player in the history of the game.. You just admitted to wanting the last word. Not everything justifies a response and if you were an adult, you would know that.

I dealt with someone like you last weekend at a town hall meeting. The meeting was to approve (or not) keeping a certain tax rate the same. When it came time for public comment.. this guy started spouting your type of rhetoric. We listened and said nothing. Why? Because it was not even close to being relevant to the topic. He finished and we moved on. Effectively ignoring him. To engage in an off topic discussion would be a waste of time and money. I know that you can't grasp that. 

Edited October 7, 2024 by impartialobserver

[Deluge]

4 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

you would be the worst poker player in the history of the game.. You just admitted to wanting the last word. Not everything justifies a response and if you were an adult, you would know that. 

Well, invertebrates like you are generally ignored, but sometimes you slip in an attention grabber, and that's worth stomping on for a while. 

Edited October 7, 2024 by Deluge