West Posted August 26, 2024 Report Posted August 26, 2024 This is how nazism rose to power in the 1920s and 1930s. Cowardly people who put their party over the good of people being targeted by their party. why? Because they disagree on politics. What a truly sad state of affairs with the masses being brainwashed Quote
Hodad Posted August 27, 2024 Report Posted August 27, 2024 Does anybody have any idea what he's on about this time? 1 Quote
Rebound Posted August 27, 2024 Report Posted August 27, 2024 1 hour ago, Hodad said: Does anybody have any idea what he's on about this time? Must be new meds. He sure doesn’t seem to be complaining about the conviction of Senator Menendez. Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
robosmith Posted August 27, 2024 Report Posted August 27, 2024 10 hours ago, West said: This is how nazism rose to power in the 1920s and 1930s. Cowardly people who put their party over the good of people being targeted by their party. why? Because they disagree on politics. What a truly sad state of affairs with the masses being brainwashed No one is being sent to jail merely for "disagree on politics." Juries convict CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR. Beliefs are NOT illegal, ACTIONS violating the law, ARE. 1 Quote
West Posted August 27, 2024 Author Report Posted August 27, 2024 4 hours ago, robosmith said: No one is being sent to jail merely for "disagree on politics." Juries convict CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR. Beliefs are NOT illegal, ACTIONS violating the law, ARE. Yes they are. It's sickening Quote
gatomontes99 Posted August 27, 2024 Report Posted August 27, 2024 13 hours ago, robosmith said: No one is being sent to jail merely for "disagree on politics." Juries convict CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR. Beliefs are NOT illegal, ACTIONS violating the law, ARE. It is happening in the UK and Kamala said that if you supported Trump, she will come for you. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Fluffypants Posted August 27, 2024 Report Posted August 27, 2024 13 hours ago, robosmith said: No one is being sent to jail merely for "disagree on politics." Juries convict CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR. Beliefs are NOT illegal, ACTIONS violating the law, ARE. Suuuuuure he was convicted by a Democrat Judge whose daughter works for the DNC, a Democrat DA and jury from the bluest district in the country that voted over 80% for Biden. 35 counts of paying off a pornstar so she would talk about an alleged affair based off misdemeanor crimes whose statute of limitations had run out on magically turned into felonies by claiming he did it to commit some unknown crime since he was never accused or convicted of anything that was connected to these payments. Quote
Hodad Posted August 27, 2024 Report Posted August 27, 2024 6 minutes ago, Fluffypants said: Suuuuuure he was convicted by a Democrat Judge whose daughter works for the DNC, a Democrat DA and jury from the bluest district in the country that voted over 80% for Biden. 35 counts of paying off a pornstar so she would talk about an alleged affair based off misdemeanor crimes whose statute of limitations had run out on magically turned into felonies by claiming he did it to commit some unknown crime since he was never accused or convicted of anything that was connected to these payments. You're right. Totally unfair. We should start having people stand trial in the jurisdictions in which the crimes were committed to avoid any appearance of bias. 1 1 Quote
Fluffypants Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 4 hours ago, Hodad said: You're right. Totally unfair. We should start having people stand trial in the jurisdictions in which the crimes were committed to avoid any appearance of bias. Considering the nature of the case and the fact it is an election year they should of granted him a change of venue at the very least if they were even trying to appear like a fair trial Quote
Hodad Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Fluffypants said: Considering the nature of the case and the fact it is an election year they should of granted him a change of venue at the very least if they were even trying to appear like a fair trial Because in America, where no one is above the law, political candidates should get special treatment "just to be fair." Got it. Edited August 28, 2024 by Hodad Quote
Fluffypants Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 Its not special treatment its prescribed by law that everyone is entitled to a fair trial. There is a reason for changes of venue and it is cases just like this. Quote
robosmith Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 5 hours ago, Fluffypants said: Suuuuuure he was convicted by a Democrat Judge whose daughter works for the DNC, a Democrat DA and jury from the bluest district in the country that voted over 80% for Biden. 35 counts of paying off a pornstar so she would talk about an alleged affair based off misdemeanor crimes whose statute of limitations had run out on magically turned into felonies by claiming he did it to commit some unknown crime since he was never accused or convicted of anything that was connected to these payments. In REALITY, the EVIDENCE is VERY STRONG. You don't get to choose your jury by partisan leanings. Duh 18 minutes ago, Fluffypants said: Its not special treatment its prescribed by law that everyone is entitled to a fair trial. There is a reason for changes of venue and it is cases just like this. Trump should have been more careful to not commit crimes in NYC. LMAO Quote
Hodad Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 (edited) 43 minutes ago, Fluffypants said: Its not special treatment its prescribed by law that everyone is entitled to a fair trial. There is a reason for changes of venue and it is cases just like this. No, change of venue is for situations in which it is not possible/probable to assemble a fair jury. Sorry, but the idea that they can't empanel a fair jury of 12 people (plus alternate) from a population of millions is preposterous. That's why it was quickly dismissed on appeal--twice. From a legal perspective, the argument was a non-starter. Trump just deployed it to stall and rile up his base--people who previously knew nothing about a change of venue, but suddenly had strong opinions on the subject--opinions that Trump had just given them. Edited August 28, 2024 by Hodad Quote
Rebound Posted August 29, 2024 Report Posted August 29, 2024 On 8/27/2024 at 11:05 PM, Fluffypants said: Considering the nature of the case and the fact it is an election year they should of granted him a change of venue at the very least if they were even trying to appear like a fair trial Did Trump file a motion for change of venue? Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
Fluffypants Posted August 30, 2024 Report Posted August 30, 2024 On 8/29/2024 at 10:31 AM, Rebound said: Did Trump file a motion for change of venue? Yes it was denied in every case Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.