Is Canada allowing too many Asians to live here?

[NAME REMOVED]

26 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Medieval times? Like when the jews opened the gates of toledo for the berber invaders?

Case in point....

[Five of swords]

1 hour ago, DUI_Offender said:

Case in point....

You can go back a lot further than that, even. And even according to the Jewish texts. So they were kicked out of Egypt for being a subversive threat there...and the celebrate a genocide they committed against the Egyptians as revenge. Then they wandered the desert for a while and finally infiltrated and subverted the xanaanites...then later they subverted Persia in thr book of esther...I dunno I sense a pattern here

[NAME REMOVED]

30 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

You can go back a lot further than that, even. And even according to the Jewish texts. So they were kicked out of Egypt for being a subversive threat there...and the celebrate a genocide they committed against the Egyptians as revenge. Then they wandered the desert for a while and finally infiltrated and subverted the xanaanites...then later they subverted Persia in thr book of esther...I dunno I sense a pattern here

Nobody cares..

[taxme]

On 8/31/2024 at 8:58 PM, eyeball said:

For the latter we need economic growth. For economic growth we need more people.

It appears we're stuck between the proverbial rock and a hard place.

There are tens of thousands of Canadians looking for work. So, just where is the need for hundreds of thousands of new legal and illegal immigrants every year? It does appear as though you are stuck between stupid and dumb. Just saying. 😁

[eyeball]

16 minutes ago, taxme said:

So, just where is the need for hundreds of thousands of new legal and illegal immigrants every year?

The need stems from the fact our population is both living longer and  aging at a faster rate than new babies are being born.

I'm afraid I can't put it in any more succinctly or to the point than that. Economists and demographers been aware of it for decades.

Edited September 4, 2024 by eyeball

[taxme]

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

The need stems from the fact our population is aging at a faster rate than new babies are being born.

I'm afraid I can't put it in any more succinctly or to the point than that. Economists and demographers been aware of it for decades.

Hogwash. There are hundreds of thousands of new born babies being born in Canada every year and this has been going on for decades now. Muslims have babies galore every year. They may eventually become the majority one day here in Canada. Not looking forward to that crap. Some economists and demographers are paid to push the bull chit that we nee more new immigrants. Canada needs a moratorium on immigration. Just saying. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, taxme said:

Hogwash. There are hundreds of thousands of new born babies being born in Canada every year and this has been going on for decades now. Muslims have babies galore every year. They may eventually become the majority one day here in Canada. Not looking forward to that crap. Some economists and demographers are paid to push the bull chit that we nee more new immigrants. Canada needs a moratorium on immigration. Just saying. 

Actually truth be told our current birth rate per female is 1.7 children.  It takes about 2.3 just to break even for population stability, never mind growth.  That's all babies born to people living in canada. 

So some immigration is indeed needed just to maintain our current pouplation. 

Having said that, @eyeball also claims that 'demographers' and experts have been SCREEEEMMING for years about canada becoming overpopulated. So y'know - grain of salt.  Everything's always been "known for decades" with him. 

[Five of swords]

On 9/2/2024 at 5:22 PM, I am Groot said:

You're mixing up your Jewish conspiracy theories. Almost all the influence Israel has in the US is based on the Jewish vote there as well as donations from wealthy Jewish donors, remember? These people live in the US, and if they had any control over immigration I think the majority would probably prefer to screen out Muslims given that religious group's noted antipathy for Jews. The idea that millions of American Jews would willingly fill their neighborhoods with potentially violent people who hate them just to ever so slightly ease the number of Arabs in the middle-east is almost laughable.

You know, a funny analogy came to me when I was thinking about this particular malfunction you have with your thinking.

 

It would be like if we were alive in 1700, and I was of the opinion that white people wanted to conquer all of North America. Which,in hindsight,we of course know that they did. And then you would protest that this could not possibly be true, because why would white people actually want to live around native Americans...who hate them and sometimes kill them and commit terrorist acts against them and their children.

 

Well it just isn't as confusing as it should be. Sometimes people just have a will to power and are perfectly okay with taking land and power from other tribes, despite the fact it is mean and will cause resentment. The white man did not need to care that Indian raids would happen sometimes, because eventually thr whole continent would be in our control and the natives would be at our mercy...which in fact is how it played out.

 

In exactly the samemanner...there may be jews who are inconvenient ienced by the arrival of Muslims who hate them in significant numbers. But jews have decided to make the middle east one of their homelands, just as white people made north America, and they are willing to deal with this conflict for the glory and the increase of their own people. Something white people used to understand, in fact...but now most white people struggle with even conceiving of such a normal and natural impulse. 

 

Furthermore, it is quite easy to find examples of jews who insist that all the formerly white countries mist become multiracial...Barbara learner specter being the cliche example...white it is vanishing rare to find any jew suggesting that historically white countries should remain white. You can find white 'gentiles' who feel that way, despite being hated for it, but you cannot find jews who feel that way. Why? Wouldn't it be better for jews, according to your theory? Why should it be so rare?

 

That is in fact a very important question to ask and to find the answer to. That is a question Adolf Hitler certainly asked himself, and he had a perfectly rational answer. And it was why he was willing to risk world war 2, despite desperately preferring to avoid it.

Edited September 5, 2024 by Five of swords

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Five of swords said:

You know, a funny analogy came to me when I was thinking about this particular malfunction you have with your thinking.

 

It would be like if we were alive in 1700, and I was of the opinion that white people wanted to conquer all of North America. Which,in hindsight,we of course know that they did. And then you would protest that this could not possibly be true, because why would white people actually want to live around native Americans...who hate them and sometimes kill them and commit terrorist acts against them and their children.

 

Well it just isn't as confusing as it should be. Sometimes people just have a will to power and are perfectly okay with taking land and power from other tribes, despite the fact it is mean and will cause resentment. The white man did not need to care that Indian raids would happen sometimes, because eventually thr whole continent would be in our control and the natives would be at our mercy...which in fact is how it played out.

 

In exactly the samemanner...there may be jews who are inconvenient ienced by the arrival of Muslims who hate them in significant numbers. But jews have decided to make the middle east one of their homelands, just as white people made north America, and they are willing to deal with this conflict for the glory and the increase of their own people. Something white people used to understand, in fact...but now most white people struggle with even conceiving of such a normal and natural impulse. 

 

Furthermore, it is quite easy to find examples of jews who insist that all the formerly white countries mist become multiracial...Barbara learner specter being the cliche example...white it is vanishing rare to find any jew suggesting that historically white countries should remain white. You can find white 'gentiles' who feel that way, despite being hated for it, but you cannot find jews who feel that way. Why? Wouldn't it be better for jews, according to your theory? Why should it be so rare?

 

That is in fact a very important question to ask and to find the answer to. That is a question Adolf Hitler certainly asked himself, and he had a perfectly rational answer. And it was why he was willing to risk world war 2, despite desperately preferring to avoid it.

1 - that's not what an analogy is.  Buy a dictionary. 

2 - at no time in the 1700's did "white people" decide to take over the world.  Various COUNTRIES did, but even if those countries were predominently white they spend more time fighting OTHER white countries than they did anyone else.  So it had nothing to do with "white people" wanting to take over anything. 

3. Every OTHER race was also represented by countries trying to take over the world and gain territory so what  you're REALLY saying is that countries want that - not races. 

4 - you're an !diot. 

[Five of swords]

26 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

1 - that's not what an analogy is.  Buy a dictionary. 

2 - at no time in the 1700's did "white people" decide to take over the world.  Various COUNTRIES did, but even if those countries were predominently white they spend more time fighting OTHER white countries than they did anyone else.  So it had nothing to do with "white people" wanting to take over anything. 

3. Every OTHER race was also represented by countries trying to take over the world and gain territory so what  you're REALLY saying is that countries want that - not races. 

4 - you're an !diot. 

As usual, you probide your level of insight. Thank you so much for your contribution.

 

Naturally, the very fact you understand what I mean when I say 'white' proves your narrative wrong, lol. In fact, it was a very significant legal reality in the history of the usa. Not 'English', but 'white'. If there was any truth behind your assertion, then there never would even exist a white racial category. But it does exist. So...try thinking more about stuff? (Try using someone else's brain for it)

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Five of swords said:

As usual, you probide your level of insight. Thank you so much for your contribution.

Are you drinking at this time of day?

Quote

Naturally, the very fact you understand what I mean when I say 'white' proves your narrative wrong, lol. I

Not at all.  It simply proves i understand your delusional and erroneous position.  If you claim that 2 +2 = 7,  the fact that i understand what each of those numbers represents does not change the fact you're wrong. 

LOL - i get that you like to think of yourself as intellectually competent. But honestly kid, you have got a LONG way to go before you're going to be able to put together rational arguments that hold water. Perhaps getting beat up here regularly will actually force you to sharpen your game and improve your reasoning and argument skills. But either way, right now as things stand you are very much at the bottom of the food chain and pretty much everyone here is looking down on you. 

Improve. 

[Five of swords]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Are you drinking at this time of day?

Not at all.  It simply proves i understand your delusional and erroneous position.  If you claim that 2 +2 = 7,  the fact that i understand what each of those numbers represents does not change the fact you're wrong. 

LOL - i get that you like to think of yourself as intellectually competent. But honestly kid, you have got a LONG way to go before you're going to be able to put together rational arguments that hold water. Perhaps getting beat up here regularly will actually force you to sharpen your game and improve your reasoning and argument skills. But either way, right now as things stand you are very much at the bottom of the food chain and pretty much everyone here is looking down on you. 

Improve. 

Maybe the reason you think you are so much more clever than I am is because you are severely retarded. Just a theory.

 

If you are going to assert that the number 2 doesn't exist, then you cannot later say that 2+2=7. It is a contradiction. That is the analogous contradiction I was pointing out. But of course, such things go over your head. Ask a person of average iq to explain it to you. I cannot.

Edited September 5, 2024 by Five of swords

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Five of swords said:

Maybe the reason you think you are so much more clever than I am is because you are severely retarded. Just a theory.

So you think  a person who's severely retarded would be seen as so much more clever than you. 

Sigh.  I'm starting to think you're right kid. 

[Five of swords]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

So you think  a person who's severely retarded would be seen as so much more clever than you. 

Sigh.  I'm starting to think you're right kid. 

Well no, lol. I think a severely retarded person us just likely to be wrong about things, including which people they are more clever than. It isn't a difficult concept for people who aren't severely retarded, but I can see why it confused you.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Five of swords said:

Well no, lol. I think  severely retarded person us just likely to be wrong about things, including which people they are more clever than. 

So you think you'd be wrong as often as a severely retarded person. 

I have to ask, do you think this is going well for you?

[taxme]

On 9/4/2024 at 2:11 PM, CdnFox said:

Actually truth be told our current birth rate per female is 1.7 children.  It takes about 2.3 just to break even for population stability, never mind growth.  That's all babies born to people living in canada. 

So some immigration is indeed needed just to maintain our current pouplation. 

Having said that, @eyeball also claims that 'demographers' and experts have been SCREEEEMMING for years about canada becoming overpopulated. So y'know - grain of salt.  Everything's always been "known for decades" with him. 

Not with female Muslims. Their birth rate appears to be very high. Whenever i see a Muslim family, they always have a minimum of two to three children with them. So, why are white women not producing more? I guess the reason for that is that most white women have fallen for that liberal Marxist anti-white program and agenda of feminism and hating men.White women are told that they do not need a man to survive. Many have probably regretted their decision after they get older. No children, no grand kids. A lonely life in the making. 

Yes, we probably do need some new immigrants but not in the numbers that we receive already. If 500,000 Canadians die every year and 400,000 are born, then maybe we should only allow 100,000 new immigrants into the country. 

There nave been many groups of people who have been "screeeemming" for decades now about our out of control immigration fiasco. But do our illustrious political leaders care? Like chit they do. They just keep bringing them all in as much as possible. A bunch of bozos indeed. Just my opinion. 

 

[eyeball]

3 minutes ago, taxme said:

I guess the reason for that is that most white women have fallen for that liberal Marxist anti-white program and agenda of feminism and hating men.

Do you talk like this in real life to people?

[taxme]

5 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Do you talk like this in real life to people?

Yup, i sure do! Do you have a problem with it? Let it out, boy. Prove me wrong? LOL. 

[eyeball]

12 minutes ago, taxme said:

Yup, i sure do! Do you have a problem with it? Let it out, boy. Prove me wrong? LOL. 

Sure you do, in any case proof is your responsibility.

[taxme]

9 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Sure you do, in any case proof is your responsibility.

 

9 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Sure you do, in any case proof is your responsibility.

So again, do you have a problem with my opinion on what i wrote above? Speak up, boy. Just asking. 

[eyeball]

11 minutes ago, taxme said:

So again, do you have a problem with my opinion on what i wrote above? Speak up, boy. Just asking.

Say whatever you like, there's little I could say that does better to underscore how ridiculous you sound.

You provide an excellent example of why Trump's handlers are refusing to allow open mikes during his campaign debates.

[I am Groot]

On 9/5/2024 at 10:19 AM, Five of swords said:

You know, a funny analogy came to me when I was thinking about this particular malfunction you have with your thinking.

I'm not sure you know what the word 'malfunction' even means. Certainly, someone disagreeing with you doesn't mean they're malfunctioning. In fact, since almost EVERYONE disagrees with you, perhaps you could evaluate the possibility it is your own thinking that is ... troubled.

On 9/5/2024 at 10:19 AM, Five of swords said:

It would be like if we were alive in 1700, and I was of the opinion that white people wanted to conquer all of North America. Which,in hindsight,we of course know that they did. And then you would protest that this could not possibly be true,

Well, if we were alive in that time period we'd probably expect that every country wanted to conquer every other country and take whatever and they could. Have you seen a map of Europe in 1700? Half of the countries we think of a ancient didn't even exist. And I don't think people thought in terms of 'white people' back then. To the Brits everyone was a 'wog' except them. The Chinese and Japanese were similarly self-focused. 

 

On 9/5/2024 at 10:19 AM, Five of swords said:

In exactly the samemanner...there may be jews who are inconvenient ienced by the arrival of Muslims who hate them in significant numbers.

The ones who live here, you mean? The one who you assume are arranging for these Muslims to live here in order to benefit Jews in Israel? Even though that doesn't actually benefit Jews in Israel at all?

 

On 9/5/2024 at 10:19 AM, Five of swords said:

Furthermore, it is quite easy to find examples of jews who insist that all the formerly white countries mist become multiracial...

To find progressives/illiberals who happen to be Jews, you mean? Sure. Just as you can find silly progressives/illiberals who are Catholic or Protestant to whatever who have the same dumb sentiments

 

On 9/5/2024 at 10:19 AM, Five of swords said:

That is in fact a very important question to ask and to find the answer to. That is a question Adolf Hitler certainly asked himself, and he had a perfectly rational answer. And it was why he was willing to risk world war 2, despite desperately preferring to avoid it.

There was nothing rational about Hitler. A rational man who had decided to rid the world of Jews would have not attacked EVERYONE at once. Besides, the Nazis had similar sentiments toward Slavs, who are probably whiter than you are, and very Christian. But they never tried to kill all the Muslims. Why do you suppose that is?

[I am Groot]

On 9/4/2024 at 3:04 PM, eyeball said:

The need stems from the fact our population is both living longer and  aging at a faster rate than new babies are being born.

I'm afraid I can't put it in any more succinctly or to the point than that. Economists and demographers been aware of it for decades.

 Key economists warned in the 1990s it's virtually impossible for immigration to forestall the aging of Canada's population. But few listened then. Or today.

https://vancouversun.com/opinion/columnists/douglas-todd-alas-immigration-wont-replace-canadas-aging-workforce

Edited September 6, 2024 by I am Groot

[Five of swords]

8 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

I'm not sure you know what the word 'malfunction' even means. Certainly, someone disagreeing with you doesn't mean they're malfunctioning. In fact, since almost EVERYONE disagrees with you, perhaps you could evaluate the possibility it is your own thinking that is ... troubled.

Well, if we were alive in that time period we'd probably expect that every country wanted to conquer every other country and take whatever and they could. Have you seen a map of Europe in 1700? Half of the countries we think of a ancient didn't even exist. And I don't think people thought in terms of 'white people' back then. To the Brits everyone was a 'wog' except them. The Chinese and Japanese were similarly self-focused. 

 

The ones who live here, you mean? The one who you assume are arranging for these Muslims to live here in order to benefit Jews in Israel? Even though that doesn't actually benefit Jews in Israel at all?

 

To find progressives/illiberals who happen to be Jews, you mean? Sure. Just as you can find silly progressives/illiberals who are Catholic or Protestant to whatever who have the same dumb sentiments

 

There was nothing rational about Hitler. A rational man who had decided to rid the world of Jews would have not attacked EVERYONE at once. Besides, the Nazis had similar sentiments toward Slavs, who are probably whiter than you are, and very Christian. But they never tried to kill all the Muslims. Why do you suppose that is?

Well obviously jews disagree with you, bro. Jews themselves believe, and say so explicitly, that it would be good for jews if the Arab people around Israel were relocated to the west. And it also just seems obviously true from common sense. I think it would be good for Europeans if all their Muslims were relocated to Israel, despite the fact some Europeans live in israel...

[I am Groot]

Just now, Five of swords said:

Well obviously jews disagree with you, bro. Jews themselves believe, and say so explicitly, that it would be good for jews if the Arab people around Israel were relocated to the west. And it also just seems obviously true from common sense. I think it would be good for Europeans if all their Muslims were relocated to Israel, despite the fact some Europeans live in israel...

I'm sure SOME Jews and SOME Catholics and SOME protestants might think and say that. 

Which proves nothing, of course.