Night 3 of DNC convention

[impartialobserver]

2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

The first time I used "your" was colloquial."Your" meant anyone that might read what I wrote. Since the forum is open to read only, that means anyone in the world. But more so, it was meant to include those that might vote. The context makes that clear.

Your focus on semantics illustrates that you understand Dem policies harm Americans. You just dont want to address the truth. So you find some alternate meaning and pretend that is what we should focus on.

 

more off topic nonsense and assumptions. hence, why I can't take most on political chat forums seriously. Keep going though. 

[CdnFox]

28 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Way to go off into the weeds... so the DNC destroyed your life (your lack of a rebuttal implies this) and yet you are here wasting your time. Some strange priorities. 

I think you are being just a little pedantic here. While I'm sure I could find some people whose lives were actually destroyed by the dNC, it's fairly obvious that what he means is that many people will have their lives very negatively impacted. And that is certainly true, the inflation that they were unable to address and in fact made worse has severely negatively impacted many people. And that's just one example.

Kamales plan for price fixing will definitely negatively impact inflation and food production. Her plan to give free money in the form of $25,000 down payments will grossly impact inflation and specifically the housing prices which will go up the moment that more money becomes available to spend on houses and we'll get back to the same sort of bubble problem that clinton's democrats caused. You'll remember the financial collapse of 2009.

Pretending that elections don't matter is just silly. People's lives are very significantly impacted by the policies and actions of the federal government.

[gatomontes99]

21 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

more off topic nonsense and assumptions. hence, why I can't take most on political chat forums seriously. Keep going though. 

[impartialobserver]

3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Case in point ^^^^. However, keep it up. Been in need of laughter. 

[NAME REMOVED]

On 8/22/2024 at 12:22 PM, Nationalist said:

 

But the truth always eeks out. 

That a mentally unstable drifter, that watched too many conspiracy videos attacked Mr Pelosi after being unable to locate Nancy, and is now doing 30 years in prison?

Edited August 24, 2024 by DUI_Offender

[Nationalist]

14 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

That s mentally unstable drifter, that watched too many conspiracy videos attacked Mr Pelosi after being unable to locate Nancy, and is now doing 20 years in prison?

Does that mean that Paul didn't let the guy in or that they weren't sex partners...somehow?

 

[robosmith]

On 8/21/2024 at 4:32 PM, West said:

Looks like Democrats are highlighting Nancy Pelosi who's husband has been accused of insider trading and Bill Clinton a man accused of raping multiple women including Juanita Broaderick. 

Interesting choices 

Of course you  MAGA CULT have a CANDIDATE who's been ACCUSED of many MUCH WORSE OFFENSES, but you TRY to DISTRACT with peripheral accusations against SUPPORTERS.

Not to mention ACTUAL FELONY CONVICTIONS.

When your guy is ACTUALLY FOUND GUILTY, not very wise to bring up peripheral ACCUSATIONS.

On 8/22/2024 at 4:06 AM, Nationalist said:

That's a pretty serious accusation there Tweenkie-poo.

Prove it.

No PROOF is necessary in a thread based ON MERE ACCUSATIONS.

You'd have a tiny bit of credibility IF you demanded proof from the OP. LMAO

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Of course you  MAGA CULT have a CANDIDATE who's been ACCUSED of many MUCH WORSE OFFENSES, but you TRY to DISTRACT with peripheral accusations against SUPPORTERS.

Not to mention ACTUAL FELONY CONVICTIONS.

When your guy is ACTUALLY FOUND GUILTY, not very wise to bring up peripheral ACCUSATIONS.

No PROOF is necessary in a thread based ON MERE ACCUSATIONS.

You'd have a tiny bit of credibility IF you demanded proof from the OP. LMAO

Yikes -  @West ,  @Nationalist,  you've got to go easier on him - you've not only melted his brain into ALL CAPS mode but he's BOLDING THEM AS WELL!!

That's only one step away from underlining and then he has to go under medical supervision and not be allowed to use cutlery for a week and THEN who do we laugh at?   (black dog i suppose...  still it's not the same... )

[West]

10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Of course you  MAGA CULT have a CANDIDATE who's been ACCUSED of many MUCH WORSE OFFENSES, but you TRY to DISTRACT with peripheral accusations against SUPPORTERS.

Not to mention ACTUAL FELONY CONVICTIONS.

When your guy is ACTUALLY FOUND GUILTY, not very wise to bring up peripheral ACCUSATIONS.

No PROOF is necessary in a thread based ON MERE ACCUSATIONS.

You'd have a tiny bit of credibility IF you demanded proof from the OP. LMAO

Chill 

[robosmith]

16 minutes ago, West said:

Chill 

Thanks for your capitulation.

[Nationalist]

33 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for your capitulation.

Ya at least you don't have to throw you self on the ground and scream now eh.

[West]

52 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for your capitulation.

😆 

[NAME REMOVED]

7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Does that mean that Paul didn't let the guy in or that they weren't sex partners...somehow?

 

Facts from a court of law:

-Paul Pelosi did not let the intruder in. Depage broke through glass-panelled doors to access the Pelosi home

-Paul Pelosi was not the intended target. Nancy Pelosi was. DePage was proven mentally ill, and has a list of other targets to assault, including Hunter Biden and other prominent Democrats.

-Depage just said he assaulted Pelosi's husband "to send a message to Democrats." 

 

You can go back to your YouTube conspiracy videos, and believe what you want. However, it's all misinformation that is aimed at the gullible and impressionable. 

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Ya at least you don't have to throw you self on the ground and scream now eh.

Never seen ANYONE do that, but it sounds you like you have extensive experience....

1 hour ago, DUI_Offender said:

Facts from a court of law:

-Paul Pelosi did not let the intruder in. Depage broke through glass-panelled doors to access the Pelosi home

-Paul Pelosi was not the intended target. Nancy Pelosi was. DePage was proven mentally ill, and has a list of other targets to assault, including Hunter Biden and other prominent Democrats.

-Depage just said he assaulted Pelosi's husband "to send a message to Democrats." 

 

You can go back to your YouTube conspiracy videos, and believe what you want. However, it's all misinformation that is aimed at the gullible and impressionable. 

It's David Depape.

[Nationalist]

2 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

Facts from a court of law:

-Paul Pelosi did not let the intruder in. Depage broke through glass-panelled doors to access the Pelosi home

-Paul Pelosi was not the intended target. Nancy Pelosi was. DePage was proven mentally ill, and has a list of other targets to assault, including Hunter Biden and other prominent Democrats.

-Depage just said he assaulted Pelosi's husband "to send a message to Democrats." 

 

You can go back to your YouTube conspiracy videos, and believe what you want. However, it's all misinformation that is aimed at the gullible and impressionable. 

Gee that's a lot different than the original reports.

What a shock...

Oh and the 911 call and body cam stuff we saw back then has been conspicuously scrubbed from Google. But...

 

huh...Paul sure sounds distressed eh?

 

[NAME REMOVED]

 

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

huh...Paul sure sounds distressed eh?

 

An 80+ elderly man asks if he could use the phone, after being confronted by a crazed lunatic with a weapon. Pelosi thinks fast, realising that if he says the wrong thing, he could be murdered, so he remains calm, and drops hints, too the point where the dispatcher catches on, and sends a Police unit to do a wellness check.

The mental gymnastics you go through, just to prove you are right and everyone else in the World (court of law, evidence, etc) are "wrong" is astonishing. 

[Nationalist]

9 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

 

An 80+ elderly man asks if he could use the phone, after being confronted by a crazed lunatic with a weapon. Pelosi thinks fast, realising that if he says the wrong thing, he could be murdered, so he remains calm, and drops hints, too the point where the dispatcher catches on, and sends a Police unit to do a wellness check.

The mental gymnastics you go through, just to prove you are right and everyone else in the World (court of law, evidence, etc) are "wrong" is astonishing. 

Somewhat like you Libbies and your lawfare eh.

Poor Paul. He should know better than to keep crazy people as gay boyfriends. 

Edited August 25, 2024 by Nationalist