Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Well, not exactly.

So Iran may have a nuke by the end of the year, Thanks Obama. The middle east is at war. The southern border has gone t'hell. Russia literally threatened to nuke us. But hey, lets tell the world we aimed our nukes at China. That's f[_]cking great policy.

You're right, it's better not to have any sort of plan in place in the event of a confrontation with a hostile nuclear power. Dumbass.

What's even funnier is you are whining about this without having the faintest idea what the strategy is or how it might differ from those of previous administrations. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

You're right, it's better not to have any sort of plan in place in the event of a confrontation with a hostile nuclear power. Dumbass.

What's even funnier is you are whining about this without having the faintest idea what the strategy is or how it might differ from those of previous administrations. 

I'm "whining" because the stupidity of announcing a strategy that diverts resources away from people that are being hostile to us at the moment is absolutely moronic. China isn't an active threat. They are a passive threat and they are primarily interested in Taiwan. There is no way in hell they will engage in a direct war with us. But you can bet that Russia and Iran are fn crazy enough to try it. Now they know less attention is paid to them. If Iran builds a nuke, they will fire the first at Israel and the second at us. That is guaranteed.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I'm "whining" because the stupidity of announcing a strategy that diverts resources away from people that are being hostile to us at the moment is absolutely moronic.

How do you know what it does or does not do?  It's a classified document you have not read you silly twat!

Edited by Black Dog
  • Like 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

How do you know what it does or does not do?  It's a classified document you have not read you silly twat!

Because they said it did.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said:

Because they said it did.

All we know is it "reorients America’s deterrent strategy to focus on China’s rapid expansion in its nuclear arsenal." It doesn't say shit about diverting resources away from anything.

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

All we know is it "reorients America’s deterrent strategy to focus on China’s rapid expansion in its nuclear arsenal." It doesn't say shit about diverting resources away from anything.

Where did you think we had them aimed? Walawala Washington?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted

Knowing biden, he probably had them aimed at Austin and Tallahassee.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
17 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

What is it with these piece of sh*t war monger democrats? 

16 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Knowing biden, he probably had them aimed at Austin and Tallahassee.

Austin's rainbow blue; the hair sniffer would never target that town. 

Posted (edited)
On 8/20/2024 at 5:22 PM, gatomontes99 said:

I'm "whining" because the stupidity of announcing a strategy that diverts resources away from people that are being hostile to us at the moment is absolutely moronic. China isn't an active threat. They are a passive threat and they are primarily interested in Taiwan. There is no way in hell they will engage in a direct war with us. But you can bet that Russia and Iran are fn crazy enough to try it. Now they know less attention is paid to them. If Iran builds a nuke, they will fire the first at Israel and the second at us. That is guaranteed.

The strategy wasn’t “announced,” some criminal traitor leaked this to the press. 
 

It isn’t any surprise. We’re supposed to have contingency plans for every possible scenario. 

Edited by Rebound

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,912
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...