CdnFox Posted August 7, 2024 Report Posted August 7, 2024 2 hours ago, myata said: This is a fine example of some folks having no clue what democracy is about; or pretending to be too dumb to have it. Either way, the options are: - the law exists for everybody, except our very own pathologically lying cute fat baby; OR: - the laws exists for everybody. We are sure free to pick and choose but it can only be one of the above. No mass of pretend dumbness; no lying tricks can change the reality. It isn't about the law you slow witted incoherent example of why mothers shouldn't drink while pregnant! it's about VENUE. If a person is a president then the body that can bring charges against them is the house and the senate as part of the impeachment process. If a person commits a crime outside of the presidency or one that has nothing to do with the duties of president like rape (hey clinton.... STAAAAAAAARE) then they can be prosecuted in a court of law. There are very good reasons for this. So the bottom line is elections matter. Pick a good candidate to be nominee and pick a good nominee to be president. Because you're giving that person a lot of power. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
CouchPotato Posted August 7, 2024 Report Posted August 7, 2024 2 hours ago, myata said: - the law exists for everybody, except our very own pathologically lying cute fat baby That's the second time you've called him cute today, myata. Quote
CouchPotato Posted August 7, 2024 Report Posted August 7, 2024 (edited) On 8/5/2024 at 3:41 PM, myata said: I'm only pointing to the facts here. People make choices and they have consequences. . Do you want to forget it all now? You sure have the right, and the ability - but don't think for a moment that it could somehow relieve you of the consequences of the choices you make. You knew what you were choosing and you knew it perfectly well - to make sure of that is my only purpose here. Your purpose here is to convince a largely Canadian audience on a Canadian forum that they would be making a mistake by voting for Trump? That's a noble and intelligent cause. Fair enough, myata. You labor not in vain. I don't want to face these consequences. I want to be able to sleep at night. This Canadian will not be voting for Trump in November. That's one down, buddy. Keep fighting. Edited August 7, 2024 by CouchPotato 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted August 7, 2024 Report Posted August 7, 2024 21 minutes ago, CouchPotato said: Your purpose here is to convince a largely Canadian audience on a Canadian forum that they would be making a mistake by voting for Trump? That's a noble and intelligent cause. Fair enough, myata. You labor not in vain. I don't want to face these consequences. I want to be able to sleep at night. This Canadian will not be voting for Trump in November. That's one down, buddy. Keep fighting. The suicide hotline just called and wants to talk to you about some employment opportunities .... Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
myata Posted August 7, 2024 Author Report Posted August 7, 2024 Isn't it funny to observe this whistling and squirming desperate to escape a plain, obvious question: is the law there for everybody, or only as we like? Yes one is free to pick the answer, but it will determine the consequences and the destination. A funny zoo gathered here that just doesn't seem to either have the mental capacity to get it, or performing their best plays yet to pretend that they are too simple to get it. The law is for everyone: this is democracy. The law is for everybody else except me/us/Him: this is Maduro and Putin, etc. What isn't clear here? Who needs to learn it again? Where is the line between funny and dumb and boring? Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
CdnFox Posted August 7, 2024 Report Posted August 7, 2024 5 hours ago, myata said: Isn't it funny to observe this whistling and squirming desperate to escape a plain, obvious question: is the law there for everybody, or only as we like? Sorry - you have to have at least a grade 3 level of education and english skills to understand the issue. That rules you out. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
myata Posted August 7, 2024 Author Report Posted August 7, 2024 Dead brains pretend to have no clue about what makes the foundation of democracy. What can be added here? In their own words. Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
CdnFox Posted August 7, 2024 Report Posted August 7, 2024 55 minutes ago, myata said: Dead brains pretend to have no clue about what makes the foundation of democracy. What can be added here? In their own words. Spam spam spam spam.... Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
myata Posted August 7, 2024 Author Report Posted August 7, 2024 Everyone with a normal brain knows the difference: - The law is for everyone: this is democracy. - The law is for everybody else except Him, Guru, the Idol: this is Maduro, Kim, Putin, etc. And for the dead brains it's only "spam". What's the difference? How could one know it? Anathema!!! Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
CdnFox Posted August 7, 2024 Report Posted August 7, 2024 38 minutes ago, myata said: Everyone with a normal brain knows the difference: So you're saying you don't know the difference. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
myata Posted August 7, 2024 Author Report Posted August 7, 2024 A blind can't see that they are blind. Dumb will not know. There's no automatic reflection here because (but the dumb wouldn't know) there are facts; and they aren't going anywhere. Someone is calling for the law to ignore the fat lying baby whatever tantrum he decides to throw; this can't be democracy. Someone can't wait to be in the audience of a war criminal under international arrest. So where do you hide all that, with what napkin? And the most interesting, nobody forced them to break any of this. In their own words, only and sincerely. Nothing we couldn't know. Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
Legato Posted August 7, 2024 Report Posted August 7, 2024 5 minutes ago, myata said: A blind can't see that they are blind. Dumb will not know. There's no automatic reflection here because (but the dumb wouldn't know) there are facts; and they aren't going anywhere. Someone is calling for the law to ignore the fat lying baby whatever tantrum he decides to throw; this can't be democracy. Someone can't wait to be in the audience of a war criminal under international arrest. So where do you hide all that, with what napkin? And the most interesting, nobody forced them to break any of this. In their own words, only and sincerely. Nothing we couldn't know. Are you any good at scrabble? 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted August 8, 2024 Report Posted August 8, 2024 1 hour ago, myata said: A blind can't see that they are blind. Dumb will not know. What are you talking about? Blind people can tell that they're blind pretty damn easily. And sure you may not know that you're dumb but we're here to tell you so no problem. And we all know you wouldn't recognize a 'fact' if it bit your face off. Hell you can't even write legible english, You go through life too frightened to even address the people you're taking to directly. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
myata Posted August 8, 2024 Author Report Posted August 8, 2024 The cult has a deep, fundamental problem with the notion of the law that applies to everyone, as in democracy. They think that it's a frill that can be used on whim or if needed and they should pick and choose what to do with it. This is a very simple idea that every totalitarian thug in the world understands and uses. Could that be the basis of the attraction? The natural connection? Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
User Posted August 8, 2024 Report Posted August 8, 2024 2 hours ago, myata said: The cult has a deep, fundamental problem with the notion of the law that applies to everyone, as in democracy. They think that it's a frill that can be used on whim or if needed and they should pick and choose what to do with it. This is a very simple idea that every totalitarian thug in the world understands and uses. Could that be the basis of the attraction? The natural connection? Are you talking about the cult of Democrats in how they cheer on the merciless prosecution of anyone there on J6 while ignoring left wing violent protestors? Quote
Nationalist Posted August 8, 2024 Report Posted August 8, 2024 Well well well... Volodymyr wants to meet with the Russians to discuss a peace deal. I'n't that speciaaalll? Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
myata Posted August 8, 2024 Author Report Posted August 8, 2024 When there aren't any good factual answers, would random rambling pass for a response? Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
User Posted August 8, 2024 Report Posted August 8, 2024 49 minutes ago, myata said: When there aren't any good factual answers, would random rambling pass for a response? Are you confessing? This is exactly what you do here. Quote
myata Posted August 8, 2024 Author Report Posted August 8, 2024 2 hours ago, User said: while ignoring left wing violent protestors? You're down to lying, a sad but very predictable outcome in such cases. No point in conversations with a lying wall. George Floyd protests, Portland: "On July 24, federal prosecutors unveiled charges against 18 protesters, five of whom were charged with suspicion of assaulting a federal officer, trespassing and creating a disturbance during protests on the night of July 20–21, eight were charged in connection with criminal conduct during the July 21–22 night protest– " Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
CouchPotato Posted August 8, 2024 Report Posted August 8, 2024 (edited) 2 hours ago, Nationalist said: Well well well... Volodymyr wants to meet with the Russians to discuss a peace deal. I'n't that speciaaalll? If this were to happen and Joe Biden were to meet with them and later make a public statement that Zelensky and Putin are admirable men who deserve great respect for reaching this peace deal, myata would be telling us that Joe delivered a masterclass on diplomacy. Edited August 8, 2024 by CouchPotato 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted August 8, 2024 Report Posted August 8, 2024 5 minutes ago, CouchPotato said: If this were to happen and Joe Biden were to meet with them and later make a public statement that Zelensky and Putin are admirable men who deserve great respect for reaching this peace deal, myata would be telling us that Joe delivered a masterclass on diplomacy. Ya well...I feel sorry for myata. He's obviously not right upstairs. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
myata Posted August 8, 2024 Author Report Posted August 8, 2024 19 minutes ago, CouchPotato said: myata would be telling us Are you taking lessons from the fat lying baby? You sure noticed that all that was conditional and in another, like alternate universe? In the meanwhile, in this one here Vlad-thug has miraculously forgotten of all his issues (and demands) to NATO and something (hint: real, that is not fat-cheek lies) did that to him. That would be the same difference between the reality and alternate, fat cheek lies. Enjoy. May also reflect on the downsides of turning the brain off, voluntarily and cheerfully. Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
CouchPotato Posted August 8, 2024 Report Posted August 8, 2024 (edited) 3 minutes ago, myata said: Are you taking lessons from the fat lying baby? When you are not thinking about the fat lying baby, myata, what sort of things do you enjoy doing? Do you have any hobbies? Edited August 8, 2024 by CouchPotato Quote
User Posted August 8, 2024 Report Posted August 8, 2024 44 minutes ago, myata said: You're down to lying, a sad but very predictable outcome in such cases. No point in conversations with a lying wall. George Floyd protests, Portland: That is not Democrats, that was the DOJ under Trump. And guess what Democrats were doing after those arrests? They were crying and complaining about them. Do you forget what the then Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said? She called the federal officers kidnappers. Quote
Nationalist Posted August 8, 2024 Report Posted August 8, 2024 On 8/7/2024 at 7:13 AM, myata said: Where is the line between funny and dumb and boring? Apparently it runs right down the middle of your face. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.