Get Ready for the Biggest Wave of Propaganda in the History of the World

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

This would mean something coming from virtually anyone but you, a dishonest loser who engages in the exact same behaviour he's whining about here. Go post some more scat pictures you dumb f*ck.

Blah, blah, blah. 

You got busted for being a liar and a weasel, AGAIN, scheisshund. FYI you don't get off the hook for your lying just by making more random, unsubstantiated accusations.

Grow up.

[Legato]

4 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

This would mean something coming from virtually anyone but you, a dishonest loser who engages in the exact same behaviour he's whining about here. Go post some more scat pictures you dumb f*ck.

 

Name calling usually points to bearded men who's hand won't fit in the cookie jar anymore.

[Black Dog]

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Blah, blah, blah. 

You got busted for being a liar and a weasel, AGAIN, scheisshund. FYI you don't get off the hook for your lying just by making more random, unsubstantiated accusations.

Grow up.

Whatever you say shiteater, we can all see your post history which is full of strawmen, personal attacks and utter fabrications (like your recent claim that your Nazi buddy James Fields was surrounded and attacked by protesters before he ran his car into protesters). 

[impartialobserver]

Still waiting for this flood of propaganda. At least not in my neck of the woods anyways, There is considerably less buzz about this election than any other I have seen. Rode around the neighborhood (560 homes at last count) and not a single Trump or Harris sign. 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

Whatever you say shiteater, we can all see your post history which is full of strawmen, personal attacks and utter fabrications (like your recent claim that your Nazi buddy James Fields was surrounded and attacked by protesters before he ran his car into protesters). 

No, that history doesn't exist, and you just saying so doesn't make it so.

You contribute nothing here, scheisshund. Your posts don't contain facts, insights, stats, cites, or anything intelligent or useful. They're just a constant stream of lies, unsubstantiated insults and drivel. 

Again, you just have a bunch of posts here today that are off-topic, slanderous and generally vile.

 

This thread is about the fact that the MSM is omitting Kamala's failures of character, competence and performance from their election narrative and just ballyhooing about her in general, without citing anything that she has actually accomplished aside from being appointed to various positions for which she was woefully unqualified. The Kamala that you think you know is just a figment of MSM propaganda, nothing more.

Your contention that User was somehow being a misogynist for saying that "tampons don't belong in boys' bathrooms" was just a dumb slander. The forum doesn't need a loser like you just chiming in to fling poop at people for no reason. 

You know that what I said about Fields was true, there's a video of it, and I didn't say it because I feel like he should get out of jail, I showed you that video to prove, beyond a shadow of doubt, how lopsided the MSM is:

1. The MSM lied and pretended that Brooks had 'his reasons' for plowing through a crowd of people in Waukesha - although they provided no evidence of it - and
2. Fields had at least that exact but flimsy excuse, caught on video, which the MSM ignored.
3. Darrell Brooks was as much of a racist as Fields was, and even called for racial violence regarding the BLM riots, but CNN whitewashed that from the picture.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THE MEDIA NEVER SHOULD HAVE PRETENDED THAT BROOKS HAD ANY REASON TO RUN OVER PEOPLE?

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT BROOKS COMMITTED A SPECIFIC ATTACK AGAINST A SPECIFIC GROUP OF PEOPLE FOR BROOKS' OWN F'ED UP POLITICAL REASONS?

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT CNN COULDN'T ADMIT THAT SOMEONE COMMITTED A TERRORIST ATTACK LIKE THAT, BASED SOLELY ON CNN PROPAGANDA, SO THEY WENT WITH HIS DUMB EXCUSE DESPITE THERE BEING NO EVIDENCE OF IT? 

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT CNN HID VIDEO SHOWING THAT FIELDS AT LEAST HAD A GROUP OF PROTESTERS AROUD HIM, AND HAD HIS CAR HIT WITH A BAT, RIGHT BEFORE HE SPED OFF?

Those are all facts, dummy. 

Bottom line: Fields had the exact excuse that the MSM tried to make for Brooks. The exact excuse. That doesn't make it good enough, or make it right, or make Fields any less of a racist loser, but he had that exact excuse. The MSM just chose not to show it. Brooks did not have that excuse. Not at all. No witnesses say that they witnessed anything indicating that Brooks was being chased or threatened in the span of time that he ran over 60+ people. Still, the MSM tried to pretend that Brooks did not commit a terrorist attack, he was "just a guy running from a domestic disturbance" lol. It was the dumbest thing you ever heard in your life, id10t. Do you now how many incidences there are of domestic disturbances every day in the US? Do you know how many people receive death threats every day in the US? When was the last time you saw someone "flee from a domestic disturbance and drive through a crowd of people, killing women and children"? Why did the MSM pretend that he was 'running from a domestic disturbance'?

Here's CNN's story: https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/22/us/what-we-know-about-suspect-in-waukesha-parade-tragedy/index.html

Did you notice that there's no mention of Kyle Rittenhouse in it? No mention of the verdict that came down just 4 days earlier just a bike-ride away? No mention that Brooks was a violent pro-BLM racist? 

Nov 23, 2021. Waukesha - Darrell Brooks' rampage. 

Nov 19, 2021. Kenosha - 40 miles away - Rittenhouse Innocent

Brooks https://nypost.com/2021/11/24/darrell-brooks-called-for-violence-against-white-people/

 

Dumbass: What I wrote about Fields was just to highlight CNN's utterly dishonest reporting. Period. Stop making accusations against me for telling the truth. Be mad at CNN for being despicable, dummy. 

Edited August 9, 2024 by WestCanMan

[CdnFox]

8 hours ago, Black Dog said:

lol why would you bring this up again after I already dismantled this with your own source?

My source literally proves i'm right. 

My source says it was a concept long before the nazis, and that the nazis believed in lebenstraum and felt it was necessary to protect germany and it's people whom they considered racially superior.  

In short - it'was always a german theory and was always considered necessary to protect germany and the nazi's agreed with that and felt it would protect german superiority. So - they didn't do it to wipe out races they didn't like They did it to make germany better.  

So it was not racially motivated.  They didn't do it because they hated other races, they did it because they wanted more room for germans. 

And that's why it was ALWAYS wanted.  

For it to have been a 'racial' policy they would have to have wanted to do it not because they wanted to expand germany but because they hated the other races.   That's not why - they wanted to expand germany. 

Sorry kiddo.    I guess you were too dumb to realize you lost that one  

[WestCanMan]

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/qVewzv6PaxMatVNH/?mibextid=J7ZoRX

[Black Dog]

On 8/9/2024 at 5:53 PM, CdnFox said:

My source literally proves i'm right. 

Your source literally has a section titled "racial ideology" that says this:

The Nazi usages of the term Lebensraum were explicitly racial, to justify the mystical right of the racially superior Germanic peoples (Herrenvolk) to fulfill their cultural destiny at the expense of racially inferior peoples (Untermenschen), such as the Slavs of Poland, Russia, Ukraine, and the other non–Germanic peoples of "the East".

Quote

 

My source says it was a concept long before the nazis, and that the nazis believed in lebenstraum and felt it was necessary to protect germany and it's people whom they considered racially superior.  

In short - it'was always a german theory and was always considered necessary to protect germany and the nazi's agreed with that and felt it would protect german superiority. So - they didn't do it to wipe out races they didn't like They did it to make germany better.  

So it was not racially motivated.  They didn't do it because they hated other races, they did it because they wanted more room for germans. 

 

lol. lmao, even.

Quote

For it to have been a 'racial' policy they would have to have wanted to do it not because they wanted to expand germany but because they hated the other races.   That's not why - they wanted to expand germany. 

You literally just admitted it was motivated by their belief in racial superiority you dingus.But i'm sure you'll have some incredible galaxy brained explanation about how believing in racial superiority and wanting to purge other races from the territory they desired wasn't racist or motivated by hate.

Quote

Sorry kiddo.    I guess you were too dumb to realize you lost that one  

Only you could be dumb enough to cite a source that proves you wrong, write an explanation that directly contradicts your thesis, and then pretend you won the argument. Zero self awarreness.

 

 

[CdnFox]

On 8/9/2024 at 8:20 AM, Black Dog said:

Whatever you say shiteater, we can all see your post history which is full of strawmen, personal attacks and utter fabrications (like your recent claim that your Nazi buddy James Fields was surrounded and attacked by protesters before he ran his car into protesters). 

we CAN all see his post history. And yours.  He makes better arguments than you, concedes points where he's wrong, puts actual thought into his posts and often has cites 

You on the other hand are dumb enough to call someone a "shiteater" while claiming that THEIR posts are full of personal attacks. That's what your posts are like. 

IF you thought comparing your post histories with @WestCanMan  was going to work out well for you, all i can say is that's pretty solid proof you're a little delusional  

[Black Dog]

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

we CAN all see his post history. And yours.  He makes better arguments than you, concedes points where he's wrong, puts actual thought into his posts and often has cites

You on the other hand are dumb enough to call someone a "shiteater" while claiming that THEIR posts are full of personal attacks. That's what your posts are like. 

IF you thought comparing your post histories with @WestCanMan  was going to work out well for you, all i can say is that's pretty solid proof you're a little delusional

lol, sure man. Dude is a textbook Gish Galloper (when he's not posting pictures of shit that is). Someone else compared him to a guy wearing a sandwich board ranting on a street corner and I couldn't have put it better myself. The fact you find his output impressive or persuasive merely indicates what a mental midget you are.

[WestCanMan]

7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

we CAN all see his post history. And yours.  He makes better arguments than you, concedes points where he's wrong, puts actual thought into his posts and often has cites 

You on the other hand are dumb enough to call someone a "shiteater" while claiming that THEIR posts are full of personal attacks. That's what your posts are like. 

IF you thought comparing your post histories with @WestCanMan  was going to work out well for you, all i can say is that's pretty solid proof you're a little delusional  

How much credibility is that guy gonna lose before he changes his username ffs? 

Can you imagine if you were running for office or something and THAT GUY was saying that he's on your side? 

It's almost like he's a double-agent or something. 

His account sounds like: "I bark at airplanes, lick windows, scream at children, and I'm voting for Kamala Harris! Who's with me?"

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Your source literally has a section titled "racial ideology" that says this:The Nazi usages of the term Lebensraum were explicitly racial,

 

Not really.  It suited their beliefs but it was policy long before that.  Put it another way - it's what germany and the nazis wanted, and had for decades, and it happend cheerfully to mesh with their dislike of those people. 

But no it wasn't explicitly racial. 

And no it wasn't about 'Justifying the mystic right" of anything.  It was about expanding the german empire because they thought the german empire and its people were best - which is the same reason that lebensraum had been popular for decades BEFORE the nazis  

They wanted a german empire that covered the world. (except possibly asia and japan). 

The policy has nothing to do with race. The policy has everythning to do with the expansion of their "Germany".  it's that simple. 

2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

You literally just admitted it was motivated by their belief in racial superiority you dingus

Sigh. I'm going to have to get the crayons out to expain this aren't i.  

No.  I "admitted" that they wanted to expand germany and have more room for germany to grow and expand. 

The reason they want that is because they think that germany, it's nationality, it's people, everything is the best. 

In short - it had nothing to do with wiping out other races just becasue they were inferior. It's not like htey were going to kill those people and go home. 

It had everything to do with "we want more room for germany".  And they excused that to a degree by saying "and the people we kill or drive off aren't worth worrying about anyway".   But the motivation was "we want more room for Germany". 

That's literally what lebensraum means.  And while their racism might have happily meshed with it, no matter WHO lived next door they were going to invade and take their lebensraum    the racism didn't drive the policy, the policy was in place and simply worked well with the racism  

 

Did you get that now? Do you need me to type slower?  

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

lol, sure man. Dude is a textbook Gish Galloper (when he's not posting pictures of shit that is). Someone else compared him to a guy wearing a sandwich board ranting on a street corner and I couldn't have put it better myself. The fact you find his output impressive or persuasive merely indicates what a mental midget you are.

You literally personally attacked him in a post complaining about his personal attacks.  I mean - right there you lose  

I'll grant you this - there are many others on the left on this board who are dumber than you and make worse arguments but you suffer from the same problem most of them do. You frequenly start with an answer and try to work your way back to a question. 

Westcanman may not be perfect (which of us are? ) and i disagree with some of his arguments but he makes the arguments better than you do for the most part, and thats the main thing even if i disagree with a conclusion. And usually i don't, he's usually got a good point. 

 

Edited August 12, 2024 by CdnFox

[WestCanMan]

6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

lol, sure man. Dude is a textbook Gish Galloper (when he's not posting pictures of shit that is). Someone else compared him to a guy wearing a sandwich board ranting on a street corner and I couldn't have put it better myself. The fact you find his output impressive or persuasive merely indicates what a mental midget you are.

Grow up, scheisshund. Just admit that the dog-pooping photo is the perfect metaphor for you. 

All you do is lie, use racist epithets, make unsubstantiated accusations, talk about other posters, and just basically shit-talk here all day long.

Not even one person missed out on one word of wisdom when I replaced your posts with a photo of a dog pooping. 

Do you get it?

What in all of this:

• lol, sure man. Dude is a textbook Gish Galloper (when he's not posting pictures of shit that is). Someone else compared him to a guy wearing a sandwich board ranting on a street corner and I couldn't have put it better myself. The fact you find his output impressive or persuasive merely indicates what a mental midget you are.

is germane to the topic of "MSM propaganda for the Dems"?

If I replaced that with a picture of a soccer ball, would anyone be missing out on any valuable information about MSM propaganda? 

No, not at all.

But the picture of the soccer ball has nothing to do with you. You're not an athlete, you're someone who's old enough to be able to read and write, and yet the content of your posts is perfectly represented by a dog taking a shit (admittedly, there should be a keyboard under his turd, so it's only 99% accurate, my bad). But if I'm being 100% honest, that's literally the exact amount of value that those posts have.  

If you doubt me, go back to one of your posts where I quoted you but replaced your words with that photo, and tell me what part of your post was germane to the thread topic... I dare you. Find some on-topic, truthful words that you said on this forum that I replaced with that photo. You can't do it, buddy. That dog is your mini-me. He shares your IQ but he doesn't lie. My apologies to the dog. 

[Black Dog]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Not really.  It suited their beliefs but it was policy long before that.  Put it another way - it's what germany and the nazis wanted, and had for decades, and it happend cheerfully to mesh with their dislike of those people. 

But no it wasn't explicitly racial. 

You are very wrong.

As your link make explicit, lebensraum as a concept was coined as a term describing physical geography as a factor that influences human activities in developing into a society. That geography concept was adapted into an ideology that was explicitly racial in nature, rooted in the belief of the superiority of the German Volk and the inferiority of the Slavic races to the east.

Quote

And no it wasn't about 'Justifying the mystic right" of anything. 

lol that's literally from your own source, dummy! You're now arguing with your own source material which suggests you either didn't read it or don't understand it. 

Quote

 No.  I "admitted" that they wanted to expand germany and have more room for germany to grow and expand. 

The reason they want that is because they think that germany, it's nationality, it's people, everything is the best. 

This is what you wrote:

Quote

the nazis believed in lebenstraum and felt it was necessary to protect germany and it's people whom they considered racially superior.  

lol not only are you arguing with your own source, now you're arguing with yourself.

Quote

That's literally what lebensraum means.  And while their racism might have happily meshed with it, no matter WHO lived next door they were going to invade and take their lebensraum   the racism didn't drive the policy, the policy was in place and simply worked well with the racism

If you weren't a complete dummy you would note that they didn't have the same views towards the French, Dutch, Belgiums, Swiss or even f*cking Luxembourgers. That's because lebensraum was explicitly rooted in anti-Slavic racism and German superiority. You're trying to pretend these are separate and distinct ideas. They are not. The idea that Germans were entitled to living space in the east was inextricable from their ideas about their racial superiority.

Edited August 12, 2024 by Black Dog

[Black Dog]

21 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You literally personally attacked him in a post complaining about his personal attacks.  I mean - right there you lose  

I never complained about his personal attacks, I was pointing out that his whinging about personal attacks while frequently engaging in them himself is hypocritical. Try and keep up.

 

Quote

Westcanman may not be perfect (which of us are? ) and i disagree with some of his arguments but he makes the arguments better than you do for the most part, and thats the main thing even if i disagree with a conclusion. And usually i don't, he's usually got a good point. 

This is entirely about you being ideologically aligned and zero to do with the quality of his arguments (which, again, are shit). You simply lack self-awareness and so delude yourself into thinking it's something else.

[WestCanMan]

I'm not really that important at all. You guys can quit talking about me anytime and I don't really care.

Say whatever you want about me black dog, I honestly couldn't care less. Leftists drag my name through the mud here every day. In my opinion it's a badge of honour to be disliked, and even better yet, hated, by leftists nowadays. Sorry man. 

Thanks for the kind words @CdnFox. Cheers!

[Black Dog]

25 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I'm not really that important at all. You guys can quit talking about me anytime and I don't really care.

Say whatever you want about me black dog, I honestly couldn't care less. Leftists drag my name through the mud here every day. In my opinion it's a badge of honour to be disliked, and even better yet, hated, by leftists nowadays. Sorry man. 

Thanks for the kind words @CdnFox. Cheers!

Oh I'm sure it's not just leftists who hate you.

[WestCanMan]

10 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Oh I'm sure it's not just leftists who hate you.

I'd rather have the full respect and love of the people I care about than tell enough lies to be accepted by leftards. 

Believe me, the last thing I ever want to hear is that someone thought I was one of you guys. 

Edited August 12, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Black Dog]

13 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I'd rather have the full respect and love of the people I care about than tell enough lies to be accepted by leftards. 

Believe me, the last thing I ever want to hear is that someone thought I was one of you guys. 

I have bad news for you lol

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

I have bad news for you lol

No you don't. You're just here running your mouth as usual.

Do you think that I believe for even a second that a weasel like you has any respect from any decent people in their life?

You wear your lack of integrity like a badge of honour ffs. I feel sorry for anyone unfortunate enough to be in your family because they're stuck with you. 

[Black Dog]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

No you don't. You're just here running your mouth as usual.

Do you think that I believe for even a second that a weasel like you has any respect from any decent people in their life?

You wear your lack of integrity like a badge of honour ffs. I feel sorry for anyone unfortunate enough to be in your family because they're stuck with you. 

I think you do believe this but you believe a lot of other really stupid shit (Derek Chauvin is innocent! Donald Trump is not an incoherent blob of ooze!) so it doesn't count for much.

[WestCanMan]

19 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I think you do believe this

If I said it I believe it, and if I said it in a declarative sentence then I know it to be true. Easy peasy. 

Quote

but you believe a lot of other really stupid shit (Derek Chauvin is innocent!

I wouldn't say innocent, but I've never seen a more unfair trial in my life. 

Dems incited riots in Floyd's name, they withheld video that painted his case in a completely different light, and all of those things contributed to a hostile situation were any verdict aside from guilty would have resulted in massive loss of life. 

You don't care because it wasn't you on that hotseat, but if you were him, knowing how much video evidence existed of what happened before Floyd ended up on the ground, you'd suddenly care about integrity.

Quote

Donald Trump is not an incoherent blob of ooze!) so it doesn't count for much.

You guys all lied about Biden's incompetence for years, and now look at the border. Look at all wars on the planet, ad how they're poised to go off. Look at the cost of groceries. The cost of living.

It's atrocious that you'd want things to keep going the way they are just out of artisan politics.

"An evil man will burn his country to the ground to rule over the ashes." You could make the case that's referring to Biden and Walz both. 

[CdnFox]

6 hours ago, Black Dog said:

I never complained about his personal attacks, I was pointing out that his whinging about personal attacks while frequently engaging in them himself is hypocritical. Try and keep up.

You literally complained about his personal attacks. While personally attacking him.   

Lets take a look at it again. 

"Whatever you say shiteater, we can all see your post history which is full of strawmen, personal attacks and utter fabrications"

- you.

No mention of 'whinging'.  No mention of complaining of others attacks.  You just simply dismiss him because his "posts are full" of <insert numerous personal attacks>

Nice attempt at spin but it's there in black and white.  You are condemning him for doing what you yourself are doing in the same sentence. 

Sorry kiddo. 

 

[Black Dog]

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

If I said it I believe it, and if I said it in a declarative sentence then I know it to be true. Easy peasy. 

Again, I think you think that but you're a very dumb person who believes a lot of dumb shit to be true.

Quote

 

I wouldn't say innocent, but I've never seen a more unfair trial in my life. 

Dems incited riots in Floyd's name, they withheld video that painted his case in a completely different light, and all of those things contributed to a hostile situation were any verdict aside from guilty would have resulted in massive loss of life. 

You don't care because it wasn't you on that hotseat, but if you were him, knowing how much video evidence existed of what happened before Floyd ended up on the ground, you'd suddenly care about integrity.

 

blah blah blah, we all saw the video that maters, the one of the pig casually kneeling on a guys neck for long enough to kill him, the rest is noise.

Quote

 

You guys all lied about Biden's incompetence for years, and now look at the border. Look at all wars on the planet, ad how they're poised to go off. Look at the cost of groceries. The cost of living.

It's atrocious that you'd want things to keep going the way they are just out of artisan politics.

"An evil man will burn his country to the ground to rule over the ashes." You could make the case that's referring to Biden and Walz both. 

 

Right because it's not partisan brain rot to blame literally all the world's problems on one guy. Sure man.

Starting to think that the single most defining trait of online conservatives is a lack of self-awareness, which certainly tracks with other conservative traits like reduced empathy and emotional intelligence.