gatomontes99 Posted July 17 Report Share Posted July 17 8 hours ago, BeaverFever said: Cannon’s ruling can be appealed, period. That’s just a fact and the Department of Justice has already said it will appeal Given that SCOTUS is also Republican controlled and has already demonstrated that they are a weapon of the Republican Party, SCOTUS will probably find an excuse to side with Trump But before then there’s an appeals court that will hear the case PS she didn’t sayJack Smith’s particular appointment didn’t follow proper procedure. She said no Special Counsel has authority which is kind of funny because they’ve been used for decades including in Hunter Biden’s recent and up upcoming trials. Ironically Biden attempted to make similar arguments Trump just did to get his cases dismissed but BOTH Democrat judges in Delaware and California were having none of it. Again just shows how the Dems are operating with integrity while the Republicans blatantly cheat at every turn. You clearly haven't paid attention. There have been a couple of cases, this year, that didn't go the Republican way. However, the SCOTUS has already issued a ruling that referenced Jack Smith's appointment. So any appeal is dead. Appeal away, it will never go back to court. This case is toast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatomontes99 Posted July 17 Report Share Posted July 17 7 hours ago, cougar said: There was no coup! (or if there was it wasn't him instigating it?) He did not cheat on taxes! He did not hide and unlawfully keep classified docs! He did not f* Stormy D. and endorse grabbing women by the p* in public. He was not convicted of34 criminal charges! Give us a break! Out of 400,000,000 Americans this is the slimy slug you vote for ???? Just allowing him to still run shows the USA IS A BANANA republic! You have no idea what a banana republic is, do you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted July 17 Author Report Share Posted July 17 7 hours ago, cougar said: There was no coup! (or if there was it wasn't him instigating it?) He did not cheat on taxes! He did not hide and unlawfully keep classified docs! He did not f* Stormy D. and endorse grabbing women by the p* in public. He was not convicted of34 criminal charges! Give us a break! Out of 400,000,000 Americans this is the slimy slug you vote for ???? Just allowing him to still run shows the USA IS A BANANA republic! Cougar...you don't like Trump. I can tell. 😆 I suppose you'd like Brandon and the Democrats to have 4 more years to completely destroy our neighbors? The Republican party overwhelmingly elected Trump their candidate. As that happens, all the lawfare the Democrats have engaged in has fallen apart. Does that burn your bra too? Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted July 17 Report Share Posted July 17 On 7/15/2024 at 10:15 AM, gatomontes99 said: His appointment was illegal. Special Counsel are supposed to be extra DOJ not intra DOJ and they are supposed to have limited scope and limited jurisdiction. Jack Smith was in the DOJ and was given an unlimited scope woth unlimited jurisdiction. There is no room for appeal. Yeah, but they really needed to get Trump. They couldn't let the constitution get in the way. Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatomontes99 Posted July 17 Report Share Posted July 17 7 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Yeah, but they really needed to get Trump. They couldn't let the constitution get in the way. That's the great thing about banana republic laws, they have a wide ranging interpretation that are contingent on your affiliations. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted July 18 Report Share Posted July 18 8 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: That's the great thing about banana republic laws, they have a wide ranging interpretation that are contingent on your affiliations. NOT DEAD IN THE WATER. Duh You're going to have to change your thread title to STOP LYING. Special counsel appeals judge's dismissal of Trump documents case Quote Special Counsel Jack Smith on Wednesday appealed the dismissal of the federal criminal case against former President Donald Trump over his handling of classified documents. On Monday, U.S. district judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the case, concluding in her 93-page ruling that Smith's appointment violated the U.S. Constitution. She said only Congress or the president have the power to appoint a special counsel — not a U.S. attorney general. Smith had contested this argument, which also went against the precedent from other courts. Cannon's opinion closely tracked reasoning from Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in a recent concurrence in another case against Trump. Smith appealed the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. The special counsel's case centered on Trump taking classified documents to his Mar-a-Lago Club in Florida, keeping them in unsecured rooms like a ballroom and a bathroom, and then refusing to return them to the government. Three strikes and Cannon is SHOT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatomontes99 Posted July 18 Report Share Posted July 18 4 hours ago, robosmith said: NOT DEAD IN THE WATER. Duh You're going to have to change your thread title to STOP LYING. Special counsel appeals judge's dismissal of Trump documents case Three strikes and Cannon is SHOT. If the SCOTUS has already ruled that Jack Smith is unconstitutional, a lower court really can't do anything. It's dead. They can appeal. But it is dead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodad Posted July 18 Report Share Posted July 18 2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: If the SCOTUS has already ruled that Jack Smith is unconstitutional, a lower court really can't do anything. It's dead. They can appeal. But it is dead. No, it didn't. lol You're just full of nonsense. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted July 18 Report Share Posted July 18 6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: If the SCOTUS has already ruled that Jack Smith is unconstitutional, a lower court really can't do anything. It's dead. They can appeal. But it is dead. The SCOTUS HAS NOT RULED that. Thomas opining on that in HIS OPINION WAS NOT VOTED ON. Duh 4 hours ago, Hodad said: No, it didn't. lol You're just full of nonsense. And so desperate, he's just flinging mud to see if it sticks. LMAO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.