Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Cannon’s ruling can be appealed, period. That’s just a fact and the Department of Justice has already said it will appeal 
 

Given that SCOTUS is also Republican controlled and has already demonstrated that they are a weapon of the Republican Party, SCOTUS will probably find an excuse to side with Trump   But before then there’s an appeals court that will hear the case  

PS she didn’t sayJack Smith’s particular appointment didn’t follow proper procedure. She said no Special Counsel has authority which is kind of funny because they’ve been used for decades including in Hunter Biden’s recent and up upcoming trials. Ironically Biden attempted to make similar arguments Trump just did to get his cases dismissed but BOTH Democrat judges in Delaware and California were having none of it. Again just shows how the Dems are operating with integrity while the Republicans blatantly cheat at every turn. 

You clearly haven't paid attention. There have been a couple of cases, this year, that didn't go the Republican way. However, the SCOTUS has already issued a ruling that referenced Jack Smith's appointment. So any appeal is dead. Appeal away, it will never go back to court. This case is toast.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
7 hours ago, cougar said:

There was no coup! (or if there was it wasn't him instigating it?)

He did not cheat on taxes!

He did not hide and unlawfully keep classified docs!

He did not f* Stormy D.  and endorse grabbing women by the p* in public.

He was not convicted of34 criminal charges!

Give us a break!  Out of 400,000,000 Americans this is the slimy slug you vote for ????

Just allowing him to still run shows the USA IS A BANANA republic!

You have no idea what a banana republic is, do you?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
7 hours ago, cougar said:

There was no coup! (or if there was it wasn't him instigating it?)

He did not cheat on taxes!

He did not hide and unlawfully keep classified docs!

He did not f* Stormy D.  and endorse grabbing women by the p* in public.

He was not convicted of34 criminal charges!

Give us a break!  Out of 400,000,000 Americans this is the slimy slug you vote for ????

Just allowing him to still run shows the USA IS A BANANA republic!

Cougar...you don't like Trump. I can tell. 😆

I suppose you'd like Brandon and the Democrats to have 4 more years to completely destroy our neighbors?

The Republican party overwhelmingly elected Trump their candidate. As that happens, all the lawfare the Democrats have engaged in has fallen apart. 

Does that burn your bra too?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
On 7/15/2024 at 10:15 AM, gatomontes99 said:

His appointment was illegal. Special Counsel are supposed to be extra DOJ not intra DOJ and they are supposed to have limited scope and limited jurisdiction. Jack Smith was in the DOJ and was given an unlimited scope woth unlimited jurisdiction. There is no room for appeal.

Yeah, but they really needed to get Trump. They couldn't let the constitution get in the way. 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
7 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Yeah, but they really needed to get Trump. They couldn't let the constitution get in the way. 

That's the great thing about banana republic laws, they have a wide ranging interpretation that are contingent on your affiliations.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
8 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

That's the great thing about banana republic laws, they have a wide ranging interpretation that are contingent on your affiliations.

NOT DEAD IN THE WATER. Duh

You're going to have to change your thread title to STOP LYING.

Special counsel appeals judge's dismissal of Trump documents case

Quote

Special Counsel Jack Smith on Wednesday appealed the dismissal of the federal criminal case against former President Donald Trump over his handling of classified documents.

On Monday, U.S. district judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the case, concluding in her 93-page ruling that Smith's appointment violated the U.S. Constitution. She said only Congress or the president have the power to appoint a special counsel — not a U.S. attorney general.

 

Smith had contested this argument, which also went against the precedent from other courts. Cannon's opinion closely tracked reasoning from Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in a recent concurrence in another case against Trump.

Smith appealed the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.

The special counsel's case centered on Trump taking classified documents to his Mar-a-Lago Club in Florida, keeping them in unsecured rooms like a ballroom and a bathroom, and then refusing to return them to the government.

Three strikes and Cannon is SHOT.

Posted
4 hours ago, robosmith said:

NOT DEAD IN THE WATER. Duh

You're going to have to change your thread title to STOP LYING.

Special counsel appeals judge's dismissal of Trump documents case

Three strikes and Cannon is SHOT.

If the SCOTUS has already ruled that Jack Smith is unconstitutional, a lower court really can't do anything. It's dead. They can appeal. But it is dead.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

If the SCOTUS has already ruled that Jack Smith is unconstitutional, a lower court really can't do anything. It's dead. They can appeal. But it is dead.

No, it didn't. lol 

You're just full of nonsense. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

If the SCOTUS has already ruled that Jack Smith is unconstitutional, a lower court really can't do anything. It's dead. They can appeal. But it is dead.

The SCOTUS HAS NOT RULED that. Thomas opining on that in HIS OPINION WAS NOT VOTED ON. Duh

4 hours ago, Hodad said:

No, it didn't. lol 

You're just full of nonsense. 

And so desperate, he's just flinging mud to see if it sticks. LMAO

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...