Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

 

It's not his business to criticize the highest court in the country: that used to be a bad, no-no thing. The branches are critical parts of democracy, all of them. They are the face of the democracy, together: when one is diminished, the democracy itself suffers. He shouldn't undermine the democracy even further, in the sad state it is already. Why couldn't he get it? How did we come to forget it so fast?

It's not about Joe. It's about America! Seems like he just couldn't get it. Oh oh. Looks like nobody gets it anymore. Or he can't think for himself anymore and someone is steering him from the shadows to a sad and dismal demise?

Let's recall, Joe has to prove: to the people, these two things:

1) he's still a candidate that can be taken seriously, and

2) he's one of best candidates the sane America can put forward. It was supposed to be "the best" but OK, past that.

Joe just wouldn't get it. He's deep into his own reality. Distractions and words won't work. Maybe Joe already decided subconsciously, to go down in flames and take it down with him and to f-ck with what's after? A cozy soft place and the memoirs, guaranteed? I can't tell. But it doesn't look like he either cares, or thinks or remembers that there will be things and there will be America after him.

Joe is becoming a sad, caricature reflection of his arch-enemy by making it about himself. Is it past the point where we remember what it was supposed to be, and was about?

What a f-ing mess is America's politics this days. A total failure of integrity vs. an accomplished failure of responsibility. Or is it America itself?

Edited by myata

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted

And yes, presidents should have some immunity for decisions in exercising their official duty as defined by the law. There isn't anything wrong with it, in general. We have to be able to keep our reason, and our minds: not handing them over either way. With our independent minds, the democracy goes as well.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
5 hours ago, myata said:

 

It's not his business to criticize the highest court in the country: that used to be a bad, no-no thing. The branches are critical parts of democracy, all of them. They are the face of the democracy, together: when one is diminished, the democracy itself suffers. He shouldn't undermine the democracy even further, in the sad state it is already. Why couldn't he get it? How did we come to forget it so fast?

It's not about Joe. It's about America! Seems like he just couldn't get it. Oh oh. Looks like nobody gets it anymore. Or he can't think for himself anymore and someone is steering him from the shadows to a sad and dismal demise?

Let's recall, Joe has to prove: to the people, these two things:

1) he's still a candidate that can be taken seriously, and

2) he's one of best candidates the sane America can put forward. It was supposed to be "the best" but OK, past that.

Joe just wouldn't get it. He's deep into his own reality. Distractions and words won't work. Maybe Joe already decided subconsciously, to go down in flames and take it down with him and to f-ck with what's after? A cozy soft place and the memoirs, guaranteed? I can't tell. But it doesn't look like he either cares, or thinks or remembers that there will be things and there will be America after him.

Joe is becoming a sad, caricature reflection of his arch-enemy by making it about himself. Is it past the point where we remember what it was supposed to be, and was about?

What a f-ing mess is America's politics this days. A total failure of integrity vs. an accomplished failure of responsibility. Or is it America itself?

Joe is going to RUN ON the corruption and extremism of this SCOTUS. NOTHING WRONG with that.

He can do that because this SCOTUS has LOST the public's trust due to their blatant attempt at a massive shift to suit their POLITICS. Esp after their stated respect for stare decisis during confirmation, which was LYING.

Posted
4 hours ago, robosmith said:

Joe is going to RUN ON the corruption and extremism of this SCOTUS. NOTHING WRONG with that.

He can do that because this SCOTUS has LOST the public's trust due to their blatant attempt at a massive shift to suit their POLITICS. Esp after their stated respect for stare decisis during confirmation, which was LYING.

Have you noticed that Joe has nothing positive to run on?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
10 hours ago, myata said:

It's not his business to criticize the highest court in the country: that used to be a bad, no-no thing.

So you don't like it when Biden criticizes the courts or when Trump criticizes the courts. I don't agree with you but at least you're consistent. There are few things in life that are above criticism and the justice system isn't one of them.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, suds said:

There are few things in life that are above criticism and the justice system isn't one of them.

No institution is infallible and citizens are free to disagree and criticize any of them. This is different as he is not just an average citizens but expresses an official position of a head of one branch of democratic power. When legitimacy of democratic institution is brought into question, the democracy suffers as a whole. We cannot chose one branch over another, it would cause a collapse of the entire construction.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
36 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Have you noticed that Joe has nothing positive to run on?

No, cause I don't watch FOS LIES exclusively.

It seems you've not heard about all the RepubliCON pols who are bragging about programs they VOTED AGAINST being delivered to their constituents. LMAO

Posted
2 minutes ago, myata said:

No institution is infallible and citizens are free to disagree and criticize any of them. This is different as he is not just an average citizens but expresses an official position of a head of one branch of democratic power. When legitimacy of democratic institution is brought into question, the democracy suffers as a whole. We cannot chose one branch over another, it would cause a collapse of the entire construction.

When Joe criticizes the SCOTUS, it provides valuable feedback that they need to CHANGE COURSE.

Of course the problem from that is the right winger JoSCOTUS don't GAS, cause they don't have to.

It ALSO tells the voters that their choice for POTUS is RESPONSIBLE for the corruption and extremism on the current SCOTUS.

Posted
18 minutes ago, robosmith said:

POTUS is RESPONSIBLE for the corruption and

We (the citizens) cannot chose one branch over another, it would cause a collapse of the entire construction. Is Joe past getting that, I wonder?

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Have you noticed that Joe has nothing positive to run on?

The only thing joe runs on is his sentences.  And of course finally beating medicare. 

  • Haha 2

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No, cause I don't watch FOS LIES exclusively.

It seems you've not heard about all the RepubliCON pols who are bragging about programs they VOTED AGAINST being delivered to their constituents. LMAO

And Biden still has nothing positive to run on.

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

The only thing joe runs on is his sentences.  And of course finally beating medicare. 

I see what you did there.

  • Haha 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted

Joe biden:

"enoyreve ees ot taerg s'ti ,gnineve siht ereh gnimoc rof uoy knahT"

(aide turns telepropmpter correct way up)

"Thank you for coming here this evening, it's great to see everyone"

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
13 minutes ago, myata said:

We (the citizens) cannot chose one branch over another, it would cause a collapse of the entire construction. Is Joe past getting that, I wonder?

The POTUS chooses the JoSCOTUS and the voters choose the POTUS. Just like Trump in part got elected by promising to appoint JoSCOTUS who would kill RvW and Joe is promising the opposite as well as a national law to reverse the effects of the Dobbs decision.

Are you past getting that?

13 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

And Biden still has nothing positive to run on.

The RepubliCON pols bragging about delivering JOE'S PROGRAMS disagree.

What you believe really doesn't matter.

Posted
6 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Joe biden:

"enoyreve ees ot taerg s'ti ,gnineve siht ereh gnimoc rof uoy knahT"

(aide turns telepropmpter correct way up)

"Thank you for coming here this evening, it's great to see everyone"

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The POTUS chooses the JoSCOTUS and the voters choose the POTUS. Just like Trump in part got elected by promising to appoint JoSCOTUS who would kill RvW and Joe is promising the opposite as well as a national law to reverse the effects of the Dobbs decision.

Are you past getting that?

The RepubliCON pols bragging about delivering JOE'S PROGRAMS disagree.

What you believe really doesn't matter.

He has nothing positive to run on.

All he has is TDS.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

He has nothing positive to run on.

All he has is TDS.

You're the one who is deranged.

Thanks for demonstrating your IGNORANCE about the programs RepubliCON pols are taking credit for.

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

You're the one who is deranged.

Thanks for demonstrating your IGNORANCE about the programs RepubliCON pols are taking credit for.

Are you Joe Biden? You have nothing positive. All you have is TDS.

Edited by gatomontes99

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^Tripling down on IGNORANT DRIVEL.

At least he's not tippling Bud Light.

Edited by Legato
Posted
2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^Tripling down on IGNORANT DRIVEL.

Trump's positives:

Close the border to illegal crossings

End the war in Ukraine

Support Israel

No tax on tips

Let states handle abortion

No men in women's locker rooms or mature sports

Lower inflation

Fewer regulations

Opportunity zones

Biden:

I hate Trump and so should you!

2 minutes ago, Legato said:

At least he's not tippling Bud Light.

Yuengling light!

Only because it is too hot for Shiner.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

Wow - you can actually see the moment he realizes he wasn't suppose to say that part :)  

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
23 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Wow - you can actually see the moment he realizes he wasn't suppose to say that part :)  

Ron Burgandy is laughing and calling him an amateur.

  • Haha 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Ron Burgandy is laughing and calling him an amateur.

LOL! The fact is the Meltdown that's going on on the left right now is absolutely unbelievable. The media is turning against the democrats because right now they look like complete and utter jackasses for insisting the Biden is perfectly fine. So to save their credibility they're claiming that they were lied to and that it's all the family's fault. Except for a handful who are trying to get behind the story and literally published an Insider report saying that Biden is generally fine between the hours of 10:00 and 4:00, but after that he gets tired and forgetful.

That's their defense. He's pretty lucid between 10 and 4:00. As long as the enemies of the united states keep their attacks during working hours like that there should be no problem. As long as there's no crisis outside of those hours they don't see a problem with him continuing.

Meanwhile the democrats are turning on the media and some of their biggest allies. They're sending letters around by email to all of their donors everywhere telling them not to listen to liberal supporting media sites that are saying that Biden is incompetent at all because they are vicious and spreading misinformation. These were their allies like 5 seconds ago.

It's also clear that the degeneration is progressing at a significant pace. However bad he is right now, in a year he's going to be considerably worse. And worse again the year after.

Basically a vote for Biden is a vote for Kamala Harris as president. Perhaps not shockingly she has come out saying we should continue to support Biden.

I don't think there's any coming back from this. They have to hope and pray something really bad happens with trump

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
17 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL! The fact is the Meltdown that's going on on the left right now is absolutely unbelievable. The media is turning against the democrats because right now they look like complete and utter jackasses for insisting the Biden is perfectly fine. So to save their credibility they're claiming that they were lied to and that it's all the family's fault. Except for a handful who are trying to get behind the story and literally published an Insider report saying that Biden is generally fine between the hours of 10:00 and 4:00, but after that he gets tired and forgetful.

That's their defense. He's pretty lucid between 10 and 4:00. As long as the enemies of the united states keep their attacks during working hours like that there should be no problem. As long as there's no crisis outside of those hours they don't see a problem with him continuing.

Meanwhile the democrats are turning on the media and some of their biggest allies. They're sending letters around by email to all of their donors everywhere telling them not to listen to liberal supporting media sites that are saying that Biden is incompetent at all because they are vicious and spreading misinformation. These were their allies like 5 seconds ago.

It's also clear that the degeneration is progressing at a significant pace. However bad he is right now, in a year he's going to be considerably worse. And worse again the year after.

Basically a vote for Biden is a vote for Kamala Harris as president. Perhaps not shockingly she has come out saying we should continue to support Biden.

I don't think there's any coming back from this. They have to hope and pray something really bad happens with trump

All of this is by design. Do you think it's an accident they did this before the convention and before the ballot deadlines?

 

Hell no!

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,928
    • Most Online
      1,878

    Newest Member
    BTDT
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...