Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Cannot get over your obsession with me 

ROFLMAO!!!!  Says the guy who spends night and day making high effort replies frantically with pictures and everything while crying to himself  :) 

I can't get over your ENTERTAINMENT value :)  

2 hours ago, Moonbox said:

CNDFOXirony.thumb.png.29527a414a433d493f93be4e7b290163.png

I'll just leave that here again...LOL 🤡

LOL  where did i tell anyone they lost? 

But as predicted, once you got your ass handed to you yet again, you're following me around desperately trying  to find a way to make yoruself feel better,... but only wind up looking stupid again :)  I totally called it :)  

LOL  you may be dumber than a dead skunk but at least you're consistent :)  

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

LOL  where did i tell anyone they lost? 

HAHAHAHA!  Where?!? 

Twice in the same thread, you dumb muppet.  

image.thumb.png.dc7b877d0ba3f65b14d3351d55631ef2.png

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

But as predicted, once you got your ass handed to you yet again

I get that it's upsetting when people show how much of an assclown you are, but you do it so regularly, and so obviously, that the solution is to think before you post something stupid.  Ranting emoji spam doesn't convince anyone of anything.  🤡

Edited by Moonbox
  • Like 1

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
On 6/22/2024 at 9:53 AM, ExFlyer said:

Why is a Top Secret clearance designation a "liberal" trap? When I had clearance (under both conservative and liberal governments) , any time there were names and personal information or information that may identify some individuals, it was top secret or at least secret.

And who is Tommy Mulclair and why does it matter what he said and what he would or would not do??

I don't know why people take Thomas Mulclair seriously?  You can still hold the government to account, while having the proper security credentials.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, CrazyCanuck89 said:

I don't know why people take Thomas Mulclair seriously? 

Because he spent a career in politics, it's been widely regarded as very knowledgeable and adept, and in fact was leader of an opposition party  at one point?

A better question is why would we take you seriously?

Quote

You can still hold the government to account, while having the proper security credentials.

Not really. You can no longer ask questions or make statements or if you find out knowledge from another source you can't even say it. It is very difficult. Why would you do that? Why would any sensible person make it far more difficult to do their job rather than demanding that the government does its job and publishes more information?

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
17 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Because he spent a career in politics, it's been widely regarded as very knowledgeable and adept, and in fact was leader of an opposition party  at one point?

A better question is why would we take you seriously?

Not really. You can no longer ask questions or make statements or if you find out knowledge from another source you can't even say it. It is very difficult. Why would you do that? Why would any sensible person make it far more difficult to do their job rather than demanding that the government does its job and publishes more information?

 

For an anti liberal, you sure suck up and defend top liberal wannabe tom mulcair LOL

Mulcair is no better than jagmeet,sucking up to whomever is in power. LOL

It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan

Posted
20 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Because he spent a career in politics, it's been widely regarded as very knowledgeable and adept, and in fact was leader of an opposition party  at one point?

A better question is why would we take you seriously?

Not really. You can no longer ask questions or make statements or if you find out knowledge from another source you can't even say it. It is very difficult. Why would you do that? Why would any sensible person make it far more difficult to do their job rather than demanding that the government does its job and publishes more information?

 

So now you guys trust career politicians?

Posted
2 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

For an anti liberal, you sure suck up and defend top liberal wannabe tom mulcair LOL

Mulcair is no better than jagmeet,sucking up to whomever is in power. LOL

I do find it funny seeing Conservatives, aplauding the former leader of the NDP.

If PP becomes PM, he will have to get the security clearance.  Their will be no more stalling.

Posted
1 hour ago, CrazyCanuck89 said:

I do find it funny seeing Conservatives, aplauding the former leader of the NDP.

If PP becomes PM, he will have to get the security clearance.  Their will be no more stalling.

He may even have to suck up to the NDP???
Now that would be a funny turn of events LOL

It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan

Posted
41 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

He may even have to suck up to the NDP???
Now that would be a funny turn of events LOL

Nah, they'll be gone. Nobody's happy with anyone on the left these days and PP will likely have a majority. 

But he won't be opposition leader any more so of course he'll read the reports.  But now he'll be able to take actions himself. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Nah, they'll be gone. Nobody's happy with anyone on the left these days...

Go tell it to Sunak and the UK Labour Party.

The only thing it takes to win elections these days is that you're not the last one in power.

The pox is on all of them these days.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Go tell it to Sunak and the UK Labour Party.

Why, are they canadian? Will they be running next election?

 But if we're talking about europe... 

Mapped: Europe’s rapidly rising right – POLITICO

The left has lead canada to disaster.  People are done with voting woke here and most of europe is the same. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
42 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Why, are they canadian? Will they be running next election?

No but I've heard people pointing at the  shift towards the right in Europe as a reason to believe there's a wholesale shift in people's ideologies going on. I don't buy it because of other indicators that say people are simply sick to death of all governments in general.

We'll know soon enough if PP is even half as reviled as Trudeau halfway through his term. People have little to no lasting patience anymore for any of them.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
Just now, eyeball said:

No but I've heard people pointing at the  shift towards the right in Europe as a reason to believe there's a wholesale shift in people's ideologies going on.

I don't buy it because of other indicators that say people are simply sick to death of all governments in general.

 

There are no such indications. If that were true they woudlnt' be switching to the right, they'd just stop voting. 

People are getting fed up with the left especially in europe.  They're sick of what immigration has done to their countries.  They're angry about the economic hardships resulting from 'woke' policy and endless climate change initiatives that don't change anything but cost a fortune.  They're not happy about a lot of recent things, 

And canada is no exception in that regard - the polling is quite clear that people feel there's way too much immigration, the young people see their future falling apart after 10 years of woke and they're desperate to save something of it, people get that the deficit si out of control and the debt now costs more in interest than the medical transfers to the provinces.'  ANd they see investment fleeing and quality of life dropping. 

Vote woke go broke. People are seeing that now across the world and looking to make changes.  IF they were just tired of gov't you'd see the same gov'ts elected with lower turn out. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,916
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    juliewar3214
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • LinkSoul60 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Раймо earned a badge
      First Post
    • Раймо earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • MDP went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • MDP earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...