Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why is a group of billionaires working to re-elect Trump?

Quote

Elon Musk and the entrepreneur and investor David Sacks reportedly held a secret dinner party of billionaires and millionaires in Hollywood last month. Its purpose: to defeat Joe Biden and re-install Donald Trump in the White House.

The guest list included Peter Thiel, Rupert Murdoch, Michael Milken, Travis Kalanick, and Steven Mnuchin, Trump’s treasury secretary.

Meanwhile, Musk is turning up the volume and frequency of his anti-Biden harangues on Twitter/X, the platform he owns.

According to an analysis by the New York Times, Musk has posted about the president at least seven times a month, on average, this year. He has criticized Biden on issues ranging from Biden’s age to his policies on health and immigration, calling Biden “a tragic front for a far left political machine”.

The Times analysis showed that over the same period of time, Musk has posted more than 20 times in favor of Trump, claiming that the criminal cases the former president now faces are the result of media and prosecutorial bias.


This is no small matter. Musk has 184 million followers on X, and because he owns the platform he’s able to manipulate the algorithm to maximize the number of people who see his posts.

No other leader of a social media firm has gone as far as Musk in supporting authoritarian leaders around the world. In addition to Trump, Musk has used his platform in support of India’s Narendra Modi, Argentina’s Javier Milei and Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro.

Some of this aligns with Musk’s business interests. In India, he secured lower import tariffs for Tesla vehicles. In Brazil, he opened a major new market for Starlink, SpaceX’s satellite internet service. In Argentina, he solidified access to lithium, the mineral most crucial to Tesla’s batteries.

But something deeper is going on. Musk, Thiel, Murdoch and their cronies are leading a movement against democracy.

Peter Thiel, the billionaire tech financier, once wrote: “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”

If freedom is not compatible with democracy, what is it compatible with?


Thiel donated $15m to the successful Republican senatorial campaign of JD Vance, who alleged that the 2020 election was stolen and that Biden’s immigration policy meant “more Democrat voters pouring into this country”. (Vance is now high on the list of Trump vice-presidential possibilities.)

Thiel also donated at least $10m to the Arizona Republican primary race of Blake Masters, who also claimed Trump won the 2020 election and admires Lee Kuan Yew, the authoritarian founder of modern Singapore.

Billionaire money is now gushing into the 2024 election. Just 50 families have already injected more than $600m into the 2024 election cycle, according to a new report from Americans for Tax Fairness. Most of this is going to the Trump Republican party. 

They are backing FASCISM. AKA, anti-democracy authoritarianism which is friendly to CORPORATE POWER. 🤮

Posted
3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Why is a group of billionaires working to re-elect Trump?

They are backing FASCISM. AKA, anti-democracy authoritarianism which is friendly to CORPORATE POWER. 🤮

What about the billionaires that back Biden?

Thirty-two billionaires and their spouses gave to Biden’s campaign in March, including 27 who donated to Biden for the first time, according to a Forbes analysis of the latest Federal Election Commission filings.

Aren't they backing the first President to use lawfare against a political rival? Isn't that far more authoritarian than the President that cut regulations and taxes while securing the boarder and maintaining international peace?

A cursory read of this article appears to show that it is a hit piece, designed to suppress Musk's opinions regarding Biden. Why does the left have to try and stop conservatives from talking? We love it when yall talk. We know what you are saying is crap. We want everyone else to hear it, so they know who to vote for. We only lose when libs hide their message well enough.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
3 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Interesting that the pro Trump and pro Biden posts have an anti billionaire theme.

Actually, the probiden post is antibillionaire. The protrump post points oit the hypocrisy of the probiden post.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
Just now, Michael Hardner said:

You're not getting a pass from me 😂

I just pointed out reality. If you don't want to accept it, that's on you.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
23 minutes ago, robosmith said:

But something deeper is going on. Musk, Thiel, Murdoch and their cronies are leading a movement against democracy.

What would a little cultist like you know about democracy? You have no clue what 'democracy' even requires, and you're dead against it.

FYI when FB, Twitter, Google and Microsoft were all banning people from the internet for telling the truth, it was Elon Musk who bought Twitter and broke TNI's monopoly on the news. 

Now you tell me, fok-fok, is a monopoly on the news democratic, or anti-democratic?

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

What would a little cultist like you know about democracy? You have no clue what 'democracy' even requires, and you're dead against it.

FYI when FB, Twitter, Google and Microsoft were all banning people from the internet for telling the truth, it was Elon Musk who bought Twitter and broke TNI's monopoly on the news. 

Now you tell me, fok-fok, is a monopoly on the news democratic, or anti-democratic?

Your "truth" is not THE truth, cause you believe FOS LIES.

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

They are? 

Prove it. 

I posted the evidence, unlike you who only ever posts BULLSHIT.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

What about the billionaires that back Biden?

None of them are anti-democracy authoritarians because Biden is NEITHER.

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Aren't they backing the first President to use lawfare against a political rival?

No "lawfare," JUST enforcement of the laws with EVIDENCE and JURIES. Duh

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Isn't that far more authoritarian than the President that cut regulations and taxes while securing the boarder and maintaining international peace?

YOUR PREMISE is INVALID.

 

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

A cursory read of this article appears to show that it is a hit piece, designed to suppress Musk's opinions regarding Biden. Why does the left have to try and stop conservatives from talking? We love it when yall talk. We know what you are saying is crap. We want everyone else to hear it, so they know who to vote for. We only lose when libs hide their message well enough.

No one is suppressing Musk opinions on X. LMAO

However his policy is oft described as "freedom of speech for me, but not for thee." 🤮

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...