CdnFox Posted May 21, 2024 Report Posted May 21, 2024 24 minutes ago, Legato said: Have you ever seen what's written on the bottom of a Guinness bottle? 15 minutes ago, robosmith said: I think the only time I ever drank a pint of Guinness might have been at a pub in London last year and it wasn't in a bottle. Sigh . I hope you checked with air traffic control before you lobbed something THAT far over his head. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted May 21, 2024 Author Report Posted May 21, 2024 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Because he lied to Congress. Duh It was about both. But that has nothing to do with what he told Costello in 2018 in a separate meeting. Cohen is a minor witness which only serves to tie all the OTHER FACTS together, including 3 instances where he confirmed Trump KNEW ABOUT the payments to Daniels. Lol. Do you ever get dizzy? Cohen has already been convicted, of perjury, with regards to the NDA. https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-says-michael-cohen-may-184303655.html The phone call was about one minute thirty seconds in length and they talked about how to stop a 14 year old from harassing him and that he paid the NDA? You have to be delusional. He was texting the body guard about a 14 year old and he was directed to call the body guard. Then, in 1.5 minutes, he discussed how to take care of that and then the phone was handed to Trump and they talked about the NDA? SERIOUSLY?! Especially if you think Cohen is a minor witness. He was the star witness. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/20/nyregion/michael-cohen-trump-court.html Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted May 21, 2024 Report Posted May 21, 2024 2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Lol. Do you ever get dizzy? Cohen has already been convicted, of perjury, with regards to the NDA. https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-says-michael-cohen-may-184303655.html Nothing in ^this cite says Cohen was "convicted of perjury." LMAO ONLY speculation that he committed perjury. Duh 2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: The phone call was about one minute thirty seconds in length and they talked about how to stop a 14 year old from harassing him and that he paid the NDA? You have to be delusional. He was texting the body guard about a 14 year old and he was directed to call the body guard. Then, in 1.5 minutes, he discussed how to take care of that and then the phone was handed to Trump and they talked about the NDA? SERIOUSLY?! Yes. Seriously. Trump was WITH SCHILLER (body guard) at that time. It only takes a few words to get confirmation from Trump to pay the money to Stromy. Like before, when Trump said, "Just do it." 2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Especially if you think Cohen is a minor witness. He was the star witness. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/20/nyregion/michael-cohen-trump-court.html Only in the sense that he was corroborated by documented facts and other witnesses. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted May 21, 2024 Author Report Posted May 21, 2024 18 minutes ago, robosmith said: Nothing in ^this cite says Cohen was "convicted of perjury." LMAO ONLY speculation that he committed perjury. Duh Yes. Seriously. Trump was WITH SCHILLER (body guard) at that time. It only takes a few words to get confirmation from Trump to pay the money to Stromy. Like before, when Trump said, "Just do it." Only in the sense that he was corroborated by documented facts and other witnesses. So you don't believe Cohen committed perjury? That's rich. Even the lamest of left wing media knows he committed perjury. I just cited the article that said what he said that perjury himself rather than the articles that brushed past the conviction. He lied about this case and about how the payment was made. He's convicted of that. Now he's the star witness for the prosecution, except it was proven that he was lying, that he stole money, and that he swore he would do anything to stay out of jail. Hell, he even named his book "Revenge". It is clear that Cohen was the star witness...for the defense. Now it is time to investigate the prosecutors. Did they know Cohen stole from Trump? If they did, did they tell the Defense? Because if they didn't, they would be guilty of not sharing exculpatory evidence with the defendant. And that is a crime. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted May 21, 2024 Report Posted May 21, 2024 1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said: So you don't believe Cohen committed perjury? That's rich. I never said that. STOP trying AND LYING to interpret what I write, TROLL. Quote
CdnFox Posted May 21, 2024 Report Posted May 21, 2024 3 minutes ago, robosmith said: I never said that. STOP trying AND LYING to interpret what I write, TROLL. So you DO believe he committed perjury. so what's the problem? Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted May 21, 2024 Author Report Posted May 21, 2024 7 minutes ago, CdnFox said: So you DO believe he committed perjury. so what's the problem? Hes an anti-anti-commy. Anything I say must be challenged. The irony is that those "blind links" are something he said he'd never click on because...I don't know...something about how I'm a bad person or something meaningless. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Fluffypants Posted May 21, 2024 Report Posted May 21, 2024 12 minutes ago, CdnFox said: So you DO believe he committed perjury. so what's the problem? You have to understand that the second you purified in the light of Trump hate you are now completely free of all sin and lies. Once he gave into hating Trump he then magically became honest and true and incorruptible just as Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney are now wonderful people because they have given into their TDS. 1 Quote
robosmith Posted May 22, 2024 Report Posted May 22, 2024 8 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Hes an anti-anti-commy. Anything I say must be challenged. The irony is that those "blind links" are something he said he'd never click on because...I don't know...something about how I'm a bad person or something meaningless. No, it's what I SAID and you FAILED to understand. Your naked links are worthless cause they don't back your point. Which you would know if you took the time to read them and post the proof here (if you could find it). Quote
robosmith Posted May 22, 2024 Report Posted May 22, 2024 8 hours ago, Fluffypants said: You have to understand that the second you purified in the light of Trump hate you are now completely free of all sin and lies. Once he gave into hating Trump he then magically became honest and true and incorruptible just as Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney are now wonderful people because they have given into their TDS. ^Says the MAGA CULT continually.... AKA, you never have anything to backup YOUR OPINIONS. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted May 22, 2024 Author Report Posted May 22, 2024 5 hours ago, robosmith said: No, it's what I SAID and you FAILED to understand. Your naked links are worthless cause they don't back your point. Which you would know if you took the time to read them and post the proof here (if you could find it). You couldn't have done more to prove me right. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Rebound Posted May 22, 2024 Report Posted May 22, 2024 Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
CdnFox Posted May 22, 2024 Report Posted May 22, 2024 6 hours ago, Rebound said: You realize that's just going to win him more votes Honestly, you guys are going to talk yourselves right out of an election Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.