Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sending armed troops to quash peaceful campus protests is a dangerous idea

Quote

On Wednesday during a visit to Columbia University, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) warned that if the wave of protests against Israel’s U.S.-funded war in Gaza on college campuses, including UCLA and USC, is not contained quickly, “there is an appropriate time for the National Guard. We have to bring order to these campuses.”

How troubling that the man who is the third in line to the presidency seems to think that it’s OK to silence largely peaceful student protests by sending in armed troops.

It’s a terrible idea, with a deadly history in the U.S. It was the Ohio National Guard that killed four unarmed students and wounded nine others at a rally against the Vietnam War at Kent State University in 1970. Since then, there have been uncountable examples of armed responses to nonviolent activities ending with innocent people getting hurt or killed.

Sens. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) have called on President Biden to deploy the National Guard to quash pro-Palestinian protests. Republican state lawmakers in New York want Gov. Kathy Hochul to deploy the National Guard to Columbia University. And more than two dozen Republican senators signed a letter urging the Biden administration to “restore order to campuses” by using federal law enforcement, prosecution and deportation against “the outbreak of anti-Semitic, pro-terrorist mobs.”

Never mind that they are unfairly assigning racist motives to thousands of people protesting the killing of more than 34,000 Palestinian people, most of them women and children. It’s clear that these Republican politicians are less concerned with the wave of antiwar protests than using them for their own political ends. 

Johnson has clearly revealed he is an UNSERIOUS POLITICAL HACK.
 

34.png
Posted

If you find any peaceful protests, let us know.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

The protest at UCLA was peaceful until these guys showed up:

Slow response from authorities left students shocked as people wearing white masks attacked pro-Palestine protesters.
 

image.png

At this point, you are simply not telling the truth. It has already been pointed out to you they engaged in violence before counter-protestors showed up. 

Even then, being "peaceful" doesn't mean they were not breaking the law. 

YOU invite this lawlessness that leads to violence when you want lawlessness. 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, User said:

At this point, you are simply not telling the truth. It has already been pointed out to you they engaged in violence before counter-protestors showed up. 

Even then, being "peaceful" doesn't mean they were not breaking the law. 

YOU invite this lawlessness that leads to violence when you want lawlessness. 

No evidence from you of "lawlessness."

My local news and other posted sources say the LEO was NOT INVOLVED until the counter protesters showed up to pick fights.

Any further evidence free posts from you will be IGNORED.

Posted

 

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

No evidence from you of "lawlessness."

My local news and other posted sources say the LEO was NOT INVOLVED until the counter protesters showed up to pick fights.

Any further evidence free posts from you will be IGNORED.

Oh please even when we supply you with evidence you either dismiss it because it doesn't come from a source YOU trust i.e. ultra left wing or we give you a source that you approve of and you still dont accept it and make some stupid excuse about it.

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
9 hours ago, robosmith said:

No evidence from you of "lawlessness."

My local news and other posted sources say the LEO was NOT INVOLVED until the counter protesters showed up to pick fights.

Any further evidence free posts from you will be IGNORED.

You're a twit.

Here's the account from NPR.

https://www.npr.org/2024/05/01/1248401802/columbia-university-protests-new-york

Note those who broke into the library are call "occupiers".

At UCLA these...protestors...spray painted all over the buildings.

https://www.reuters.com/pictures/pictures-police-storm-ucla-protest-encampment-2024-05-02/WVUE4R3WSBLULAAFEDQBXURR7U

There is all sorts of visual evidence of "lawlessness". You ignore it because it does not fit your lies. In short...

You're a twit.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

At UCLA these...protestors...spray painted all over the buildings.

https://www.reuters.com/pictures/pictures-police-storm-ucla-protest-encampment-2024-05-02/WVUE4R3WSBLULAAFEDQBXURR7U

There is all sorts of visual evidence of "lawlessness". You ignore it because it does not fit your lies. In short...

You're a twit.

From your cite:

Quote

after protesters were asked to leave by UCLA campus police, May 2.

AKA what I said, "after the counter protesters showed up to pick fights."

You don't even know how to read.

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

No one said they're ALL peaceful, lDIOT.

Posted
22 hours ago, robosmith said:

No evidence from you of "lawlessness."

My local news and other posted sources say the LEO was NOT INVOLVED until the counter protesters showed up to pick fights.

Any further evidence free posts from you will be IGNORED.

I already provided it to you in another thread... and like you consistently do, you run away. 

It is not lawful to block other people's paths in a public right of way. It is not lawful to assemble as they were, taking over public areas. 

The fact that police stood by and did nothing is only evidence of their allowing the lawlessness. And as I have repeatedly told you now, if you are going to support this kind of lawlessness, you do not get to cry when others take matters into their own hands. 
 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
13 hours ago, User said:

I already provided it to you in another thread... and like you consistently do, you run away. 

It is not lawful to block other people's paths in a public right of way. It is not lawful to assemble as they were, taking over public areas. 

The fact that police stood by and did nothing is only evidence of their allowing the lawlessness. And as I have repeatedly told you now, if you are going to support this kind of lawlessness, you do not get to cry when others take matters into their own hands. 
 

It is one thing i notice about the left.  "WE'RE BREAKING THE LAW IN PROTEST!!! WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BREAK THE LAW!!! IT"S NECESSARY TO BREAK THE LAW !! ITS......  woah! Hey - those guys are harassing us, that's breaking the law!!! Where the hell are the police!?!?!?!!?!!"

Ohhh the hypocrisy ;) 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,916
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Раймо
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Раймо earned a badge
      First Post
    • Раймо earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • MDP went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • MDP earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • MDP went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...