BubberMiley Posted February 7, 2006 Report Posted February 7, 2006 I always thought a Justice Minister should be beyond reproach in terms of their past history of obeying the law. Vic Toews was convicted last year of breaking Manitoba's elections finance laws in the 1999 provincial election. He pled guilty and was fined. Harper seems to be maintaining the status quo in Ottawa quite nicely. Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Hicksey Posted February 7, 2006 Report Posted February 7, 2006 All I can say is that with each new revelation I find myself to be nearly as disappointed in Harper as I was with the Liberals. I say almost because Harper hasn't found the opportunity to pilfer away a few hundred million taxpayer dollars to his friends and supporters ... yet. Quote "If in passing, you never encounter anything that offends you, you are not living in a free society." - Rt. Hon. Kim Campbell - “In many respects, the government needs fewer rules, but rules that are consistently applied.” - Sheila Fraser, Former Auditor General.
geoffrey Posted February 7, 2006 Report Posted February 7, 2006 I always thought a Justice Minister should be beyond reproach in terms of their past history of obeying the law. Vic Toews was convicted last year of breaking Manitoba's elections finance laws in the 1999 provincial election. He pled guilty and was fined. Harper seems to be maintaining the status quo in Ottawa quite nicely. The difference is there was no cover, he was fined in accordance with the law, and he's on with his life. Theres was no fraud or theft or racketeering. This doesn't really compare to the recent goings on in our government. Not that I'm justifying Vic, he did break the law. And he accepted responsibility for it. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
shoop Posted February 7, 2006 Report Posted February 7, 2006 It isn't like this is a really *new* revelation anyways. Toews' conviction was news well before the election. The voters knew it and still elected him. The difference is there was no cover, he was fined in accordance with the law, and he's on with his life.Theres was no fraud or theft or racketeering. This doesn't really compare to the recent goings on in our government. Not that I'm justifying Vic, he did break the law. And he accepted responsibility for it. Quote
geoffrey Posted February 7, 2006 Report Posted February 7, 2006 It isn't like this is a really *new* revelation anyways. Toews' conviction was news well before the election. The voters knew it and still elected him. The difference is there was no cover, he was fined in accordance with the law, and he's on with his life.Theres was no fraud or theft or racketeering. This doesn't really compare to the recent goings on in our government. Not that I'm justifying Vic, he did break the law. And he accepted responsibility for it. This is true. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
FTA Lawyer Posted February 9, 2006 Report Posted February 9, 2006 I always thought a Justice Minister should be beyond reproach in terms of their past history of obeying the law. Vic Toews was convicted last year of breaking Manitoba's elections finance laws in the 1999 provincial election. He pled guilty and was fined. Harper seems to be maintaining the status quo in Ottawa quite nicely. He's probably been convicted of a number of traffic offences also...hardly cause to preclude him from being a Justice Minister. FTA Quote
geoffrey Posted February 9, 2006 Report Posted February 9, 2006 I always thought a Justice Minister should be beyond reproach in terms of their past history of obeying the law. Vic Toews was convicted last year of breaking Manitoba's elections finance laws in the 1999 provincial election. He pled guilty and was fined. Harper seems to be maintaining the status quo in Ottawa quite nicely. He's probably been convicted of a number of traffic offences also...hardly cause to preclude him from being a Justice Minister. FTA On a related anecdote, Peter Mackay got his license suspended awhile back for speeding. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
tml12 Posted February 9, 2006 Report Posted February 9, 2006 I don't think Toews' conviction is that bad. The man is more than qualified to be justice minister and has done a lot as justice critic. I think in the long term this will pass as one of the less interesting stories of the Harper government... Quote "Those who stand for nothing fall for anything." -Alexander Hamilton
geoffrey Posted February 9, 2006 Report Posted February 9, 2006 I don't think Toews' conviction is that bad. The man is more than qualified to be justice minister and has done a lot as justice critic. I think in the long term this will pass as one of the less interesting stories of the Harper government... I don't even think the most anti-CPC person out there really even cares. Do you ever sleep tml, you seem to be on this 24 hours a day, its 1:30am out here, its what, 3:30 there? On a Wednesday? Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
tml12 Posted February 9, 2006 Report Posted February 9, 2006 I don't think Toews' conviction is that bad. The man is more than qualified to be justice minister and has done a lot as justice critic. I think in the long term this will pass as one of the less interesting stories of the Harper government... I don't even think the most anti-CPC person out there really even cares. Do you ever sleep tml, you seem to be on this 24 hours a day, its 1:30am out here, its what, 3:30 there? On a Wednesday? Yeah it is 3:30...actually I went to bed around 11 but, sometimes, I wake up in the middle of the night and can't go back to sleep so I just do work around the house and come on the forum. Around 6 I'll be sleeping again. Quote "Those who stand for nothing fall for anything." -Alexander Hamilton
betsy Posted February 9, 2006 Report Posted February 9, 2006 I am feeling disappointed too. This better be worth it. Quote
tml12 Posted February 9, 2006 Report Posted February 9, 2006 All I can say is that with each new revelation I find myself to be nearly as disappointed in Harper as I was with the Liberals. I say almost because Harper hasn't found the opportunity to pilfer away a few hundred million taxpayer dollars to his friends and supporters ... yet. If this is the worst Harper does, I'll still be pro-Harper in the next election. Quote "Those who stand for nothing fall for anything." -Alexander Hamilton
Argus Posted February 9, 2006 Report Posted February 9, 2006 I always thought a Justice Minister should be beyond reproach in terms of their past history of obeying the law. Vic Toews was convicted last year of breaking Manitoba's elections finance laws in the 1999 provincial election. He pled guilty and was fined. Harper seems to be maintaining the status quo in Ottawa quite nicely. He's probably been convicted of a number of traffic offences also...hardly cause to preclude him from being a Justice Minister. FTA On a related anecdote, Peter Mackay got his license suspended awhile back for speeding. Oh the humanity!!! Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Michael Hardner Posted February 9, 2006 Report Posted February 9, 2006 I'm not a CPC supporter, but I do take heart in the fact that many Conservatives seem to be holding the new government up to the same scrutiny they had for the Liberals. Thank you for that. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
geoffrey Posted February 9, 2006 Report Posted February 9, 2006 I'm not a CPC supporter, but I do take heart in the fact that many Conservatives seem to be holding the new government up to the same scrutiny they had for the Liberals.Thank you for that. Your Welcome. Us conservative folks are just asses to everyone equally. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
Hicksey Posted February 9, 2006 Report Posted February 9, 2006 I'm not a CPC supporter, but I do take heart in the fact that many Conservatives seem to be holding the new government up to the same scrutiny they had for the Liberals. Thank you for that. Your Welcome. Us conservative folks are just asses to everyone equally. Part of being conservative is an intense distrust of government. Who is in power doesn't really matter. Besides, who's going to hold my party to its promises if I don't? The Liberals, NDP or BQ? Hardly. The other parties and their supporters obviously don't want what I do from our government or they would have voted for them in the first place. Its up to conservatives to hold conservatives to their promises. Quote "If in passing, you never encounter anything that offends you, you are not living in a free society." - Rt. Hon. Kim Campbell - “In many respects, the government needs fewer rules, but rules that are consistently applied.” - Sheila Fraser, Former Auditor General.
Michael Hardner Posted February 10, 2006 Report Posted February 10, 2006 I hope that this continues and that the other parties are held to this standard by their supporters. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
shoop Posted February 10, 2006 Report Posted February 10, 2006 The Liberals would *never* do that. You cannot point to one Liberal MP who publicly took issue with Belinda crossing the floor last spring. The Liberals worry only about power. So their is no *standard* their supporters can hold them to. I hope that this continues and that the other parties are held to this standard by their supporters. Quote
geoffrey Posted February 10, 2006 Report Posted February 10, 2006 The Liberals would *never* do that. You cannot point to one Liberal MP who publicly took issue with Belinda crossing the floor last spring.The Liberals worry only about power. So their is no *standard* their supporters can hold them to. I hope that this continues and that the other parties are held to this standard by their supporters. You mean Scott Brison didn't complain? Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
newbie Posted February 10, 2006 Report Posted February 10, 2006 The Liberals would *never* do that. You cannot point to one Liberal MP who publicly took issue with Belinda crossing the floor last spring. Apples and oranges Shoop. Quote
shoop Posted February 10, 2006 Report Posted February 10, 2006 Thanks for proving my point newbie. The Conservatives actually had MPs complain about floor crossing -on principle- when somebody crossed the floor *TO* them. When Belinda crossed the floor NO Liberal MP complained on the principle of the issues. Instead of admitting the hypocrisy you try and deflect the issue. Soooo much easier when you have no principles. Apples and oranges Shoop. Quote
newbie Posted February 10, 2006 Report Posted February 10, 2006 Thanks for proving my point newbie. The Conservatives actually had MPs complain about floor crossing -on principle- when somebody crossed the floor *TO* them.When Belinda crossed the floor NO Liberal MP complained on the principle of the issues. Instead of admitting the hypocrisy you try and deflect the issue. Soooo much easier when you have no principles. Apples and oranges Shoop. Nice try, but the situation was entirely different as you are well aware. Try and remember back what Mr. Harper said when dear Belinda left his party. Do you remember? Here's a little reminder of the situation. http://www.canada.com/topics/news/politics...139a9f9&k=70347 Like I said, apples and oranges. Quote
Bryan Posted February 10, 2006 Report Posted February 10, 2006 Harper said he felt betrayed by Belinda when she left, he didn't say she shouldn't have been able to leave. Big difference. In fact, during the election cmapaign, Harper made it very clear that he would oppose a motion to stop floor crossing. He felt an MP has to have the ability to move with their conscience, and that a party leader should not be able to hold an MPs seat over their heads to make them tow the party line. There's nothing remotely unethical about either the Emmerson or Fortier appointments. They were done with full disclosure, and in accordance with parliamentary procedure. It's hypocrisy of epic proportions for Liberals to cry foul about these appointments. Vic Toews? Fantastic choice for justice minister. He was a great justice minister here in Manitoba, and he'll do a great job federally too. The only appointment that irks me is Flaherty as finance minister. If ever there was a specific portfolio to make SURE to reward your Calgary roots with, its finance. Quote
newbie Posted February 10, 2006 Report Posted February 10, 2006 Harper said he felt betrayed by Belinda when she left, he didn't say she shouldn't have been able to leave. Big difference. In fact, during the election cmapaign, Harper made it very clear that he would oppose a motion to stop floor crossing. He felt an MP has to have the ability to move with their conscience, and that a party leader should not be able to hold an MPs seat over their heads to make them tow the party line. There's nothing remotely unethical about either the Emmerson or Fortier appointments. They were done with full disclosure, and in accordance with parliamentary procedure. It's hypocrisy of epic proportions for Liberals to cry foul about these appointments. Full disclosure to who? What a crock. What an insult to his constituents. At least Belinda ran again in the next election and won as a Liberal. Speaking of hypocrisy, what about this statement Emerson said the day after the election? "I'm going to be Stephen Harper's worst enemy," he warned. "We're going to stir the pot and you better believe we are going to make a heck of a lot of noise." http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/News/2006/01/24/1408892.html Something odd to say when you're about to switch parties. Or was that before the "full disclosure." Quote
uOttawaMan Posted February 10, 2006 Report Posted February 10, 2006 I'm not a CPC supporter, but I do take heart in the fact that many Conservatives seem to be holding the new government up to the same scrutiny they had for the Liberals. Thank you for that. Your Welcome. Us conservative folks are just asses to everyone equally. Part of being conservative is an intense distrust of government. Who is in power doesn't really matter. Besides, who's going to hold my party to its promises if I don't? The Liberals, NDP or BQ? Hardly. The other parties and their supporters obviously don't want what I do from our government or they would have voted for them in the first place. Its up to conservatives to hold conservatives to their promises. Instead of a "natural governing party" sounds like a "natural official opposition" to meeee Quote "To hear many religious people talk, one would think God created the torso, head, legs and arms but the devil slapped on the genitals.” -Don Schrader
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.