Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 4/26/2024 at 3:49 PM, robosmith said:

First off, the existence of inequalities are OBVIOUS to anyone whose head is not up their ass.

What are they? Can you give some examples?

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
10 minutes ago, ironstone said:

What are they? Can you give some examples?

"These "inequities"....  are they in the room with us now?"

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

"These "inequities"....  are they in the room with us now?"

Not inequities...inequalities. he's saying there is a difference in recession, sexes, religions, etc. He also implied that it is ok to treat people differently based on those inequalities.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
On 4/26/2024 at 1:49 PM, robosmith said:

So your thesis is that "the left" has blatant hypocrisy SOLELY DUE to YOUR BELIEF they have no intent to accomplish what they advocate.

Based on YOUR PERCEPTION that inequalities are ONLY "perceived."

First off, the existence of inequalities are OBVIOUS to anyone whose head is not up their ass.

Secondly YOUR BELIEF about anyone else's INTENT does NOT make it FACTUAL.

 

robobabble, why don't you show examples that disprove his observations? It's a helluva lot more effective than flapping your stupid cyber gums. Nobody believes you anyways, so you'd best stick with what you can prove. ;) 

Posted
3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Not inequities...inequalities.

Meh - the left tends to use those words back and forth to suit their purpose, it's hard to keep track.

Quote

He also implied that it is ok to treat people differently based on those inequalities.

Of course he does.

Make no mistake - the left right now is incredibly bigoted, racists and prejudicial. They are all about dividing people into dozens of groups based on race, sex, etc etc and then assigning each group an 'intersectional' score. If you're a woman you score higher than men, if you're a black woman you score higher than a white woman, if you're muslim you score higher than christian etc etc.

Heck at the ndp convention people were only allowed to speak based on that very order - black lesbian women would be first to be allowed, and then if there's still time at the end white men. There are job listings right now at universities in the east that say no white christian men allowed.

These people are not interested  in equality or equity of any kind no matter how you look at it.

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
21 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Not inequities...inequalities. he's saying there is a difference in recession, sexes, religions, etc. He also implied that it is ok to treat people differently based on those inequalities.

Fine...what "inequalities" might we be talkin' 'bout?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Fine...what "inequalities" might we be talkin' 'bout?

Ask him. I said all people are equal. He said there are inequalities.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Ask him. I said all people are equal. He said there are inequalities.

I did once but I used the word "inequities" and may have confused the li'l tyke. I'll try again.

@robosmith What "inequalities" might we be talkin' 'bout?

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
41 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I did once but I used the word "inequities" and may have confused the li'l tyke.

 

I seem to recall that -  i think Robosmith thinks that inequities are some sort of investment product.

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,915
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Раймо
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • MDP went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • MDP earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • MDP went up a rank
      Rookie
    • MDP earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • derek848 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...