ironstone Posted April 29, 2024 Report Posted April 29, 2024 On 4/26/2024 at 3:49 PM, robosmith said: First off, the existence of inequalities are OBVIOUS to anyone whose head is not up their ass. What are they? Can you give some examples? Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
CdnFox Posted April 29, 2024 Report Posted April 29, 2024 10 minutes ago, ironstone said: What are they? Can you give some examples? "These "inequities".... are they in the room with us now?" Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted April 29, 2024 Author Report Posted April 29, 2024 2 minutes ago, CdnFox said: "These "inequities".... are they in the room with us now?" Not inequities...inequalities. he's saying there is a difference in recession, sexes, religions, etc. He also implied that it is ok to treat people differently based on those inequalities. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Deluge Posted April 29, 2024 Report Posted April 29, 2024 On 4/26/2024 at 1:49 PM, robosmith said: So your thesis is that "the left" has blatant hypocrisy SOLELY DUE to YOUR BELIEF they have no intent to accomplish what they advocate. Based on YOUR PERCEPTION that inequalities are ONLY "perceived." First off, the existence of inequalities are OBVIOUS to anyone whose head is not up their ass. Secondly YOUR BELIEF about anyone else's INTENT does NOT make it FACTUAL. robobabble, why don't you show examples that disprove his observations? It's a helluva lot more effective than flapping your stupid cyber gums. Nobody believes you anyways, so you'd best stick with what you can prove. Quote
CdnFox Posted April 29, 2024 Report Posted April 29, 2024 3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Not inequities...inequalities. Meh - the left tends to use those words back and forth to suit their purpose, it's hard to keep track. Quote He also implied that it is ok to treat people differently based on those inequalities. Of course he does. Make no mistake - the left right now is incredibly bigoted, racists and prejudicial. They are all about dividing people into dozens of groups based on race, sex, etc etc and then assigning each group an 'intersectional' score. If you're a woman you score higher than men, if you're a black woman you score higher than a white woman, if you're muslim you score higher than christian etc etc. Heck at the ndp convention people were only allowed to speak based on that very order - black lesbian women would be first to be allowed, and then if there's still time at the end white men. There are job listings right now at universities in the east that say no white christian men allowed. These people are not interested in equality or equity of any kind no matter how you look at it. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Nationalist Posted April 29, 2024 Report Posted April 29, 2024 21 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Not inequities...inequalities. he's saying there is a difference in recession, sexes, religions, etc. He also implied that it is ok to treat people differently based on those inequalities. Fine...what "inequalities" might we be talkin' 'bout? Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
gatomontes99 Posted April 29, 2024 Author Report Posted April 29, 2024 3 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Fine...what "inequalities" might we be talkin' 'bout? Ask him. I said all people are equal. He said there are inequalities. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Nationalist Posted April 29, 2024 Report Posted April 29, 2024 (edited) 31 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Ask him. I said all people are equal. He said there are inequalities. I did once but I used the word "inequities" and may have confused the li'l tyke. I'll try again. @robosmith What "inequalities" might we be talkin' 'bout? Edited April 29, 2024 by Nationalist Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CdnFox Posted April 29, 2024 Report Posted April 29, 2024 41 minutes ago, Nationalist said: I did once but I used the word "inequities" and may have confused the li'l tyke. I seem to recall that - i think Robosmith thinks that inequities are some sort of investment product. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.