Caswell Thomas Posted April 16, 2024 Report Posted April 16, 2024 Seen by reporters inside the Trial Court....Trump ...so full of comments for reporters when the limelight us turned on and he's coming or going TO or FROM the Courtroom, while IN the Courtroom he can't be bothered with any of the proceedings to select his own jury ....and is seen to be falling asleep. Remember...Biden is not the only aged political candidate, Trump is just a few years behind him and in worse health. Quote
West Posted April 16, 2024 Report Posted April 16, 2024 Yawn. Just trying to keep the guy off the campaign trail 2 Quote
robosmith Posted April 16, 2024 Report Posted April 16, 2024 3 hours ago, West said: Yawn. Just trying to keep the guy off the campaign trail If that was Biden sleeping you'd be planning his funeral. But Biden isn't facing the (political) death penalty like Trump. 3 hours ago, West said: Yawn. Just trying to keep the guy off the campaign trail Trump did that to HIMSELF by LYING and CHEATING. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted April 16, 2024 Report Posted April 16, 2024 Trial of the century? Puhlease! He's on Trial, in a state, for a federal campaign finance charge on a crime that has passed the statute of limitations and was paid for out of personal funds and labeled a legal expense because the lawyer wrote up and paid a NDA with a porn star. Why wasn't this dismissed out of hand? Because the Banana Republic is alive and well. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Fluffypants Posted April 16, 2024 Report Posted April 16, 2024 7 hours ago, robosmith said: If that was Biden sleeping you'd be planning his funeral. But Biden isn't facing the (political) death penalty like Trump. Trump did that to HIMSELF by LYING and CHEATING. BS, this case is based on him breaking a misdemeanor law that is way past the statute of limitations, a law that Hilary Clinton broke as well and the biggest difference between the 2 is Trump hid payments to a porn star who was extorting him which had nothing to do with capaign payments and Hilary hid payments to a oppo group to create the debunked Steele Dossier for the campaign, which was a direct campaign law violation. Also this was a case that the feds wouldn't touch. This whole case is based on "intent" to break another law that he wasn't even indicted for because the only way they can make falsifying business documents a felony is by linking it to the pursuit of a felony. Of course it is all conjecture on which felony Trump was pursuing because Alvin hasn't said. This case is the weakest case of them all but they have a judge presiding over it whose daughter is receiving financial benefits from the case since her company helps raise money for Democrats and she is using this case to fund raise off of. This judge has placed a gag order on Trump where it allows the witnesses to taint the jury pool by letting them talk all the trash they want about Trump on national television but Trump cannot respond. 1 Quote
Deluge Posted April 16, 2024 Report Posted April 16, 2024 11 hours ago, Caswell Thomas said: Seen by reporters inside the Trial Court....Trump ...so full of comments for reporters when the limelight us turned on and he's coming or going TO or FROM the Courtroom, while IN the Courtroom he can't be bothered with any of the proceedings to select his own jury ....and is seen to be falling asleep. Remember...Biden is not the only aged political candidate, Trump is just a few years behind him and in worse health. He's as bored with the witch hunt as the rest of us are. Only woketards are enjoying this. Quote
robosmith Posted April 16, 2024 Report Posted April 16, 2024 7 hours ago, Fluffypants said: BS, this case is based on him breaking a misdemeanor law that is way past the statute of limitations, a law that Hilary Clinton broke as well and the biggest difference between the 2 is Trump hid payments to a porn star who was extorting him which had nothing to do with capaign payments and Hilary hid payments to a oppo group to create the debunked Steele Dossier for the campaign, which was a direct campaign law violation. Also this was a case that the feds wouldn't touch. This whole case is based on "intent" to break another law that he wasn't even indicted for because the only way they can make falsifying business documents a felony is by linking it to the pursuit of a felony. Of course it is all conjecture on which felony Trump was pursuing because Alvin hasn't said. This case is the weakest case of them all but they have a judge presiding over it whose daughter is receiving financial benefits from the case since her company helps raise money for Democrats and she is using this case to fund raise off of. This judge has placed a gag order on Trump where it allows the witnesses to taint the jury pool by letting them talk all the trash they want about Trump on national television but Trump cannot respond. Too bad you're NO LEGAL EXPERT and have NO CORROBORATION of ^this OPINION from ANY. It will be decided by the jury and YOUR OPINION is IRRELEVANT. "Trash about Trump" LMAO. It would take eons to match Trump's trash about EVERYONE else who opposes his CRIMES. Quote
Nationalist Posted April 17, 2024 Report Posted April 17, 2024 Here's a legal expert... Oops... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Fluffypants Posted April 17, 2024 Report Posted April 17, 2024 20 hours ago, robosmith said: Too bad you're NO LEGAL EXPERT and have NO CORROBORATION of ^this OPINION from ANY. It will be decided by the jury and YOUR OPINION is IRRELEVANT. "Trash about Trump" LMAO. It would take eons to match Trump's trash about EVERYONE else who opposes his CRIMES. I must of made sense since you felt the need to thrash about and attack me for not being a "legal expert" and can't refute anything I said about the case. Quote
robosmith Posted April 17, 2024 Report Posted April 17, 2024 1 hour ago, Fluffypants said: I must of made sense since you felt the need to thrash about and attack me for not being a "legal expert" and can't refute anything I said about the case. No need to refute your amateur OPINION with anything more than MINE that you're wrong. Find someone who's expert on the LAW, IF YOU CAN. Quote
Caswell Thomas Posted April 17, 2024 Author Report Posted April 17, 2024 On 4/16/2024 at 7:27 AM, Deluge said: He's as bored with the witch hunt as the rest of us are. Only woketards are enjoying this. Funny then how FOX News is running two extra channels on the trial and on each.one the Collections Plates are prominent in every paragraph where sneakers, pillows, towels and Trump stamped bibles . 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.