Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

Forget Everything You Think You Know

gatomontes99
 Share

Recommended Posts

CdnFox Grand Master

CdnFox

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

 

Your naivete is already off the charts.

Well @Nationalist,  he does have a point. You're right off the charts.

Mind you - seeing as he still counts with his fingers and can't get his mittens off without help his chart only goes to 2. So it doesn't take that much to go off of it :) 

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^TWO blatant right wing propaganda sites: Daily Caller and Townhall. Could find any sources with CREDIBILITY?

Those aren't credible? So I assume you have information that backs that claim. Or, do you just throw that accusation around so you don't have to confront inconvenient truths?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Grand Master

CdnFox

Posted
Posted
Just now, gatomontes99 said:

Those aren't credible? So I assume you have information that backs that claim. Or, do you just throw that accusation around so you don't have to confront inconvenient truths?

Uhhh - i realize you're new here but if you're hoping that he's NOT going to just throw accusations around so he doesn't have to confront the truth, you may want to prepare for disappointment ;)

He almost never produces evidence and on the rare occasions he does it's usually not relevant but he'll insist it is.

TRUMP COLLUDED WITH RUSSIANS!!! LOOK AT THIS REPORT!

(report turns out to be study of migratory patterns of grey squirrels)

SEE?!?!? SEE?!?!? PROOF HE COLLUDED!!!

LOL - don't let it get to you  he's like that with everyone ;)  All you can do is laugh at it a little.

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

robosmith Grand Master

robosmith

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Those aren't credible? So I assume you have information that backs that claim. Or, do you just throw that accusation around so you don't have to confront inconvenient truths?

No, they are WELL KNOWN right wing propaganda sites. Try some sites with professional journalistic ethical standards instead of the right wing echo chamber.

gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Uhhh - i realize you're new here but if you're hoping that he's NOT going to just throw accusations around so he doesn't have to confront the truth, you may want to prepare for disappointment ;)

He almost never produces evidence and on the rare occasions he does it's usually not relevant but he'll insist it is.

TRUMP COLLUDED WITH RUSSIANS!!! LOOK AT THIS REPORT!

(report turns out to be study of migratory patterns of grey squirrels)

SEE?!?!? SEE?!?!? PROOF HE COLLUDED!!!

LOL - don't let it get to you  he's like that with everyone ;)  All you can do is laugh at it a little.

I know his type.

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

No, they are WELL KNOWN right wing propaganda sites. Try some sites with professional journalistic ethical standards instead of the right wing echo chamber.

What is wrong with the information?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Nationalist Grand Master

Nationalist

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^Supreme IRONY from the top DEFENDER of the 88 count indictments against Trump. Talk about FAILURE.... 🤮

Lol...Trump will be your next POTUS.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

CdnFox Grand Master

CdnFox

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:
Quote

No, they are WELL KNOWN right wing propaganda sites.

What is wrong with the information?

LOL well there you go  :)  It never occurred to him to wonder what was wrong with the information - the SITES are bad. :)  

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

LOL well there you go  :)  It never occurred to him to wonder what was wrong with the information - the SITES are bad. :)  

I knew he would. Let him discredit himself. I don't need to stoop to his level.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Grand Master

CdnFox

Posted
Posted
Just now, gatomontes99 said:

I knew he would. Let him discredit himself. I don't need to stoop to his level.

Makes sense - nobody is winning a limbo contest with him any time soon that's for sure

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

robosmith Grand Master

robosmith

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I knew he would. Let him discredit himself. I don't need to stoop to his level.

IF your information is TRUE, you should have NO PROBLEM finding credible reporting.

But ethical journalists will not publish BULLSHIT.

IT's unfortunate that you're so naive you don't know that ANYONE can POST ANYTHING on the Interwebz. Including YOU.

CdnFox Grand Master

CdnFox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

IF your information is TRUE, you should have NO PROBLEM finding credible reporting.

But ethical journalists will not publish BULLSHIT.

IT's unfortunate that you're so naive you don't know that ANYONE can POST ANYTHING on the Interwebz. Including YOU.

Oh the irony :)  

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

CdnFox Grand Master

CdnFox

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Dude... https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/

 

Yeah - it does look like trump is still ahead by a nose.  It is close though.

And there's been little movement really in the last month or two - there's always a little up and down but it's pretty stable.  I think probably these are going to be the starting positions for when the real election starts and people just aren't really paying attention right now

When august is over and we have boht official nominees and the race starts in earnest after the summer - i think we'll start seeing some movement and get an idea who's going to take it.

But yes it's looking nice for trump at the moment :)  

  • Thanks 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

IF your information is TRUE, you should have NO PROBLEM finding credible reporting.

But ethical journalists will not publish BULLSHIT.

IT's unfortunate that you're so naive you don't know that ANYONE can POST ANYTHING on the Interwebz. Including YOU.

Your only source is you.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Nationalist Grand Master

Nationalist

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Yeah - it does look like trump is still ahead by a nose.  It is close though.

And there's been little movement really in the last month or two - there's always a little up and down but it's pretty stable.  I think probably these are going to be the starting positions for when the real election starts and people just aren't really paying attention right now

When august is over and we have boht official nominees and the race starts in earnest after the summer - i think we'll start seeing some movement and get an idea who's going to take it.

But yes it's looking nice for trump at the moment :)  

Completely agreed.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,915
    • Most Online
      1,403
    MDP
    Newest Member
    MDP
    Joined

  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      MDP
      MDP earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rookie
      MDP
      MDP went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Conversation Starter
      MDP
      MDP earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Week One Done
      derek848
      derek848 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      MDP
      MDP earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...