QuebecOverCanada Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 Just now, robosmith said: They're NOT ASKING US to fight THEIR battles. Duh Yes they did you mother f*cker. They pretended Poland was attacked by Russia a year ago. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 Just now, QuebecOverCanada said: Yes. Ukraine said that Poland was hit by an Ukrainian missile a year ago and Ukraine said Russia did it, and said that they wanted Article 5 to be initiated. You are as ignorant as all the other chicken hawks. STILL NOT ASKING FOR US TROOPS. Ukraine has NO STANDING to invoke Article 5 nor even request it. Duh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuebecOverCanada Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 Just now, robosmith said: STILL NOT ASKING FOR US TROOPS. Ukraine has NO STANDING to invoke Article 5 nor even request it. Duh You're so illiterate. Ukraine pretended officially that Poland was attacked by Russia. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 Just now, QuebecOverCanada said: Yes they did you mother f*cker. They pretended Poland was attacked by Russia a year ago. Nothing happened cause the missile was NOT an attack from Russia, despite your delusions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted February 9 Author Report Share Posted February 9 2 hours ago, myata said: Any stupidity that can be imagined will be said, or done by someone some time. That clarifies the reason for your posts 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 Just now, QuebecOverCanada said: You're so illiterate. Ukraine pretended officially that Poland was attacked by Russia. Ukraine DOES NOT SPEAK for Poland. Duh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuebecOverCanada Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 Just now, robosmith said: Nothing happened cause the missile was NOT an attack from Russia, despite your delusions. Ukraine officially stated that Poland was attacked by Russia. Why are you trying so hard? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 Just now, QuebecOverCanada said: Ukraine officially stated that Poland was attacked by Russia. Why are you trying so hard? Ukraine does NOT SPEAK for POLAND. Duh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuebecOverCanada Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Ukraine does NOT SPEAK for POLAND. Duh The question that was asked is if Ukraine wanted US troops to intervene. The answer is yes. They lied, clearly, to involve all of NATO into an open war with Russia. You're so inconsistent. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 (edited) 20 minutes ago, robosmith said: Hate to break it to ya, but if we stay out, Putin wins. AKA, surrender. It's entirely credible how STUPID YOU ARE because you demonstrate it all the time here. Wins what? A failed nation? Hell its a money pit. Go ahead. The only surrender will be Zelinsky's...if he lives that long. I expect one of his own is gonna cap the greedy slob soon. Edited February 9 by Nationalist 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted February 9 Author Report Share Posted February 9 2 hours ago, Yakuda said: There is no bottom to human stupidity. The thing is that at some point in the past we would let people experience the natural consequences of their stupidity. If their stupidity killed them that was unfortunate but wasn't necessarily bad because their stupidity wouldn't spread to a new generation. If they happened to survive their stupidity and learned from it that was good for everyone. What we do these days is constantly protect people from their own stupidity and it's been to our continuing deterioration. A perfect example is when Biden is given a pass for his felony possession of classified docs because "he's elderly with memory issues". But hey, let's make him the leader of the free world for another 4 years. He's only getting younger, right? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 14 minutes ago, robosmith said: Apparently you don't understand the differences between aiding an invaded nation with arms and sending our troops to fight their battles. 🤮 Apparently you're a two-faced chickenshit. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted February 9 Author Report Share Posted February 9 38 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Nope, totally different. Go read a single book for once. Dude, stop acting like the truth would make a difference to you. If Biden said it, you're all-in, regardless of any other factor. You guys even pretend not to see inflation when he says it's not there ffs. There's literally no connection between "the truth" and what comes out of your mouth. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 30 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Awwwww, Black Dog just dropped another pile of wit. How cute. Last time I checked the only people accepting Naziism were the leftards here, vaxtards, Zelenski, Ukrainians, Jon Stewart, the pentagon, Trudeau and the LPOC, Biden, the Demis, etc. You're too much of a gimp to actually join the Azovs in battle, but don't worry, they appreciate the support of their keyboard warrior buddies like you. None of this blather changes the fact that they're right wing anticommunists just like you. I don't know why you're letting a little problematic branding put you off when you have so much in common. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted February 9 Author Report Share Posted February 9 20 minutes ago, QuebecOverCanada said: The exact same playbook was used by war mongerers in the 70s. It's always the same discourse; we must protect a group that is defending itself! We must then arm the side oppressed for freedom. Be it in Libya, Iraq, Viet Nam, Syria, it's always been the same discourse. And ten years later they'll add that war to "The list of wars where the US attacked countries in the ME!!!!" The words "thank you" aren't in their vocabulary. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuebecOverCanada Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 12 minutes ago, robosmith said: They're NOT ASKING US to fight THEIR battles. Duh Fu ck off. They (Ukraine) invoked Article 5 after they threw a missile at Poland. Investigations shed light on the fact that Ukrainians themselves threw the missile. But even Zelensky was trying to say that Russia threw the missile at Poland, because he knew that if Poland was attacked, all of NATO would start a war at Russia. If you're so dense you can't comprehend this simple fact, you should be cannon fodder for the Ukrainians. Go to Adviivka. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 20 minutes ago, QuebecOverCanada said: Go fu ck yourself. The exact same playbook was used by war mongerers in the 70s. It's always the same discourse; we must protect a group that is defending itself! We must then arm the side oppressed for freedom. Be it in Libya, Iraq, Viet Nam, Syria, it's always been the same discourse. You're an outdated chicken hawk. Get in with the times, nobody believes you anymore. Actually dipshit, the "discourse" is very different in each one of those cases. Again, read a book kid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuebecOverCanada Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 Just now, Black Dog said: Actually dipshit, the "discourse" is very different in each one of those cases. Again, read a book kid. No you, c*ck su cker. Every time, it's the same thing. 'it's a defensive war!' 'we are attacked if X people is attacked!' 'we are next if X loses!' It's exactly the same effing thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 Just now, QuebecOverCanada said: No you, c*ck su cker. Every time, it's the same thing. 'it's a defensive war!' 'we are attacked if X people is attacked!' 'we are next if X loses!' It's exactly the same effing thing. This literally is a defensive war; are you pretending otherwise, child? God it's so good people like ytou aren't breeding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted February 9 Author Report Share Posted February 9 4 minutes ago, Black Dog said: No need to respond to that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuebecOverCanada Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 (edited) 1 minute ago, Black Dog said: This literally is a defensive war; are you pretending otherwise, child? God it's so good people like ytou aren't breeding. So the US/NATO should intervene in any war for countries that are under an attack? By the way, do not worry about my fertility, when you got no balls to fight in the wars you so want to push on others. Edited February 9 by QuebecOverCanada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted February 9 Author Report Share Posted February 9 2 minutes ago, QuebecOverCanada said: No you, c*ck su cker. Every time, it's the same thing. 'it's a defensive war!' 'we are attacked if X people is attacked!' 'we are next if X loses!' It's exactly the same effing thing. He's just a troll with a sub-60 IQ. Ignore him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuebecOverCanada Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 Just now, WestCanMan said: He's just a troll with a sub-60 IQ. Ignore him. He's actually subhuman. I would totally send him to the front lines in Ukraine. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 3 minutes ago, QuebecOverCanada said: So the US/NATO should intervene in any war for countries that are under an attack? Not with troops, but i don't have any issue supplying arms and intel etc. 2 minutes ago, QuebecOverCanada said: He's actually subhuman. I would totally send him to the front lines in Ukraine. Good thing you have no more power to do that than you have in any other aspect of your pathetic life, you nobody. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuebecOverCanada Posted February 9 Report Share Posted February 9 Just now, Black Dog said: Not with troops, but i don't have any issue supplying arms and intel etc. Yes, so 18 years olds from abroad die for your stupid ideals. Just now, Black Dog said: Good thing you have no more power to do that than you have in any other aspect of your pathetic life, you nobody. It's a good thing nobody cares about your warmongering scams anymore. Almost nobody wants to die for Ukraine, nobody wants to send its taxes there for a lost cause. South Vietnam was conquered and Vietnam eventually became an economic partner of the West. The same fate will happen to Ukraine, despite all your doom saying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.