Leftists Just Getting More and More Revolting

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, godzilla said:

yeah sure... but how did they fix the election?

It was the FBI that went to members of the Trusted News Initiative in Oct and told them that there would be some laptop information being leaked which was all " Russian  disinformation ". 

The FBI had the laptop in their possession for 11 months at that point, they absolutely knew that it was not Russian disinformation.

As a result of the FBI's interference, and the Trusted News Initiative's quick action, the story was made out to be another example of Trump colluding with Russians, and people were banned from social media for talking about the laptop. Even the NY Post was banned from Twitter, and every single thing that they said was true.

You gotta admit: these Trusted News Initiatives guys really do seem to be wrong - in lock step - a lot. 

 

Did you notice how fast Elon Musk went from "International superhero fighting global warming and a generally awesome guy" to "evil super-villain" wthe day that he started trying to buy Twitter? 

How did they all suddenly figure that he was an evil guy just because of that? Twitter was a one-man show when Dorsey ran it, in conjunction with the "Trusted News Initiative." Why would it be worse when super-awesome Elon ran it? 

Here's exactly what happened: the TNI turned on him like a cut snake. Suddenly the TNI's stranglehold on social media was gone. Now Elon gets slandered regularly, and Twitter is dragged as a cesspool of vile filth.

I dunno, Twitter was at a super-low point after banning talk of the BSL4 Lab and then banning the NY Post for talking about the laptop. It's really weird that people thought Twitter could go downhill from there, right? 

[WestCanMan]

5 hours ago, godzilla said:

fake dossier is NOT anti democratic.

claiming "collusion" is NOT anti democratic.

When the top members of the FBI's collusion investigation were informed in an email from the CIA that Carter Page was a CIA asset - BEFORE THE FIRST FISA WARRANT APPLICATION - and then they pretended that Page was almost certainly spying for Russia when he was meeting with all of these dodgy Russians on their first three FISA applications, that was a crime, every single time they submitted an application. They knew he was spying for America, they pretended he was spying for Russia. All of the top members who signed off on the first 3 warrant applications were guilty of omitting critical information, or even outright lying to the judge. That's a crime.

Then Carter Page had to go public and say that he was a CIA spy to clear his name, which put his own life in danger and revealed the all-important "sources and methods" that Dems are always so concerned about, so the FBI had to double-down on their lies to the FISA court in order to get their 4th application approved, and Kevin Clinesmith edited the original email from the CIA, changing it from "Page is a CIA asset" to "Page is NOT a CIA asset", and the FBI used that altered email to get the 4th warrant.

Clinesmith pled guilty to that crime, but he wasn't even disbarred. He never spent a day in jail. 

Compare that to what happened to Gen. Flynn.... He never submitted anything false, he never actually even lied to the FBI (the know  liars), but he went to jail for a long time and it cost him millions to clear his name. 

 

You tell me godzilla, is it anti-democratic when the country's premier law enforcement agency is lying to judges to get warrants to spy on the president, and then runs a highly publicized smear campaign against him? How banana republic is that? 

[WestCanMan]

Look at all the new thread titles coming from the leftists today. Just more proof of how revolting they are. 

[CdnFox]

19 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Look at all the new thread titles coming from the leftists today. Just more proof of how revolting they are. 

As we get closer to november and trump still hasn't been 'stopped' it's a safe bet that the desperation will increase.  Expect much gnashing of teeth and rending of garments.

[eyeball]

What would really be sweet is a tie - a result that's so close that Trump turns purple.

I'd pay money to see that.

[CdnFox]

30 minutes ago, eyeball said:

What would really be sweet is a tie - a result that's so close that Trump turns purple.

I'd pay money to see that.

LOL - well i admitted in another thread i was hoping to see trump win by 1 vote because the entire us would explode, but a tie would be just as good except we'd probably see a civil war for a few years.

[WestCanMan]

13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

LOL - well i admitted in another thread i was hoping to see trump win by 1 vote because the entire us would explode, but a tie would be just as good except we'd probably see a civil war for a few years.

You don't think a truckload of missing ballots would be discovered? 

Trump needs to win by millions in the swing states. 

[WestCanMan]

@godzilla You asked me some questions - I answered them. 

Did you see the laundry list of covid disinformation from the Dems/MSM? 

Did you notice that all the people who joined the Trusted News Initiative were in lock-step on every single covid narrative that ended up being wrong? Theoretically they were "combatting disinformation", but with the benefit of hindsight, we can see that they combat disinformation like islamic state combats religious bigotry.

[CdnFox]

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You don't think a truckload of missing ballots would be discovered? 

Trump needs to win by millions in the swing states. 

I don't know that stealing ballots would be a way to victory - if the ballots are sealed how do you know who they voted for before you stole them?

But in any case the idea you'd need millions is not accurate.  Have a look:

https://www.npr.org/2020/12/02/940689086/narrow-wins-in-these-key-states-powered-biden-to-the-presidency

In many cases trump lost by 'thousands' not millions.  And you woudln't need to win them all to take the election.

And picking up 20,000 votes in those areas just with mail in ballot frauds and harvesting alone would not be that hard or require a lot of people.  And you'd never know. It's largely undetectable.

Then there's voter impersonation, ineligible voters etc and other frauds and we know all of this happens.  If you can't detect it - how can you trust the results? And this is why about 1./3 of the us feels the election was 'stolen' or seriously tampered with.  Believe me - no matter what the results of the next election about the same percent will still feel that way, it just flips depending on who wins and it's been that way for several elections now.

If you close the loopholes and get rid of the opportunities to cheat and tighten things up then you make it hard enough to cheat without being detected that suddenly people can have a little faith. You'll get the odd nutjob but nothing like there is now.

 

[WestCanMan]

4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I don't know that stealing ballots would be a way to victory - if the ballots are sealed how do you know who they voted for before you stole them?

Who says the ballots ever have to go anywhere, and then get stolen?

They just need to get their guys to keep some of the ballots that are supposed to go to people who never vote, fill them in, and send them.

If I "send a ballot to you", or if I pretend to send it to you and then fill it in and mail it in myself, who's to know better? The Dems can get some ballots post-marked if they want to. Theoretically the US landed a man on the moon in the '60s.

Quote

In many cases trump lost by 'thousands' not millions.  And you woudln't need to win them all to take the election.

That's why Trump needs to win by millions there. If it's "close", it's within the margin of cheating for the Dems. 

[impartialobserver]

Any topic where you have lots of micro data is going to have some issues with interpretation. Does "blah, blah, blah" qualify as x or y. If you use human eyes, then it slows way down and gets very subjective. If you use automation then you lose the ability to be discerning and to incorporate nuance. Health statistics can be misleading because of this. 

[CdnFox]

36 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Who says the ballots ever have to go anywhere, and then get stolen?

They just need to get their guys to keep some of the ballots that are supposed to go to people who never vote, fill them in, and send them.

If I "send a ballot to you", or if I pretend to send it to you and then fill it in and mail it in myself, who's to know better? The Dems can get some ballots post-marked if they want to. Theoretically the US landed a man on the moon in the '60s.

 

well that's a type of ballot harvesting and yes that's a problem. People can also go door to door or to old people's homes and such and 'offer to fill them in and mail them for you'.  You can even pull the old  trick where you offer to drop ballots off for people and as they get it ask 'who'd you vote for?" and if they say someone you don't like then their ballot goes in the garbage not the mail.

Most states have laws against this but it so easy to get around that it's a serious problem.  And the person who gave you the ballot won't know there was a problem.

it's not hard to make a big difference.  Remember taking 1000 vote away from trump and giving them to biden actually makes a 2000 vote difference to the result becuase it reduces trump by 1 and increases biden by 1

It leaves the door VERY open for the possibility of fraud, so what do you say to those who claim biden stole the election?  How can you say you can be reasonably sure he didn't? Compare that to the Canadian system, you're still going to get a little fraud every election but not much and it's pretty easy to verify that no large scale fraud occurred.

 

Quote

That's why Trump needs to win by millions there. If it's "close", it's within the margin of cheating for the Dems. 

They're going to think he cheated if he wins no matter how much he wins by.

Edited January 19, 2024 by CdnFox

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

They're going to think he cheated if he wins no matter how much he wins by.

I'm just saying that if it's close enough, the Dems can definitely cheat enough to pull it off. 

If the vote is lopsided by a million or so, it becomes much harder to cheat. There are too many polling stations in each state to swing the result with just one polling station if it's really lopsided everywhere else. 

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

I'm just saying that if it's close enough, the Dems can definitely cheat enough to pull it off. 

If the vote is lopsided by a million or so, it becomes much harder to cheat. There are too many polling stations in each state to swing the result with just one polling station if it's really lopsided everywhere else. 

Ahhh - i see where you were going with that now.  I did not read that correctly initially.

It's always nice to have a safety buffer because you never know what shennanigans will pop up. But the polling and the profile of the race suggests that there's about a 65 percent chance it'll be very tight, and only about a 35 percent chance that it'll be a wide margin or a blow out.  It's going to be a hard fight for the both of them.

[Caswell Thomas]

On 1/12/2024 at 8:27 PM, WestCanMan said:

There's not a leftist here that can name a positive achievement by Trudeau or Biden. Those two just aren't achievers. All they do is virtue signal and f everything up royally.

Yet somehow, leftards on this site can't find any fault with them, and they cling to every anti-Trump anti-Poilievre story that comes along like drowning men clutching at straws.

Who on God's green earth would look out their window and think to themselves "Another term of Biden/Trudeau is just what the doctor ordered"?

These leftards do nothing but spew lies, exaggerate, omit, cheer on FBI crimes, and their campaign slogans are platitudes like "If Trump wins it's the end of democracy!"

On average, these guys are 4 yr olds at best. I can't help but wonder how much actual value our countries get out of 10M leftists... What do they contribute that's worthwhile? 

We really need to take the warning labels off of everything. This is what we get for trying to defy Darwinism. 

Who cares what you think. You don't even vote here.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Caswell Thomas said:

Who cares what you think. You don't even vote here.

Uh Oh - someone's getting cranky  

You don't play professional sports but you probably watch some and comment on them  

I get why you're angry - the polls have trump most likely to win at this point. Cheer up, it's still a long way to the election. A lot can happen in 10 months.

[WestCanMan]

14 hours ago, Caswell Thomas said:

Who cares what you think. You don't even vote here.

Again with the riveting dissection of a fact-laden post that made you feel butt-hurt.

Awww, poor Cazzy. 

Put some local anesthetic on your arse and walk it off, cupcake.

[WestCanMan]

14 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You don't play professional sports but you probably watch some and comment on them  

In fairness to Caz, Americans never get involved in the local politics of other countries....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

🤣😂😅 

[CdnFox]

17 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

In fairness to Caz, Americans never get involved in the local politics of other countries....

 

🤣😂😅 

Yeah - you trolled me good there    I was like  WAT!! WHAT DOES HE MEAN HAS HE LOST HIS oh there's smiley faces. Sigh..  backspace backspace backspace.....     

[Caswell Thomas]

5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Again with the riveting dissection of a fact-laden post that made you feel butt-hurt.

Awww, poor Cazzy. 

Put some local anesthetic on your arse and walk it off, cupcake.

See my prior post.