GOP Seeks Records on Censorship by Left-Wing Groups

[Deluge]

"Left-wing groups such as GDI and NewsGuard have been used by major advertising agencies to block military recruitment ads on many conservative media outlets."

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/state-department-house-gop/2024/01/09/id/1148853/

That above part is telling because woke unicorn tear drinkers want to change the military too. 

Anyone remember this cringefest? lol

 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

That above part is telling because woke unicorn tear drinkers want to change the military too. 

Anyone remember this cringefest? lol

 

As if leftists are going to fight for the US.

I'd be willing to bet that if it came right down to it, 20% of Dem voters would join another army to fight against the US. 

[Michael Hardner]

Theoretical.  Whereas Trumpets already fought against the US on January 6th.

[Deluge]

8 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

As if leftists are going to fight for the US.

I'd be willing to bet that if it came right down to it, 20% of Dem voters would join another army to fight against the US. 

Agreed. In fact, the percentage would probably be higher than that. 

[Deluge]

3 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Theoretical.  Whereas Trumpets already fought against the US on January 6th.

That was just a protest gone bad. What you're really referring to is all those riots BLM and Antifa unleashed on the American public and how we probably haven't seen the last of it.  

[WestCanMan]

3 minutes ago, Deluge said:

That was just a protest gone bad. What you're really referring to is all those riots BLM and Antifa unleashed on the American public and how we probably haven't seen the last of it.  

He posts less frequently than robo, but with similar value. 

[Deluge]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

He posts less frequently than robo, but with similar value. 

That's because they both get their talking points from the same dictator. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

Theoretical.  Whereas Trumpets already fought against the US on January 6th.

Oh look - another lefty lie.  Do you have video of trump actually taking up arms and fighting as you claim? No?

Sounds pretty legit then, Mr "i'm a conservative guys honest!"

[Legato]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

Theoretical.  Whereas Trumpets already fought against the US on January 6th.

The Trumpets just played Trumpet Voluntary. Upon hearing this the Biden section started to play a cacophony of jarring percussion, totally lacking rhythm or purpose. Every drum had a manufacture date of Jan 06. Ever since most sane people have had to wear ear protectors.

Mr Wonderful won't see this I'm on ignore.😄 

[Michael Hardner]

To recap: The Great Leader proclaimed to his supporters to fight, which they did and they entered the Capitol building to stop the peaceful transfer of power and abduct the VP.

Many have been found guilty and Great Leader may be banned from running again.

In a few years, nobody will be proud to have supported this hypocritical and selfish embarrassment.

I haven't seen a solid retort, just insults...

[Deluge]

3 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

To recap:

1. The Great Leader proclaimed to his supporters to fight,

2. which they did and they entered the Capitol building to stop the peaceful transfer of power and abduct the VP.

3. Many have been found guilty and Great Leader may be banned from running again.

4. In a few years, nobody will be proud to have supported this hypocritical and selfish embarrassment.

5. I haven't seen a solid retort, just insults...

Yes, let's recap:

1. Trump also said to assemble peacefully, and since you Trump hating woketards are incapable of taking two messages and coming out with the correct interpretation of both, you simply cast the "peaceful" request aside and go straight to "fight". 

Now, nanny statists like you are virtually incapable of understanding that the word "fight" has multiple meanings. For example:

-- The USC Trojans football team this last year had the words "Fight on" on the back of their helmets. Now, using your stoopid a$$ interpretation of the word "fight" the USC Trojans would have really been trying to murder opposing players in cold blood. And still using your stoopid a$$ interpretation, they would have really sucked at that because they didn't actually kill anybody. Obviously the team didn't mean to take lives in 2023, so "Fight on" must've meant to play hard and try to win. 

-- Donald Trump said to "fight". He didn't say "grab your guns, advance on the capitol and take control of it." He simply said to "fight". Now, when you consider that he already asked his supporters to assemble peacefully, it's logical to think that when he said to "fight" he was talking about protesting the results of the election because it looked like you a$$holes cheated. 

2. No, the videos clearly show what looked like a tour of the building. There was no overthrow of the government. Just left-wing drama queens like you running around screaming while pulling your hair out. 

3. Many have been found guilty by left-wing banana courts. I expect full pardons for every patriot in 2025. 

4. In a few years you will be back in dark corners and the underground where weirdos belong. 

5. You haven't seen anything outside of left-wing propaganda. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

To recap: The Great Leader proclaimed to his supporters to fight, which they did and they entered the Capitol building to stop the peaceful transfer of power and abduct the VP.

Many have been found guilty and Great Leader may be banned from running again.

In a few years, nobody will be proud to have supported this hypocritical and selfish embarrassment.

I haven't seen a solid retort, just insults...

An insult is a retort.

re·tort¹

a sharp, angry, or wittily incisive reply to a remark.

"she opened her mouth to make a suitably cutting retort"

 

What you mean is some species of reply or counter argument.  And yes you have.

 

As noted -"Great Leader" did not order his people to physical violence. He specifically told them to be peaceful and lawful.  The term "fight" is a very very common word to mean struggle metaphorically - people 'fight'  for their rights all the time, lawyers 'fight' for their clients,  etc etc.  No violence, no actual physical 'fighting'.

in fact the term is so common that your instance that it must be 'proof' of orders of physical violence suggests extreme dishonesty on your part.

 

None have been found guilty of insurrection or rebellion and there is no reason to believe he'll be banned outside of the severe misuse of powers of some left wing state judges who believe it's ok to interfere with democracy.

 

In a few years people will feel the same as they do now.  Almost nobody outside of the protesters actually supports what they did. Everyone says it was wrong.  But - the dems will likley give up on trying to pretend that democracy was ever actually threatened.

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

That was just a protest gone bad. What you're really referring to is all those riots BLM and Antifa unleashed on the American public and how we probably haven't seen the last of it.  

^False equivalence. No attack on the Federal government (except a Post Office building). LMAO

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

He posts less frequently than robo, but with similar value. 

Thanks for the compliment. 👍

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

That's because they both get their talking points from the same dictator. 

If by "dictator" you mean the ENTIRE US MEDIA. LMAO

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

The Trumpets just played Trumpet Voluntary. Upon hearing this the Biden section started to play a cacophony of jarring percussion, totally lacking rhythm or purpose. Every drum had a manufacture date of Jan 06. Ever since most sane people have had to wear ear protectors.

Mr Wonderful won't see this I'm on ignore.😄 

So he's recognized your (nonexistent) value. Stop TROLLING and I'll let him know about your return to sanity.

[Deluge]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

^False equivalence. No attack on the Federal government (except a Post Office building). LMAO

The false equivalence is your read on the 14th Amendment - just ask the SCOTUS. 

Meanwhile, your fellow flag burning degenerate Antifa and BLM buddies are probably getting ready to trash more cities and private property.  

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

To recap: The Great Leader proclaimed to his supporters to fight, which they did and they entered the Capitol building to stop the peaceful transfer of power and abduct the VP.

It was actually Trump's SS which tried to abduct Pence but he refused to get in the vehicle.

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

Many have been found guilty and Great Leader may be banned from running again.

In a few years, nobody will be proud to have supported this hypocritical and selfish embarrassment.

I haven't seen a solid retort, just insults...

That's all the intellectually bankrupt have.

[Deluge]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

If by "dictator" you mean the ENTIRE US MEDIA. LMAO

No, I mean the dictators who control the ENTIRE US MEDIA. You're just at the bottom of the ooze.

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

The false equivalence is your read on the 14th Amendment - just ask the SCOTUS. 

Meanwhile, your fellow flag burning degenerate Antifa and BLM buddies are probably getting ready to trash more cities and private property.  

The SCOTUS has already been asked. It's only in your fantasies that they've answered. LMAO

Just now, Deluge said:

No, I mean the dictators who control the ENTIRE US MEDIA. You're just at the bottom of the ooze.

^DELUGINAL. As in divorced from REALITY.

[Deluge]

Just now, robosmith said:

The SCOTUS has already been asked. It's only in your fantasies that they've answered. LMAO

No, that's your fantasy. The truth is, we BOTH know how they will/would rule.

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^DELUGINAL. As in divorced from REALITY.

robodamaged is projecting again. He does that a lot when he's getting kicked liked a b*tch up and down the forum.

[Deluge]

17 minutes ago, robosmith said:

So he's recognized your (nonexistent) value. Stop TROLLING and I'll let him know about your return to sanity.

You have no value, so it's pointless for you to even speak of it. 

[Legato]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

So he's recognized your (nonexistent) value. Stop TROLLING and I'll let him know about your return to sanity.

How can you recognise something that is nonexistent. Must be a robot trait running on a faulty algorithm.

Do you need a reboot? Switch yourself off, count to ten and then switch back on.

Hope that helps.

 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

No, that's your fantasy. The truth is, we BOTH know how they will/would rule.

robodamaged is projecting again. He does that a lot when he's getting kicked liked a b*tch up and down the forum.

You're dreaming again. LMAO

[robosmith]

36 minutes ago, Legato said:

How can you recognise something that is nonexistent. Must be a robot trait running on a faulty algorithm.

No, it's recognizing that something doesn't exist. Duh

Is English your first language? LMAO

More likely you're just TROLLING as usual. 🤮

 

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

You have no value, so it's pointless for you to even speak of it. 

The point is you're an lDIOT.

[Legato]

15 hours ago, robosmith said:

No, it's recognizing that something doesn't exist. Duh

Is English your first language? LMAO

More likely you're just TROLLING as usual. 🤮

 

The point is you're an lDIOT.

Same. If someone recognises something that does not exist. One could blame it on LSD.

Answer me this very important question...Do you see Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds, or, LUCY IN THE SKY WITH DIAMONDS?