Biden Impeachment - Bad for the GOP

[robosmith]

7 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Read the post above this one you dumb little weasel. Joe used the weight of his political office to benefit his son, and Hunter got millions from it. 

You have vivid imagination and NO EVIDENCE there was any conspiracy there. 

The evidence shows that Joe was implementing OFFICIAL US POLICY on instructions from POTUS.

7 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

FYI that's not what you're supposed to do as the VPOTUS.

And no evidence political favors were DELIVERED. 

7 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I personally hope that Biden still runs next year, it's a huge mistake to derail that loser right now. 

Sure. He beat Trump before and will likely do it again, cause Trump is that rotten and corrupt.

No one wants a "dictator" except the stupid MAGA CULT.

[WestCanMan]

13 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You have vivid imagination and NO EVIDENCE there was any conspiracy there. 

The evidence shows that Joe was implementing OFFICIAL US POLICY on instructions from POTUS.

And no evidence political favors were DELIVERED. 

Sure. He beat Trump before and will likely do it again, cause Trump is that rotten and corrupt.

No one wants a "dictator" except the stupid MAGA CULT.

You're a vile little propagandist. 

I say vile because the level of corruption that you're trying to normalize is way beyond the pale. It's the kind of stuff that Putin and KJU can get away with, but it's not supposed to be possible in a western democracy. 

Your idea of what's legal and moral is exactly the same as that of every dictator that ever walked the earth. 

[herbie]

5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

It seems like a great time to elect a skeleton, only to be replaced by a low IQ fool.

You can do both - vote for Trump. You get way more outright senile dementia in a younger and less fit body!

[robosmith]

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I'm a vile little propagandist. 

ftfy....

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I say vile because the level of corruption that you're trying to normalize is way beyond the pale. It's the kind of stuff that Putin and KJU can get away with, but it's not supposed to be possible in a western democracy. 

Your idea of what's legal and moral is exactly the same as that of every dictator that ever walked the earth. 

Now, now don't go away mad just cause you have NO EVIDENCE of ANY CORRUPTION.

You just believe the fantasies you hear on FOS LIES..

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

ftfy....

Oh look - robosmith is copying eyeball and lying about what people said to cover the fact he was losing the argument.  Must be a leftie thing. 

[robosmith]

LMAO

[Hodad]

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Which one of these things is false, stupid?

1) Biden showed up, 2) Zloch was in trouble, 3) Zloch hired Joe's kid for stupid gobs of cash, 4) Joe fired the guy who put Zloch in trouble 5) Joe hired a "solid guy" who let Zloch off the hook 6) Joe pretended that he didn't know about Hunter's overseas business dealings 7) Joe pretended that he didn't talk to Hunter's associates  8. Joe was busted for using an email alias to talk to some of Hunter's associates.

2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 are entirely false, partially false or wildly misleading. 

Which, given your track record, counts as progress!

Edited December 21, 2023 by Hodad

[WestCanMan]

40 minutes ago, Hodad said:

2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 are entirely false, partially false or wildly misleading. 

Which, given your track record, counts as progress!

 

1. Here's the list, just so we're in agreement
   
2.  
3. Zloch was in trouble,
4. Zloch hired Joe's kid for stupid gobs of cash,
5. Joe fired the guy who put Zloch in trouble
6. Joe hired a "solid guy" who let Zloch off the hook
7. Joe pretended that he didn't know about Hunter's overseas business dealings
8. Joe pretended that he didn't talk to Hunter's associates  
9. Joe was busted for using an email alias to talk to some of Hunter's associates.

 

Listen up stupid, I'm not gonna explain this 10 more times for you:

2) Yeah, zloch absolutely was in trouble. His house, cars and other assets were seized by Shokin's court order. Zloch left Ukraine and didn't come back until after Joe's "solid guy" prosecutor gave him his get out of jail free card.

How does that look like "not in trouble" to you?

4) Joe absolutely fired Shokin. He said that himself in no uncertain terms. 

Are you honestly trying to split hairs over whether "Joe fired him" or "Joe gave the Ukrainian gov't an ultimatum and they fired him for Joe"?

5) At the end of the infamous "Well sonofab!tch, he was fired..." video Joe says "and I had a 'solid guy' put in his place."

Again, Joe's own words, not mine. 

6) On more than one occasion, Joe forcefully denied knowledge of Hunter's overseas business dealings. 

7) Even now, Joe's official position is that he never talked to Hunter's business associates. 

8. Yes, Joe used an email alias to talk to Hunter's associates. Try to stay up to speed. 

[Hodad]

12 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

 

1. Here's the list, just so we're in agreement
2.  
3. Zloch was in trouble,
4. Zloch hired Joe's kid for stupid gobs of cash,
5. Joe fired the guy who put Zloch in trouble
6. Joe hired a "solid guy" who let Zloch off the hook
7. Joe pretended that he didn't know about Hunter's overseas business dealings
8. Joe pretended that he didn't talk to Hunter's associates  
9. Joe was busted for using an email alias to talk to some of Hunter's associates.

 

Listen up stupid, I'm not gonna explain this 10 more times for you:

2) Yeah, zloch absolutely was in trouble. His house, cars and other assets were seized by Shokin's court order. Zloch left Ukraine and didn't come back until after Joe's "solid guy" prosecutor gave him his get out of jail free card.

How does that look like "not in trouble" to you?

4) Joe absolutely fired Shokin. He said that himself in no uncertain terms. 

Are you honestly trying to split hairs over whether "Joe fired him" or "Joe gave the Ukrainian gov't an ultimatum and they fired him for Joe"?

5) At the end of the infamous "Well sonofab!tch, he was fired..." video Joe says "and I had a 'solid guy' put in his place."

Again, Joe's own words, not mine. 

6) On more than one occasion, Joe forcefully denied knowledge of Hunter's overseas business dealings. 

7) Even now, Joe's official position is that he never talked to Hunter's business associates. 

8. Yes, Joe used an email alias to talk to Hunter's associates. Try to stay up to speed. 

Hey look. The guy who continually spams threads repeating himself is literally just repeating himself. I am shocked!

And, FYI, you changed the numbering.

[robosmith]

Republicans Can’t Believe Fox News Keeps Calling Them Out on Their Impeachment Bulls--t

Quote

That Republicans will likely vote to authorize a formal impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden on Wednesday should not come as a surprise to anyone given the GOP’s history of (1) being obsessed with the unproven claim that the president sits at the top of a sprawling family crime ring (2) doing everything Donald Trump tells it to do, and (3) having no shame. What is surprising—and downright hilarious—is that Fox News, which the GOP thought had its back, keeps telling viewers that Republicans have zero basis to impeach the president and are also hypocrites to boot.

The hypocrisy callout came on Tuesday night, when anchor Bret Baier played a 2019 clip of Mike Johnson, then a little-known congressman, declaring that the founding fathers were rolling over in their graves on account of Trump facing impeachment so close to an election year. “The founders of this country warned against a single-party impeachment—for good reason. They feared that it would bitterly, and perhaps irreparably, divide our nation,” Johnson said almost exactly four years ago. “As the next election in 2020 is drawing so close now, and their candidates for president are so terribly weak, they obviously met somewhere at liberal high command about 75 days ago and convinced Nancy Pelosi they had to pull the trigger. I hope and pray that future Congresses can and will exercise greater restraint.”

Fox News stars, father and son Steve Doocy and Peter Doocy, reminded viewers that Republicans have been investigating Biden for more than a year and have still come up with no evidence to impeach him. As in zero, zilch, nada. “The House Oversight Committee has been at this for years,” Boy Doocy said Friday, “and they have so far not been able to provide any concrete evidence that Joe Biden personally profited from his son Hunter’s overseas business.” On Monday, Peter’s father informed the Fox & Friends audience that “at this point…[Republicans] have not connected the dots” between Hunter’s alleged crimes and Joe Biden. “They’ve connected the dots—the Department of Justice did on Hunter. But they have not shown where Joe Biden did anything illegally. 

 

[CdnFox]

Just now, robosmith said:

Republicans Can’t Believe Fox News Keeps Calling Them Out on Their Impeachment Bulls--t

 

Yeah - that might be more meaningfull if the dems hadn't tried to impeach trump twice after falsely accusing him with the 'steel' dossier and weaponizing the FBI against him