2020-2021 Election fraud timeline

[Deluge]

I figured now would be a good time to start digging into the bullshit that is leftism/wokeness in terms of election fraud, and what better place to start than the 2020 rigging? 

From Conservapedia:

"When Democrats want to tilt elections in their favor outside the ballot box, Marc Elias of Perkins Coie is the go-to guy. Perkins Coie is the Democratic law firm, paid by the Hillary Clinton campaign, that hired Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on Donald Trump in 2016. They failed, but still compiled the Steele dossier full of foreign-solicited lies about Trump and Russia, which was leaked by Obama intelligence officials to try to sabotage the new president's administration, sow doubt in his election victory, and invalidate the votes of 63 million Americans. From Wisconsin to Nevada, to California, Marc Elias and the Democrats pushed lawsuits disguised as “election reform” to water down important election safeguards and increase the opportunity for fraud, abuse, and corruption"

Now dig in, and don't be shy - this is a safe space.

[WestCanMan]

24 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Marc Elias and the Democrats pushed lawsuits disguised as “election reform” to water down important election safeguards and increase the opportunity for fraud, abuse, and corruption"

C'mon, are you saying that not requiring ID in order to vote makes it easier to commit voter fraud? How so? 

[robosmith]

21 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

C'mon, are you saying that not requiring ID in order to vote makes it easier to commit voter fraud? How so? 

Are you having trouble reading or understanding?

No, Elias is clearly saying that requiring ID makes voter suppression easier because segments of the population that vote Democratic are less likely to have or easily be able to get ID.

That is why Democrats have to LEGALLY challenge Republican led voter suppression disguised as "safeguards" when there is NO EVIDENCE of elections being successfully attacked with secret mass voter impersonation fraud despite mechanisms in place to DETECT IT.

It is far easier to SUPPRESS the vote with long voting lines than to organize mass voter impersonation IN SECRET.

[Deluge]

54 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

C'mon, are you saying that not requiring ID in order to vote makes it easier to commit voter fraud? How so? 

Exactly! 

[WestCanMan]

36 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Are you having trouble reading or understanding?

No, Elias is clearly saying that requiring ID makes voter suppression easier because segments of the population that vote Democratic are less likely to have or easily be able to get ID.

What percent of the legal voting population doesn't have ID? 1%? 0.01%? 0.001%?

Why don't the Demonrats just get those guys ID so that they can buy cigarettes, use the public library, etc?

How did they all vote before? 

Above is a perfect example of how much of a waste of time it is to read one of robo's posts. 

[WestCanMan]

Why can't you answer bozotwit? 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Why can't you answer bozotwit? 

Because bozotwit's questions are irrelevant. LMAO

[Deluge]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

Are you having trouble reading or understanding?

No, Elias is clearly saying that requiring ID makes voter suppression easier because segments of the population that vote Democratic are less likely to have or easily be able to get ID.

That is why Democrats have to LEGALLY challenge Republican led voter suppression disguised as "safeguards" when there is NO EVIDENCE of elections being successfully attacked with secret mass voter impersonation fraud despite mechanisms in place to DETECT IT.

It is far easier to SUPPRESS the vote with long voting lines than to organize mass voter impersonation IN SECRET.

Elias is a scumbag and a Clinton/Obama/DNC/Communist Party operative. 

There's no such thing as voter suppression. There IS such a thing as election rigging, and the democrats are in the middle of it. 

[reason10]

No, Elias is clearly saying that requiring ID makes voter suppression easier because segments of the population that vote Democratic are less likely to have or easily be able to get ID.

Are you suggesting that Democrats are STUPID, and are too incompetent to obtain a photo ID?

Earth to Cretin:  There are government issued photo IDS without having to drive a car. One can't apply for welfare benefits without an ID, so THAT argument is invalid. (Since most Democrats are welfare bums.)

Photo IDS prevent people from committing voter fraud, which is the ONLY reason people on your Nazi side of the aisle are opposed to them. You more onz cannot win elections without it.

 

Edited November 16, 2023 by reason10

[WestCanMan]

18 hours ago, Deluge said:

There's no such thing as voter suppression. 

It is a thing, they just aren't doing it anymore (or at east not out in the open). 

In the old days the Demonrats would get the kkk to physically/violently prevent black people from going to the polling stations, and even if they did manage to get in there and vote the kkk would dump their ballot boxes anyways.

Don't worry though, one day in 1963 all of the Demonrats suddenly decided to stop being racists and they magically turned the GOP into the racist party that day.   

[Deluge]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It is a thing, they just aren't doing it anymore (or at east not out in the open). 

In the old days the Demonrats would get the kkk to physically/violently prevent black people from going to the polling stations, and even if they did manage to get in there and vote the kkk would dump their ballot boxes anyways.

Don't worry though, one day in 1963 all of the Demonrats suddenly decided to stop being racists and they magically turned the GOP into the racist party that day.   

This is true. Those were dark times in American history, and somehow, the democrat party still has a voice. 

The GOP really needs to step up its game. 

[West]

Now that we are starting to get all the footage of January 6th, its safe to say that it was a set up and the person below is the real J6 architect

[Nationalist]

On 11/19/2023 at 1:58 AM, West said:

Now that we are starting to get all the footage of January 6th, its safe to say that it was a set up and the person below is the real J6 architect

Pelosi. Oh how I wish she'd just curl up and die. After Paul is exposed as a closet homo that is...

Edited November 20, 2023 by Nationalist

[Deluge]

"Marc Elias and the Democrats pushed lawsuits disguised as “election reform” to water down important election safeguards and increase the opportunity for fraud, abuse, and corruption"

This shit is probably what opened the door to the Dominion bullshit and mail fraud. 

[Deluge]

More about the democrat party's voter contact program and other bullshit: 

Coronavirus has turned the Democratic Party’s voter contact program, one operative said, into something more like a tech support operation than a traditional door-knocking effort.....Priorities USA, the Democratic super PAC, is spending $24 million on voter mobilization, which includes vote-by-mail education. Fair Fight, a group founded by Stacey Abrams, has rolled out voter protection programs in 17 states....

Meanwhile, President Donald Trump’s recent attacks on the USPS and on mail-voting is raising concern among voters, operatives say.

“We've seen such an increase from young people in terms of concern about their ballot casting,” said Jared DeLoof, the states director of NextGen America, which targets younger voters. “They want to vote, they want to make sure that that vote is going to count.” [...]

Democrats believe they will also have to follow up with some voters after their ballot has been cast, in an effort to help them fix ballots that have been rejected for technical reasons. State rules vary widely on if or how voters can correct their ballots, and the time windows to do so can be short.

While Democratic campaigns and groups navigate the patchwork of state rules governing mail ballots to encourage turnout, Democratic election attorney Marc Elias is trying to change many of those rules.

This is the other half of the party’s vote-by-mail efforts: a sprawling legal effort that spans every battleground state and is costing tens of millions of dollars. Priorities USA, just one of Elias’ clients, has expanded its voting litigation budget to $32 million.

“One of the features of vote by mail is that between the point that the voter cast the ballot and the point that the ballot is counted, several things have to go right,” Elias said in an interview. “One is that the ballot has to be received by the election officials in time. ... And the second is that the ballot needs to be verified and accepted.”

Elias, who was the lead attorney in former Sen. Al Franken’s (D-Minn.) 2008 recount victory and the general counsel for Hillary Clinton and John Kerry’s presidential campaigns, is pursuing what he calls “four pillars” of legal changes to election laws during coronavirus. The first, that mail ballots should include paid postage with them, has some cross-partisan support.

The other three do not, locking Elias in a wide-range legal fight with Republicans all over the country, including the Republican National Committee and its legal budget of at least $20 million. Those fights are over Elias’ push to mandate that states count ballots postmarked by Election Day but received after the fact; overhauling signature matching laws, which Elias derides as based on pseudoscience; and allowing for third parties to collect and turn in voters’ sealed absentee ballots, which Democrats call “community collection” and Republicans largely deride as “ballot harvesting.”

“One thing you do is you make sure that people whose ballot is being challenged based on signature matching, that the people that are doing that have been trained, are applying uniform non-discriminatory standards. And most importantly, the voter is notified and has an opportunity to cure,” Elias said of his legal strategy. (A cure process mandates that a state contacts voters whose ballots have been rejected to give them the ability to fix — or cure — their ballot.)

Several Democratic-backed lawsuits have also pushed to expand who can cast absentee ballots. In 44 states, any voter can, at a minimum, request an absentee ballot if they choose to do so, and some states have changed that requirement as a response to the pandemic. [...]

Republicans argue that allowing for outside parties to collect and deliver ballots could lead to coercion or fraud. [...]

Depending on how close the races for the White House and battleground Senate seats are, "we could be headed for a Bush v. Gore situation in every battleground state, depending how close the results are."^[1]