Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

 

Republicans’ “star”impeachment lawyer Jonathan Turley laid an egg today at the impeachment hearing on Joe Biden.

 He just said in his opening statement, “I do NOT believe the evidence currently meets the standard of a high crime & misdemeanor needed for an article of impeachment."

Starting to really look like Republicans have NOTHING.

More and more Republicans are showing they can only whine and complain, and have very few actual skills.

Edited by CrakHoBarbie
Posted

BARBIE!!! - I was worried we'd scared you off there,  god knows common sense is your kryptonie!    We missed the comic relief you bring :)

Anyway, no - he didn't lay an egg :)

They said they didn't have the evidence to go to full impeachment but that the evidence they have definitely justifies the hearing and further investigation to get answers to the questions the evidence raises.

in otherwords - they've got the smoke, and they have now shown the hearings are necessary to look for the fire.

Pretty  normal stuff - that's why you have the hearings. Otherwise you'd just go straight to impeachment .


But it's cute as hell that you thought it was some sort of mistake or something :)   lol!

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

BARBIE!!! - I was worried we'd scared you off there,  god knows common sense is your kryptonie!    We missed the comic relief you bring :)

Anyway, no - he didn't lay an egg :)

They said they didn't have the evidence to go to full impeachment but that the evidence they have definitely justifies the hearing and further investigation to get answers to the questions the evidence raises.

in otherwords - they've got the smoke, and they have now shown the hearings are necessary to look for the fire.

Pretty  normal stuff - that's why you have the hearings. Otherwise you'd just go straight to impeachment .


But it's cute as hell that you thought it was some sort of mistake or something :)   lol!

Ahhh, the cdnbonehead,

Good to see your still an inept fool/tool.

And, as such, youve completely failed to notice they've got nothing.

Nothing but theories.

What they need is a money trail leading to Joe Biden. 

What they have is squat.

But hey, damn good catching up with you my moronic friend.

Edited by CrakHoBarbie
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, CrakHoBarbie said:

Ahhh, the cdnbonehead,

LOL -really :)  that's the best you could do?

Quote

Good to see your Still an inept fool/tool.

Ahhh still practicing that self delusion you love so much i see :)

Quote

And, as such, you e completely failed to notice they've got nothing.

Actually the very quote you quoted goes on to show they have quite a bit. :)   That's why it's funny that you think it went badly :)

They've got a great deal and it's more than enough to justify the investigation.

Quote

What they need is a money trail leading to Joe Biden. 

True, hence the investigation

Quote

What they have is squat.

What they have is the money trail leading right up to biden's door :)

Now they're looking for the last bit of evidence they need to tie it all together.

That's literally what was happening - they were proving they have enough evidence to completely justify the investigation.  And they do

But hey - great to see you again, you're unique mix of failure and stupid always brings down the house :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL -really :)  that's the best you could do?

Ahhh still practicing that self delusion you love so much i see :)

Actually the very quote you quoted goes on to show they have quite a bit. :)   That's why it's funny that you think it went badly :)

They've got a great deal and it's more than enough to justify the investigation.

True, hence the investigation

What they have is the money trail leading right up to biden's door :)

Now they're looking for the last bit of evidence they need to tie it all together.

That's literally what was happening - they were proving they have enough evidence to completely justify the investigation.  And they do

But hey - great to see you again, you're unique mix of failure and stupid always brings down the house :) 

If they'd had any evidence of wrongdoing viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law, they'd of presented it today.

So, at this point they've got squat.

Unfortunately for them, one can only demand their "theories" are viable for so long before actual "evidence" is needed.

Let's see how long the GOP can stretch this out for.

 

The GOP knows that even the illusion of impropriety can hurt Biden.

That's why they're doing it.

That and their childish sour grapes.

The far right is full of whining, whinging emotionally immature Jethros.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

 

Unfortunately for them, one can only demand their "theories" are viable for so long before actual "evidence" is needed.

How long is "so long"? These dipshits are still playacting about election fraud in 2020, completely without evidence and even after the liars have confessed to making it all up.

Lack of evidence is clearly no impediment to prolonged jackassery by Trump's GOP.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Posted
4 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

If they'd had any evidence of wrongdoing viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law, they'd of presented it today.

To day was about justifying the inquiry. The inquiry looks into wrongdoing.

If they had squat then there'd be no justification for the inquiry. But there is  :)

 I mean you can't just create a fake dossier full of bogus accusations and try to impeach someone based on that.  oh.... wait..... 

 

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

How long is "so long"? These dipshits are still playacting about election fraud in 2020, completely without evidence and even after the liars have confessed to making it all up.

Lack of evidence is clearly no impediment to prolonged jackassery by Trump's GOP.

Yeah - none of that is true.

Would you feel better if they gave a bunch of fake info and stuffed it in a dossier and sent it to the fbi?

The evidence is real, pretending there is none won't help. It's enough to get to the bottom of it with an investigation.

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Turley admits they don't have the evidence to prove a crime by Joe.

Why does anyone believe that after months of investigations they will FINALLY dig up MORE evidence leading to Joe when they've completely FAILED? LMAO

The dems went after trump for THREE YEARS for 'russian collusion' believing something would turn up - hell they tried to fabricate it where necessary.

So i guess ask them?

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
44 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

The dems went after trump for THREE YEARS for 'russian collusion' believing something would turn up - hell they tried to fabricate it where necessary.

So i guess ask them?

Plenty of evidence was found of Trump's campaign colluding with Russian agents whether you understand that or not. Esp Manafort as campaign CHAIRMAN.

Putin stated on National TV that he wanted Trump to win, and members of his IRA were INDICTED (probable cause) for their roles in helping Trump.

You need to broaden your news sources; if you can let go of your cognitive dissonance and face THE TRUTH.

Until then, you'll remain in your state of DENIAL. Duh

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Posted
13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

LOL -really :)  that's the best you could do?

Ahhh still practicing that self delusion you love so much i see :)

Actually the very quote you quoted goes on to show they have quite a bit. :)   That's why it's funny that you think it went badly :)

They've got a great deal and it's more than enough to justify the investigation.

True, hence the investigation

What they have is the money trail leading right up to biden's door :)

Now they're looking for the last bit of evidence they need to tie it all together.

That's literally what was happening - they were proving they have enough evidence to completely justify the investigation.  And they do

But hey - great to see you again, you're unique mix of failure and stupid always brings down the house :) 

Msnbc told him so. Cut the guy some slack

Posted
10 hours ago, Hodad said:

How long is "so long"? These dipshits are still playacting about election fraud in 2020, completely without evidence and even after the liars have confessed to making it all up.

Lack of evidence is clearly no impediment to prolonged jackassery by Trump's GOP.

Good observation.

Republicans have such a wonderful economy with reality.

Posted
1 hour ago, West said:

Msnbc told him so. Cut the guy some slack

My old pal west,

How wonderful to hear from you.

As I already schooled cndmoronman, at this point, the alt-right zealots have absolutely no evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law.

If y'all weren't such biased partisan halfwit hacks, you'd be able to tell fact from fiction.

 

Posted
21 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

 

If y'all weren't I wasn't such a biased partisan halfwit hack, you'd I'd be able to tell fact from fiction.

 

Fixed.

Posted (edited)

The (formerly) respectable Republicans are in a big conundrum these days: how to handle possible nomination of an obvious "zero integrity" pathological liar jerk now also indited of multiple offences? Like how to explain, rationalize this, and show to the public?

No. You cannot. There's no way of explaining the insanity.

Either the Republican party will go off the rails of sanity and decency. Or it will take the democracy with it.

You choose.

Edited by myata

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
10 hours ago, robosmith said:

Plenty of evidence was found of Trump's campaign colluding with Russian agents whether you understand that or not. Esp Manafort as campaign CHAIRMAN.

 

Not enough for charges - and in the end the report said so.

But they still went after it for 3 years.

There's plenty of evidence Biden's been taking cash for influence, Guess we'll see :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
14 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

ROFLMAO !!!!  Holy shit you're bitter :)  No arguments, no thought, no rational position - just  'i hate everybody and everything waaaaaah" :)

what happened - caught your boyfriend cheatnig again and needed to attack someone else because you feel powerless in the real world?

Or is it that every poll has people turning more and more against the excesses of the trans activists and you realized  you lost the culture war and you're angry?

Or is it because biden is polling below trump and now the majority of people believe he was up to skanky crap with his son? Is the very real fear of a trump re-election what's getting you down?

THere there girl -  remember that most of that stuff is sort of a fake problem.  It's mostly inflated in your head, they're not real problems.

then again, you're not a real girl. So i guess pretending the fake is real is kind of your bread and butter :) 

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
5 hours ago, CdnFox said:

ROFLMAO !!!!  Holy shit you're bitter :)  No arguments, no thought, no rational position - just  'i hate everybody and everything waaaaaah" :)

what happened - caught your boyfriend cheatnig again and needed to attack someone else because you feel powerless in the real world?

Or is it that every poll has people turning more and more against the excesses of the trans activists and you realized  you lost the culture war and you're angry?

Or is it because biden is polling below trump and now the majority of people believe he was up to skanky crap with his son? Is the very real fear of a trump re-election what's getting you down?

THere there girl -  remember that most of that stuff is sort of a fake problem.  It's mostly inflated in your head, they're not real problems.

then again, you're not a real girl. So i guess pretending the fake is real is kind of your bread and butter :) 

 

What a useless load of far right zealotry.

I can see your still prone bouts of bottomless ignorance.

Listen carefully.

At this time, the GOP doesn't have enough evidence to impeach Biden.

That's it, halfwit.

But you have to argue a point that's not up for argument.

Even the GOP's own people are admitting it.

But I guess that's a road to far for a hardened ignoramus such as yourself.

Please....  Do carry on.

Posted
17 hours ago, CdnFox said:

 

If they had squat then there'd be no justification for the inquiry.  

Well, I'm sure we can agree that if they do not find a money trail to Joe, this impeachment inquiry is going to fall flat on its face.

Posted
1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

What a useless load of far right zealotry.

I guess that's your way of saying "you're right and i can't argue against you but it really makes me angry so i'll just spout bullshit" without saying it :)

Listen carefully ,,,,

At this time there is evidence indicating joe biden committed crimes.  But while the evidence is substantial it is not conclusive proof.

Therefore the committee and investigation and the effort to dig further into the matter to get to the truth is entirely valid.

It's that simple.

Sorry little leftie - i know it must be crushing for you :) but it's really not complex

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
14 hours ago, CdnFox said:

 

At this time there is evidence indicating joe biden committed crimes.  

Yet, still, nothing viable enough to warrant impeachment.

Turley just made the same statement.

Without a money trail to Joe Biden, all the moronic garbage being spewed from your heavily biased maw is useless.

 

Posted
50 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Yet, still, nothing viable enough to warrant impeachment.

Of course not - or there'd be no need for the investigation.

If someone's finger prints are found at the scene of a crime and that person had a grudge against the murdered victim, and they can't account for their whereabouts - thats generaly not enough to convict someone. But it's sure as hell enough to start investigating :)

That's where we're at.  Your claim that they have 'nothing' is pure fibbery.  They have a great deal that implicates biden and warrants further investigation.  And investigations is how you get the rest of the evidence.

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Of course not - or there'd be no need for the investigation.

If someone's finger prints are found at the scene of a crime and that person had a grudge against the murdered victim, and they can't account for their whereabouts - thats generaly not enough to convict someone. But it's sure as hell enough to start investigating :)

That's where we're at.  Your claim that they have 'nothing' is pure fibbery.  They have a great deal that implicates biden and warrants further investigation.  And investigations is how you get the rest of the evidence.

What I said was at this point you've got squat.

At this point, there is no evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law.

At this point, there is no evidence viable enough to warrant impeachment.

I understand... you have extremely poor comprehension skills.

Do not fret buddy.

I'm here for you 

Posted
3 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

What I said was at this point you've got squat.

 

Yes, and of course that's an absolute lie.  Which is what you lefties do best :)

What they've got now is a lot.  They have clear and convincing evidence. Now they're looking at completing the puzzle and raising that to evidnece beyond a reasonable doubt.

Pretending that a lot is somehow the same as nothing is chlidish in the extreme, and a sign that you've lost control of your emotional response and can't think about the subject rationally.

I can - and it's easy to see they have a lot of evidence, but that they have some gaps.  If they can fill those gaps with facts then biden goes to jail. If they can't, then they won't be able to meet the bar of a criminal conviction, although it might still be enough to convince the public he's dirty.  It sure looks that way.

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...