The GOP wants to impeach Biden for ‘corruption’? Don’t make me laugh

[CdnFox]

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

You do not understand the LAWS that Trump has broken.

 

Oh? Show me the convictions.

Are you a judge?  Has their been a trial

Sigh - once again i must explain the basics of law to you - you can't demand he's guilty of crimes unless he's been convicted by a judge.  That's how it works.  Look it up

In any case the impeachments had nothing to do with his crimes (and the senate found him innocent in both cases).

The dems did it for political reasons and a lot of people commented on that at the time.

Don't you think you should reserve commenting on this kind of stuff until you learn the basics about how the legal system works?  Yeash - american education must be in a pretty sad state.

[Rebound]

5 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Oh? Show me the convictions.

Are you a judge?  Has their been a trial

Sigh - once again i must explain the basics of law to you - you can't demand he's guilty of crimes unless he's been convicted by a judge.  That's how it works.  Look it up

In any case the impeachments had nothing to do with his crimes (and the senate found him innocent in both cases).

The dems did it for political reasons and a lot of people commented on that at the time.

Don't you think you should reserve commenting on this kind of stuff until you learn the basics about how the legal system works?  Yeash - american education must be in a pretty sad state.

Convictions? He’s paid out $25 million to settle a fraud lawsuit over his phoney university.  He was found guilty of corporate fraud in New York, rape in New York, and defamation (twice).  He’s now facing 91 felony charges and several hundred million in civil lawsuits. 

Senator Romney has a book out and he said a bunch of Republican Senators said they didn’t vote to convict Trump in his second impeachment because they were afraid their families would be attacked.  
 

Cowardly basstards, those Republicans. They’ll vote to send boys off to war but they’re too afraid to stand up for principles.  Pathetic.  

Edited September 22, 2023 by Rebound

[CdnFox]

Just now, Rebound said:

Senator Romney has a book out and he said a bunch of Republican Senators said they didn’t vote to convict Trump in his second impeachment because they were afraid their families would be attacked.  
 

 

Nobody on earth believes that.  It's the kind of thing a complete liar would say to sell books.   He was SOOOOOO afraid that he stayed silent at the time, but now that trump's supporters have ACTUALLY attacked people he's published it in writing. Sure.

It should never have been an impeachment issue, but the dems had already turned impeachment into a political tool rather than a legal tool.

In any case that certainly didn't excuse the first time.

[Rebound]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Nobody on earth believes that.  It's the kind of thing a complete liar would say to sell books.   He was SOOOOOO afraid that he stayed silent at the time, but now that trump's supporters have ACTUALLY attacked people he's published it in writing. Sure.

It should never have been an impeachment issue, but the dems had already turned impeachment into a political tool rather than a legal tool.

In any case that certainly didn't excuse the first time.

Starting a riot is definitely an impeachment issue. And he’s going to go to jail for it. 

[Hodad]

18 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Convictions? He’s paid out $25 million to settle a fraud lawsuit over his phoney university.  He was found guilty of corporate fraud in New York, rape in New York, and defamation (twice).  He’s now facing 91 felony charges and several hundred million in civil lawsuits. 

Senator Romney has a book out and he said a bunch of Republican Senators said they didn’t vote to convict Trump in his second impeachment because they were afraid their families would be attacked.  
 

Cowardly basstards, those Republicans. They’ll vote to send boys off to war but they’re too afraid to stand up for principles.  Pathetic.  

Don't forget that he was fined $2 million and his "charity" was dissolved because he has been illegally using the funds to buy himself things like oversized portraits and campaign ads, and to pay legal fees. 

He's a scumbag and a scammer, to the core.

[CdnFox]

46 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Convictions? He’s paid out $25 million to settle a fraud lawsuit over his phoney university.  He was found guilty of corporate fraud in New York, rape in New York, and defamation (twice).  He’s now facing 91 felony charges and several hundred million in civil lawsuits. 

So you have nothing whatsoever with regards to his political carrer.  Or were you stupid enough to think they impeached him for taxes?

Nope? Had to lie to prove your point? thought so

Nice of you to admit it tho,

And no - he was not found guilty of rape

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-was-donald-trump-found-guilty-rape-1799935

Like - why do you have to lie about that stuff? It's like you think he's such a nice guy that the truth won't cut it so you have to lie to make him sound worse!

And as i've said a million times - when he's actually convicted of something, we can talk

But right now? Nope.

37 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Don't forget that he was fined $2 million and his "charity" was dissolved because he has been illegally using the funds to buy himself things like oversized portraits and campaign ads, and to pay legal fees. 

He's a scumbag and a scammer, to the core.

So's biden and clinton (talk about her 'charity').

But again - a fine for something that has nothing to do with his politics is not grounds for impeachment.

The dems turned impeachment into a politial tool to attack opponents with and now that's going to be the new norm.

[robosmith]

11 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Biden was draining the oil reserves dopy. They're now down 60%. 

 

NOT recently, GNAT-MAN

Quote

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced a notice of sale of as much as 15 million barrels of crude oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) on October 18, 2022, to help address the market supply disruption caused by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine and to help lower energy costs.Oct 24, 2022

Joe also promised to REFILL the  reserve from DOMESTIC SOURCES, so maybe that's why the price is a little higher now than LAST SUMMER.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

Starting a riot is definitely an impeachment issue. And he’s going to go to jail for it. 

Not JUST a riot, but one which was clearly for the PURPOSE of DISRUPTING the EC vote count.

Trump told McCarthy that rioters ‘more upset about the election than you are’: report

[robosmith]

12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So you have nothing whatsoever with regards to his political carrer.  Or were you stupid enough to think they impeached him for taxes?

Nope? Had to lie to prove your point? thought so

Nice of you to admit it tho,

And no - he was not found guilty of rape

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-was-donald-trump-found-guilty-rape-1799935

Like - why do you have to lie about that stuff? It's like you think he's such a nice guy that the truth won't cut it so you have to lie to make him sound worse!

And as i've said a million times - when he's actually convicted of something, we can talk

But right now? Nope.

So's biden and clinton (talk about her 'charity').

But again - a fine for something that has nothing to do with his politics is not grounds for impeachment.

The dems turned impeachment into a politial tool to attack opponents with and now that's going to be the new norm.

Conspiracy to DISRUPT THE EC VOTE COUNT has everything to do with Trump's politics.

Clearly you've NOT EVEN READ the indictments and don't understand them. 

[CdnFox]

30 minutes ago, robosmith said:

NOT recently, GNAT-MAN

 

uhhhhh - the link you provided showed he was right.  Did you mean to do that?

23 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Conspiracy to DISRUPT THE EC VOTE COUNT has everything to do with Trump's politics.

 

And he hasn't been convicted of that has he.   

LOL - it's just so hard for you to keep track of which lie you're telling at the moment isn't it   

[Nationalist]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

NOT recently, GNAT-MAN

Joe also promised to REFILL the  reserve from DOMESTIC SOURCES, so maybe that's why the price is a little higher now than LAST SUMMER.

And maybe ur just full of it...

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

And maybe ur just full of it...

You certainly HAVE NO IDEA due to your complete IGNORANCE.

Are you really claiming that slightly higher gas prices TODAY are due to OIL reserve releases A YEAR AGO? LMAO

IF ANYTHING, they were LOWER a year ago due to those releases, to punish Russia by denying oil sales for the Ukraine invasion.

It really seems like you have NO INSIGHT into anything other than "gas price rise bad."

We're sorry that you can afford neither more expensive gas nor purchasing a HYBRID to mitigate it. LMAO

[robosmith]

6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

uhhhhh - the link you provided showed he was right.  Did you mean to do that?

And he hasn't been convicted of that has he.   

LOL - it's just so hard for you to keep track of which lie you're telling at the moment isn't it   

You can't even specify anything I said that is FALSE, so it is YOU who is LYING.

Nor are you able to evaluate ACTUAL REPORTED EVIDENCE.

Are you DENYING Trump's guilt? Go ahead and take a stand, IF you dare.

After the trial we'll revisit how wrong you are.

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You certainly HAVE NO IDEA due to your complete IGNORANCE.

 

That does sound like something that someone  who's completely full of it would say....

Just now, robosmith said:

You can't even specify anything I said that is FALSE, so it is YOU who is LYING.

 

It's not false - it's true - the problem is that it proves he's right and you're wrong.

I'm sure the link you provided is accurate but it shows his statement about oil reserves was accurate, and yours refuting ti was false.

Don't get mad at me... you're the one who proved him right.  I'm just saying that if you're going to argue against him maybe don't do that?

[Rebound]

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

So you have nothing whatsoever with regards to his political carrer.  Or were you stupid enough to think they impeached him for taxes?

Nope? Had to lie to prove your point? thought so

Nice of you to admit it tho,

And no - he was not found guilty of rape

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-was-donald-trump-found-guilty-rape-1799935

Like - why do you have to lie about that stuff? It's like you think he's such a nice guy that the truth won't cut it so you have to lie to make him sound worse!

And as i've said a million times - when he's actually convicted of something, we can talk

But right now? Nope.

So's biden and clinton (talk about her 'charity').

But again - a fine for something that has nothing to do with his politics is not grounds for impeachment.

The dems turned impeachment into a politial tool to attack opponents with and now that's going to be the new norm.

Republican Logic:

A blowjob is sex

Inserting a cigar into a woman’s privates is sex

Inserting a finger into a woman’s privates is not sex

[Nationalist]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

You certainly HAVE NO IDEA due to your complete IGNORANCE.

Are you really claiming that slightly higher gas prices TODAY are due to OIL reserve releases A YEAR AGO? LMAO

IF ANYTHING, they were LOWER a year ago due to those releases, to punish Russia by denying oil sales for the Ukraine invasion.

It really seems like you have NO INSIGHT into anything other than "gas price rise bad."

We're sorry that you can afford neither more expensive gas nor purchasing a HYBRID to mitigate it. LMAO

Good lord...you're really stupid, ya know that?

[Rebound]

On 9/22/2023 at 12:03 AM, Nationalist said:

Refute? Robo everything you libbies touch turns to rot.

Everything?

What have Democrats created?

Nuclear weapons. 
Hydroelectric dams throughout the south and southwest, including Hoover Dam

Social Security

Medicare

Thousands of miles of highways

National minimum wage

Mandatory overtime pay

Equal pay for women

The Civil Rights Act

The Voting Rights Act

I could go on, and on, and on

[CdnFox]

6 hours ago, Rebound said:

Republican Logic:

A blowjob is sex

Inserting a cigar into a woman’s privates is sex

Inserting a finger into a woman’s privates is not sex

Sorry - you're thinking of democrat logic   Republicans DID think all those things were sex - till DEMOCRATS insisted they weren't and voted on it  

At that point they set the bar for what is or isn't sex.

"WE DON'T LIKE YOUR DEFINITION OF SEX SO WE'RE CHANGING IT TO ONE THAT WORKS FOR US!!!!!  Hey .... wait, you can't actually USE the one we've demanded is the new definition, that's crazy!"

Pick a lane kiddo  

[Nationalist]

21 hours ago, Rebound said:

Everything?

What have Democrats created?

Nuclear weapons. 
Hydroelectric dams throughout the south and southwest, including Hoover Dam

Social Security

Medicare

Thousands of miles of highways

National minimum wage

Mandatory overtime pay

Equal pay for women

The Civil Rights Act

The Voting Rights Act

I could go on, and on, and on

All by themselves? Get a grip.

What the democrats have created is inner city poverty, lack of policing, lack of justice, about 4,000,000 illegals, inflation, a puppet state for blood letting, a fentenyl crisis, 

I could go on, and on, and on

[Rebound]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

All by themselves? Get a grip.

What the democrats have created is inner city poverty, lack of policing, lack of justice, about 4,000,000 illegals, inflation, a puppet state for blood letting, a fentenyl crisis, 

I could go on, and on, and on

1) There has always been poverty in American inner cities. Always. 
2) Obama funded the salaries of 10,000’s of police officers.  Ouch!  Your lies aren’t holding up! 
3) Ok. You say Democrats are responsible for 4 million illegal immigrants? Fine. There are 14 million illegal immigrants in the US, so the other 10 million are the Republicans’ fault. 
4) Inflation is a worldwide issue right now

5) I haven’t lost any blood lately. I think you’re confused.  
6) Trump said there was a fentanyl crisis when he was President. Why didn’t he solve it? 

[CdnFox]

6 hours ago, Rebound said:

1) There has always been poverty in American inner cities. Always. 

But thanks to democrats, it's worse.

Quote

2) Obama funded the salaries of 10,000’s of police officers.  Ouch!  Your lies aren’t holding up! 

Obama DEFUNDED police - producing fewer police per capita and starting a 'war on cops'

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/obama-war-on-cops-police-advocacy-group-225291

 

Quote

3) Ok. You say Democrats are responsible for 4 million illegal immigrants? Fine. There are 14 million illegal immigrants in the US, so the other 10 million are the Republicans’ fault. 

The fact that they're not being removed is still the democrats.

 

Quote

4) Inflation is a worldwide issue right now

No it isn't actually.  And it certainly shouldn't be in the states - the inflation in the states is a direct result of overspending and 'relief' spending, same as we have in Canada.  THere's a scotiabank study that explains how that works

Interest rates rise as a result.

 

Quote

6) Trump said there was a fentanyl crisis when he was President. Why didn’t he solve it? 

In the three years he had before covid?  Do you really need that explained to you?

[Rebound]

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

But thanks to democrats, it's worse.

Obama DEFUNDED police - producing fewer police per capita and starting a 'war on cops'

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/obama-war-on-cops-police-advocacy-group-225291

 

The fact that they're not being removed is still the democrats.

 

No it isn't actually.  And it certainly shouldn't be in the states - the inflation in the states is a direct result of overspending and 'relief' spending, same as we have in Canada.  THere's a scotiabank study that explains how that works

Interest rates rise as a result.

 

In the three years he had before covid?  Do you really need that explained to you?

You are terrible at rebuttals. You said that Obama defunded police departments, but your link didn’t mention police funding at all. Local and state police departments usually aren’t funded by the federal government at all, but Obama’s economic recovery program, in the wake of Bush’s economic devastation, funded police departments across the nation. 
 

For example:

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2009/07/obama_team_announces_1_billion.html
 

The Trump Administration did not provide such funding. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

You are terrible at rebuttals.

I'm quite good at them - and you make it easy

Quote

You said that Obama defunded police departments, but your link didn’t mention police funding at all.

It DID prove the second point that obama started the 'war on police'  - and why would i post a link to my first comment when you didn't in the first place?  What kind of loser provides no evidence and then complains when someone doesn't provide evidence?     You're not terribly smart or anything are you  

 

For example:

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2009/07/obama_team_announces_1_billion.html
 

well that doesn't show anything at all about his overall funding does it.  You can add in one place and take away in others.

So - you REALLY suck at this, unable to even prove your point.  This is simple - were there more police under obama? Or fewer?

Let me help you out.

In 2008  when obama took office - there were 1,019,246 cops.

In 2012 when his first term ended - there were 970,976.  Far fewer cops - despite the increase in population.

He was largely critisized and made some 'fake' attempts to 'fix it' - but in 2016 there was still 977,615. . FAR LOWER THAN WHEN HE TOOK OFFICE

It started to climb back up under trump and by covid had almost reached its former levels.

https://usafacts.org/articles/police-departments-explained/

 

So - once again you're wrong.

Do you see the problem? You're WRONG - like not a little wrong, REALLY wrong! And this is all the time with you.

So when you make claims about  trump etc - NOBODY BELIEVES You.

If you could just learn to tell the truth and look things up before talking - you'd stand a chance of peole seeing things your way

 

Again -  here's police in the obama years

Edited September 25, 2023 by CdnFox

[Rebound]

21 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I'm quite good at them - and you make it easy

It DID prove the second point that obama started the 'war on police'  - and why would i post a link to my first comment when you didn't in the first place?  What kind of loser provides no evidence and then complains when someone doesn't provide evidence?     You're not terribly smart or anything are you  

 

For example:

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2009/07/obama_team_announces_1_billion.html
 

well that doesn't show anything at all about his overall funding does it.  You can add in one place and take away in others.

So - you REALLY suck at this, unable to even prove your point.  This is simple - were there more police under obama? Or fewer?

Let me help you out.

In 2008  when obama took office - there were 1,019,246 cops.

In 2012 when his first term ended - there were 970,976.  Far fewer cops - despite the increase in population.

He was largely critisized and made some 'fake' attempts to 'fix it' - but in 2016 there was still 977,615. . FAR LOWER THAN WHEN HE TOOK OFFICE

It started to climb back up under trump and by covid had almost reached its former levels.

https://usafacts.org/articles/police-departments-explained/

 

So - once again you're wrong.

Do you see the problem? You're WRONG - like not a little wrong, REALLY wrong! And this is all the time with you.

So when you make claims about  trump etc - NOBODY BELIEVES You.

If you could just learn to tell the truth and look things up before talking - you'd stand a chance of peole seeing things your way

 

Again -  here's police in the obama years

You dumb illiterate mother f-er…

What I SAID was that Obama funded local police departments. Using FEDERAL money. Trump did not. Can your itty-bitty brain understand that? Or is that really so complicated?

Total police employed nationwide is not a Federal issue because police are locally funded, you ignoramus.  Again… is that really SO HARD to understand, bozo?  You’d know that if you bothered to read the article you linked.  It says just that, dum-dum.
 

These aren’t big complicated things.  They’re really simple. Obama funded local police departments and Trump did not.  Simple simple simple.  

Edited September 25, 2023 by Rebound

[CdnFox]

10 minutes ago, Rebound said:

You dumb illiterate mother f-er…

ROFLMAO -  wow you lefties sure do get triggered when someone DARES repeat what you said and shows it's not true

Obama did not fund local police departments - he REDUCED funding for them.  As the graph which INCLUDES LOCAL POLICE shows nicely

So - now that we have once again seen you're a lying sack who doesnt' look up his bullshit before stating it as truth,  lets dispense with the bullshit.  obama REDUCED police - and worse he turned the public against police (which lead to pressure to 'defund' them on several levels). 

So you were 100 percent entirely wrong.

Would you like to try again with something else? or would you like to continue being stupid and wrong with this?