Clarence Thomas’ 38 Vacations: The Other Billionaires Who Have Treated the Supreme Court Justice to Luxury Travel

[robosmith]

Clarence Thomas’ 38 Vacations: The Other Billionaires Who Have Treated the Supreme Court Justice to Luxury Travel

Quote

The fullest accounting yet shows how Thomas has secretly reaped the benefits from a network of wealthy and well-connected patrons that is far more extensive than previously understood.

During his three decades on the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas has enjoyed steady access to a lifestyle most Americans can only imagine. A cadre of industry titans and ultrawealthy executives have treated him to far-flung vacations aboard their yachts, ushered him into the premium suites at sporting events and sent their private jets to fetch him — including, on more than one occasion, an entire 737. It’s a stream of luxury that is both more extensive and from a wider circle than has been previously understood.

Like clockwork, Thomas’ leisure activities have been underwritten by benefactors who share the ideology that drives his jurisprudence. Their gifts include:

At least 38 destination vacations, including a previously unreported voyage on a yacht around the Bahamas; 26 private jet flights, plus an additional eight by helicopter; a dozen VIP passes to professional and college sporting events, typically perched in the skybox; two stays at luxury resorts in Florida and Jamaica; and one standing invitation to an uber-exclusive golf club overlooking the Atlantic coast.

This accounting of Thomas’ travel, revealed for the first time here from an array of previously unavailable information, is the fullest to date of the generosity that has regularly afforded Thomas a lifestyle far beyond what his income could provide. And it is almost certainly an undercount.

Clear now that Thomas is the MOST CORRUPT JoSCOTUS in HISTORY. ?

 

 

Edited August 17, 2023 by robosmith

[Aristides]

But, but, Hunter Biden.

That said, If Joe was promoting his son's business dealings when he was in office, I would consider that unethical. If he personally benefited from Hunter's business dealings when he was in office, I think that would be illegal.

Hopefully we would hold supreme court justices and judges in general to a higher ethical standard than politicians.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

But, but, Hunter Biden.

That said, If Joe was promoting his son's business dealings when he was in office, I would consider that unethical. If he personally benefited from Hunter's business dealings when he was in office, I think that would be illegal.

Hopefully we would hold supreme court justices and judges in general to a higher ethical standard than politicians.

But, but, what?

Are you kidding me?

What Hunter Biden did was 1,000x worse than this. The VPOTUS is way more powerful than a SCOTUS, but now sellout Joe is the POTUS. You're on crack if you think that this is comparable.

Furthermore, when Trudeau accepted gifts from foreigners you guys all thought that it was no big deal. What changed? And this isn't even from foreigners, it's from people in his own country. 

Know what else? When your own doctor accepts a luxury vacation from a pharmaceutical company based on the amount of prescriptions that he sells, and your prescriptions helped him get that vacation, he doesn't have to tell you either.

You can put drugs with serious side-effects into your body based solely on their advice - even the covid jab - and they don't have to tell you if they get a kickback. You were an extreme advocate for forcing people to take that jab.

 

I think that Thomas's credibility is shot now, but I can guarantee you that it's only because of how desperate the FBI is to get rid of a conservative SCOTUS. 

[Aristides]

Regardless of what Hunter Biden may have done, he does not and never has held a public office.

Thomas shot his own credibility, the guy is a disgrace to his position.

Edited August 17, 2023 by Aristides

[WestCanMan]

3 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Regardless of what Hunter Biden may have done, he does not and never has held a public office.

Thomas shot his own credibility, the guy is a disgrace to his position.

America's problem isn't what Hunter did, it's Joe's involvement in what Hunter did.

There was a very good reason why Joe vehemently lied every time he was asked about his knowledge of Hunter's sellout tours. He knew that he would be implicating himself in what was clearly going on.  

[robosmith]

10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

But, but, what?

Are you kidding me?

What Hunter Biden did was 1,000x worse than this. The VPOTUS is way more powerful than a SCOTUS, but now sellout Joe is the POTUS. You're on crack if you think that this is comparable.

Furthermore, when Trudeau accepted gifts from foreigners you guys all thought that it was no big deal. What changed? And this isn't even from foreigners, it's from people in his own country. 

Know what else? When your own doctor accepts a luxury vacation from a pharmaceutical company based on the amount of prescriptions that he sells, and your prescriptions helped him get that vacation, he doesn't have to tell you either.

You can put drugs with serious side-effects into your body based solely on their advice - even the covid jab - and they don't have to tell you if they get a kickback. You were an extreme advocate for forcing people to take that jab.

 

I think that Thomas's credibility is shot now, but I can guarantee you that it's only because of how desperate the FBI is to get rid of a conservative SCOTUS. 

Doctors have NOT been allowed to accept "luxury vacations" from Big Pharma HERE for many years.

For the very reason it is highly unethical. Duh.

Maybe in Canada, but I doubt that.

[Aristides]

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

America's problem isn't what Hunter did, it's Joe's involvement in what Hunter did.

There was a very good reason why Joe vehemently lied every time he was asked about his knowledge of Hunter's sellout tours. He knew that he would be implicating himself in what was clearly going on.  

Yes and you need to have evidence that Joe personally profited while he was in office.

[robosmith]

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

America's problem isn't what Hunter did, it's Joe's involvement in what Hunter did.

There was a very good reason why Joe vehemently lied every time he was asked about his knowledge of Hunter's sellout tours. He knew that he would be implicating himself in what was clearly going on.  

How many times was that? Cite(s)?

[Aristides]

Just now, robosmith said:

Doctors have NOT been allowed to accept "luxury vacations" from Big Pharma HERE for many years.

For the very reason it is highly unethical. Duh.

Maybe in Canada, but I doubt that.

Perfectly OK for a judge apparently.

[robosmith]

14 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

But, but, what?

Are you kidding me?

What Hunter Biden did was 1,000x worse than this. The VPOTUS is way more powerful than a SCOTUS, but now sellout Joe is the POTUS. You're on crack if you think that this is comparable.

Furthermore, when Trudeau accepted gifts from foreigners you guys all thought that it was no big deal. What changed? And this isn't even from foreigners, it's from people in his own country. 

Know what else? When your own doctor accepts a luxury vacation from a pharmaceutical company based on the amount of prescriptions that he sells, and your prescriptions helped him get that vacation, he doesn't have to tell you either.

You can put drugs with serious side-effects into your body based solely on their advice - even the covid jab - and they don't have to tell you if they get a kickback. You were an extreme advocate for forcing people to take that jab.

 

I think that Thomas's credibility is shot now, but I can guarantee you that it's only because of how desperate the FBI is to get rid of a conservative SCOTUS. 

It WAS NOT the FBI which uncovered this corruption. ?

1 minute ago, Aristides said:

Perfectly OK for a judge apparently.

It was not; but there was NO ENFORCEMENT outside the honor (or lack thereof) of the individual Justices.

[Rebound]

35 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

But, but, what?

Are you kidding me?

What Hunter Biden did was 1,000x worse than this. The VPOTUS is way more powerful than a SCOTUS, but now sellout Joe is the POTUS. You're on crack if you think that this is comparable.

Furthermore, when Trudeau accepted gifts from foreigners you guys all thought that it was no big deal. What changed? And this isn't even from foreigners, it's from people in his own country. 

Know what else? When your own doctor accepts a luxury vacation from a pharmaceutical company based on the amount of prescriptions that he sells, and your prescriptions helped him get that vacation, he doesn't have to tell you either.

You can put drugs with serious side-effects into your body based solely on their advice - even the covid jab - and they don't have to tell you if they get a kickback. You were an extreme advocate for forcing people to take that jab.

 

I think that Thomas's credibility is shot now, but I can guarantee you that it's only because of how desperate the FBI is to get rid of a conservative SCOTUS. 

You’re arguing that it’s ok for a judge to accept lavish gifts from people who have a business interest before the Court. 
 

Hunter Biden is not a government official. Clarence Thomas is. 

Edited August 17, 2023 by Rebound

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Yes and you need to have evidence that Joe personally profited while he was in office.

You need to be less of a joke. 

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

You’re arguing that it’s ok for a judge to accept lavish gifts from people who have a business interest before the Court. 
 

Hunter Biden is not a government official. Clarence Thomas is. 

Read my post, stupid. I never said that t was ok at all.

In fact, I said that it was quite the opposite of ok. He should probably go. 

The only problem with that is that it will give the Dems a chance to put another activist on the SCOTUS and then the constitution will go out the window. 

[robosmith]

11 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You need to be less of a joke. 

Read my post, stupid. I never said that t was ok at all.

In fact, I said that it was quite the opposite of ok. He should probably go. 

The only problem with that is that it will give the Dems a chance to put another activist on the SCOTUS and then the constitution will go out the window. 

Already done by Alito when he relied on 16th century British judiciary that burned witches in the Dobbs OPINION. ?

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Already done by Alito when he relied on 16th century British judiciary that burned witches in the Dobbs OPINION. ?

Cry me a river robo.

The Dobbs Decision is exactly what Ruth Bader Ginsberg said it should be herself.

The cowardly skank wouldn't dare cast her vote with conscience, but at least she admitted that Roe v Wade was undemocratic. 

[robosmith]

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Cry me a river robo.

The Dobbs Decision is exactly what Ruth Bader Ginsberg said it should be herself.

 

Far from it. She favored the result but disagreed with the PROCESS.

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

The cowardly skank wouldn't dare cast her vote with conscience, but at least she admitted that Roe v Wade was undemocratic. 

Nope. She thought that decision was too radical and favored a more INCREMENTAL PROGRESSION.

Quote

The seven to two judgment in Roe v. Wade declared “violative of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment” a Texas criminal abortion statute that intolerably shackled a woman’s autonomy; the Texas law “except[ed] from criminality only a life-saving procedure on behalf of the [pregnant woman].” Suppose the Court had stopped there, rightly declaring unconstitutional the most extreme brand of law in the nation, and had not gone on, as the Court did in Roe, to fashion a regime blanketing the subject, a set of rules that displaced virtually every state law then in force. Would there have been the twenty-year controversy we have witnessed, reflected most recently in the Supreme Court’s splintered decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey? A less encompassing Roe, one that merely struck down the extreme Texas law and went no further on that day, I believe and will summarize why, might have served to reduce rather than to fuel controversy.

 

[Aristides]

57 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You need to be less of a joke. 

Ya, but you still need to provide evidence.

[WestCanMan]

17 hours ago, Aristides said:

Ya, but you still need to provide evidence.

Hunter Biden is in a partnership with the Communist Bank of China and their belt and road initiative.

Here's some info on Hunter and the Chinese gov't's joint venture: the belt and road initiative: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-massive-belt-and-road-initiative

[robosmith]

43 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Hunter Biden is in a partnership with the Communist Bank of China and their belt and road initiative.

Here's some info on Hunter and the Chinese gov't's joint venture: the belt and road initiative: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-massive-belt-and-road-initiative

Is BRI sanctioned by US LAW? IF NOT, there is nothing illegal about such a partnership.

[robosmith]

Carence Thomas Is Shamed Into Finally Revealing How Billionaire Harlan Crow Bought Him Off

Quote

On Thursday, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas disclosed long-awaited information about how Republican billionaire megadonor Harlan Crow had him flown out across the country.

According to CNN, the conservative justice who helped vote down the same affirmative action policies that sent him to law school disclosed that, in 2022, Crow paid for private jet trips for Thomas to attend a speech in Texas and a vacation at Crow’s luxurious estate in New York. Thomas reportedly claimed in May that he needed to take private transportation gifted to him by Crow due to “increased security risk” after the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade was leaked. 

 

LMAO

Edited September 7, 2023 by robosmith

[WestCanMan]

22 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Carence Thomas Is Shamed Into Finally Revealing How Billionaire Harlan Crow Bought Him Off

 

LMAO

Guess what, stupid...

The president of the US gave protesters permission to protest outside of Thomas's home, as well as those of the other SCJ's, and a would-be murderer showed up at Justice Kavanaugh's home. His security concerns were very real. 

On 8/18/2023 at 10:18 AM, robosmith said:

Is BRI sanctioned by US LAW? IF NOT, there is nothing illegal about such a partnership.

Your selective morality (hypocrisy) is duly noted.

[Legato]

28 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Carence Thomas Is Shamed Into Finally Revealing How Billionaire Harlan Crow Bought Him Off

 

LMAO

Oh looky more evidence that the left can't meme

[robosmith]

10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Guess what, stupid...

The president of the US gave protesters permission to protest outside of Thomas's home, as well as those of the other SCJ's, and a would-be murderer showed up at Justice Kavanaugh's home. His security concerns were very real. 

Guess what lDIOT, no one is going to believe your mere ^CLAIMS without PROOF.

10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Your selective morality (hypocrisy) is duly noted.

That would be you. Dinging Hunter who's not even in government but saying NOTHING about the Trump Crime Family which had offices in the WH (Jared and Ivanka) and THEIR DEALS in China, like the trademarks and manufacturing of Ivanka's products.

[robosmith]

Advance knowledge of SCOTUS decisions was very profitable.

Ginni Thomas Sought to Profit from Court Decision

Quote

As the Supreme Court prepared to decide the Citizens United case that designated money as political speech, Ginni Thomas — wife of Justice Clarence Thomas — along with conservative activists quietly filed to create exactly the type of non-profit group that would benefit from the decision.

Thomas also had a rich backer: Harlan Crow, the billionaire who had helped Thomas and her husband in many ways, from funding luxury vacations to picking up tuition payments for their great-nephew.

 

 

Certainly the most CORRUPT JoSCOTUS in HISTORY. ?

[robosmith]

Clarence Thomas Secretly Participated in Koch Network Donor Events

Quote

Supreme Court Justice Clarence ThomasThomas has attended at least two Koch donor summits, putting him in the extraordinary position of having helped a political network that has brought multiple cases before the Supreme Court.

Thomas’ involvement in the events is part of a yearslong, personal relationship with the Koch brothers that has remained almost entirely out of public view. It developed over years of trips to the Bohemian Grove, a secretive all-men’s retreat in Northern California. Thomas has been a regular at the Grove for two decades, where he stayed in a small camp with real estate billionaire Harlan Crow and the Kochs, according to records and people who’ve spent time with him there. 

 

 

Most corrupt JoSCOTUS in HISTORY.