Trump Triggers Attempted Shooting/Bombing of Obama’s House

[Hodad]

3 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

I still did not go into the dark web, but will go, however, I do find it strange that not one screenshot is allowed on the actual web, with some blurred words. 

@robosmith, what do you think? Will dig in tonight or tomorrow, some folks need to have it if it was indeed posted, however, I find it a bit suspicious, that not one screenshot with blurred content is online. 

Need to see that material and then will do a double against @reason10. 

You don't have to go anywhere crazy--well, NY Post is pretty kooky. Most outlets are not going to post the screenshot to avoid giving the original piece a larger platform.

But this is a ridiculous conversation. Really. 

[reason10]

1 minute ago, Contrarian said:

I will dig tonight, oh, that, the video, from Michael Save just conveys that Fox News is prostitution. Back from my Chuds days. I still believe that today. Same with CNN. 

We will see where this story goes, however, the fact that there are no screenshots on the open web, something smells. 

Savage's OPINION of Fox has NOTHING to do with this issue. You forget that the NEVER TRUMPER movement originated with Fox. If this had actually happened, FOX would have run with it full steam. It would have been a ratings bonanza. Those fake news sites  would have LIKEWISE SPLATTERED this story all over their news feed if it were the truth, and they would be masturbating the entire time.

Hell, a story of someone at Obama's house with a gun and a bomb would have been ALL OVER CNN, MSNBC, and all the other fake rags.

[reason10]

3 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

@reason10, what about @Hodad's post?! I did not even have to work, a man from California did it for me. 

Is accuracy of information here boy, not propaganda at MAGA.

That article is very old. And it wasn't written by Trump. It was written shortly after Trump took the oath of office.

Are you people REALLY that fcking stupid and desperate?

[reason10]

1 minute ago, Contrarian said:

Wait, what? @Hodad, are you posting old information? 

Me? Brother? Everyone spits on you on this board, I am your man, if it turns our @Hodad posted fake information, it will be his mistake, because, I can turn into a Michael Savage 24/7, 

However, I doubt it, which article is old?  

A little history is in order. In the beginning, there was Rush Limbaugh. He broke ALL the rules with his EIB radio talk show. He became the most listened to radio talk show host of all time. Because of him, a lot of other names got their shot at fame, people like Sean Hannity, Alan Colmes, Mark Levin, Neal Boortz, and a bunch of others too numerous to name. They ALL claim they owe Rush their careers, because he opened this HUGE spot in AM radio.

Michael Savage had a radio show for late at night. It never broke the sound barrier in ratings and actually did very poorly because Michael was not very entertaining. He was very caustic and insulting. And he was critical of EVERYONE who was not Michael Savage. A lot of markets dumped him because of that.

Yes, Foxnews has become a popular target, mostly from former employees. But there you're talking opinion shows, both on Fox TV and radio.

I look at Fox's NEWS feed, because that's the lineup that keeps Fox at the top of the ratings. I don't give a rat's ass about the Op-eds in Fox or anywhere else. Rush is gone, so what's the  point. Fox's news coverage and its comprehensive and professional manner uphold the slogan "fair and balanced."

And again, this FAKE story about Trump doxing the Kenyan Village Idi0t hasn't appeared in ANY other major news feed. Certainly the goose steppers at CNN would be masturbating all over each other for a story like this.

 

[Rebound]

5 hours ago, reason10 said:

 If he had actually done this, it would have been reported on FoxNews as well as the fake sites (CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, PMSNBC). So far the ONLY source reporting this is the one at the beginning of this thread. And I have proved that source is LYING.

You are in incorrect. Super-wrong, in fact:

PBS:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/after-trump-posted-what-he-said-was-obamas-address-an-armed-man-was-arrested-there-prosecutors-say
 

New York Post (same as Fox):

https://nypost.com/2023/07/06/suspect-busted-near-obamas-home-got-address-from-trump-post/amp/
 

CNN:

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/07/05/politics/taylor-taranto-detention-memo-obama-neighborhood-arrest/index.html
 

Washington Post:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/06/trump-truth-social-obama/
 

Fox 10 Phoenix (Fox):

https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/trump-posted-what-he-said-was-obamas-address-prosecutors-say-an-armed-man-was-soon-arrested-there.amp

 Business Insider:

https://www.businessinsider.com/chris-christie-trump-posting-obama-address-irresponsible-conduct-2024-2023-7?amp

[Hodad]

39 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

Wait, what? @Hodad, are you posting old information? 

Me? Brother? Everyone spits on you on this board, I am your last soldier man, if it turns @Hodad posted fake information, it will be his mistake, because, I can turn into a Michael Savage 24/7 against his views. 

However, I doubt it, which article is old?!  

Sigh. Of course not.

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

Politicians never lie on legal matters? This is purely political.

Not to Federal Officers, if they don't want to go to PRISON. Like Flynn before he was pardoned.

2 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

Don't give me that "no, not as bad as he did" BS.

It's not "BS" just because you don't like it.

[Guest]

Just now, robosmith said:

It's not "BS" just because you don't like it.

I couldn't care less if Trump goes to jail or not. Just that anyone seeing this as not politically motivated, are delusional at best.

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Perspektiv said:

I couldn't care less if Trump goes to jail or not. Just that anyone seeing this as not politically motivated, are delusional at best.

NO EVIDENCE it's politically motivated. Trump CHOSE to commit those crimes so he could RAISE MONEY, just like his BIG LIE. That is ILLEGAL, too and he's being investigated for that WIRE FRAUD. That is the ONLY "politically motivated" aspect.

Crimes don't automatically become "politically motivated" just cause Trump threw his hat into the ring early to CLAIM THAT.

The thing you apparently don't understand is that Trump has a LONG HISTORY of breaking the law and paying off pols and prosecutors to avoid accountability.

[Hodad]

38 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

I couldn't care less if Trump goes to jail or not. Just that anyone seeing this as not politically motivated, are delusional at best.

It seems that in your view any enforcement of the law against a politician is inherently "politically motivated."

Which seems to me to be a tremendously lazy analysis. These people are not meant to be above the law.

[Rebound]

8 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

Pursuing it, is. 

Presidents like Bush would be in jail  if it was good practice to jail your opposition.

All people in power are obliged to fall under the same rules is bogus.

This is purely political. Guaranteed they don't pursue so aggressively if he didn't run.

Donald Trump tried to illegally overturn the results of a Presidential election, culminating in a violent attack on the US Congress. That is on Trump.  He belongs in a prison cell for doing that. Hard stop.  You aren’t allowed to violently overthrow the government.  
He didn’t just attempt to violently overturn the election results, but he also tried to intimidate officials in Arizona and Georgia AND he also tried to have fake electors falsely certified in several states, in an attempt to have Congress assign the false electors instead of the actual electors. 
That isn’t political. It is criminal. 
 

Trump’s own lawyers told him over and over that he’d lost. He simply refuses to accept democracy. This is his own doing, and every decent person in America wants to see him behind bars for it. 

Edited July 8, 2023 by Rebound

[Nationalist]

On 7/7/2023 at 4:11 PM, Rebound said:

 

So the answer is NO, doxxing is a horrible thing to do.  We live in a democracy. We don’t threaten the lives of people we disagree with, and doxxing is a method of harassing and endangering others.  I don’t care who does it, it’s wrong.  
 

Hmm...

So when they doxxed the conservative SCOTUS judges, you posted your disapproval?

[Rebound]

24 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Hmm...

So when they doxxed the conservative SCOTUS judges, you posted your disapproval?

Yet another of your pointless Whataboutism rebuttals.

I wasn’t on the board at the time. 

Edited July 9, 2023 by Rebound

[Nationalist]

 

 

18 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

This was me, a follower, years ago, and some think I am joking:

?

Savage does live up to his name. 

I'm curious...do you object to his demeanor or his points?

[Nationalist]

21 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Yet another of your pointless Whataboutism rebuttals.

I wasn’t on the board at the time. 

Fair enough. 

I know you don't like "Whataboutisms". Yet they continually identify the rank hypocrisy of the Democrats. Thus...not really pointless.

[Nationalist]

2 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

I was a follower to Savage, my friend, even went to his private showings, don't pretend you don't know him, this game does not work with me. 

Oh I've heard his shtick, but I prefer others. I do find myself agreeing with his points quite often though.

[Nationalist]

10 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

The liberals use to doxx his shows, there is a famous story of how he was harassed by liberal talk radio shows, yet, he stood his ground and moved along without Mainstream approval. 

He really goes off the grid, however, the independence part is what I respect, to stand your ground against the mainstream is not easy, they are paid trolls, 24/7, yet he made it. 

True.

Yet I sense you posted his stuff to exhibit your disapproval. Was I wrong? 

[Nationalist]

12 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

Now, of course, I grew up. 

Realized being a follower, even to an independent Michael Savage does not bring benefits, to me long term. 

Ayn Rand...never could completely agree with her economic theories.

The idea is to form informed opinion. Not blindly follow.

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Fair enough. 

I know you don't like "Whataboutisms". Yet they continually identify the rank hypocrisy of the Democrats. Thus...not really pointless.

Yeah. The "point" is deflection from a CURRENT offense by SOMEONE ELSE.

[Nationalist]

4 hours ago, Contrarian said:

Yes, but it took you to engage with me and other reasonable conversations to come to these sentences.

Far away from the man you were 1 year ago telling @BeaverFever you would put him in the box.

and this is what these leftists don't understand: they can turn a man like you into good. 

However, the leftists do not want that, and the party establishment trolls from the right, they just want your vote, so they use you, until you learn the power of language, then you make fun of them, is that easy, both sides.

Am am already "good"...thank you very much.

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Yeah. The "point" is deflection from a CURRENT offense by SOMEONE ELSE.

Robo...Robo...Robo...

I think I've already explained to you...I know Joe Biden, Hillary-Billary and the rest will never be prosecuted so, I'm good with the complete destruction of their names and legacies.

2 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

You are going towards "good", compared to 1 year ago telling people you would put them in a box  and fight them. 

Language has changed, and the approach has changed. 

Why? Because of interactions and who you come in contact with. 

Lol...yes I am prone to testosterone rushs. Oh well...

[Guest]

23 hours ago, Rebound said:

Donald Trump tried to illegally overturn the results of a Presidential election

Gets a free pass on this. Literally slapped on the wrists.

23 hours ago, Rebound said:

He belongs in a prison cell for doing that.

Never will see a jail cell for it. 

He knows not to get his own hands dirty, or at least knew it this instance.

23 hours ago, Rebound said:

That isn’t political. It is criminal. 

We are in agreement. He has done plenty of criminal things. 

Got off with a slap on the wrists, and used the bad press to boost his votes and ratings.

The current charges are also criminal. 

However  you will not convince me them being pursued so heavily and hastily have anything to so with doing the right thing vs finally finding something to silence Trump and going guns a blazing about it. 

Its purely political.

 

[Rebound]

6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Fair enough. 

I know you don't like "Whataboutisms". Yet they continually identify the rank hypocrisy of the Democrats. Thus...not really pointless.

No they do not.  
 

This is about Trump, who you fools still worship.  Some guy doxxed justices. Not the leader of the Democratic Party. Not a democratic senator. There’s no equivalence.  
 

Hillary mishandled classified information. She didn’t steal it. She didn’t retain it. She didn’t lie to investigators. Trump stole classified information.  He retained it. He lied to investigators about it.  There’s no equivalence here at all.  
 

Where your ridiculous Whataboutisms really screw up is when you invent laws.  Donald Trump clearly broke the law. He said himself that people who steal classified information belong in prison and his DOJ put people in prison for it. 

[Nationalist]

34 minutes ago, Rebound said:

No they do not.  
 

This is about Trump, who you fools still worship.  Some guy doxxed justices. Not the leader of the Democratic Party. Not a democratic senator. There’s no equivalence.  
 

Hillary mishandled classified information. She didn’t steal it. She didn’t retain it. She didn’t lie to investigators. Trump stole classified information.  He retained it. He lied to investigators about it.  There’s no equivalence here at all.  
 

Where your ridiculous Whataboutisms really screw up is when you invent laws.  Donald Trump clearly broke the law. He said himself that people who steal classified information belong in prison and his DOJ put people in prison for it. 

Presidential Records Act.

Do have a warm and fuzzy day.

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Robo...Robo...Robo...

I think I've already explained to you...I know Joe Biden, Hillary-Billary and the rest will never be prosecuted so, I'm good with the complete destruction of their names and legacies.

They will never be prosecuted because they committed NO CRIMES. Unlike the fraudulent Trump whom YOU DEFEND.

What FOS LIES tells you is all you "know." LMAO

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Robo...Robo...Robo...

I think I've already explained to you...I know Joe Biden, Hillary-Billary and the rest will never be prosecuted so, I'm good with the complete destruction of their names and legacies.

Lol...yes I am prone to testosterone rushs. Oh well...

And lack of self-control, etc....