85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, eyeball said:

 

Wow - there's a blast from the past     Fake quoting me because you've got no argument and you're too much of a loser to cope  

Well lets see,..

you support terrorists and the slaughter of innocent people because '48. 

You don't mind if people die as long as it makes YOU feel safe. 

You're quite happy with more opiod deaths as long as you can virtue signal

And you think trudeua's misdeeds are harper's fault. 

And you make up for that by...  fake quoting other people to try to prop up your ego .

LOL - and you wonder why nobody respects you  

[WestCanMan]

On 7/20/2024 at 2:53 PM, Goddess said:

"This constant lying is not aimed at making people believe the lie, but at ensuring that no one believes anything any more. 

A people that can no longer distinguish between truth and lies, cannot distinguish between right and wrong.

And such a people, deprived of the power to think and judge is, without knowing and willing it, completely subjected to the rule of lies.

With such people, you can do whatever you want. "

~~Hannah Arendt ~~

Hannah underestimated the credulity of the leftard horde... They still believe everything.

That looks like eyeball, ex-flyer, Hodad, Moonbox and Satan. I never expected to see all of them in one picture, for obvious reasons. 

[Goddess]

Interview clip of author of "Fisman's Fraud - The Rise of Canadian Hate Science" 

4 mins

This is where eyeball and the others got their lies from, which they are still repeating.  And it was the basis of vax mandates.

The actual data showed that the vaccinated were getting covid far more than the unvaxxed.

Trudeau paid Fisman to flip the data.

 

[Goddess]

[Political Smash]

There are no vaccines to do with covid, Sept. 10 2021 (go ahead and look it up) the CDC removed the definition of vaccine and replaced it with their rubbish.

 

 

[Goddess]

21 hours ago, Political Smash said:

There are no vaccines to do with covid, Sept. 10 2021 (go ahead and look it up) the CDC removed the definition of vaccine and replaced it with their rubbish.

 

 

Fallacious equivocation is the vax-fanatics' favorite trick. 

An example of fallacious equivocation:

Premise 1: All stars are in the sky.

Premise 2: Some famous actors are stars.

Conclusion: Therefore, some famous actors are in the sky.

So we get:

Yes, it IS a vaccine, because we just changed the definition of ‘vaccine.’

So there.

 

[Goddess]

@robosmith

I'm putting some further info on the DNA contamination in the covid jabs here for you, as the topic we were discussing it on before (July 19) was not approp.

**********************************************************************************

The dispute regarding the contamination is not just about whether the contamination levels are compliant with regulated allowable amounts. It's that the regulations should not apply to the mRNA injections.

The reason being - the risk of naked residual DNA, which has a short half-life in the body, is not the same as the risk of DNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), which ferry their contents to all major organs in the body, where they transfect and dump their contents into cells.

Dr. Phillip Buckaults of the University of South Carolina, called the application of standard DNA limits to the mRNA products a "serious regulatory oversight" during his testimony to a state Senate hearing in September last year.  (You can see it here:  Dr. Phillip Buckhault's Testimony on DNA Contamination in Pfizer's mRNA Vaccine (rumble.com)

Quote

“They inappropriately applied that [traditional] regulatory limit to this new kind of vaccine where everything is encapsulated in this lipid nanoparticle,” he told Senators, warning that “there is a very real hazard” of DNA fragments integrating with a person’s genome and causing rare but serious side effects.

Professor Wafik El-Deiry, Director of the Cancer Centre at Brown University, agreed with Dr. Buckhaults’s concerns, stating that if the LNPs carrying contaminant DNA get into cells, “they can integrate in the genome which is permanent, heritable and has a theoretical risk of causing cancer depending on where in the genome they integrate.” 

It is true that biologics made with DNA plasmids are not new.

But the LNP casing of the DNA - IS new. And the science around the potential concerns related to this is only emerging now.

The LNPs have been praised as the technology that allowed the mRNA vaccines to work because they protect the mRNA from degrading as soon as it’s injected into the body.

But, these LNPs protect the DNA just as much as they protect the RNA, thereby changing the risk profile of any residual DNA compared to that found in traditional vaccines.

However in the mRNA vaccines, contaminating DNA and the active ingredient mRNA are both nucleic acids, meaning they are chemically similar and therefore more difficult to separate in the purification process. This challenge would not have been identified in the Pfizer clinical trial, which used a different manufacturing process for the trials, as that used for the mass rollout.

(Most people don't realize there were 2 different manufacturing processes used - one for the trials and one for the rollout.  See here: Pfizer’s Bait and Switch a ‘Gut Punch’ for Informed Consent - Umbrella News )

This pre-print study discovered that 40% of plasmids used in gene therapy, carry mutations and this raises serious alarm bells with regard to plasmid fidelity.  See here:  Prevalence of errors in lab-made plasmids across the globe | bioRxiv

Now, there are some authorities that originally denied the contamination (Australia's TGA, for example) but this is very suspect - it's already been determined and replicated by numerous labs - in Germany, the US and in Canada.  All these labs found levels in EXCESS of what regulations allow.

Allowable level is <330 ng DNA/mg RNA.

The injections are ranging from 360 to 534 times the permissible DNA limit.

See this peer-reviewed German study by König and Kirchner, from May of this year:  MPs | Free Full-Text | Methodological Considerations Regarding the Quantification of DNA Impurities in the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Comirnaty&reg; (mdpi.com)

 

The above study used one very important methodolgy - it used the SAME method to measure the RNA AND the DNA in the injections, called fluorescence spectrometry (also called fluorometry).

The authorities who have denied the importance of the DNA contamination like to use a different technique, qPCR (and I think we all now know how accurate PCR testing is), to measure DNA levels. But the qPCR method, the authors explain, checks less than 1% of the original template, with the other 99% being extrapolated mathematically.

König and Kirchner were also concerned that the qPCR method does not pick up very small DNA fragments and that DNA at the particular region of the plasmid that Pfizer measures is susceptible to being “masked,” by the enzyme used in the qPCR measurement process, making it less detectable.

Therefore König and Kirchner set out to measure ALL of the residual DNA in the Pfizer Covid vaccine.

First, they used a detergent to disintegrate the LNPs to release the mRNA and any DNA encased within them. They then measured DNA levels flourometry, which resulted in the detection of such high levels of contamination.

Other scientists agree that the RNA and DNA should both be measured at the same end point in manufacturing using the SAME tool.

 

FURTHER READING:

COVID vaccines and your DNA: What the science tells us (and what it doesn't) - Umbrella News

Edited July 30, 2024 by Goddess

[Goddess]

The DNA contamination is only one part of what's in the jabs, as well.  There's also the SV40 promoter, a known oncogenic.

I'll see if I have time to put some info on that together, and how it relates to the DNA contamination, which was NOT DISCLOSED to governments or other authorities and is only known because of FOI's.

A senior Health Canada (HC) official, Dr. Dean Smith, wrote in a FOI'ed email about the SV40 sequence:

“Pfizer has communicated to us recently, that they apparently chose not to mention this information to EMA, FDA or HC at the time of their initial or subsequent submissions.”

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, Goddess said:

@robosmith

I'm putting some further info on the DNA contamination in the covid jabs here for you, as the topic we were discussing it on before (July 19) was not approp.

**********************************************************************************

The dispute regarding the contamination is not just about whether the contamination levels are compliant with regulated allowable amounts. It's that the regulations should not apply to the mRNA injections.

The reason being - the risk of naked residual DNA, which has a short half-life in the body, is not the same as the risk of DNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), which ferry their contents to all major organs in the body, where they transfect and dump their contents into cells.

Dr. Phillip Buckaults of the University of South Carolina, called the application of standard DNA limits to the mRNA products a "serious regulatory oversight" during his testimony to a state Senate hearing in September last year.  (You can see it here:  Dr. Phillip Buckhault's Testimony on DNA Contamination in Pfizer's mRNA Vaccine (rumble.com)

Professor Wafik El-Deiry, Director of the Cancer Centre at Brown University, agreed with Dr. Buckhaults’s concerns, stating that if the LNPs carrying contaminant DNA get into cells, “they can integrate in the genome which is permanent, heritable and has a theoretical risk of causing cancer depending on where in the genome they integrate.” 

It is true that biologics made with DNA plasmids are not new.

But the LNP casing of the DNA - IS new. And the science around the potential concerns related to this is only emerging now.

The LNPs have been praised as the technology that allowed the mRNA vaccines to work because they protect the mRNA from degrading as soon as it’s injected into the body.

But, these LNPs protect the DNA just as much as they protect the RNA, thereby changing the risk profile of any residual DNA compared to that found in traditional vaccines.

However in the mRNA vaccines, contaminating DNA and the active ingredient mRNA are both nucleic acids, meaning they are chemically similar and therefore more difficult to separate in the purification process. This challenge would not have been identified in the Pfizer clinical trial, which used a different manufacturing process for the trials, as that used for the mass rollout.

(Most people don't realize there were 2 different manufacturing processes used - one for the trials and one for the rollout.  See here: Pfizer’s Bait and Switch a ‘Gut Punch’ for Informed Consent - Umbrella News )

This pre-print study discovered that 40% of plasmids used in gene therapy, carry mutations and this raises serious alarm bells with regard to plasmid fidelity.  See here:  Prevalence of errors in lab-made plasmids across the globe | bioRxiv

Now, there are some authorities that originally denied the contamination (Australia's TGA, for example) but this is very suspect - it's already been determined and replicated by numerous labs - in Germany, the US and in Canada.  All these labs found levels in EXCESS of what regulations allow.

Allowable level is <330 ng DNA/mg RNA.

The injections are ranging from 360 to 534 times the permissible DNA limit.

See this peer-reviewed German study by König and Kirchner, from May of this year:  MPs | Free Full-Text | Methodological Considerations Regarding the Quantification of DNA Impurities in the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Comirnaty&reg; (mdpi.com)

 

The above study used one very important methodolgy - it used the SAME method to measure the RNA AND the DNA in the injections, called fluorescence spectrometry (also called fluorometry).

The authorities who have denied the importance of the DNA contamination like to use a different technique, qPCR (and I think we all now know how accurate PCR testing is), to measure DNA levels. But the qPCR method, the authors explain, checks less than 1% of the original template, with the other 99% being extrapolated mathematically.

König and Kirchner were also concerned that the qPCR method does not pick up very small DNA fragments and that DNA at the particular region of the plasmid that Pfizer measures is susceptible to being “masked,” by the enzyme used in the qPCR measurement process, making it less detectable.

Therefore König and Kirchner set out to measure ALL of the residual DNA in the Pfizer Covid vaccine.

First, they used a detergent to disintegrate the LNPs to release the mRNA and any DNA encased within them. They then measured DNA levels flourometry, which resulted in the detection of such high levels of contamination.

Other scientists agree that the RNA and DNA should both be measured at the same end point in manufacturing using the SAME tool.

 

FURTHER READING:

COVID vaccines and your DNA: What the science tells us (and what it doesn't) - Umbrella News

Show us the medical journal documented studies. Lancet or Journal of Immunology will do.

You asked, we answered: Can mRNA vaccines alter human DNA?

[WestCanMan]

10 hours ago, Goddess said:

Fallacious equivocation is the vax-fanatics' favorite trick. 

An example of fallacious equivocation:

Premise 1: All stars are in the sky.

Premise 2: Some famous actors are stars.

Conclusion: Therefore, some famous actors are in the sky.

So we get:

Yes, it IS a vaccine, because we just changed the definition of ‘vaccine.’

So there.

 

And then they call us anti-vaxers because they don't take the pseudovax.

My kid has all his vaccines because I'm not an 1d10t.

My kid doesn't have the covid jab because I'm not an 1d10t.

[Goddess]

11 hours ago, robosmith said:

Show us the medical journal documented studies. Lancet or Journal of Immunology will do.

Per the information I've already provided to you and my previous studies posted in the Trickle thread - the mechanisms for gene integration were identified long ago.  That means they know HOW it happens.

In 2014, Moderna admitted in 2 patents that gene integration due to DNA contamination would be a very bad thing and that it needed to be solved before mRNA tech was rolled out for human use or it would be catastrophic. (I posted the patents so you can see that it was already a concern). 

Per the information I provided to you, DNA integration into human cells has been confirmed in vitro.  That means they know it CAN happen.

Testing is continuing to be done.  It will likely continue well into the future, as we do not know what effect altering YOUR DNA will have on YOUR children.

We do know that the levels of contamination vary with vax brand and batch number.  Those who got the worst batches are already experiencing issues.  You can check out howbadismybatch.com to see that adverse events are associated with certain batches.

You are correct this is not settled.

But you are incorrect that it is not a cause for concern and should not be investigated further.

You do understand it was an experiment, right?  And that it's on-going?

[Goddess]

12 hours ago, robosmith said:

Show us the medical journal documented studies. Lancet or Journal of Immunology will do.

You asked, we answered: Can mRNA vaccines alter human DNA?

This sort of tells me that you either didn't read or didn't understand the rest of the post.

[Goddess]

20 hours ago, Goddess said:

This pre-print study discovered that 40% of plasmids used in gene therapy, carry mutations and this raises serious alarm bells with regard to plasmid fidelity.  See here:  Prevalence of errors in lab-made plasmids across the globe | bioRxiv

@robosmith

Common sense - do you think that repeatedly injecting yourself with billions of mutated DNA shards and fragments is a GOOD thing?

[Goddess]

10 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

My kid has all his vaccines because I'm not an 1d10t.

My kid doesn't have the covid jab because I'm not an 1d10t.

When I find out about all the healthy teenagers that died shortly after getting jabbed, like Dan Hartman's son, Sean - who within a month of the jab went to the ER twice and then was found dead on his bedroom floor, It's astonishing to me the number of people here, parents & grandparents that, if it happened to them would just go "Meh. Oh well, it couldn't be the vax, it's safe & effective."

Especially after knowing that vax injuries and deaths were deliberately censored to the public so that everyone would take the jabs.

[Goddess]

In the last year, there's been a few countries who've had their contracts with Pfizer FOIA'ed.

Here's S. Africa's, but it reads the same as all the others that I've seen, I imagine Canada signed exactly the same contract.

South Africa-Pfizer Contract - DocumentCloud

 

Rapid development, no guarantees of long-term safety or efficacy, adverse events unknown.

Is that what you were told about the jabs? 🤔

"The Product shall not be serialized" - makes traceability and accountability more difficult, can easily be dumped or thrown away, and in the event of any government wanting to sue Pfizer, they can't really trace it back to Pfizer since the vaccine's circle of traceability is incomplete - they can claim "You can't prove this was our's."

Quote

One key aspect of pharma product traceability at unit level is serialization. "Performing pharmaceutical serialization reduces the risks of harm associated with counterfeit medicines seeping into the market. Additionally, serializing medications allows regulatory authorities to hold violators accountable, preserve the integrity of the pharmacological supply chain, and protect consumers." For the manufacturer, serialization helps the company detect counterfeit products and protect its brand.

 

Australia:

Australian public assessment report for BNT162b2 (mRNA) (tga.gov.au)

NOT TESTED in pregnant or breastfeeding women, but they certainly were fired from their jobs if they didn't agree to to take part in the experiment.

 "Safe & Effective" .....was a lie.

Making it mandatory was wrong & illegal.

No one was given the full information about the nature of the injections and so, no one could have made an informed consent to take it.

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Goddess said:

Per the information I've already provided to you and my previous studies posted in the Trickle thread - the mechanisms for gene integration were identified long ago.  That means they know HOW it happens.

In 2014, Moderna admitted in 2 patents that gene integration due to DNA contamination would be a very bad thing and that it needed to be solved before mRNA tech was rolled out for human use or it would be catastrophic. (I posted the patents so you can see that it was already a concern). 

Per the information I provided to you, DNA integration into human cells has been confirmed in vitro.  That means they know it CAN happen.

It CAN happen IN VITRO, is not the SAME as happening in the human body and INTEGRATING into sperm/ovum.

4 hours ago, Goddess said:

Testing is continuing to be done.  It will likely continue well into the future, as we do not know what effect altering YOUR DNA will have on YOUR children.

It will have NO EFFECT unless the DNA in reproductive cells is altered.

4 hours ago, Goddess said:

We do know that the levels of contamination vary with vax brand and batch number.  Those who got the worst batches are already experiencing issues.  You can check out howbadismybatch.com to see that adverse events are associated with certain batches.

You are correct this is not settled.

But you are incorrect that it is not a cause for concern and should not be investigated further.

You do understand it was an experiment, right?  And that it's on-going?

The ONLY thing you got is different vaxxes used in release vs. trials. Seems highly suspicious if true.

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Goddess said:

@robosmith

Common sense - do you think that repeatedly injecting yourself with billions of mutated DNA shards and fragments is a GOOD thing?

I think it's a better thing than getting COVID; which I never got due to precautions with vaccines and wearing my custom fully sealed P100 mask before the vax.

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Goddess said:

When I find out about all the healthy teenagers that died shortly after getting jabbed, like Dan Hartman's son, Sean - who within a month of the jab went to the ER twice and then was found dead on his bedroom floor, It's astonishing to me the number of people here, parents & grandparents that, if it happened to them would just go "Meh. Oh well, it couldn't be the vax, it's safe & effective."

Especially after knowing that vax injuries and deaths were deliberately censored to the public so that everyone would take the jabs.

Public Health often requires INDIVIDUAL sacrifice, like quarantines, war, etc.

[Goddess]

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It will have NO EFFECT unless the DNA in reproductive cells is altered.

Oh dear.  You should probably research that a bit. 

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I think it's a better thing than getting COVID

Hmmmmm.  

99.9% chance of surviving covid VS. repeatedly injecting yourself with mutated DNA, with no long-term idea of what it will do......

We all make our own decisions.

8 minutes ago, robosmith said:

COVID; which I never got due to precautions with vaccines and wearing my custom fully sealed P100 mask

I never got covid either.  Never got the jabs. 

How am I still alive??? 🤣

 

 

[Goddess]

13 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Public Health often requires INDIVIDUAL sacrifice, like quarantines, war, etc.

How lovely.

You and eyeball - both so willing to sacrifice other people's children so you can feel safer from a 99.9% survival virus.

PS.

I'm not sure WAR is public health......  And I think science/medical topics may be a bit over your head. 😬

Edited July 31, 2024 by Goddess

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

Oh dear.  You should probably research that a bit. 

The only DNA involved in growing a baby comes from sperm/ovum. AKA reproductive cells.

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

Hmmmmm.  

99.9% chance of surviving covid VS. repeatedly injecting yourself with mutated DNA, with no long-term idea of what it will do......

No long-term idea of what COVID will do. 

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

We all make our own decisions.

I never got covid either.  Never got the jabs. 

How am I still alive??? 🤣

I keep hearing about total lockdowns in Canada. Maybe that's why.

Meanwhile in the US, we could do necessary shopping. And I traveled 30+ hours on airliners during the height of the pandemic wearing my bullet proof mask.

[robosmith]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

How lovely.

You and eyeball - both so willing to sacrifice other people's children so you can feel safer from a 99.9% survival virus.

FACT CHECK:

Quote

Giordano said compared to the average COVID-19 death rate in the U.S., “you look at what the vaccines can do, they decrease the risk of death and severe illness by more than 90 percent, 95 percent in the randomized studies.”

Data from May showed nearly all U.S. deaths from the virus were among people who haven’t received the vaccine, AP reporting found. About 99.5% of all deaths from COVID-19 are in the unvaccinated, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky has said.

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

PS.

I'm not sure WAR is public health......  And I think science/medical topics may be a bit over your head. 😬

Unless you have an MD, and/or an MS degree like I do, you're on the short end of the stick here.

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

FACT CHECK:

Unless you have an MD, and/or an MS degree like I do, you're on the short end of the stick here.

I've already posted and explained the IFR for covid. 

Walensky, in her capacity as director for the CDC, repeatedly lied in the Senate hearings.  As did Fauci.

Your "fact check" is from 2021, at the height of fear-mongering.

I don't understand why you guys keep clinging to the early lies and rejecting current scientific understanding.

 

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

I've already posted and explained the IFR for covid. 

Walensky, in her capacity as director for the CDC, repeatedly lied in the Senate hearings.  As did Fauci.

Your "fact check" is from 2021, at the height of fear-mongering.

I don't understand why you guys keep clinging to the early lies and rejecting current scientific understanding.

Because you interwebz "experts" are woefully bad at understanding cherry picked data.

Get your PhD, and then MAYBE you'll have some credibility.

[Goddess]

19 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The only DNA involved in growing a baby comes from sperm/ovum.

OMG. 😬

Mitochondria in human sperm contain no or very little DNA. They are gametes.

Holy fuque.