85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

WestCanMan · June 17, 2024

17 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

That is off topic.. You need to show quotes of me saying that the vax was safe and effective. The forum is searchable...

My observing that society is moving on is much the same as my pointing out that the high in Carson City , NV for June 17, 2024 is forecasted to be 70 degrees...

Here's a whole page of you denying that there are any vax-Naziism issues worth addressing, and pretending that it's time to just ignore it all and move on.

The entire list of grievances there was nothing to you, you pretend that it's all make-believe.

You crawled and slithered with the likes of Ex-Flyer for God's sake.

impartialobserver · June 17, 2024

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

Here's a whole page of you denying that there are any vax-Naziism issues worth addressing, and pretending that it's time to just ignore it all and move on.

The entire list of grievances there was nothing to you, you pretend that it's all make-believe.

You crawled and slithered with the likes of Ex-Flyer for God's sake.

you are correct in that it means nothing to me. And if it matters to you.. that's fine. I am not instructing you or anyone moving on. I am simply observing that folks are moving on. I know that you can't tell the difference. If I say that folks are buying Taylor Swift's records.. that must mean that I am instructing/encouraging them to do so. I have a massive record collection and not a single Taylor Swift item.. hmmm...

Goddess · June 17, 2024

4 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

And you have the authority to force them to be passionate and have the same views as you? Interesting. If you have such authority and power, why have you not used it yet? I am not the only one who does not lose sleep over this. Its over. But if this is your passion.. feel free to continue. Free speech at its finest.

And you are free to continue following me around the board, trying to shame me into silence.

You cannot shame me into silence.

I have the real science on my side. I have datasets, studies, experts, doctors, nurses and scientists.

You have MSM headlines and liars.

impartialobserver · June 17, 2024

Just now, Goddess said:

And you are free to continue following me around the board, trying to shame me into silence.

You cannot shame me into silence.

I have the real science on my side. I have datasets, studies, experts, doctors, nurses and scientists.

You have MSM headlines and liars.

What is with your types? "MSM headlines and liars".. you assume that I am pro-vax. Where have i stated this directly? This forum is searchable so should only take a few seconds. I do not want you to stop.. keep going. Its called free speech. My observing that society is moving on is not the same as instructing you to move on.. no matter how you twist it.

WestCanMan · June 17, 2024

4 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

you are correct in that it means nothing to me. And if it matters to you.. that's fine. I am not instructing you or anyone moving on. I am simply observing that folks are moving on. I know that you can't tell the difference. If I say that folks are buying Taylor Swift's records.. that must mean that I am instructing/encouraging them to do so. I have a massive record collection and not a single Taylor Swift item.. hmmm...

And it's not time to move on.

Crimes were committed. People were forced to take a harmful jab by members of the gov't.

Heads need to roll. IMO the death penalty should be on the table.

impartialobserver · June 17, 2024

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

And it's not time to move on.

Crimes were committed. People were forced to take a harmful jab by members of the gov't.

Heads need to roll. IMO the death penalty should be on the table.

You can have this view.. feel free to keep going. As for myself, I have other proverbial fish to fry.

Edited June 17, 2024 by impartialobserver

WestCanMan · June 17, 2024

Just now, impartialobserver said:

You can have this view.. feel free to keep going. As for myself, I have other proverbial fish to fry.

No you don't. This is important to you.

It's important to you that there is no accountability for anyone, ever. You'll never stop pretending that "It's time to move on, and forget about the crimes of the past."

impartialobserver · June 17, 2024

Just now, WestCanMan said:

No you don't. This is important to you.

It's important to you that there is no accountability for anyone, ever. You'll never stop pretending that "It's time to move on, and forget about the crimes of the past."

I was never all that passionate about this topic. Annoyed at times but never passionate. Again, feel free to keep going and making assumptions about myself. If society was not moving on.. I would have the same views.

Goddess · June 17, 2024

A heart-rending clip making the rounds this weekend showed the halting testimony of a covid vaccine-injured pharmacist. Former pharmacist. He’s 100% disabled now. Mike Yoha testified last week before an Ohio house committee considering the Conscientious Right to Refuse Act, H.B. 319.

This is an Ohio bill. Change will need to happen on the state level until the Feds act on this.

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1801781505829531934

Goddess · June 17, 2024

2 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Again, feel free to keep going and making assumptions about myself.

It's not an "assumption".

You're all over these threads insisting you don't care about the topic. 🙄

How about this:

**pats you on the head** We get it. You have no interest in this topic.

Feel better?

WestCanMan · June 17, 2024

3 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

I was never all that passionate about this topic. Annoyed at times but never passionate. Again, feel free to keep going and making assumptions about myself. If society was not moving on.. I would have the same views.

If you don't care then ignore the topic, stupid.

Do you chime into every thread to say "I don't care about this thread"?

impartialobserver · June 17, 2024

Just now, WestCanMan said:

If you don't care then ignore the topic, stupid.

Do you chime into every thread to say "I don't care about this thread"?

Look at how quickly you get off topic. You assume that I know about these crimes and want them swept under the rug. This assumes that I am pro-vax.. the logic is not too difficult to follow. When challenged to show these explicit quotes.. you always dodge. I know why...

Goddess · June 17, 2024

Statement of Dr. Naomi Wolf to the Royal Courts of Justice, London, United Kingdom

"I am here today because Ofcom, the media watchdog agency, concluded that my presentation of information from scientific reports about the Pfizer injection, on Mark Steyn’s TV show in October 2022, caused “harm.” Ofcom also referred to me in public documents as a “conspiracy theorist,” using that discrediting characterisation of my work, as part of its decision to penalise Steyn for airing the show in which I brought forth the evidence I did.

I wish to describe to the court please the nature of the evidence I presented on GB News. I then wish to describe my credentials, and lastly, I wish to make some points about the history of censorship.

The material I described to Mark Steyn is not my work. I am a non-fiction writer and journalist. I am not a medical doctor or a scientist. The material I presented is from scientific reports compiled by 3,250 highly credentialled doctors and scientists, the WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis research team (see addendum), that convened from 2021 to the present, to read through and issue reports based upon the 450,000 internal documents released under court order due to a successful lawsuit against the Food and Drug Administration by US attorney Aaron Siri. These are internal Pfizer documents submitted to the FDA for the purpose of securing the Emergency Use Authorisation that allowed for the rollout in the US of an experimental injection that bypassed normal trials. They are primary internal documents produced by Pfizer-BioNTech, that date from November 2020 to February 2021 and that record the 43,000 plus adverse events and more than 1,220 deaths recorded by Pfizer in those three months.

The documents go into detail about serious side effects and explain their mechanisms; the Pfizer documents contain internal reports on stroke, liver damage, kidney damage, many forms of blood clotting and blood damage (including the thrombotic thrombocytopenia that recently triggered the withdrawal of the AstraZeneca vaccine in the UK in 2024; we broke that story in 2022); many neurological events including dementias, epilepsies and Guillain-Barre syndromes, and serious respiratory issues. The documents include a section in which 80 per cent of the pregnant women lost their babies and another section in which two babies’ deaths in utero were due to “maternal exposure” to the vaccine, in Pfizer’s words. There is a great deal of information in the Pfizer documents, including charts, showing damage to women’s menstrual cycles, including serious damage such as haemorrhaging, passing tissue and bleeding every day. There is documentation of lipid nanoparticles (the fatty casing for the mRNA) accumulating in the ovaries of women — more with each injection. There is documentation of damage to babies from nursing from vaccinated mothers and of one baby who died of multi-organ system failure after ingesting a vaccinated mom’s breast milk. The Pfizer documents contain a warning to vaccinated men not to have intercourse with women of childbearing age. These are just some of the findings that our doctors and scientists summarized in their now 104 reports.

Ofcom seeks to portray this material as “harmful.” But can findings be “harmful” if they are true? I am a reporter and I base my opinion on facts...."

Goddess · June 17, 2024

Kansas sues Pfizer over 'misrepresentations' and 'adverse events' of COVID-19 vaccine | Fox Business

The state of Kansas has filed a lawsuit against pharmaceutical company Pfizer, Inc. for alleged consumer protection violations related to the company's manufacturing of the COVID-19 vaccine, saying the company marketed the shot as "safe" even though it "knew" the vaccine was connected to "serious adverse events."

"Pfizer misled the public that it had a ‘safe and effective’ COVID-19 vaccine," the 69-page lawsuit filed Monday in the District Court of Thomas County alleges.

"Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public," the suit alleges.

WestCanMan · June 17, 2024

1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:

Look at how quickly you get off topic. You assume that I know about these crimes and want them swept under the rug. This assumes that I am pro-vax.. the logic is not too difficult to follow. When challenged to show these explicit quotes.. you always dodge. I know why...

You do know about the crimes because they're documented here with proof, and you are protecting the vax-Nazis for whatever reason.

WestCanMan · June 17, 2024

24 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Kansas sues Pfizer over 'misrepresentations' and 'adverse events' of COVID-19 vaccine | Fox Business

The state of Kansas has filed a lawsuit against pharmaceutical company Pfizer, Inc. for alleged consumer protection violations related to the company's manufacturing of the COVID-19 vaccine, saying the company marketed the shot as "safe" even though it "knew" the vaccine was connected to "serious adverse events."

"Pfizer misled the public that it had a ‘safe and effective’ COVID-19 vaccine," the 69-page lawsuit filed Monday in the District Court of Thomas County alleges.

"Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public," the suit alleges.

The Prep Act set the bar at "intent to harm" for the purposes of suing vax-pimps for promoting the jab, but they seem to clear that bar easily.

CdnFox · June 17, 2024

3 hours ago, eyeball said:

Actually it's because it completes me.

Well sure it did but we paid the COVID free fee to the administrator.

Go stick it up your smelly old twat you fu cking douchbag

Isn't there ANYONE on this board who likes you or respects you? Geez.

Goddess · June 17, 2024

The Kansas press conference:

CdnFox · June 17, 2024

4 hours ago, eyeball said:

Actually it's because it completes me.

Well sure it did but we paid the COVID free fee to the administrator.

Go stick it up your smelly old twat you fu cking douchbag

Isn't there ANYONE on this board who likes you or respects you? Geez.

21 minutes ago, Goddess said:

The Kansas press conference:

Wow. THat'll be a bombshell indeed if they win.

Goddess · June 17, 2024

Frontiers | Brief research report: impact of vaccination on antibody responses and mortality from severe COVID-19 (frontiersin.org)

This study found vaccinated patients were more likely to have severe covid outcomes than were unvaccinated patients.

The study measured antibody responses and mortality in jabbed and unjabbed patients hospitalized with severe covid and acute respiratory failure at Ohio State University hospitals between May 2020 and November 2022.

The researchers found that among covid patients, mortality was significantly higher in vaccinated patients (70%) compared to unvaccinated patients (37%), even after adjusting for comorbidities. Even more fascinating, they found the vaccinated patients had higher total IgG4 antibody levels, suggesting jabbed people develop an improper immune tolerance allowing spike protein to run wild.

(I discussed the IgG4 antibody problem in the Trickle thread.)

These antibodies are a normal but unusual part of the immune system that usually activates in response to allergens, where the body tries to stop an immune over-response by ignoring a particular foreign protein, like pollen. In this case, the allergen is probably mRNA-induced spike protein.

As is now known, the jabs were originally sold on the false premise they would flatten the curve and help us reach herd immunity. When that narrative collapsed, bureaucrats and pharma shills shifted to arguing that they still “protected people” through somehow reducing the severity of covid infection when they had it.

But this study adds to the growing evidence that, not only don’t the shots prevent infection in the first place, and not only don’t they protect people from severe covid cases, but they appear to actually increase the risk of a bad covid case and increase the risk of dying from covid.

WestCanMan · June 17, 2024

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Isn't there ANYONE on this board who likes you or respects you? Geez.

I hate to admit it, but eyeball dislikes goddess more than he dislikes you and me. That makes me feel kind of empty inside.

CdnFox · June 17, 2024

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I hate to admit it, but eyeball dislikes goddess more than he dislikes you and me. That makes me feel kind of empty inside.

Clearly we're not trying hard enough.

WestCanMan · June 17, 2024

55 minutes ago, Goddess said:

When that narrative collapsed, bureaucrats and pharma shills shifted to arguing that they still “protected people” through somehow reducing the severity of covid infection when they had it.

Nothing will ever top @Hodad's argument: "Sure, 30% more people are dying now that 86% of the population is jabbed, but that's because there are way more people getting infected than there were before!" 🤣

Eyeball: "IT'S A BASE RATE FALLACY!"

:banghead:

Quote

But this study adds to the growing evidence that, not only don’t the shots prevent infection in the first place, and not only don’t they protect people from severe covid cases, but they appear to actually increase the risk of a bad covid case and increase the risk of dying from covid.

TBH, that's way above the threshold of "whether or not young, healthy people were forced to take a worthless and dangerous jab that they didn't need, for the purpose of determining whether or not a capital crime was committed on a massive scale."

We're at the point now where we need to determine who needs to get their f'ing head chopped off in front of parliament, and the answer isn't "nobody".

Edited June 17, 2024 by WestCanMan

WestCanMan · June 17, 2024

7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Clearly we're not trying hard enough.

I think goddess definitely takes the crown for covid information, and that's what he hates most of all.

A leftist looking at facts is like a vampire looking at a garlic-infused holy-water bathtub sitting in the bright sunlight under a wooden stake inside of a canon.

Hodad · June 17, 2024

51 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Nothing will ever top @Hodad's argument: "Sure, 30% more people are dying now that 86% of the population is jabbed, but that's because there are way more people getting infected than there were before!" 🤣

You really should be embarrassed by your inability to grasp this simple concept. Just don't buckle your seatbelt, Dummy. Automotive fatalities have gone up every single year since the shoulder belt became mandatory.