Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, herbie said:

Why bother? From the original post title onwards it's obvious that the usual gang of dinosaurs feels the subject is deviant. disgusting and shouldn't be discussed at all.

There's more of a spectrum of opinions on this than one might assume.

Zeitgeist:

 Kids do need to learn about reproductive cycles, including ovulation and menstruation.  They need to know how females become pregnant and learn about the risks of STD’s, the responsibilities of raising a child, etc.  They need to learn about consent and the level of responsibility required to manage sexual behaviour, which is why many social teachings, religious and otherwise, promote abstinence for young people and people who aren’t in committed relationships.  
 

 

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted



I'm still calling for examples.   I'm going to keep this thread as a list of discussion points rather than have the discussion here on the thread itself.

 

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
11 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

I'm just trying to start a library shelf for end-points of the discussion is all.

I read this today.  Somewhat disturbing:

  https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/grade-1-teacher-who-said-boys-and-girls-no-different-in-gender-fluidity-lesson-cleared-by-rights-tribunal

This is why I prefer teachers stick to facts or teaching theories as theory instead of teaching theory as facts.

  • Like 2

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...