First a trickle....Now a flood

[User]

6 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Of course i did. right after you asked the questions 

It's there for you to see, for me to see, for everyone to see.  So what you're really doing is trying to cover the fact you were a lying asswipe who was wrong from minute one but too much of a coward to admit it. 

It's RIGHT THERE.  EVERYTHING you asked got answered, and right away. Till you started asking the same thing over and over despite the fact it had been answered

The gov't did not substantially warn the public of the risk, THey should have, they have not stood behind people who suffered from the shot, they should,  you're a twat, you shouldn't be. 

 THat simple and the rest is you being a crybaby coward instead of facing facts you don't like

Listen, once again, this is your little way to get off, playing this dumb game. 
 

If you want to keep talking, go back to the lengthy post I made where I responded to you and you ignored it. 

[Goddess]

17 minutes ago, User said:

Now you want data and studies? 

No, I just assumed since you're here pretending to be knowledgeable about every vaccine that you would have an opinion based on more than just.......emotion.

My bad.

[User]

Just now, Goddess said:

No, I just assumed since you're here pretending to be knowledgeable about every vaccine that you would have an opinion based on more than just.......emotion.

My bad.

Knowledgable… enough. You want to play this dumb game here where you find some tidbit of information someone doesn’t know to impugn them as being too stupid to talk to or that because I’m not a lifelong immunologist I can’t know anything…

It is one of the dumbest logical fallacies.

 

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

The point I'm making is that we need to assess the benefits of vaccination rationally and objectively, not hysterically and instinctively, as User is doing by having emotional meltdowns when presented with facts, yelling that millions of children would die without them.

 

That was largely my point too. If you want to inspire trust and give people confidence in believing in your recommended course of action you need to be honest. You need to let people know what the real risks are and then why you feel it's worth it.

And you need to stand behind them afterward if there are problems, and spreading hatred about people who don't agree with you is not helping

If you don't do these things then next time more people question and distrust.  it makes things WORSE. 

Just be honest about the risks, and if there are unexpected consequences stand beside people. 

That would have been nothing wrong with saying 'This is still in the development phases and we can't say with certainty what risks there might be but we honestly believe that for most people the risks are lower than the risks they will face from covid itself based on the information we have today. You will have to make your own decisions"

3 minutes ago, User said:

Knowledgable… enough. You want to play this dumb game here where you find some tidbit of information someone doesn’t know to impugn them as being too stupid to talk to or that because I’m not a lifelong immunologist I can’t know anything…

It is one of the dumbest logical fallacies.

 

I think you shamed yourself enough in this thread that you got in any position to criticize any information anyone else brings forward

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, User said:

Knowledgable… enough. You want to play this dumb game here where you find some tidbit of information someone doesn’t know to impugn them as being too stupid to talk to or that because I’m not a lifelong immunologist I can’t know anything…

It is one of the dumbest logical fallacies.

 

Nobody is saying you have to be an immunologist or a virologist or an epidemiologist.

But surely you are basing your decisions on more than just emotional hysteria.

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, User said:

Listen, once again, this is your little way to get off, playing this dumb game. \

The only one playing a dumb game is you. It's right there for everyone to see, I can see it you can see it goddess can see it everyone looking at this thread can see it you're being a line sack of shit And I'm not interested in playing appease the liberal for you

Okay any government did not warn its people substantially about the rest. They should have. They have not stood behind people who have suffered as a result. They should have. Every one of your questions was answered above right after you ask them and everyone can see it. You're being a pathetic little liberal snake

Just now, Goddess said:

But surely you are basing your decisions on more than just emotional hysteria.

No he isn't. And stop calling him Shirley