First a trickle....Now a flood

[User]

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I answered every single one of them previously and once again your own reply prove that

I'm done watching you be a coward just because you don't like the answers kiddo.

And I spelled out at great length what they did say and what they should have said

I don't know what the hell is wrong with you but you've chosen to be such a Weasley little coward in this threat but the fact that you don't like the answers doesn't mean they haven't been given

Get your head out of your ass and stop channeling Justin Trudeau

My response above was only to your latest half-assed attempt that didn't really answer any of them. 

The fact that you respond doesn't mean you actually answered the questions. 

All you have is this petulant child act. 

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, User said:

My response above was only to your latest half-assed attempt 

And admitted that you lied and my attempts have been 100% accurate and complete

Don't get you diapers changed Justin

[User]

22 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And admitted that you lied and my attempts have been 100% accurate and complete

Don't get you diapers changed Justin

I did not admit to lying anywhere. You are just making crap up... 

 

[Goddess]

"SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)."

 

Fauci-Intel-Release-2026.06.11.pdf

[eyeball]

Whatever it's origins we still would have needed to respond to it in much the same manner and you people would have kicked and screamed no differently.

[User]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

"SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)."

This is evidence that Major Joseph Murphy believed SARS-CoV-2 was created. It is not evidence that DARPA, the U.S. government, or the scientific community established that as fact. Where is the evidence supporting the conclusion, rather than the conclusion itself?

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, User said:

I did not admit to lying anywhere. You are just making crap up... 

 

You did above where i pointed it out. You claimed i never answered your question doezens of times then posted the answer i gave, proving your lie. 

Pretty simple.  And you've done that through out even going so fart as to deny YOUR OWN links. 

I don't know what the hell got into your wee little head about this subject but this was absolutely embarrassing.  NEVER let your emotions dictate your reasoning and NEVER let yourself slip to the point where you start sounding like a leftist. 

And don't lie.  If you have to lie to make a point you havne't got a very good point and it's time to rethink. 

All your questions were answered, the government failed to substantially inform canadians of the risks, the government is failing to stand beside them at this point, and this thread was an absolute embarrassment for you.

[User]

11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You did above where i pointed it out. You claimed i never answered your question doezens of times then posted the answer i gave, proving your lie. 

Yes… you made a half ass attempt to answer them all… then. Not before. 
 

25 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Pretty simple.  And you've done that through out even going so fart as to deny YOUR OWN links. 

I have not denied my own links. You make baseless assertions about them and then run from my asking you to back them up.

 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, User said:

Yes… you made a half ass attempt to answer them all… then. Not before. 

 

It's the same answer I gave before and the answer is right there for everyone to see. You're lying twat and an embarrassment

And in both cases it's a full answer by the way

[User]

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It's the same answer I gave before and the answer is right there for everyone to see. You're lying twat and an embarrassment

And in both cases it's a full answer by the way

No. Just the same stupid game. If you want to engage, go back to where I just gave you a lengthy response you literally said you were ignoring.

You can’t engage on the facts, you just play this endless circle jerk with yourself quibbling about how you answered the questions calling me a liar. 

[CdnFox]

22 minutes ago, User said:

No. Just the same stupid game.

. On your part. The questions were answered, and everybody can see it. You spent three pages acting like a complete coward, running away from the truth at every turn.

And for what? The truth that you fear for whatever reason remains the same

The government did not substantially warn Canadians about the threat and dangers of taking the vaccine. They did not stand behind people who became ill now. I think that's bad because it will make people even more hesitant in the future.And you've spent endless time looking like a complete twat trying to deny these simple truths

 

[User]

18 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

. On your part. The questions were answered, and everybody can see it. You spent three pages acting like a complete coward, running away from the truth at every turn.

And for what? The truth that you fear for whatever reason remains the same

Not really. I outlined how your latest attempt didn't really answer most of them at all. You ignored that and literally admitted you were. That is running away. 

20 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

The government did not substantially warn Canadians about the threat and dangers of taking the vaccine.

This was your original assertion, and you still have not provided any real argument to support this version of it. 

"Obviously this is somewhat Canada specific, but I think a big part of the problem was that the government was unwilling to admit that there was a possible risk in any meaningful way"

 

[CdnFox]

4 minutes ago, User said:

Not really. I outlined how your latest attempt didn't really answer most of them at all.

You lied about it in a particularly embarrassing fashion you mean. Yes I agree

The answers were provided in full when asked originally each and every time. You then spent four pages denying that I had answered any of them when they have all been answered and the answers are complete and full

They are also accurate. The government did not Substantially worn the public about the dangers of this type of vaccine. They should have and I explained exactly how they should have. I have also not stood behind people now that they are suffering from unexpected side effects and in my opinion they should.  And you spent pages lying about that. 

Yawn. 

[User]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

You lied about it in a particularly embarrassing fashion you mean. Yes I agree

I did not lie. 

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

The answers were provided in full when asked originally each and every time. You then spent four pages denying that I had answered any of them when they have all been answered and the answers are complete and full

No, the answers were not provided in full. You ignored my response pointing this out. 

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

They are also accurate. The government did not Substantially worn the public about the dangers of this type of vaccine. They should have and I explained exactly how they should have. I have also not stood behind people now that they are suffering from unexpected side effects and in my opinion they should.  And you spent pages lying about that. 

This is your baseless assertion to back up. I have already provided the examples for where the government warned of risk. 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, User said:

I did not lie. 

 

When you said I had to answer the questions you lied. I took the time to carefully answer each one as soon as you ask them and answer the number of them several times as you kept demanding the same question be answered yet again.

And this discussion can't progress any further as long as you're going to deny that simple truth.

I said they didn't substantially Warn the citizens

You posted to a Government web page and said they didn't warn people, and I pointed out that government web page indicated that the vaccine was only as dangerous as existing vaccines or less. I also pointed out that this was not true and why it was not true and how they would know it. And I posted a public statement in the newspaper from the Prime Minister and chief health officer but downplayed the risk even further.

Then you asked what risks, I spelled it out in clear detail. I also spelled out exactly what they should say

The way again and again consisted that none of that have ever happened. You even went so far as to suggesting you hadn't posted the link that you had provided

All of which is a lie. The answer is clear about and I stated it many times.

You're being a child. Not to mention a coward.

I made a statement, for emotional reasons rather than logical ones you freaked out and attacked that statement, not surprisingly it was easy to prove that I was right and you were wrong and all you've done since then is deny it like your diapers are full and you have an itch

You're boring kid