First a trickle....Now a flood

[User]

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I answered every single one of them previously and once again your own reply prove that

I'm done watching you be a coward just because you don't like the answers kiddo.

And I spelled out at great length what they did say and what they should have said

I don't know what the hell is wrong with you but you've chosen to be such a Weasley little coward in this threat but the fact that you don't like the answers doesn't mean they haven't been given

Get your head out of your ass and stop channeling Justin Trudeau

My response above was only to your latest half-assed attempt that didn't really answer any of them. 

The fact that you respond doesn't mean you actually answered the questions. 

All you have is this petulant child act. 

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, User said:

My response above was only to your latest half-assed attempt 

And admitted that you lied and my attempts have been 100% accurate and complete

Don't get you diapers changed Justin

[User]

22 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And admitted that you lied and my attempts have been 100% accurate and complete

Don't get you diapers changed Justin

I did not admit to lying anywhere. You are just making crap up... 

 

[Goddess]

"SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)."

 

Fauci-Intel-Release-2026.06.11.pdf

[eyeball]

Whatever it's origins we still would have needed to respond to it in much the same manner and you people would have kicked and screamed no differently.

[User]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

"SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)."

This is evidence that Major Joseph Murphy believed SARS-CoV-2 was created. It is not evidence that DARPA, the U.S. government, or the scientific community established that as fact. Where is the evidence supporting the conclusion, rather than the conclusion itself?