Jump to content

Latest Harvard Study on the Vaccines


Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, sharkman said:

And they also have factual knowledge on the thousands of people dying from the vaccines, but they are keeping that to themselves…

 

Would you be able to point me to an actual legitimate source of information on that?  

 

There's risks in all things, especially medicines.  I have not, yet, heard of "thousands of deaths" from the vaccine.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 12/14/2021 at 12:12 PM, Infidel Dog said:

So, if we take away the snark you're basically admitting the vaccine doesn't work in the way we were at one time promised it would.

Maybe its more a matter of vaccine not doing everything you'd hoped for and meeting your expectations.  It's painfully clear Covid is the proverbial moving target.  Couple that with the strong desire people have for certainty with the even stronger desire of politicians and governments to provide certainty and it becomes a little easier perhaps to see where all the angst over the time it's taking to get past this is coming from.  If there's anything we've learned about Covid it's how easily it exploits our impatience. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, eyeball said:

Maybe its more a matter of vaccine not doing everything you'd hoped for and meeting your expectations.  

Then why do things keep getting worse? That wasn't my expectation.

Again if all these things - masks, lockdowns, the so-called "vaccine," passports, mandates etc. work, why haven't they?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Then why do things keep getting worse? That wasn't my expectation.

 I think things are still getting better despite omicron and pandemic fatigue testing our resolve.

Quote

Again if all these things - masks, lockdowns, the so-called "vaccine," passports, mandates etc. work, why haven't they?

From my perspective they have worked and I think we'd be faced with a lot worse outcomes if we hadn't used them.  As such I think we should probably keep steering a similar course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/13/2021 at 6:29 PM, sharkman said:

https://theplantstrongclub.org/2021/12/10/harvard-study-explodes-myths-about-vaccines-stopping-the-spread-but-its-even-worse-than-that-by-kyle-becker-becker-news/
 

A Harvard study of 68 nations and 2,947 counties in the United States published in the European Journal of Epidemiologyis shattering the argument that the mRNA therapeutic drugs being marketed as “vaccines” do anything significantly to stop the spread of Covid-19.

It’s even worse than that. As Becker News suggested in September, there is a positive correlation between a nation’s vaccination levels and the “case” rates being reported. The scientific findings are a crushing blow to the argument that the vaccines have a “public health” purpose and that vaccine mandates are justified.

 

Can anyone find fault with this study?  It looks pretty damning…

One study?  No, not damning.  Cherry picked.  The scientists will settle this, not your media outlets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/12/2022 at 6:02 PM, eyeball said:

 I think things are still getting better despite omicron and pandemic fatigue testing our resolve.

From my perspective they have worked and I think we'd be faced with a lot worse outcomes if we hadn't used them.  As such I think we should probably keep steering a similar course.

Trying to explain science to folks who do not accept science is quite taxing.  That's why I choose social distancing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

British Medical Journal Editor-In-Chief Calls Out "Incompetent" Facebook “Fact Checkers” (thepulse.one)

The British medical Journal has been slapped with a FALSE rating due to "factcheckers."

Particularly in regard to a whistleblower from Vantavia (who helps carry out the Pfizer trials).

 

 

Quote

 

Brook Jackson began providing The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails.

Godlee and Abbasi explain,

“These materials revealed a host of poor clinical trial research practices occurring at Ventavia that could impact data integrity and patient safety. We also discovered that, despite receiving a direct complaint about these problems over a year ago, the FDA did not inspect Ventavia’s trial sites.”

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,741
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    timwilson
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • User earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Videospirit went up a rank
      Explorer
    • DACHSHUND earned a badge
      First Post
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...