Jump to content

Joe Morrissey, the Pedophile Politician (Dem of Course)


Recommended Posts

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/joe-morrissey-receptionist/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Morrissey

Quote

From Wiki:

In August 2013, police found Morrissey in his Henrico County home with a 17-year-old girl, now his wife, who was at the time an employee of his law office. Morrissey, the girl, and her mother denied any impropriety. A Henrico County court convened a grand jury to investigate a possible improper sexual relationship between Morrissey and the girl.[23] On June 30, 2014, Morrissey was indicted on felony charges of indecent liberties with a minor, possession and distribution of child pornography, and electronic solicitation of a minor, in addition to a misdemeanor charge of contributing to the delinquency of a minor, for which conviction he served three months of a 12-month sentence. After being convicted, Morrissey resigned as a delegate at the Virginia House.[23]

According to statements from the prosecutor in court documents, Morrissey had sex with the girl multiple times in his law office in August 2013, and possessed a nude photograph of the girl, which he also sent to a friend.[23] Morrissey allegedly continued the relationship with the girl after she left his law office in August 2013, and the two allegedly shared a hotel room overnight in October 2013.[23]

Morrissey denied the charges, saying the girl came to him for advice about family problems and was being abused by her father, and that the special prosecutor was out to get him because of a personal vendetta. Morrissey said he rejected a plea bargain for a single misdemeanor in December 2013.[28] He vowed to fight the charges in court, declaring that he would be vindicated, and rejected calls to resign his House seat.[29]

Morrissey again made national headlines in July 2014 when he used an obscenity on live television while reading a text message he claimed was planted on his phone by hackers.[29]

 

Hackers I tell you! Russian hackers, who like to interfere in US elections lol.

He was born in 1957, she was born in about 1996.

Right now he's 64 and she's 25.

What's that whole thing about the power imbalance between an employee (who's still a minor) and her boss? 

Quote

"Frequent episodes of unethical, contumacious,

I had to use google to find out how much of a scumbag this guy was. Turns out that being contumacious isn't that big of a deal, the word's probably still useful in the bedroom or a rap song though. 

Quote

or otherwise inappropriate conduct mar Joseph D. Morrissey's career as prosecutor and private defense attorney." The appellate court said, "Evidence … demonstrates Morrissey's 15-year history of contempt citations, reprimands, fines, suspensions, and even incarcerations arising from unprofessional conduct mostly involving an uncontrollable temper, inappropriate responses to stress, and dishonesty."

Definitely a Dem. I think that last bolded part was actually his campaign slogan. 

Edited by WestCanMan
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is another one that I do found particularly disgusting. This guy:

‘When A Baby Screams It’s My Favorite’: Establishment Republican Insider, MTG Hater Arrested For Child Pornography

Notice the difference though. I won't hesitate to name and shame this filth even if he is connected to a party I support.

I'm not defending him like you are Joe Morrisey, Bubber.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

I bet I can name to pedophile Republicans for each Democrat who has married a 17 year old. 

Dennis Hastert

Larry Craig

Your turn.

Hastert = maggot extraordinaire, but he wasn't re-elected as a pedophile.

The point here is that the Dems elected a guy EVEN THOUGH he's a pedophile. 

Larry Craig? That's kinda like a scene from Borat or Bruno. He tried to blow an undercover cop in a bathroom lol. I could see how a lot of Republicans might hate the guy but I'd still vote for him. 

Edited by WestCanMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another Dem for you. He was doing an Obama. ;) 

Andrew Gillum’s Sexual Affairs With Male Escort Were More Extensive Than First Claimed

OK that's not fair because the allegation of Barry snorting coke and whatever off the male prostitute in the back of a limo was never proven.

Fair enough let's say he was up to a little Mano o Mano, Marion Berry action then. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Where did he defend anyone, he was just pointing out WestCanMan's hypocrisy 

It's not hypocrisy unless I was to defend Republicans who elected a pedophile as well. 

Bubber named a GOPer who was busted for pedophilia, but the guy wasn't elected after he was found guilty. That's what the thread is actually about.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

Another Republican. What's with that party?

 

Trump hating RINO. But yeah, I hear you guys have turned against those Lincoln Project neo-liberal weirdos since they helped your guys steal the election. Don't need them anymore I guess.

Edited by Infidel Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

Another Republican. What's with that party?

You still need to find an example of a Republican who was elected after he was convicted of pedophilia. 

There are a lot of really gross politicians, Hastert (hopefully, but not likely) being the worst of all, but no one could run for office as a Republican after they were busted for pedophilia. 

Dem voters are not very picky now, are they? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It's not hypocrisy unless I was to defend Republicans who elected a pedophile as well. 

Bubber named a GOPer who was busted for pedophilia, but the guy wasn't elected after he was found guilty. That's what the thread is actually about.

 

Strom Thurmond

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Aristides said:

He was a racist who had a child with a 16 year old black woman when he was 22. 

1) What part of that sentence doesn't make any sense?

2) I didn't see that part in his bio, is it just an allegation?

3) Strom was elected several times as a Dem before he went Republican, so he was basically running based on his record as a politician when he ran, and he also would have had a lot of support from the Dem voting pool to win that election. 

 

Interesting factoid: The Civil Rights Act had more popularity among Republicans than Demonrats in BOTH the HOUSE & SENATE, despite the fact that it was officially a Dem bill.

It's the only bill in the history of the US that had more support from the opposite side of the aisle than from the party that presented the bill. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wasn't an allegation. After Thurmond's death, the family acknowledged she was his child. Her name was added to the list of Thurmond's children on a monument at the State House.

He changed parties after the Democrats passed the Civil Rights Act, like so many other racist southerners. After the Civil war, southerners voted Democrat because the Republican were the party of Lincoln. After the Civil Rights Act, they voted Republican.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Republicans are not all sex offenders !!! 

Sometimes they just hang out with them:


https://www.forbes.com/sites/lisettevoytko/2020/07/21/heres-every-time-donald-trump-and-ghislaine-maxwell-have-been-photographed-together/?sh=18c026d9183d
 

 

Quote

 

At his bizarre press conference outside Four Seasons Total Landscaping in PhiladelphiaRudy Giuliani called up several witnesses to testify of alleged irregularities at vote-counting facilities – and one, it turns out, is a convicted sex offender.

Poll watcher Darryl Mikell Brooks was convicted in the 1990s of sexual assault, lewdness and endangering the welfare of a minor. He was charged with exposing himself to two girls aged seven and 11, although he has always maintained his innocence. 

 

 

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/giuliani-trump-four-seasons-sex-offender-b1719801.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Aristides said:

It wasn't an allegation. After Thurmond's death, the family acknowledged she was his child. Her name was added to the list of Thurmond's children on a monument at the State House.

He changed parties after the Democrats passed the Civil Rights Act, like so many other racist southerners. After the Civil war, southerners voted Democrat because the Republican were the party of Lincoln. After the Civil Rights Act, they voted Republican.

There are a lot of huge differences here:

1) This 'statutory rape' was between a 22 yr old and a 16 year old. Still not kosher, but not nearly the same thing as a 56 year old member of the government having sex with his 17 yr old employee. 

2) When Thurmond was elected no one knew about the 'rape', and he was elected by Dems anyways. 

There are rumours that Trudeau may have (statutory) raped a student when he was teaching in Vancouver, so it could be that millions of Canadians voted for a pedophile without even knowing it. Do you feel like unknowingly voting for a pedophile (if the rumours become public knowledge) is the same thing as voting for a convicted criminal? 

Would you vote for Trudeau again if they find him guilty of that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

You can see how long ago those photos were taken, right? Epstein was barred from Mar-A-Lago over 20 years ago. Did Epstein even own that island back then? 

Bill Clinton was involved much more intimately, much more recently. This rush to connect Trump with Epstein when Bill Clinton is tied so much closer is like trying to pin the minister of propaganda title for the Nazis on Neville Chamberlain instead of Goebbels. 

 

The article about Giuliani is a total joke. Just because a guy was accused of something a long time ago doesn't disqualify them as a witness. It's ridiculous of you to even bring that up.

Edited by WestCanMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

 There are rumours that Trudeau may have...

Oh... we're publishing rumours eh ?  Cool... here's one better... a 13-year old filed a lawsuit against Trump saying he and Epstein raped her.   You likely don't have a lawsuit for your rumour, though... (Yes this was withdrawn, nobody knows why or how much she was paid)

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-rape-accusation-underage-girl-claim-what-happened-sexual-assault-allegation-a7354111.html

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said:

Oh... we're publishing rumours eh ?  Cool... here's one better... a 13-year old filed a lawsuit against Trump saying he and Epstein raped her.   You likely don't have a lawsuit for your rumour, though... (Yes this was withdrawn, nobody knows why or how much she was paid)

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-rape-accusation-underage-girl-claim-what-happened-sexual-assault-allegation-a7354111.html

The Dems are famous for making fake allegations, I put no stock in that whatsoever. Smollett, Ford, Jean Caroll, etc.

It's an embarrassment to even quote those people. 

 

And FYI, I didn't bring up the Trudeau example to imply that he was guilty of anything either MH. I brought it up to illustrate how different it is to vote for someone who may at some point in the future be credibly accused of statutory rape, and voting for an actual, confessed rapist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

There are a lot of huge differences here:

1) This 'statutory rape' was between a 22 yr old and a 16 year old. Still not kosher, but not nearly the same thing as a 56 year old member of the government having sex with his 17 yr old employee. 

2) When Thurmond was elected no one knew about the 'rape', and he was elected by Dems anyways. 

There are rumours that Trudeau may have (statutory) raped a student when he was teaching in Vancouver, so it could be that millions of Canadians voted for a pedophile without even knowing it. Do you feel like unknowingly voting for a pedophile (if the rumours become public knowledge) is the same thing as voting for a convicted criminal? 

Would you vote for Trudeau again if they find him guilty of that?

1924 South Carolina, a rich white boy could get away with just about anything as long as it was against someone who was black.

What makes you think I would ever vote for Trudeau?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,747
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    wwef235
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • CDN1 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • CDN1 earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • User went up a rank
      Experienced
    • exPS went up a rank
      Contributor
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...