Georgia Senate Races

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

Well, I knew you were wrong about something.

What a coincidence. Did you know that I was wrong for the first time in my life the other day? I said: "Not all leftists are idiots. Some are just liars." 

Turns out that even the liars are idiots.

[Guest]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

What a coincidence. Did you know that I was wrong for the first time in my life the other day? I said: "Not all leftists are idiots. Some are just liars." 

Turns out that even the liars are idiots.

We certainly can agree that liars are idiots.  We saw that in spades today.

[BeaverFever]

28 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I'll bet you that a lot of your heroes in Antifa are incels. Have you seen their mugshots? They're so ugly they can't even masturbate. 

Faisal Hussein.

Toronto Danforth mass shooter's long dark obsession with death, violence and 'incel' ideology

Despite his disturbing pattern of violent ideation, police said they found no evidence Hussain was affiliated with radical ideologies, hate groups or terrorist organizations

Toronto’s Danforth mass shooter was preoccupied with outrageous killing fantasies from a young age, including a recent interest in the deeply misogynistic “involuntary celibate” ideology, Toronto police investigators say.

On phones and electronic equipment of Faisal Hussain, police found a copy of a manifesto by Elliot Rodger, a U.S. man who killed six people in 2014 to punish women for rejecting him.

https://nationalpost.com/news/toronto/toronto-danforth-mass-shooters-long-dark-obsession-with-death-violence-and-incel-ideology

 

Toronto police and the national post are part of the CBC?

[BeaverFever]

29 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Obama was a first class dog whistler who fear mongered police and stoked racial division at every turn.

He said nary a word to discourage rioting, and as soon as it sprung up again in 2020 him and his stanky wife started pushing racial division and fear mongering police again. 

Again, you're the liar. This is getting old Beave.

No you’re still lying. Obama never called on anyone to riot.  And he denounced the riots and protests that occurred

 

That’s  unlike Trump, Trump Jr amd Giuliani who organized the DC protests and encited the crowd to violence and still have yet to denounce it

[Infidel Dog]

So what the hysterics of Progdom seem to want us to believe is the hundreds of thousands of attendees at the Washington rally were called by Trump to riot like a horde of Antifa and BLMers. 

Not true.

Trump has called supporters to many rallies and they actually were what the liars of the left call their rioters and looters. Trump rally supporters really always are "mostly peaceful."

Today tens if not hundreds of thousands of Patriots came to support the President and let the world know they don't believe they can still trust american elections.

A small group of radicals (much smaller than what typically loots and vandalizes cities in the name of the left) broke off from the main group and broke into the building where the electoral college votes were being presented.

A woman among the group was shot in the neck. This is her:

https://heavy.com/news/ashli-babbit/

Her name is Ashli Babbit. She's an air force veteran from San Diego. 

Quote

Her Twitter page contained references to QAnon, which is a fringe extremist right wing conspiracy theory movement that believes pedophiles are embedded in high-ranking governmental positions.

So does that mean that all among the tens to hundreds of thousands who were at that Washington rally were QAnon? No more than it suggests they were all air force veterans or from San Diego.

A rally was organized in Washington to support the President and call for fair elections. Trump invited supporters to come just as he had done at hundreds of "mostly peaceful" rallies before this one.

Go ahead Beave, do what you do. Do this  and tell us that isn't what happened. 

Edited January 7, 2021 by Infidel Dog

[Infidel Dog]

I don't know how long this one will stay up so you might want to see it quick, but here's what actually happened.

This is Ashley Babbit with a small group of protesters outside an inner door into the main building. The door window breaks. She tries to climb through it. They shoot her.

 

[BeaverFever]

8 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

So what the hysterics of Progdom seem to want us to believe is the hundreds of thousands of attendees at the Washington rally were called by Trump to riot like a horde of Antifa and BLMers. 

Not true.

Trump has called supporters to many rallies and they actually were what the liars of the left call their rioters and looters. Trump rally supporters really always are "mostly peaceful."

Today tens if not hundreds of thousands of Patriots came to support the President and let the world know they don't believe they can still trust american elections.

A small group of radicals (much smaller than what typically loots and vandalizes cities in the name of the left) broke off from the main group and broke into the building where the electoral college votes were being presented.

A woman among the group was shot in the neck. This is her:

https://heavy.com/news/ashli-babbit/

Her name is Ashli Babbit. She's an air force veteran from San Diego. 

So does that mean that all among the tens to hundreds of thousands who were at that Washington rally were QAnon? No more than it suggests they were all air force veterans or from San Diego.

A rally was organized in Washington to support the President and call for fair elections. Trump invited supporters to come just as he had done at hundreds of "mostly peaceful" rallies before this one.

Go ahead Beave, do what you do. Do this  and tell us that isn't what happened. 

Hilarious excuse-making. Only a small portion of BLM protesters rioted or looted, most were peaceful but that wasn’t relevant to you they were all collectively responsible. Hypocrite. 
 

Anyone with an IQ above 10 and anyone fit to be a leader understands that if you rally a crouud and purposely dial the excitement it up to 11, the crazier elements in your crowd will take it to 15....which is why any responsible or competent  leader never dials it up to 11.  
 

I get that Trump and his enablers probably wanted to whip the crowd into a maximum frenzy just one inch short of explosive mob violence without anyone  actually crossing the line into violence. But any intelligent person understands that’s not possible and attempting it is highly irresponsible and leaders have a responsibility to stay well back from that dangerous line. Not this idiotic dumpster fire or a president though. 
 

Also unlike  his previous rallies, this one was conducted right in the presence of the “enemy”  so when his supporters got worked up there was a convenient target for their anger nearby. He called on his goons to march on the capital building.  Giuliani took the stage and said this would be “trial by combat“ and thesre was similar rhetoric using violent metaphors throughout the rally by Trump amd Don Jr and others :

 

The show was started by Alabama congressman Mo Brooks who told the crowd "today is the day that American patriots start taking down names and kicking ass." 
 

Next, right-wing activist Katrina Pierson spoke and said that “we’re not gonna complain, we’re not gonna cry in the streets” 
 

Trump Jr then tells the crowd “You can be a hero, or you can be a zero. And the choice is yours. But we are all watching. The whole world is watching, folks. Choose wisely.” 
 

As the crowd starts to shout ‘fight for Trump’ Donald Jr strangely adds “these guys better fight for Trump because if they're not, guess what? I’m gonna be in your backyard in a couple of months.”
 

Newly elected congressman Madison Cawthorn is next on stage and calls his fellow members of Congress “cowards.”
 

While promoting baseless conspiracy theories about voting machines, Giuliani adds “let’s have trial by combat” which warrants a huge cheer from the crowd. 
 

Trump arrives on stage and immediately hypes up the crowd by claiming that there are “hundreds of thousands” in attendance and that “they are not going to take it any longer.”

Trump tells the crowd “you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength.”

 

Trump says “we gotta get rid of the weak congresspeople. The Liz Cheneys of the world.”

Trump wraps up his speech with perhaps the biggest red flag of the entire day. “We’re going to walk down Pennsylvania Ave and we’re going to. the Capitol and we’re going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones because the strong ones don't need any of our help, we're to try and get them the kind of pride and boldness they need to take back our country. So let’s walk down Pennsylvania Ave.”

 

https://www.indy100.com/news/trump-rally-washington-capitol-riots-b1783707

[WestCanMan]

16 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Toronto Danforth mass shooter's long dark obsession with death, violence and 'incel' ideology

Despite his disturbing pattern of violent ideation, police said they found no evidence Hussain was affiliated with radical ideologies, hate groups or terrorist organizations

Toronto’s Danforth mass shooter was preoccupied with outrageous killing fantasies from a young age, including a recent interest in the deeply misogynistic “involuntary celibate” ideology, Toronto police investigators say.

On phones and electronic equipment of Faisal Hussain, police found a copy of a manifesto by Elliot Rodger, a U.S. man who killed six people in 2014 to punish women for rejecting him.

https://nationalpost.com/news/toronto/toronto-danforth-mass-shooters-long-dark-obsession-with-death-violence-and-incel-ideology

 

Toronto police and the national post are part of the CBC?

Right. This all looks very interesting, but it's also worth noting that his family were devout muslims and one of his best friends since childhood was busted with over 50 kilos of carfentanyl. 2 milligrams of that stuff is enough to be lethal to most people. IE, he had enough murder-drug to kill about 25M people.

Why did Faisal have murder fantasies from a young age? I dunno. You offer up your best guess Beave.

The whole point is that every time a muslim goes on a killing spree there's an instantaneous rush to distance their actions from their religion, even when they praise their god while they're busy massacring random, innocent people. 

Omar Mateen was a perfect example of a guy who praised allah while he was gunning down people in a gay bar. The MSM blamed gun laws and Republican hate speech, although AK-47s were illegal before Mateen was born and there's no Republican war cry that anyone can cite which praises allah.  

Therefor, I contend that I have ample room to suggest that the people who were involved in yesterday's rioting can't be called 'Trump supporters' merely because they wore MAGA hats and chanted about the election being stolen. It's far more likely (by CNN's standards) that they're a bunch of pro-abortion radicals. 

Here's a photo of a gay parade in NYC that happened a week after Omar was killed (a week where CNN tried desperately to connect Omar's actions with 'Republican hate speech', although they had no cites showing where Republicans had ever advocated for any gay bashing let alone murders. CNN just offered their baseless accusations to their muppet horde, just like they did when some Jews were killed in Pennsylvania and CNN rushed to blame Trump (FYI Trump's son-in-law is a Jew, his grandkids are being raised in the Jewish faith, and he's the most pro-Israeli POTUS ever. By contrast, there's the fact that America's most virulent anti-Semites are hard-core Democrats)). 

Anyways - the photo:

 

 

Edited January 7, 2021 by WestCanMan

[WestCanMan]

16 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

No you’re still lying. Obama never called on anyone to riot.  And he denounced the riots and protests that occurred

 

That’s  unlike Trump, Trump Jr amd Giuliani who organized the DC protests and encited the crowd to violence and still have yet to denounce it

Obama made the Trayvon Martin case out to be something that it wasn't, which stoked racial division. He also played up the Michael Brown incident like something that it wasn't, which again stoked racial division. He also stood in front of 5 murdered cops, and instead of just lambasting the killers as inhuman filth, he insinuated that centuries of slavery and discrimination were partly to blame for their murders. Then, during the worst rioting in 3 years (summer 2020) Michelle Obama gave a speech to new grads praising anger and demonstrations, without a hint of disgust at the racial violence, murders or arson that occurred during those riots.

Add in that CNN and the Dem puppet-masters were calling the riots 'mostly peaceful' and even saying things to the effect that the riots were important enough that the violence (which was known to include several murders at the time) and destruction was just part and parcel of the bigger picture.

I get that you don't want to acknowledge that the Obamas are vocal supporters of rioting and looting, but that has nothing to do with facts and everything to do with where your head is lodged.

[WestCanMan]

9 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Hilarious excuse-making. Only a small portion of BLM protesters rioted or looted, most were peaceful but that wasn’t relevant to you they were all collectively responsible. 

Hilarious disinformation (FYI that means lies).

The Dems, CNN and Obama knew that there was going to be bloodshed and violence on almost every single night that it ever happened (eg, on nights after a decision came out in the court, or when lies and disinformation about a new event were actively being spread by the media). There was never any stern reproach. The rioters were never called out for the criminals that they were. The Demmies never did their best to stop it, they eggged it on and provided false justification for it.

They never even told the public when new information had come out that proved the old theories to be wong. For example:

1) When the body-cam footage of G Floyd's arrest was made public CNN never even showed it. They showed a heavily-edited version of it which didn't show key parts of the incident, and they posted known disinformation on it while they did it (a statement from Floyd's family's lawyers which said that 'police approached the van with guns drawn because there was a black man in the van'. The video footage clearly showed that the guns weren't out until after the officers told Floyd MULTIPLE TIMES to put his hands where they could see them - Floyd was rummaging under the passenger seat while officers were telling him that over and over again. You'd have to be a complete idiot to rummage under the seat of your car while an American cop has you pulled over.)

Did you notice that after the body-cam footage was released the rioting across America instantly stopped? Sure, CNN refused to show it, but the people who were rioting actually cared enough to look at the video footage on the internet and when they did it took all of the wind out of their sails. 

FYI it was a high-profile Dem, AG Keith Ellison, who chose to stifle that partially- exculpatory (mitigating anyways) body-cam footage despite the fact that incendiary footage of other parts of the arrest were very public. It sure seems like Ellison wanted the rioting to occur, because he knew as well as anyone what that footage showed.

2) The Dems, CNN and Obama let the Brionna disinformation run unchecked for months after she was shot. They didn't say squat to set the record straight. 1) She wasn't in her bed, 2) the police did knock despite the fact that they had a warrant which said they didn't have to, and 3) the shooting happened after her boyfriend opened fire on the cops, who at the time were executing a legal search warrant. How big of a deal is it for people to know that a cop was shot before Brionna was shot? How heinous was the shooting compared to the version of events that was making the rounds?

FYI allowing disinformation to be spread and not doing anything about it, when you have the power to easily set the record straight like CNN, Obama and the Dems did, is just as bad as spreading the disinformation yourself. People were getting killed and businesses were being destroyed while the truth was considered verboten.

 

There was one day with rioting by Trump supporters and they didn't kill anyone. The Dem-led riots went on for months and almost two dozen people were murdered. It's like the difference between moonlight and sunlight.

Edited January 8, 2021 by WestCanMan

[Cannucklehead]

20 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Hilarious disinformation (FYI that means lies).

The Dems, CNN and Obama knew that there was going to be bloodshed and violence on almost every single night that it ever happened (eg, on nights after a decision came out in the court, or when lies and disinformation about a new event were actively being spread by the media). There was never any stern reproach. The rioters were never called out for the criminals that they were. The Demmies never did their best to stop it, they eggged it on and provided false justification for it.

They never even told the public when new information had come out that proved the old theories to be wong. For example:

1) When the body-cam footage of G Floyd's arrest was made public CNN never even showed it. They showed a heavily-edited version of it which didn't show key parts of the incident, and they posted known disinformation on it while they did it (a statement from Floyd's family's lawyers which said that 'police approached the van with guns drawn because there was a black man in the van'. The video footage clearly showed that the guns weren't out until after the officers told Floyd MULTIPLE TIMES to put his hands where they could see them - Floyd was rummaging under the passenger seat while officers were telling him that over and over again. You'd have to be a complete idiot to rummage under the seat of your car while an American cop has you pulled over.)

Did you notice that after the body-cam footage was released the rioting across America instantly stopped? Sure, CNN refused to show it, but the people who were rioting actually cared enough to look at the video footage on the internet and when they did it took all of the wind out of their sails. 

FYI it was a high-profile Dem, AG Keith Ellison, who chose to stifle that partially- exculpatory (mitigating anyways) body-cam footage despite the fact that incendiary footage of other parts of the arrest were very public. It sure seems like Ellison wanted the rioting to occur, because he knew as well as anyone what that footage showed.

2) The Dems, CNN and Obama let the Brionna disinformation run unchecked for months after she was shot. They didn't say squat to set the record straight. 1) She wasn't in her bed, 2) the police did knock despite the fact that they had a warrant which said they didn't have to, and 3) the shooting happened after her boyfriend opened fire on the cops, who at the time were executing a legal search warrant. How big of a deal is it for people to know that a cop was shot before Brionna was shot? How heinous was the shooting compared to the version of events that was making the rounds?

FYI allowing disinformation to be spread and not doing anything about it, when you have the power to easily set the record straight like CNN, Obama and the Dems did, is just as bad as spreading the disinformation yourself. People were getting killed and businesses were being destroyed while the truth was considered verboten.

 

There was one day with rioting by Trump supporters and they didn't kill anyone. The Dem-led riots went on for months and almost two dozen people were murdered. It's like the difference between moonlight and sunlight.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/07/politics/capitol-police-officer-dead-after-riot/index.html

 

Yeah the police don't matter. 

You can replace him with guys like Kyle Rittenhouse, he'd make a really great cop.  

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Cannucklehead said:

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/07/politics/capitol-police-officer-dead-after-riot/index.html

 

Yeah the police don't matter. 

You can replace him with guys like Kyle Rittenhouse, he'd make a really great cop.  

Unfortunately for you, you're not gonna be able to find any conservative websites or news outlets who say that the loss of 5 lives was an acceptable outcome. They're just not dishonest enough to categorize 5 deaths as 'mostly peaceful'. 

We both know that I can find multiple quotes from every alt-left media outlet in the US that called the riots 'mostly peaceful'. It's a buzzword that they're prompted to use. 

Also:

Quote

 Her husband, who worked as a salesman in the steel and aluminum industry, “had a history of high blood pressure, and in the midst of the excitement, suffered a heart attack,” she added.

Of the 5 deaths that you named it appears that one of them died from a heart attack. I'm surprised that they didn't count this one as covid. 

Quote

a call from D.C. police informing them that Philips had suffered a stroke and died at George Washington University Hospital

And a stroke victim.

So it's down to 1 person killed by police, and two geezers who possibly just keeled over. 

Still unacceptable though.

 

 

Edited January 8, 2021 by WestCanMan

[BeaverFever]

6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Right. This all looks very interesting, but it's also worth noting that his family were devout muslims and one of his best friends since childhood was busted with over 50 kilos of carfentanyl. 2 milligrams of that stuff is enough to be lethal to most people. IE, he had enough murder-drug to kill about 25M people.

Why did Faisal have murder fantasies from a young age? I dunno. You offer up your best guess Beave.

The whole point is that every time a muslim goes on a killing spree there's an instantaneous rush to distance their actions from their religion, even when they praise their god while they're busy massacring random, innocent people. 

Omar Mateen was a perfect example of a guy who praised allah while he was gunning down people in a gay bar. The MSM blamed gun laws and Republican hate speech, although AK-47s were illegal before Mateen was born and there's no Republican war cry that anyone can cite which praises allah.  

Therefor, I contend that I have ample room to suggest that the people who were involved in yesterday's rioting can't be called 'Trump supporters' merely because they wore MAGA hats and chanted about the election being stolen. It's far more likely (by CNN's standards) that they're a bunch of pro-abortion radicals. 

Here's a photo of a gay parade in NYC that happened a week after Omar was killed (a week where CNN tried desperately to connect Omar's actions with 'Republican hate speech', although they had no cites showing where Republicans had ever advocated for any gay bashing let alone murders. CNN just offered their baseless accusations to their muppet horde, just like they did when some Jews were killed in Pennsylvania and CNN rushed to blame Trump (FYI Trump's son-in-law is a Jew, his grandkids are being raised in the Jewish faith, and he's the most pro-Israeli POTUS ever. By contrast, there's the fact that America's most virulent anti-Semites are hard-core Democrats)). 

Anyways - the photo:

 

 

Wow that’s a lot of words to say it’s impossible to be an incel and also  from a Muslim family.  I didn’t know being an incel was a white privilege.

[BeaverFever]

6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Obama made the Trayvon Martin case out to be something that it wasn't, which stoked racial division. He also played up the Michael Brown incident like something that it wasn't, which again stoked racial division. He also stood in front of 5 murdered cops, and instead of just lambasting the killers as inhuman filth, he insinuated that centuries of slavery and discrimination were partly to blame for their murders. Then, during the worst rioting in 3 years (summer 2020) Michelle Obama gave a speech to new grads praising anger and demonstrations, without a hint of disgust at the racial violence, murders or arson that occurred during those riots.

Add in that CNN and the Dem puppet-masters were calling the riots 'mostly peaceful' and even saying things to the effect that the riots were important enough that the violence (which was known to include several murders at the time) and destruction was just part and parcel of the bigger picture.

I get that you don't want to acknowledge that the Obamas are vocal supporters of rioting and looting, but that has nothing to do with facts and everything to do with where your head is lodged.

You’re a joke. You have a real black derangement problem. It’s also funny how you blame Obama and Trudeau for every little thing that ever happened during their administration bit Trump is totally blameless for everything that happened during his dumpster fire presidency. Obama is to blame for not ending riots sooner and maybe even starting them. But Trump bears no blame for riots that lasted longer and were more destructive  thats suddenly all of the individual cities’ fault. 
 

Trayvon’s murder was not “made into something it wasn’t” and it wasn’t , and Obama was not the reason people were upset about it.   

[BeaverFever]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Hilarious disinformation (FYI that means lies).

The Dems, CNN and Obama knew that there was going to be bloodshed and violence on almost every single night that it ever happened (eg, on nights after a decision came out in the court, or when lies and disinformation about a new event were actively being spread by the media). There was never any stern reproach. The rioters were never called out for the criminals that they were. The Demmies never did their best to stop it, they eggged it on and provided false justification for it.

They never even told the public when new information had come out that proved the old theories to be wong. For example:

1) When the body-cam footage of G Floyd's arrest was made public CNN never even showed it. They showed a heavily-edited version of it which didn't show key parts of the incident, and they posted known disinformation on it while they did it (a statement from Floyd's family's lawyers which said that 'police approached the van with guns drawn because there was a black man in the van'. The video footage clearly showed that the guns weren't out until after the officers told Floyd MULTIPLE TIMES to put his hands where they could see them - Floyd was rummaging under the passenger seat while officers were telling him that over and over again. You'd have to be a complete idiot to rummage under the seat of your car while an American cop has you pulled over.)

Did you notice that after the body-cam footage was released the rioting across America instantly stopped? Sure, CNN refused to show it, but the people who were rioting actually cared enough to look at the video footage on the internet and when they did it took all of the wind out of their sails. 

FYI it was a high-profile Dem, AG Keith Ellison, who chose to stifle that partially- exculpatory (mitigating anyways) body-cam footage despite the fact that incendiary footage of other parts of the arrest were very public. It sure seems like Ellison wanted the rioting to occur, because he knew as well as anyone what that footage showed.

2) The Dems, CNN and Obama let the Brionna disinformation run unchecked for months after she was shot. They didn't say squat to set the record straight. 1) She wasn't in her bed, 2) the police did knock despite the fact that they had a warrant which said they didn't have to, and 3) the shooting happened after her boyfriend opened fire on the cops, who at the time were executing a legal search warrant. How big of a deal is it for people to know that a cop was shot before Brionna was shot? How heinous was the shooting compared to the version of events that was making the rounds?

FYI allowing disinformation to be spread and not doing anything about it, when you have the power to easily set the record straight like CNN, Obama and the Dems did, is just as bad as spreading the disinformation yourself. People were getting killed and businesses were being destroyed while the truth was considered verboten.

 

There was one day with rioting by Trump supporters and they didn't kill anyone. The Dem-led riots went on for months and almost two dozen people were murdered. It's like the difference between moonlight and sunlight.

“Dem-led riots”???

There you are lying again.  They were not led by Dems. Unlike the protest organized and attended  by Trump amd his band of traitors . He still has not appeared live to condemn the terrorism. That day he only appeared briefly to tell the rioters to go home and he loved them amd to repeat his false election claims Then 24 hrs later after his inner circle turned on him, he only condemned them via a pre-recorded video. 
 

I don’t know why you keep bringing up the Floyd body cam it doesn’t disprove any of the police brutality accusations and the 4 fired cops are still facing trial 

[DogOnPorch]

13 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

He still has not appeared live to condemn the terrorism.

 

Ummm...

 

[BeaverFever]

6 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

Ummm...

 

That wasn’t live that was the pre-recorded speech he released today

[DogOnPorch]

Just now, BeaverFever said:

That wasn’t live that was the pre-recorded speech he released today

 

Looked alive to me.

[WestCanMan]

7 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

“Dem-led riots”???

There you are lying again.  They were not led by Dems. Unlike the protest organized and attended  by Trump amd his band of traitors . He still has not appeared live to condemn the terrorism. That day he only appeared briefly to tell the rioters to go home and he loved them amd to repeat his false election claims Then 24 hrs later after his inner circle turned on him, he only condemned them via a pre-recorded video. 
 

I don’t know why you keep bringing up the Floyd body cam it doesn’t disprove any of the police brutality accusations and the 4 fired cops are still facing trial 

Yes "Dem-led riots". Did you ever have any doubts about the fact that the Dems supported the rioting?

They supported everything from anthem kneeling, playing a black national anthem, painting BLM on city streets while the BLMers were burning down cities and murdering people, they supported de-funding the police until they saw how much that hurt their popularity, they hid bodycam footage from the public in G Floyd's death while the riots were causing billions in damages plus 20 lives.....

I know that you like to play stupid here but even you can't deny that the Dems supported the rioting 100%. FFS Hillary even went on TV and bemoaned her white privilege.

 

And if you're keeping score, Trump told rioters twice in the span of a few hours to chill the f out but that's not enough for you? (You can count to two, right? Or do I need to point them both out in your own post that's quoted above?) 

Obama and the Dems told the rioters to tone it down zeeeroooo times from 2014 thru 2016. Them and their buds at CNN even said that protests didn't even need to be peaceful. They justified the riots every time they went on TV by talking about how bad the police were instead of talking about how bad burning homes and killing people was. 

Then they really threw gas during the 4 months of rioting in 2020, and you think they're just grand Beavie?

Do I have to explain the difference between how Trump talked about rioting and how Obama talked about rioting to you? I bet that I do, I'm just not going to bother because everyone else gets it.

Your comments are morally repugnant and utterly disgusting.

 

Last thing - the day the bodycam footage came out the G Floyd riots dropped off the face of the earth. They didn't even fizzle out, they just ended abruptly. Try telling me that Ellison didn't know what was on that footage lol. 

[WestCanMan]

14 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

That wasn’t live that was the pre-recorded speech he released today

If it wasn't live it doesn't count right Beave? You cracked the code big guy. Give yourself a big, fat star.

 

At-that uz-way arcasm-say. On't-day ell-tay eave-Bay. 

[BeaverFever]

11 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Yes "Dem-led riots". Did you ever have any doubts about the fact that the Dems supported the rioting?

Yes you’re a pathetic liar. Please show me where Dems are “leading” the riots. Or even “supporting” the riots. 

 

14 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

They supported everything from anthem kneeling, playing a black national anthem, painting BLM on city streets

None of those are “rioting”
 

16 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

while the BLMers were burning down cities and murdering people,

Most BLMers were peaceful protesters. 

 

17 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

they hid bodycam footage from the public in G Floyd's death

More crackpot conspiracy theories surrounding the non-issue of the non-concealed bodycam footage that wasn’t hiding any secret  

 

18 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

And if you're keeping score, Trump told rioters twice in the span of a few hours to chill the f out but that's not enough for you? (You can count to two, right? Or do I need to point them both out in your own post that's quoted above?) 

No Trumps response was not good enough for anyone that’s why more and more staff are quitting by the day.  Doing a shitty job of it twice doesn’t add up to one decent job. If you weren’t such a terrible reader you would have noticed in my post I said how horrible his responses were  

 

23 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Obama and the Dems told the rioters to tone it down zeeeroooo times from 2014 thru 2016

Shameless Liar. If you weren’t in such a bubble you would know that. 
 

Obama: ‘No sympathy’ for violence in Ferguson

President Barack Obama said he has “no sympathy at all for destroying your own communities,” urging protesters in Ferguson to avoid a second night of violence and fight instead for longer-lasting political changes.
 

https://www.cnn.com/2014/11/25/politics/obama-holder-ferguson/index.html
 

Obama: ‘No excuse’ for violence in Baltimore
 

CNN) —  

President Barack Obama on Tuesday condemned the “criminals and thugs who tore up” the city of Baltimore on Monday night, after rioting and looting paralyzed the city and overwhelmed local officials.

https://www.cnn.com/2015/04/28/politics/obama-baltimore-violent-protests/index.html

 

Obama Calls on Nation to Accept Ferguson Decision, Protest Peacefully

Nov. 24, 2014, 10:28 PM EST / Updated Nov. 24, 2014, 10:42 PM EST

President Barack Obama called on the nation to accept the Ferguson, Missouri, grand jury's decision not to indict Officer Darren Wilson in the death of Michael Brown — and urged protesters to stay peaceful and police to exercise restraint. 
 

https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/michael-brown-shooting/obama-calls-nation-accept-ferguson-decision-protest-peacefully-n255466

 

 

Your Floyd body cam nonsense is just nonsense   What is it you think the cam shows?  Apparently it’s only you that’s discovered this special secret. 

[BeaverFever]

38 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

If it wasn't live it doesn't count right Beave? You cracked the code big guy. Give yourself a big, fat star.

 

At-that uz-way arcasm-say. On't-day ell-tay eave-Bay. 

OMG seriously?  Yes. Exactly you fukin dumbass.

A national tragedy and instead of condemning the nation immediately and live like Biden and so many in Congress he ways a full day to release a recorded condemnation. That’s a deliberate choice to downplay the disgraceful conduct of his violent thugs and he was probably forced to do it.  

[DogOnPorch]

The only actual violence I saw during this riot was a girl getting shot by the police.

[WestCanMan]

41 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

[1] Yes you’re a pathetic liar. Please show me where Dems are “leading” the riots. Or even “supporting” the riots. 

 

[2) This --->]   None of those are “rioting”
 

[and this--->]   Most BLMers were peaceful protesters. 

1) You can't keep calling a person a liar and then not offering proof, and saying stupid things isn't considered proof of anything. Your lying is getting out of hand.

2) FYI those things are EXACTLY the kinds of things that constitute support of rioting when you do all those things in support of a group that is inciting riots. 

And FYI BLM wasn't a bunch of 'peaceful protestors' Beave. They selectively edit video to make police look bad and then disseminate their deceitful trash as broadly as they can for the sole purpose of inciting rioting you genius.

 

I didn't even read any of the rest of your post. There's literally no point. I've already offered up enough proof of the abject worthlessness of it. 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, DogOnPorch said:

The only actual violence I saw during this riot was a girl getting shot by the police.

There was other violence. Pushing the gates back into and over the police is pretty bad, there were scuffles there, and I heard reports of teargas being used on officers but I don't know if that's true. If it is then someone is royally screwed. That's worthy of several years in jail imo.